skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Predictable Robots for Autistic Children—Variance in Robot Behaviour, Idiosyncrasies in Autistic Children’s Characteristics, and Child–Robot Engagement

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 August 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Predictability is important to autistic individuals, and robots have been suggested to meet this need as they can be programmed to be predictable, as well as elicit social interaction. The effectiveness of robot-assisted interventions designed for social skill learning presumably depends on the interplay between robot predictability, engagement in learning, and the individual differences between different autistic children. To better understand this interplay, we report on a study where 24 autistic children participated in a robot-assisted intervention. We manipulated the variance in the robot’s behaviour as a way to vary predictability, and measured the children’s behavioural engagement, visual attention, as well as their individual factors. We found that the children will continue engaging in the activity behaviourally, but may start to pay less visual attention over time to activity-relevant locations when the robot is less predictable. Instead, they increasingly start to look away from the activity. Ultimately, this could negatively influence learning, in particular for tasks with a visual component. Furthermore, severity of autistic features and expressive language ability had a significant impact on behavioural engagement. We consider our results as preliminary evidence that robot predictability is an important factor for keeping children in a state where learning can occur.

References

  1. Alyssa M. Alcorn, Eloise Ainger, Vicky Charisi, Stefania Mantinioti, Sunčica Petrović, Bob R. Schadenberg, Teresa Tavassoli, and Elizabeth Pellicano. 2019. Educators’ views on using humanoid robots with autistic learners in special education settings in england. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 6, November (Nov. 2019), 1–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00107Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). American Psychiatric Association, Arlington, VA. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890423349Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Author, Washington, DC. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Salvatore M. Anzalone, Sofiane Boucenna, Serena Ivaldi, and Mohamed Chetouani. 2015. Evaluating the engagement with social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 7, 4 (Aug. 2015), 465–478. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0298-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Roger Azevedo. 2015. Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: Conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues. Educational Psychologist 50, 1 (Jan. 2015), 84–94. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Joshua H. Balsters, Matthew A. J. Apps, Dimitris Bolis, Rea Lehner, Louise Gallagher, and Nicole Wenderoth. 2017. Disrupted prediction errors index social deficits in autism spectrum disorder. Brain 140, 1 (Jan. 2017), 235–246. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww287Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Moshe Bar. 2007. The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11, 7 (Jul. 2007), 280–289. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Simon Baron-Cohen. 2002. The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6, 6 (Jun. 2002), 248–254. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01904-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Simon Baron-Cohen. 2009. Autism: The empathizing-systemizing (E-S) theory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1156, 1 (2009), 68–80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04467.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jackson Beatty. 1982. Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin 91, 2 (1982), 276–292. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.276Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jackson Beatty and Brennis Lucero-Wagoner. 2000. The pupillary system. In Proceedings of the Handbook of Psychophysiology (2nd ed.), John T. Cacioppo, Louius G. Tassinary, and Gary G. Berntson (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 142–162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Momotaz Begum, Richard W. Serna, and Holly A. Yanco. 2016. Are robots ready to deliver autism interventions? A comprehensive review. International Journal of Social Robotics 8, 2 (Mar. 2016), 157–181. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0346-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Howard Berenbaum, Keith Bredemeier, and Renee J. Thompson. 2008. Intolerance of uncertainty: Exploring its dimensionality and associations with need for cognitive closure, psychopathology, and personality. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 22, 1 (Jan. 2008), 117–125. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.01.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Timothy W. Bickmore, Daniel Schulman, and Langxuan Yin. 2010. Maintaining engagement in long-term interventions with relational agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence 24, 6 (Jul. 2010), 648–666. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2010.492259 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Christina Boulter, Mark H. Freeston, Mikle South, and Jacqui Rodgers. 2014. Intolerance of uncertainty as a framework for understanding anxiety in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 44, 6 (2014), 1391–1402. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-2001-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Margaret M. Bradley, Laura Miccoli, Miguel A. Escrig, and Peter J. Lang. 2008. The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology 45, 4 (Jul. 2008), 602–607. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ricarda Braukmann, Emma Ward, Roy S. Hessels, Harold Bekkering, Jan K. Buitelaar, and Sabine Hunnius. 