Elsevier

Advances in Space Research

Volume 68, Issue 11, 1 December 2021, Pages 4702-4712
Advances in Space Research

Study of the development and mechanism of large amplitude decreases in cosmic ray intensity during geomagnetic disturbances in the magnetosphere

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.08.019Get rights and content

Abstract

We analyze the time-variation of cosmic ray intensity during the periods when large and sudden disturbances occur and last for several days. We consider periods when there are sudden decreases of ≥5% in the galactic cosmic ray (GCR) intensity records. For the analysis, in addition to cosmic-ray intensity data, we utilize several solar wind plasma and field parameters. Time variation of changes in GCR intensity have been compared with simultaneous changes in solar wind plasma and field parameters, in order to gain insight about the physical processes responsible for large-amplitude cosmic ray disturbances. We utilize not only data about changes in the magnitude of some of the plasma and magnetic field parameters but also the parameters which provide information about the turbulent or quite (non-turbulent) nature of the parameters. Moreover, we also utilize the magnitude of a number of plasma and field parameters and their various products, during cosmic ray decrease of various magnitudes. The magnitudes of various plasma and field parameters and their various products including some newly tried products are subjected to correlation analysis with the magnitude of cosmic-ray decreases. We identify plasma and field parameters and their products which best correlates with cosmic-ray decreases. We provide an empirical relation that can be useful to estimate the amplitude of Forbush decreases using interplanetary plasma and field observations. Our results provide further insight about the physical processes playing important role during large cosmic ray disturbances in the heliosphere. Our results further demonstrate that large-amplitude Forbush decreases in GCR intensity occur due to passage of enhanced and turbulent magnetic field structure, consistent with the model that Forbush decreases are mainly due to scattering of cosmic ray particles by enhanced turbulent magnetic field regions in the heliosphere.

Introduction

Disturbances in the geomagnetic field of the magnetosphere (Geomagnetic storms) and sudden disturbances (decreases) in the cosmic ray intensity (e.g., Forbush decreases) are observed together during the passage of interplanetary structures associated with the occurrence of coronal mass ejections (e.g., see, Badruddin et al., 1986, Venkatesan and Badruddin, 1990, Cane, 2000, Belov et al., 2001, Blanco et al., 2013, Arunbabu et al., 2013). However, the magnitudes of geomagnetic storms and Forbush decreases are not proportional to each other. Although the sources of the two phenomena may be the same, the generation mechanism of the two phenomena are different (e.g., Kudela and Brenkus, 2004, Kane, 2010, Badruddin and Kumar, 2015, Aslam and Badruddin, 2017).

Galactic cosmic rays (GCR) are high energy charged particles that enter the magnetic environment of the Sun (Heliosphere) from the outer space (Chowdhury et al., 2016, López-Comazzi and Blanco, 2020). The heliosphere is filled with solar plasma and the magnetic field carried outward by the solar wind blowing from the Sun. Travelling through this region from the outer heliosphere towards the Earth and Sun, these charged cosmic ray particles are affected by the presence of plasma and field in the interplanetary space. This result in variations of GCR intensity at various time scales, notably ~11-years and ~22-year periods (see, Potgieter, 2013, Aslam and Badruddin, 2015, Chowdhury and Kudela, 2018; and the references therein). However, in addition to these long-term variations, short-time variations (both periodic and non-periodic) are observed in GCR intensity (see, Dunzlaff et al., 2008, Singh et al., 2012, Kudela and Sabbah, 2016, Chowdhury et al., 2016, Poblet and Azpilicueta, 2018, López-Comazzi and Blanco, 2020, Oloketuyi et al., 2020). One of the prominent non-periodic short-time variations frequently observed is the so-called Forbush decrease; a sudden decrease in the GCR intensity of a few per cent magnitudes within a period of about one day followed a slow gradual recovery extending up to several days. These decreases are related to changes in plasma and field conditions in the interplanetary space. Changes in the plasma and field conditions observed in the interplanetary space are mainly due to two emissions of different nature; high-speed solar wind streams (HSS) from the coronal holes with open magnetic field lines and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) with closed magnetic field structures. Ejected from certain regions of the solar atmosphere and propagating in interplanetary space they evolve into two different types of large-scale interplanetary structures, corotating interaction regions (CIRs) and interplanetary manifestations of CMEs (ICMEs).

