Skip to main content
Log in

Analytical Water Shortage Probabilities and Distributions of Various Lead Times for a Water Supply Reservoir

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reducing the negative impacts of water shortages is the primary concern of water supply reservoir operation. This study aims to propose a theoretical framework of water shortage probabilities and distributions of various future lead times for a water supply reservoir based on the supply–demand relationship. Reservoir supply ability is represented by the water availability, which is the sum of storage and inflow. The water availability distribution is obtained by the convolution of storage and inflow distributions since both are random variables. The water shortage probability is thus the probability that the water availability is insufficient to meet the known demand. The water shortage distribution is a flip of the water availability distribution with a right-shifted amount of demand and truncating the infeasible negative water shortage. The Nanhua Reservoir located in southern Taiwan is used as an example to illustrate the proposed methodology. The water shortage probabilities and distributions of various initial storage amounts in any month for future 1- to 6-month lead times are constructed based on the fitted inflow distribution and known monthly demand. Apparently different water shortage probabilities in various months are attributed to the initial storage and inherently different inflow distributions in low- or high-inflow months. Low initial storage induces greater water shortage probabilities in low-inflow months, but approximate null probabilities are noted in high-inflow months due to abundant inflow. The effects of future lead times on water shortage probabilities and distribution also reflect the characteristics of inflow distributions of the current and lead-time months under consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Streamflow data used in this study are provided from Water Resources Agency, Taiwan (https://www.wra.gov.tw).

References

  • Bijl DL, Biemans H, Bogaart PW, Dekker SC, Doleman JC, Stehfest E, van Vuuren DP (2018) A global analysis of future water deficit based on different allocation mechanisms. Water Resour Res 54(8):5803–5824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini U, Mulinacci S, Romagnoli S (2011) A copula-based model of speculative price dynamics in discrete time. J Multivar Anal 102(6):1047–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordão MJDS, Rufino IAA, Alves PBR, Barros MNM (2020) Water shortage risk mapping: A GIS-MCDA approach for a medium-sized city in the Brazilian semi-arid region. Urban Water J 17(7):642–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edalat MM, Stephen H (2019) Socio-economic drought assessment in Lake Mead, USA, based on a multivariate standardized water-scarcity index. Hydrol Sci J 64(5):555–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao X, Liu Y, Sun B (2018) Water shortage risk assessment considering large-scale regional transfers: a copula-based uncertainty case study in Lunan, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(23):23328–23341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang WC, Yuan LC (2004) A drought early warning system on real-time multireservoir operations. Water Resour Res 40(6):W06401. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z, Liu X, Sun S, Tang Y, Yuan X, Tang Q (2021) Global assessment of future sectoral water scarcity under adaptive inner-basin water allocation measures. Sci Total Environ 783:146973