2018. Action prediction in 10-month-old infants at high and low familial risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 49, May 2017 (May 2018), 34–46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.02.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Linley C. Bryan and David L. Gast. 2000. Teaching on-task and on-schedule behaviors to high-functioning children with autism via picture activity schedules. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 30, 6 (2000), 553–567. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005687310346Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. John-John Cabibihan, Hifza Javed, Marcelo Ang, and Sharifah Mariam Aljunied. 2013. Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. International Journal of Social Robotics 5, 4 (Nov. 2013), 593–618. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0202-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. R. Nicholas Carleton. 2016. Into the unknown: A review and synthesis of contemporary models involving uncertainty. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 39 (Apr. 2016), 30–43. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.02.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Paul D. Chamberlain, Jacqui Rodgers, Michael J. Crowley, Sarah E. White, Mark H. Freeston, and Mikle South. 2013. A potentiated startle study of uncertainty and contextual anxiety in adolescents diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Molecular Autism 4, 1 (2013), 31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-4-31Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Caitlyn Clabaugh, Kartik Mahajan, Shomik Jain, Roxanna Pakkar, David Becerra, Zhonghao Shi, Eric C. Deng, Rhianna Lee, Gisele Ragusa, and Maja J. Matarić. 2019. Long-term personalization of an in-home socially assistive robot for children with autism spectrum disorders. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 6, November (Nov. 2019), 1–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00110Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Caitlyn Clabaugh and Maja J. Matarić. 2019. Escaping Oz: Autonomy in socially assistive robotics. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems 2, 1 (May 2019), 33–61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-060117-104911Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Andy Clark. 2013. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36, 3 (Jun. 2013), 181–204. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Olivier Collignon, Geneviève Charbonneau, Frédéric Peters, Marouane Nassim, Maryse Lassonde, Franco Lepore, Laurent Mottron, and Armando Bertone. 2013. Reduced multisensory facilitation in persons with autism. Cortex 49, 6 (Jun. 2013), 1704–1710. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.06.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Jonathan S. Comer, Amy K. Roy, Jami M. Furr, Kristin Gotimer, Rinad S. Beidas, Michel J. Dugas, and Philip C. Kendall. 2009. The intolerance of uncertainty scale for children: A psychometric evaluation. Psychological Assessment 21, 3 (2009), 402–411. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016719Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Alexandre Coninx, Paul E. Baxter, Elettra Oleari, Sara Bellini, Bert P.B. Bierman, Olivier A. Blanson Henkemans, Lola Cañamero, Piero Cosi, Valentin Enescu, Raquel Ros Espinoza, Antoine Hiolle, Rémi Humbert, Bernd Kiefer, Ivana Kruijff-Korbayová, Rosemarijn Looije, Marco Mosconi, Mark A. Neerincx, Giulio Paci, Georgios Patsis, Clara Pozzi, Francesca Sacchitelli, Hichem Sahli, Alberto Sanna, Giacomo Sommavilla, Fabio Tesser, Yiannis Demiris, and Tony Belpaeme. 2015. Towards long-term social child-robot interaction: Using multi-activity switching to engage young users. Journal of Human–Robot Interaction 5, 1 (Aug. 2015), 32–64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.5.1.Coninx Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. James P. Connell and James G. Wellborn. 1991. Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In Self processes and Development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ, 43–77. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1991-97029-002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee J. Corrigan, Christopher Peters, Dennis Küster, and Ginevra Castellano. 2016. Engagement perception and generation for social robots and virtual agents. In Toward Robotic Socially Believable Behaving Systems. Anna Esposito and Lakhmi C. Jain (Eds.), Intelligent Systems Reference Library, Vol. 105, Springer, International Publishing, Cham, 29–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31056-5_4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Cristina A. Costescu, Bram Vanderborght, and Daniel O. David. 2015. Reversal learning task in children with autism spectrum disorder: A robot-based approach. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 45, 11 (2015), 3715–3725. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2319-zGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Sander Van de Cruys, Kris Evers, Ruth Van der Hallen, Lien Van Eylen, Bart Boets, Lee De-Wit, and Johan Wagemans. 2014. Precise minds in uncertain worlds: Predictive coding in autism. Psychological Review 121, 4 (2014), 649–675. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037665Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Kerstin Dautenhahn. 1999. Robots as social actors: Aurora and the case of autism. In Proceedings of the 3rd Cognitive Technology Conference (CT’99). Vol. 359. M.I.N.D. Lab, San Fransisco, CA, 359–374. Retrieved from https://books.google.nl/books?id=QM--tgAACAAJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2007. Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362, 1480 (Apr. 2007), 679–704. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Kerstin Dautenhahn and Iain Werry. 2004. Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: Background, motivation and challenges. Pragmatics & Cognition 12, 1 (2004), 1–35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.12.1.03dauGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Daniel O. David, Cristina A. Costescu, Silviu-Andrei Matu, Aurora Szentagotai, and Anca Dobrean. 