Global spatial information on biodiversity, carbon storage and land-use abound. Yet maps are conspicuously absent from national climate and biodiversity strategies, hampering integrated approaches to meeting economic, social and environmental objectives, including those under the forthcoming Global Biodiversity Framework.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
The conservation value of forests can be predicted at the scale of 1 hectare
Communications Earth & Environment Open Access 11 April 2024
-
The scope and extent of literature that maps threats to species globally: a systematic map
Environmental Evidence Open Access 09 July 2022
-
Machine learning-based global maps of ecological variables and the challenge of assessing them
Nature Communications Open Access 22 April 2022
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Khan, M. & Schmidt-Traub, G. Use of Spatial Information in National Climate Strategies. An Analysis of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) (SDSN, 2020); https://resources.unsdsn.org/use-of-spatial-information-in-national-climate-strategies
Cadena, M. et al. Nature is counting on us: Mapping Progress to Achieve the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. NBSAP Forum https://go.nature.com/3B9vo5Z (2019).
Díaz, S. et al. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).
First Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework CBD/WG2020/3/3 (CBD, 2021); https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/abb5/591f/2e46096d3f0330b08ce87a45/wg2020-03-03-en.pdf
Clark, M. A. et al. Science 370, 705–708 (2020).
Soterroni, A. C. et al. Env. Res. Lett. 13, 074021 (2018).
Wallbott, L., Siciliano, G. & Lederer, M. Ecol. Soc. 24, 24 (2019).
Brauman, K. A. et al. Global trends in nature’s contributions to people. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 32799–32805 (2020).
Jung, M. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01528-7 (2021).
Sala, E. et al. Nature 592, 397–402 (2021).
Global Biodiversity Outlook 5 (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2020); https://go.nature.com/3z6jZls
Schmidt-Traub, G. et al. Natl Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/gnr8 (2020).
Schmidt-Traub, G., Adams, J. & Zhu, C. The EU and China must cooperate to green commodity supply chains. China Dialogue https://go.nature.com/3rfOpPN (2020).
G7 2030 Nature Compact. G7 https://go.nature.com/3ilGLzj (2021).
Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office (FCDO) of the UK government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt-Traub, G. National climate and biodiversity strategies are hamstrung by a lack of maps. Nat Ecol Evol 5, 1325–1327 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01533-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01533-w
This article is cited by
-
The conservation value of forests can be predicted at the scale of 1 hectare
Communications Earth & Environment (2024)
-
The scope and extent of literature that maps threats to species globally: a systematic map
Environmental Evidence (2022)
-
Machine learning-based global maps of ecological variables and the challenge of assessing them
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Conservation needs to break free from global priority mapping
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2021)