  • Jonsdottir H, Eliasson J, Madsen H (2005) Assessment of serious water shortage in the Icelandic water resource system. Phys Chem Earth 30(6–7):420–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khedun CP, Chowdhary H, Mishra AK, Giardino JR, Singh VP (2013) Water deficit duration and severity analysis based on runoff derived from Noah land surface model. J Hydrol Eng 18(7):817–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindqvist AN, Fornell R, Prade T, Tufvesson L, Khalil S, Kopainsky B (2021) Human-water dynamics and their role for seasonal water scarcity − a case study. Water Resour Manage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02819-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ly S, Pho KH, Ly S, Wong WK (2019) Determining distribution for the product of random variables by using copulas. Risks 7(1):23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moursi H, Kim D, Kaluarachchi JJ (2017) A probabilistic assessment of agricultural water scarcity in a semi-arid and snowmelt-dominated river basin under climate change. Agric Water Manag 193:142–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolosi V, Cancelliere A, Rossi G (2009) Reducing risk of shortage due to drought in water supply system using genetic algorithms. Irrig Drain 58(2):171–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orimoloye IR, Belle JA, Olusola AO, Busayo ET, Ololade OO (2021) Spatial assessment of drought disasters, vulnerability, severity and water shortages: a potential drought disaster mitigation strategy. Nat Hazards 105(3):2735–2754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian L, Wang Z, Wang H, Deng C (2020) An improved method for predicting water shortage risk in the case of insufficient data and its application in Tianjin, China. J Earth Syst Sci 129(1):48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian L, Zhang R, Hong M, Wang H, Yang L (2016) A new multiple integral model for water shortage risk assessment and its application in Beijing, China. Nat Hazards 80(1):43–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JRC, Michelsen AM, Gollehon NR (2010) Mitigating water shortages in a multiple risk environment. Water Policy 12(1):114–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano E, Guyennon N, Del Bon A, Petrangeli AB, Preziosi E (2017) Robust method to quantify the risk of shortage for water supply systems. J Hydrol Eng 22(8):04017021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi G, Cancelliere A (2013) Managing drought risk in water supply systems in Europe: a review. Int J Water Resour Dev 29(2):272–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruckdeschel P, Kohl M (2014) General purpose convolution algorithm in S4 classes by means of FFT. J Stat Softw 59(4):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo SB, Kim YO, Kim CR (2015) A new way for incorporating GCM information into water shortage projections. Water 7(5):2435–2450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT, Hsiao YY (2012) Water-deficit-based drought risk assessment in Taiwan. Nat Hazards 64(1):237–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT, Hung YN, Sie HR (2018) Effects of hedging factors and fuzziness on shortage characteristics during droughts. Water Resour Manage 32(5):1913–1929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT, Wen HH, Su IW (2021) Comparing optimal hedging policies incorporating past operation information and future hydrologic information. Water Resour Manage 35(7):2177–2196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzanakakis VA, Paranychianakis NV, Angelakis AN (2020) Water supply and water scarcity. Water 12(9):2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah H, Akbar M (2021) Drought risk analysis for water assessment at gauged and ungauged sites in the low rainfall regions of Pakistan. Environ Process 8(1):139–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilchfort O, Lund JR (1997) Shortage management modeling for urban water supply system. J Water Resour Plan Manag 123(4):250–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Wang H, Zhang Y, Wang C (2021) Risk assessment of water resources and energy security based on the cloud model: a case study of China in 2020. Water 13(13):1823

  • Yoo C, Jun C, Zhu J, Na W (2021) Evaluating of dam water-supply capacity in Korea using the water-shortage index. Water 13(7):956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu PS, Yang TC, Kuo CM, Wang YT (2014) A stochastic approach for seasonal water-shortage probability forecasting based on seasonal weather outlook. Water Resour Manage 28(12):3905–3920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zareian MJ (2021) Optimal water allocation at different levels of climate change to minimize water shortage in arid regions (case study: Zayandeh-Rud River Basin, Iran). J Hydro Environ Res 35:13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Liang X, Fang Z, Jiang T, Wang Y, Wang L (2016) Urban water resources allocation and shortage risk mapping with support vector machine method. Nat Hazards 81(2):1209–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Cui N, Guan J, Du P, Zhang Y, Jiang S (2021) Copula-based risk analysis of agricultural water shortage under natural precipitation conditions in the Guanzhong Plain, a drought-prone region of China. J Hydrol Eng 26(6):04021016

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this study was graciously provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC (MOST 109-2221-E-006-020).

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC, grand number MOST 109–2221-E-006–020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: J.T. Shiau; Methodology: J.T. Shiau; Formal analysis and investigation: J.T. Shiau; Writing – original draft preparation: J.T. Shiau; Writing – review and editing: J.T. Shiau; Funding acquisition: J.T. Shiau.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenq-Tzong Shiau.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shiau, JT. Analytical Water Shortage Probabilities and Distributions of Various Lead Times for a Water Supply Reservoir. Water Resour Manage 35, 3809–3825 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02921-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02921-4

Keywords

Navigation