2020. Effects of a robot-enhanced intervention for children with ASD on teaching turn-taking skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research 58, 1 (Mar. 2020), 29–62. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119830344Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Lorenzo Desideri, Marco Negrini, Massimiliano Malavasi, Daniela Tanzini, Aziz Rouame, Maria Cristina Cutrone, Paola Bonifacci, and Evert-Jan Hoogerwerf. 2018. Using a humanoid robot as a complement to interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder: A pilot study. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders 2, 3 (2018), 273–285. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-018-0066-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Joshua J. Diehl, Charles R. Crowell, Michael Villano, Kristin Wier, Karen Tang, and Laurel D. Riek. 2014. Clinical applications of robots in autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and treatment. In Comprehensive Guide to Autism. Vinood B. Patel, Victor R. Preedy, and Colin R. Martin (Eds.). Springer, New York, NY, 411–422. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4788-7_14Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Joshua J. Diehl, Lauren M. Schmitt, Michael Villano, and Charles R. Crowell. 2012. The clinical use of robots for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A critical review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 6, 1 (Jan. 2012), 249–262. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.05.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Lucy Diep, John-John Cabibihan, and Gregor Wolbring. 2015. Social Robots: Views of special education teachers. In Proceedings of the 3rd 2015 Workshop on ICTs for improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques. ACM, New York, NY, 160–163. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2838944.2838983 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Anca Dragan and Siddhartha Srinivasa. 2014. Familiarization to robot motion. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 366–373. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559674 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Katherine Driggs-Campbell and Ruzena Bajcsy. 2016. Communicating intent on the road through human-inspired control schemes. In 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 3042–3047. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2016.7759471Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Michel J. Dugas, Kristin Buhr, and Robert Ladouceur. 2004. The role of intolerance of uncertainty in etiology and maintenance. In Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Advances in Research and Practice. R. G. Heimberg, C. L. Turk, & D. S. Mennin (Eds.), Guilford Press, New York, NY143–163. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Audrey Duquette, François Michaud, and Henri Mercier. 2008. Exploring the use of a mobile robot as an imitation agent with children with low-functioning autism. Autonomous Robots 24, 2 (Feb. 2008), 147–157. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-007-9056-5 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Danielle A. Einstein. 2014. Extension of the transdiagnostic model to focus on intolerance of uncertainty: A review of the literature and implications for treatment. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 21, 3 (Sep. 2014), 280–300. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12077Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Louise Ewing, Elizabeth Pellicano, and Gillian Rhodes. 2013. Atypical updating of face representations with experience in children with autism. Developmental Science 16, 1 (Jan. 2013), 116–123. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. David J. Feil-Seifer and Maja J. Matarić. 2009. Toward socially assistive robotics for augmenting interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. In Experimental Robotics, O. Khatib, V. Kumar, and G. J. Pappas (Eds.), Vol. 54. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 201–210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00196-3_24Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Cindy Ferrara and Suzanne D. Hill. 1980. The responsiveness of autistic children to the predictability of social and nonsocial toys. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 10, 1 (1980), 51–57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408432Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Jennifer A. Fredricks, Phyllis C. Blumenfeld, and Alison H. Paris. 2004. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research 74, 1 (Mar. 2004), 59–109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Karl J. Friston. 2005. A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360, 1456 (Apr. 2005), 815–836. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1622Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Morgan Frost-Karlsson, Martyna Alexandra Galazka, Christopher Gillberg, Carina Gillberg, Carmela Miniscalco, Eva Billstedt, Nouchine Hadjikhani, and Jakob Åsberg Johnels. 2019. Social scene perception in autism spectrum disorder: An eye-tracking and pupillometric study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 41, 10 (Nov. 2019), 1024–1032. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2019.1646214Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Eleanor J. Gibson and Anne D. Pick. 2000. Perceptual Learning and Development: An Ecological Approach. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Lakshmi J. Gogate and George Hollich. 2010. Invariance detection within an interactive system: A perceptual gateway to language development. Psychological Review 117, 2 (2010), 496–516. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019049Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Judith Goris, Senne Braem, Annabel D. Nijhof, Davide Rigoni, Eliane Deschrijver, Sander Van de Cruys, Jan R. Wiersema, and Marcel Brass. 2018. Sensory prediction errors are less modulated by global context in autism spectrum disorder. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging 3, 8 (Aug. 2018), 667–674. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.02.