Adult: Perioperative ManagementA nomogram to predict postoperative pulmonary complications after cardiothoracic surgery
Graphical abstract
Strong multivariate baseline and perioperative predictors were factored into a novel nomogram to predict PPCs. Bootstrapped calibration curve demonstrated the model calibration showing ideal (green line), apparent (blue line), and bias-corrected (red line) model. High agreement was noted between observed (frequencies), and predicted pulmonary complications events were plotted against predicted probabilities. The prediction nomogram was further internally validated in an independent dataset to estimate clinical usefulness that demonstrated excellent discrimination with preserved calibration ability. Early identification of pulmonary complications in at-risk patients provides latitude to the clinicians to use preemptive measures and may help modify postoperative outcomes.
Section snippets
Materials and Methods
With Institutional Review Board approval (15-1046) and waived consent, we conducted a single-center, large, retrospective observational cohort study. The analysis included 17,433 adult patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft, valve, or thoracic aorta repair surgery between January 2, 2009, and September 24, 2015, at the Cleveland Clinic's main campus. Patients were excluded if they were aged less than 18 years; information regarding main demographic or baseline characteristics and
Results
Among 24,124 patients who underwent cardiac and vascular surgery between January 2, 2009, and September 24, 2015, a total of 17,433 met our inclusion and exclusion criteria with complete accumulated data required to build the prediction models (Figure 1). The summary of the demographic and baseline characteristics of patients, intraoperative and ICU characteristics, and postoperative pulmonary outcomes is shown in Table 1. PPCs were observed in 1669 patients (9.6%), of whom 1361 (7.8%)
Discussion
Our augmented model of PPCs that included intraoperative and postoperative variables, and baseline characteristics (area under the curve 0.87; 0.86-0.88) showed a statistically superior performance compared with the base model (area under the curve, 0.80; 0.79-0.81) that only included baseline characteristics. Furthermore, bootstrapped validation showed satisfactory internal validity with excellent ability to discriminate PPC (area under receiver operating characteristic of 0.80; 95% CI,
Conclusions
We identified 25 strong multivariate perioperative predictors associated with PPCs after cardiovascular surgery and simultaneously compared our augmented model with a base model that has excellent discriminative power. Finally, we validated our prediction nomogram in an independent set to estimate clinical usefulness. Intensivists and surgeons practicing cardiac surgical critical care should be able to use this nomogram to predict and intervene proactively to prevent PPCs in these patients.
References (38)
- et al.
Prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications through respiratory rehabilitation: a controlled clinical study
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(1998) - et al.
Current trends in preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care of the adult cardiac surgery patient
Curr Probl Surg
(2015) - et al.
Postoperative pulmonary complications
Br J Anaesth
(2017) - et al.
Lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome after cardiac surgery
Ann Thorac Surg
(2013) - et al.
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1–coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
Ann Thorac Surg
(2009) - et al.
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2–isolated valve surgery
Ann Thorac Surg
(2009) - et al.
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3–valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
Ann Thorac Surg
(2009) - et al.
Monitoring the results of cardiac surgery by variable life-adjusted display
Lancet (London, England)
(1997) - et al.
Nitric oxide in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
(2018) - et al.
Pulmonary complications after descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: predictors, prevention, and treatment
Ann Thorac Surg
(2007)
American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the respiratory and related management of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy undergoing anesthesia or sedation
Chest
Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data
Lancet Respir Med
Incidence of mortality and morbidity related to postoperative lung injury in patients who have undergone abdominal or thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lancet Respir Med
Continuous versus interrupted suture technique in microvascular anastomosis in rats
Acta Cir Bras
Postoperative pulmonary complications: an update on risk assessment and reduction
Cleve Clin J Med
Intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for respiratory failure after coronary bypass
Ann Thorac Surg
Pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
EuroSCORE II
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
Risk of assessing mortality risk in elective cardiac operations: age, creatinine, ejection fraction, and the law of parsimony
Circulation
Cited by (5)
Commentary: Earlier warning for pulmonary complications: It's never too soon to take action
2023, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryMachine learning for real-time prediction of complications induced by flexible uretero-renoscopy with laser lithotripsy
2024, International Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringAssociation of preoperative frailty with pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery in elderly individuals: a prospective cohort study
2023, Aging Clinical and Experimental ResearchPrediction and prognosis of reintubation after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection
2022, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval: Date of approval: August 21, 2015; IRB number: 15-1046. Consent Statement: IRB (No. 15-1046) waived written consent for this study.