These two types of large-scale structures (CIRs and ICMEs) with distinct structures and plasma/field properties not only produce disturbances in GCR intensity (e.g., Lockwood, 1971, Mavromichalaki et al., 2003, Mavromichalaki et al., 2011, Modzelewska and Alania, 2012, Papaioannou et al., 2010, Papaioannou et al., 2020, Kumar and Badruddin, 2014, Badruddin and Kumar, 2016) but also generate disturbances in the geomagnetic activity in the near-Earth Space. The disturbances generated by CIRs in GCR intensity are in general, slowly varying of relatively smaller amplitudes and corotating in nature (see McKibben et al., 1999, Dumbović et al., 2012, Guo and Florinski, 2014, Luo et al., 2020). However, the ICME generated disturbances in GCR intensity are fast of larger amplitude and transient in nature (e.g., Iucci et al., 1989, Singh and Badruddin, 2007, Dorotovič et al., 2008, Richardson and Cane, 2011, Arunbabu et al., 2015, Belov et al., 2015, Bhaskar et al., 2016).

Individual transient decreases in GCR intensity, generally known as Forbush decreases (Forbush, 1937), are of different depth (magnitude of decrease) take different time to reach their minimum intensity level (different decrease duration) and take different time to reach normal intensity level (different recovery time). Study of Forbush decrease precursors along with interplanetary magnetic field and solar wind parameters can be useful to understand the relevance of Forbush decreases in space weather predictions, and also the physics of the transient variations (like FDs) in the GCR intensity (e.g., see, Kudela et al., 2000, Dorman, 2005, Chertok et al., 2018, Badruddin et al., 2019).

Although many studies in the past; both theoretical/modeling (Nishida, 1982, Kadokura and Nishida, 1986, Chih and Lee, 1986, le Roux and Potgieter, 1991, Luo et al., 2017) and observational (Lockwood et al., 1991, Badruddin et al., 1991, Belov et al., 2014, Belov et al., 2015, Badruddin et al., 2019) have attempted to understand this phenomenon of Forbush decrease (FD), opinions are still divided about the relative importance of different structures in ICMEs (shock/sheath/ejecta/magnetic clouds) in producing Forbush decreases (e.g., Zhang and Burlaga, 1988, Dasso et al., 2005, Reames et al., 2009, Yu et al., 2010, Petukhova et al., 2019). It is also to be established with certainty which interplanetary plasma/field parameter/function best correlates with the amplitude of Forbush decrease (Mavromichalaki et al., 2011, Melkumyan et al., 2019). Moreover, the physical process playing the dominant role in the phenomena of Forbush decreases still requires a general agreement (see, also Cane, 2000, Luo et al., 2017). It is also be established with certainty whether all the large amplitude Forbush decreases are due to shock associated ICMEs or some of them can be due to isolated ejecta/magnetic cloud only.

Recently, Fadaaq and Badruddin (2021) have studied the transient modulation of galactic cosmic rays. For this purpose, using superposed epoch analysis, they analyzed the cosmic ray intensity data and solar wind plasma/field parameters with reference to ICMEs associated/not-associated with shock and ICMEs having magnetic cloud/non-magnetic cloud structure. Their results are consistent with the hypothesis that transient decrease in cosmic ray intensity is mainly due to the turbulent shock/sheath region preceding the ICME and the decrease due to ICME without shock/sheath structure, if any, is small.

Present work is further attempt to understand the transient (Forbush) decrease phenomena better. For this purpose, we identified large-amplitude (≥5%) FDs with clear time profile. In this work, we use superposed epoch analysis to analyze the cosmic-ray neutron monitor data together with solar wind plasma/field data with reference to onset of selected Forbush decreases of different amplitude, decrease and recovery time. Moreover, for our analysis, we analyzed some additional solar wind plasma/field parameters (and their derivatives), compared to earlier studies (e.g., see Fadaaq and Badruddin, 2021 and the references therein).

Section snippets

Data and analysis

We isolated large-amplitude decreases from the neutron monitor records using Oulu neutron monitor (https://cosmicrays.oulu.fi/; 65.05°N, 25.47°E, local vertical geomagnetic cutoff rigidity is about 0.8 GV; see Usoskin et al. 2001) 1-hour resolution data plots for solar cycles 23 and 24 with following criteria: (a) The events show a clear profile of typical Forbush-like decrease with a fast decrease (of different decrease time) and smooth slow recovery (of different recovery durations) and free

Results and discussions

The superposed epoch analyzed results of the hourly GCR intensity (in %), solar wind velocity V (kms−1), IMF vector magnitude F (nT), RMS standard deviation in VV (kms−1)], RMS standard deviation in FF (nT)], the products [FV.10−3 (mVm−1)], and the product (σFV) are plotted in Fig. 1. In this figure epoch (zero hour) corresponds to the onset of selected 29 large-amplitude Forbush decreases. The solid line is superposed epoch result of 29 FD events and the shaded area indicates standard

Conclusions

The analysis of the selected 29 large FD events (≥5%) leads us to the following conclusions.