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Judith Goris, Marcel Brass, Charlotte Cambier, Jeroen Delplanque, Jan R. Wiersema, and Senne Braem. 2020. The relation between preference for predictability and autistic traits. Autism Research 13, 7 (Jul. 2020), 1144–1154. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2244Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Charles R. Greenwood. 1991. Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Exceptional Children 57, 6 (May 1991), 521–535. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299105700606Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Dan W. Grupe and Jack B. Nitschke. 2013. Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: An integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14, 7 (Jul. 2013), 488–501. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3524Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Rebecca Grzadzinski, Marisela Huerta, and Catherine Lord. 2013. DSM-5 and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs): An opportunity for identifying ASD subtypes. Molecular Autism 4, 1 (2013), 12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-4-12Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Victoria Hallett, Joanne Mueller, Lauren Breese, Megan Hollett, Bryony Beresford, Annie Irvine, Andrew Pickles, Vicky Slonims, Stephen Scott, Tony Charman, and Emily Simonoff. 2021. Introducing ‘predictive parenting’: A feasibility study of a new group parenting intervention targeting emotional and behavioral difficulties in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 51, 1 (Jan. 2021), 323–333. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04442-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Francesca Happé and Uta Frith. 2006. The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 36, 1 (Jan 2006), 5–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-005-0039-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Francesca Happé, Angelica Ronald, and Robert Plomin. 2006. Time to give up on a single explanation for autism. Nature Neuroscience 9, 10 (Oct. 2006), 1218–1220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1770Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Annika Hellendoorn, Lex Wijnroks, and Paul P. M. Leseman. 2015. Unraveling the nature of autism: Finding order amid change. Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015), 359. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00359Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. E. H. Hess and J. M. Polt. 1964. Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving. Science 143, 3611 (Mar. 1964), 1190–1192. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.143.3611.1190Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Jakob Hohwy. 2013. The Predictive Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682737.001.0001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Ryan Y. Hong and Mike W.L. Cheung. 2015. The Structure of cognitive vulnerabilities to depression and anxiety. Clinical Psychological Science 3, 6 (Nov. 2015), 892–912. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614553789Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Claire A. G. J. Huijnen, Monique A. S. Lexis, Rianne Jansens, and Luc P. de Witte. 2017. How to implement robots in interventions for children with autism? A co-creation study involving people with autism, parents and professionals. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 47, 10 (Oct. 2017), 3079–3096. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3235-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Claire A. G. J. Huijnen, Monique A. S. Lexis, Rianne Jansens, and Luc P. de Witte. 2019. Roles, strengths and challenges of using robots in interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 49, 1 (Jan. 2019), 11–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3683-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Bibi E. B. M. Huskens, Rianne Verschuur, Jan C. C. Gillesen, Robert Didden, and Emilia I. Barakova. 2013. Promoting question-asking in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorders: Effectiveness of a robot intervention compared to a human-trainer intervention. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 16, 5 (2013), 345–356. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2012.739212Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Shomik Jain, Balasubramanian Thiagarajan, Zhonghao Shi, Caitlyn Clabaugh, and Maja J. Matarić. 2020. Modeling engagement in long-term, in-home socially assistive robot interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Science Robotics 5, 39 (Feb. 2020), eaaz3791. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aaz3791Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Hifza Javed, Rachael Burns, Myounghoon Jeon, Ayanna M. Howard, and Chung Hyuk Park. 2019. A robotic framework to facilitate sensory experiences for children with autism spectrum disorder. ACM Transactions on Human–Robot Interaction 9, 1 (Dec. 2019), 1–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3359613 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Hifza Javed, WonHyong Lee, and Chung Hyuk Park. 2020. Toward an automated measure of social engagement for children with autism spectrum disorder—a personalized computational modeling approach. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7, April (Apr. 2020), 14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00043Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. D. Kahneman and J. Beatty. 1966. Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science 154, 3756 (Dec. 1966), 1583–1585. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.154.3756.1583Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Deb Keen. 2009. Engagement of children with autism in learning. Australasian Journal of Special Education 33, 2 (2009), 130–140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1375/ajse.33.2.130Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. C.D. Kidd and Cynthia Breazeal. 2008. Robots at home: Understanding long-term human–robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 3230–3235. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2008.4651113Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Elizabeth Kim, Rhea Paul, Frederick Shic, and Brian Scassellati. 2012. Bridging the research Gap: Making HRI useful to individuals with autism. Journal of Human–Robot Interaction 1, 1 (Aug. 2012), 26–54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Kim Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Elizabeth S. Kim, Lauren D. Berkovits, Emily P. Bernier, Dan Leyzberg, Frederick Shic, Rhea Paul, and Brian Scassellati. 2013. Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 43, 5 (May 2013), 1038–1049. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1645-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Elizabeth S. Kim, Christopher M. Daniell, Corinne Makar, Julia Elia, Brian Scassellati, and Frederick Shic. 2015. Potential clinical impact of positive affect in robot interactions for autism intervention. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. IEEE, 8–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2015.7344544 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Jacqueline Kory and Cynthia Breazeal. 2014. Storytelling with robots: Learning companions for preschool children’s language development. In Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 643–648. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926325Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Viviane Kostrubiec and Jeanne Kruck. 2020. Collaborative research project: Developing and testing a robot-assisted intervention for children with autism. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7, March (Mar. 2020), 1–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00037Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Hideki Kozima, Marek P. Michalowski, and Cocoro Nakagawa. 2009. Keepon. International Journal of Social Robotics 1, 1 (Jan. 2009), 3–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0009-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Rebecca P. Lawson, Christoph Mathys, and Geraint Rees. 2017. Adults with autism overestimate the volatility of the sensory environment. Nature Neuroscience 20, 9 (Jul. 2017), 1293–1299. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4615Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Rebecca P. Lawson, Geraint Rees, and Karl J. Friston. 2014. An aberrant precision account of autism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8, May (May 2014), 302. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00302Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Jamy J. Li, Daniel Davison, Alyssa M. Alcorn, Alria Williams, Snezana Babovic Dimitrijevic, Sunčica Petrović, Pauline Chevalier, Bob R. Schadenberg, Eloise Ainger, Liz Pellicano, and Vanessa Evers. 2020. Non-participatory user-centered design of accessible teacher-teleoperated robot and tablets for minimally verbal autistic children. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA ’20). 51–59. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3389189.3393738 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Itay Lieder, Vincent Adam, Or Frenkel, Sagi Jaffe-Dax, Maneesh Sahani, and Merav Ahissar. 2019. Perceptual bias reveals slow-updating in autism and fast-forgetting in dyslexia. Nature Neuroscience 22, 2 (Feb. 2019), 256–264. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0308-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Catherine Lord, Michael Rutter, Pamela C. DiLavore, Susan Risi, Katherine Gotham, and Somer L. Bishop. 2012. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: ADOS-2. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, CA. Retrieved from https://www.wpspublish.com/store/p/2648/ados-2-autism-diagnostic-observat ion-schedule-second-editionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Nichola Lubold, Erin Walker, and Heather Pon-Barry. 2016. Effects of voice-adaptation and social dialogue on perceptions of a robotic learning companion. In Proceedings of the 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction. IEEE, 255–262. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451760 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Hope Macdonald, Michael Rutter, Patricia Howlin, Patricia Rios, Ann Le Conteur, Christopher Evered, and Susan Folstein. 1989. Recognition and expression of emotional cues by autistic and normal adults. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 30, 6 (Nov. 1989), 865–877. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1989.tb00288.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Gregory S. MacDuff, Patricia J. Krantz, and Lynn E. McClannahan. 1993. Teaching children with autism to use photographic activity schedules: Maintenance and generalization of complex response chains. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 26, 1 (Mar. 1993), 89–97. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1993.26-89Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Catherine Manning, James Kilner, Louise Neil, Themelis Karaminis, and Elizabeth Pellicano. 2017. Children on the autism spectrum update their behaviour in response to a volatile environment. Developmental Science 20, 5 (Sep. 2017), e12435. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12435Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Lizzie Maughan, Sergei Gutnikov, and Rob Stevens. 2007. Like more, look more. Look more, like more: The evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Brand Management 14, 4 (Apr. 2007), 335–342. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2550074Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Joanne McCann and Sue Peppé. 2003. Prosody in autism spectrum disorders: a critical review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 38, 4 (Jan. 2003), 325–350. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1368282031000154204Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Linda McCormick, Mary J. O. Noonan, and Ronald Heck. 1998. Variables affecting engagement in inclusive preschool classrooms. Journal of Early Intervention 21, 2 (Jan. 1998), 160–176. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/105381519802100208Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Gary B. Mesibov and Victoria Shea. 2010. The TEACCH program in the era of evidence-based practice. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 40, 5 (May 2010), 570–579. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0901-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Brian W. Miller. 2015. Using reading times and eye-movements to measure cognitive engagement. Educational Psychologist 50, 1 (Jan. 2015), 31–42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1004068Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. D. Mumford. 1992. On the computational architecture of the neocortex. Biological Cybernetics 66, 3 (Jan. 1992), 241–251. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00198477 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Louise Neil, Nora Choque Olsson, and Elizabeth Pellicano. 2016. The relationship between intolerance of uncertainty, sensory sensitivities, and anxiety in autistic and typically developing children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 46, 6 (Jun. 2016), 1962–1973. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2721-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Heather L. O’Brien and Elaine G. Toms. 2008. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, 6 (Apr. 2008), 938–955. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20801 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Mike Oliver. 2013. The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability and Society 28, 7 (Oct. 2013), 1024–1026. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  98. Alexia Ostrolenk, Vanessa A. Bao, Laurent Mottron, Olivier Collignon, and Armando Bertone. 2019. Reduced multisensory facilitation in adolescents and adults on the autism spectrum. Scientific Reports 9, 1 (Dec. 2019), 11965. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48413-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  99. Mark O’Reilly, Jeff Sigafoos, Giulio Lancioni, Chaturi Edrisinha, and Alonzo Andrews. 2005. An examination of the effects of a classroom activity schedule on levels of self-injury and engagement for a child with severe autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 35, 3 (Jun. 2005), 305–311. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-005-3294-1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Colin J. Palmer, Rebecca P. Lawson, and Jakob Hohwy. 2017. Bayesian approaches to autism: Towards volatility, action, and behavior. Psychological Bulletin 143, 5 (2017), 521–542. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000097Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Rhea Paul, Amy Augustyn, Ami Klin, and Fred R. Volkmar. 2005. Perception and production of prosody by speakers with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 35, 2 (Apr. 2005), 205–220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-004-1999-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. Martin P. Paulus and Murray B. Stein. 2006. An insular view of anxiety. Biological Psychiatry 60, 4 (Aug. 2006), 383–387. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.042Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  103. Philip J. Pell, Isabelle Mareschal, Andrew J. Calder, Elisabeth A. H. von dem Hagen, Colin W.G. Clifford, Simon Baron-Cohen, and Michael P. Ewbank. 2016. Intact priors for gaze direction in adults with high-functioning autism spectrum conditions. Molecular Autism 7, 1 (Dec. 2016), 25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-016-0085-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  104. Elizabeth Pellicano and David Burr. 2012. When the world becomes ’too real’: A Bayesian explanation of autistic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16, 10 (2012), 504–510. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.08.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. Elizabeth Pellicano, Linda Jeffery, David Burr, and Gillian Rhodes. 2007. Abnormal adaptive face-coding mechanisms in children with autism spectrum disorder. Current Biology 17, 17 (Sep. 2007), 1508–1512. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.065Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  106. Jose Pinheiro, Douglas Bates, Saikat DebRoy, Deepayan Sarkar, and R Core Team. 2020. Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlmeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Michael I. Posner. 1980. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32, 1 (Feb 1980), 3–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  108. W. James Potter and Deborah Levine-Donnerstein. 1999. Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research 27, 3 (Aug. 1999), 258–284. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889909365539Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. R Core Team. 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Technical Report. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Aditi Ramachandran, Chien-Ming Huang, and Brian Scassellati. 2017. Give me a break!. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 146–155. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020209Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  111. Stephen W. Raudenbush and Anthony S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models. Applications and Data Analysis Methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Charles Rich, Brett Ponsleur, Aaron Holroyd, and Candace L. Sidner. 2010. Recognizing engagement in human–robot interaction. In Proceeding of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI ’10). ACM Press, New York, NY, 375. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1734454.1734580 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. Daniel J. Ricks and Mark B. Colton. 2010. Trends and considerations in robot-assisted autism therapy. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 4354–4359. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509327Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. Ben Robins, Kerstin Dautenhahn, René te Boekhorst, and Aude Billard. 2005. Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: Can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills?Universal Access in the Information Society 4, 2 (Dec. 2005), 105–120. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-005-0116-3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  115. Jacqui Rodgers, Anna Hodgson, Kerry Shields, Catharine Wright, Emma Honey, and Mark Freeston. 2017. Towards a treatment for intolerance of uncertainty in young people with autism spectrum disorder: Development of the coping with uncertainty in everyday situations (CUES©) programme. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 47, 12 (Dec. 2017), 3959–3966. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2924-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  116. Ognjen Rudovic, Jaeryoung Lee, Miles Dai, Björn Schuller, and Rosalind W. Picard. 2018. Personalized machine learning for robot perception of affect and engagement in autism therapy. Science Robotics 3, 19 (Jun. 2018), eaao6760. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aao6760Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  117. Ognjen Rudovic, Jaeryoung Lee, Lea Mascarell-Maricic, Björn W. Schuller, and Rosalind W. Picard. 2017. Measuring engagement in robot-assisted autism therapy: A cross-cultural study. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 4, July (Jul. 2017), 36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2017.00036Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. Michael Rutter, Anthony Bailey, and Cathrine Lord. 2003. The Social Communication Questionnaire: Manual. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, CA. Retrieved from https://www.wpspublish.com/scq-social-communication-questionnaireGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. Michelle J. Salvador, Sophia Silver, and Mohammad H. Mahoor. 2015. An emotion recognition comparative study of autistic and typically-developing children using the zeno robot. In Procedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 6128–6133. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2015.7140059Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Felippe Sartorato, Leon Przybylowski, and Diana K Sarko. 2017. Improving therapeutic outcomes in autism spectrum disorders: Enhancing social communication and sensory processing through the use of interactive robots. Journal of Psychiatric Research 90 (Jul. 2017), 1–11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.02.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  121. Brian Scassellati. 2007. How social robots will help us to diagnose, treat, and understand autism. In Robotics Research. Sebastian Thrun, Rodney Brooks, and Hugh Durrant-Whyte (Eds.). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 552–563. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48113-3_47Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. Brian Scassellati, Henny Admoni, and Maja J. Matarić. 2012. Robots for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 14, 1 (2012), 275–294. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150036Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  123. Brian Scassellati, Laura Boccanfuso, Chien-Ming Huang, Marilena Mademtzi, Meiying Qin, Nicole Salomons, Pamela Ventola, and Frederick Shic. 2018. Improving social skills in children with ASD using a long-term, in-home social robot. Science Robotics 3, 21 (8 2018), eaat7544. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat7544Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. Bob R. Schadenberg. 2021. Robots for Autistic Children: Understanding and Facilitating Predictability for Engagement in Learning. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Twente, Enschede. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036551649Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. Bob R. Schadenberg, Dirk K. J. Heylen, and Vanessa Evers. 2018. Affect bursts to constrain the meaning of the facial expressions of the humanoid robot Zeno. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Social Interaction and Multimodal Expression for Socially Intelligent Robots30–39. Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2059/paper4.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. Bob R. Schadenberg, Mark A. Neerincx, Fokie Cnossen, and Rosemarijn Looije. 2017. Personalising game difficulty to keep children motivated to play with a social robot: A Bayesian approach. Cognitive Systems Research 43 (2017), 222–231. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2016.08.003 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  127. Bob R. Schadenberg, Dennis Reidsma, Dirk K. J. Heylen, and Vanessa Evers. 2020. Differences in spontaneous interactions of autistic children in an interaction with an adult and humanoid robot. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7 (Mar. 2020), 19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00028Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  128. Bob R. Schadenberg, Dennis Reidsma, Dirk K. J. Heylen, and Vanessa Evers. in press. “I see what you did there”: Understanding people’s social perception of a robot and its predictability. ACM Transactions on Human–Robot Interaction 10, 3 (in press), 1–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3461534 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  129. Eric Schopler, Mary E. Van Bourgondien, Glenna J. Wellman, and Steven R. Love. 2010. The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS-2). Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, CA. Retrieved from https://www.wpspublish.com/store/p/2696/cars-2-childhood-autism-rating-sc ale-second-editionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. Candace L. Sidner, Christopher Lee, Cory D. Kidd, Neal Lesh, and Charles Rich. 2005. Explorations in engagement for humans and robots. Artificial Intelligence 166, 1-2 (Aug. 2005), 140–164. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2005.03.005 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  131. Emily Simonoff, Andrew Pickles, Tony Charman, Susie Chandler, Tom Loucas, and Gillian Baird. 2008. Psychiatric disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders: Prevalence, comorbidity, and associated factors in a population-derived sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 47, 8 (Aug. 2008), 921–929. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e318179964fGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  132. Kate Simpson, Deb Keen, and Janeen Lamb. 2013. The use of music to engage children with autism in a receptive labelling task. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 7, 12 (Dec. 2013), 1489–1496. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.08.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  133. Ramona E. Simut, Johan Vanderfaeillie, Andreea Peca, Greet Van de Perre, and Bram Vanderborght. 2016. Children with autism spectrum disorders make a fruit salad with probo, the social robot: An interaction study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 46, 1 (Jan. 2016), 113–126. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2556-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  134. Gale M. Sinatra, Benjamin C. Heddy, and Doug Lombardi. 2015. The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist 50, 1 (1 2015), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. Pawan Sinha, Margaret M. Kjelgaard, Tapan K. Gandhi, Kleovoulos Tsourides, Annie L. Cardinaux, Dimitrios Pantazis, Sidney P. Diamond, and Richard M. Held. 2014. Autism as a disorder of prediction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 42 (2014), 15220–15225. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416797111Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  136. James P. Stevens. 2002. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (5th ed.). Taylor & Francis, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  137. Caroline L. van Straten, Iris Smeekens, Emilia I. Barakova, Jeffrey C. Glennon, Jan K. Buitelaar, and Aoju Chen. 2018. Effects of robots’ intonation and bodily appearance on robot-mediated communicative treatment outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorder. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 22, 2 (Apr. 2018), 379–390. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-1060-y Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  138. Dag Sverre Syrdal, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Ben Robins, Efstathia Karakosta, and Nan Cannon Jones. 2020. Kaspar in the wild: Experiences from deploying a small humanoid robot in a nursery school for children with autism. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 11, 1 (Jul. 2020), 301–326. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2020-0019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  139. Adriana Tapus, Andreea Peca, Amir Aly, Cristina A. Pop, Lavinia Jisa, Sebastian Pintea, Alina S. Rusu, and Daniel O. David. 2012. Children with autism social engagement in interaction with Nao, an imitative robot: A series of single case experiments. Interaction Studies 13, 3 (2012), 315–347. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1075/is.13.3.01tapGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  140. Furtuna G. Tewolde, Dorothy V. M. Bishop, and Catherine Manning. 2018. Visual motion prediction and verbal false memory performance in autistic children. Autism Research 11, 3 (Mar. 2018), 509–518. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1915Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  141. Serge Thill, Cristina A. Pop, Tony Belpaeme, Tom Ziemke, and Bram Vanderborght. 2012. Robot-assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorders with (Partially) autonomous control: Challenges and outlook. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 3, 4 (Jan. 2012), 209–217. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2478/s13230-013-0107-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  142. Marco Turi, David C. Burr, Roberta Igliozzi, David Aagten-Murphy, Filippo Muratori, and Elizabeth Pellicano. 2015. Children with autism spectrum disorder show reduced adaptation to number. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 25 (Jun. 2015), 7868–7872. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504099112Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  143. Joshua Wainer, Ben Robins, Farshid Amirabdollahian, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2014. Using the humanoid robot KASPAR to autonomously play triadic games and facilitate collaborative play among children with autism. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development 6, 3 (Sep. 2014), 183–199. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2014.2303116Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  144. Susan W. White, Donald Oswald, Thomas Ollendick, and Lawrence Scahill. 2009. Anxiety in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Clinical Psychology Review 29, 3 (Apr. 2009), 216–229. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.01.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  145. Sarah Wigham, Jacqui Rodgers, Mikle South, Helen McConachie, and Mark H. Freeston. 2015. The interplay between sensory processing abnormalities, intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety and restricted and repetitive behaviours in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 45, 4 (2015), 943–952. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2248-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  146. World Health Organization. 1992. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. World Health Organization, Geneva. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/37958Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  147. Shu-Chieh Wu and Roger W. Remington. 2003. Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29, 5 (2003), 1050–1067. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1050Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  148. Nurit Yirmiya, Connie Kasari, Marian Sigman, and Peter Mundy. 1989. Facial expressions of affect in autistic, mentally retarded and normal children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 30, 5 (Sep. 1989), 725–735. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1989.tb00785.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Predictable Robots for Autistic Children—Variance in Robot Behaviour, Idiosyncrasies in Autistic Children’s Characteristics, and Child–Robot Engagement

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format