The onset of large-amplitude FDs coincides the shock arrival time during the passage of shock-sheath-ICME structure. Moreover, the major part of the decrease happens during the passage of magnetically turbulent sheath region in which σF is significantly enhanced, consistent with the earlier findings.

Durations of the main phase of FDs are quite variable from event to event. Our analysis, based on the

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant no. G: 354-130-1441. The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR for technical and financial support. The authors thank the Station Manager of the Oulu neutron monitor (Ilya Usoskin) for making available the neutron monitor data (https://cosmicrays.oulu.fi). We acknowledge with thanks the use of the ICME catalog of I. G. Richardson and H.V. Cane

References (64)

  • Aslam, O.P.M., Badruddin, 2015. Study of cosmic-ray modulation during the recent unusual minimum and mini-maximum of...
  • Aslam, O.P.M., Badruddin, 2017. Study of the geoeffectiveness and galactic cosmic-ray response of VarSITI-ISEST...
  • Badruddin, Kumar, A., 2015. Study of the Forbush decreases, geomagnetic storms, and ground-level enhancements in...
  • Badruddin, Kumar, A., 2016. Study of the cosmic-ray modulation during the passage of ICMEs and CIRs. Solar Phys. 291,...
  • Badruddin, Vankatesan, D., Zhu, B.Y., 1991. Study and effect of magnetic clouds on the transient modulation of...
  • Badruddin, Yadav, R. S., Yadav, N. R., 1986. Influence of magnetic clouds on cosmic-ray intensity variation. Solar...
  • Badruddin,B., Aslam,O.P.M., Derouich,M., Asiri,H., Kudela,K., 2019. Forbush decreases and geomagnetic storms during a...
  • A. Belov et al.

    Coronal mass ejections and non-recurrent Forbush decreases

    Solar Phys.

    (2014)
  • A. Belov et al.

    Galactic cosmic ray density variations in magnetic clouds

    Solar Phys.

    (2015)
  • A. Bhaskar et al.

    Relative contribution of the magnetic field barrier and solar wind speed in ICME-associated Forbush decreases

    Astrophys. J.

    (2016)
  • Blanco, J. J., Catalán, E., Hidalgo, M. A., Medina, J., García, O., Rodríguez-Pacheco, J., 2013. Observable effects of...
  • H.V. Cane

    Coronal mass ejections and Forbush decreases

    Space Sci. Rev.

    (2000)
  • P.P. Chih et al.

    A perturbation approach to cosmic ray transients in interplanetary space

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1986)
  • Chertok, I. M., Belov, A. V., Abunin, A. A., 2018. Solar eruptions, Forbush decreases, and geomagnetic disturbances...
  • P. Chowdhury et al.

    Quasi-periodicities in cosmic rays and time lag with the solar activity at a middle latitude neutron monitor: 1982–2017

    Astrophys. Space Sci.

    (2018)
  • P. Chowdhury et al.

    A study of heliospheric modulation and periodicities of galactic cosmic rays during cycle 24

    Solar Phys.

    (2016)
  • L.I. Dorman

    Space weather and dangerous phenomena on the Earth: Principles of great geomagnetic storms forecasting by online cosmic ray data

    Ann. Geophys.

    (2005)
  • I. Dorotovič et al.

    On 17–22 January 2005 Events in Space Weather

    Solar Phys.

    (2008)
  • M. Dumbović et al.

    An analytical diffusion-expansion model for Forbush decreases caused by flux ropes

    Astrophys. J.

    (2018)
  • M. Dumbović et al.

    Cosmic ray modulation by different types of solar wind disturbances

    Astron. Astrophys.

    (2012)
  • P. Dunzlaff et al.

    Observations of recurrent cosmic ray decreases during solar cycles 22 and 23

    Ann. Geophys.

    (2008)
  • M. Fadaaq et al.

    Study of transient modulation of galactic cosmic rays due to interplanetary manifestations of coronal mass ejections: 2010–2017

    Astrophys. Space Sci.

    (2021)
  • Cited by (3)

    View full text