Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Ethnographies involve the exploration of social phenomena in the field, typically for an extended period of time. Traditionally, ethnographers listen to, observe, and directly communicate with the subjects of their research. At its essence, ethnography is about storytelling, and the data are collected through human interaction. With the development of new technologies, and with the plethora of social media platforms, the manner in which many stories are told has become significantly more varied. Accordingly, digital ethnography has emerged as a new approach to conducting ethnographies. In the present study, we focus specifically on the use of digital ethnographies in third sector studies. Building on our own experience using digital ethnography, collecting data from Facebook pages and groups, blogs, and websites of nonprofit organizations and individual volunteers and donors, we describe two different ways of conducting digital ethnography: One, at the micro-level, explores human milk donations to nonprofit milk banks. The second, at the meso-level, explores a community of migrant workers. We aim to outline the potential, limitations, and ethical considerations of this methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appe, S., & Oreg, A. (2019). Lost and found in Upstate New York: Exploring the motivations of “Lost Boys” refugees as founders of international nonprofit organizations. Administration & Society, 52(8), 1209–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appe, S., & Oreg, A. (2020). Philanthropic entrepreneurs who give overseas: An exploratory study of international giving through grassroots organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(3), 502–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babis, D. (2018). Exploring the emergence of traditional healer organizations: The case of an ethno-medical association in Bolivia. Health Sociology Review, 27(2), 136-152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babis, D. (2021a). Digital mourning on Facebook: The case of Filipino migrant worker live-in caregivers in Israel. Media, Culture & Society, 43(3), 397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babis, D. (2021b). Inclusion and beauty pageants? The Filipino migrant worker community in Israel. Gender, Place & Culture. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2021.1887090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babis & Sabar. (2021). Filipino migrant caregivers in Israel during COVID-19: Enhancing communal social capital via Facebook. (Manuscript submitted for publication).

  • Babis, D., Zychlinski, E., & Kagan, M. (2021). Comparing transnational and communal diaspora philanthropies among temporary migrant workers: The case of the Filipino community in Israel. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(2), 372–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, M. J., & Maddox, A. (2016). Active engagement with stigmatized communities through digital ethnography. Qualitative Research, 16(6), 701–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baym, N. K., & Markham, A. N. (Eds.). (2009). Internet inquiry: Conversations about method. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. A., Lambright, K. T., & Wells, C. J. (2014). Looking for friends, fans, and followers? Social media use in public and nonprofit human services. Public Administration Review, 74(5), 655–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. A., & Lambright, K. T. (2019). Are you out there? Internet presence of nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(6), 1296–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. A., & Lambright, K. T. (2020). Terms of engagement: Facebook and twitter use among nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(4), 545–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coover, R. (2004). Using digital media tools in cross-cultural research, analysis and representation. Visual Studies, 19(1), 6–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crichton, S., & Kinash, S. (2003). Virtual ethnography: Interactive interviewing online as method. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 29(2).

  • Denzin, N. K. (1999). Cybertalk and the method of instances. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Doing internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net (pp. 107–26). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, A. C., Standlee, A. I., Bechkoff, J., & Cui, Y. (2009). Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(1), 52–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Golan, O., & Babis, D. (2019a). Towards professionalism through social networks: Constructing an occupational community via Facebook usage by temporary migrant workers from the Philippines. Information, Communication & Society, 22(9), 1230–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golan, O., & Babis, D. (2019b). Digital host national identification among Filipino temporary migrant workers. Asian Journal of Communication, 29(2), 164–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Ritzer, G. (2007). Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Routledge: Abingdon, 10, 9781405165518.

  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hine, C. (2007). Connective ethnography for the exploration of e-science. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 618–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C. H., Chiu, K. H., Chen, H., & Papazafeiropoulou, A. (2015). Can internet blogs be used as an effective advertising tool? The role of product blog type and brand awareness. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 346–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P. N. (2002). Network ethnography and the hypermedia organization: New media, new organizations, new methods. New Media and Society, 4(4), 550–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihm, J. (2017). Classifying and relating different types of online and offline volunteering. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(1), 400–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jong, S. T. (2017). Netnography:Researching online populations. Handbook of research methods in health social sciences.

  • Kaur‐Gill, S., & Dutta, M. J. (2017). Digital ethnography. The international encyclopedia of communication research methods, pp. 1–10.

  • Keeley-Browne, E. (2011). Cyber-Ethnography: The emerging research approach for 21st century research investigation. In Handbook of Research on Transformative Online Education and Liberation: Models for Social Equality (pp. 330–238). IGI Global.

  • Keim-Malpass, J., Steeves, R. H., & Kennedy, C. (2014). Internet ethnography: A review of methodological considerations for studying online illness blogs. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(12), 1686–1692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubitschko, S., & Kaun, A. (Eds.). (2016). Innovative methods in media and communication research. Springer International Publishing. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine Daniel, J., & Eckerd, A. (2019). Organizational sensegiving: Indicators and nonprofit signaling. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(2), 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markham, A. N. (2005). The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). Internet. Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, D. (2008). Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, 42(5), 837–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreg, A. (2019). Milk donation after losing one's baby: Adopting a donor identity as a means of coping with loss. Social Science & Medicine, 238, 112519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreg, A. (2020) The grief ritual of extracting and donating human milk after perinatal loss. Social Science & Medicine, 113312.

  • Oreg, A., & Appe, S. (2020). “Ain’t no hood like motherhood”: The complexity of human milk donor identity. Social Science Quarterly, 101(2), 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallas, C. L., Gethings, D., & Harris, M. (2015). Do the right thing: The impact of INGO legitimacy standards on stakeholder input. VOLUNTA: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(4), 1261–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S., Ardèvol, E., & Lanzeni, D. (2016). Digital materiality. Digital materialities: Design and anthropology, 1.

  • Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, 145(1), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L., Smith, L., & Pollock, C. (2004). Conducting ethical research online: Respect for individuals, identities and the ownership of words. In Readings in virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies (pp. 156–173). IGI Global.

  • Robinson, L., & Schulz, J. (2009). New avenues for sociological inquiry: Evolving forms of ethnographic practice. Sociology, 43(4), 685–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabar, G., Babis, D., & Sabar Ben-Yehoshua, N. (2021). From fragility to empowerment through philanthropy: The Filipino labor migrant community in Israel during COVID-19. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2021.1898074.

  • Scurlock, R., Dolsak, N., & Prakash, A. (2020). Recovering from Scandals: Twitter coverage of oxfam and save the children Scandals. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(1), 94–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varis, P. (2016). Digital ethnography. The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication, pp. 55–68.

  • Waskul, D., & Douglas, M. (1996). Considering the electronic participant: Some polemical observations on the ethics of on-line research. Information Society, 12, 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. D. (2007). Nonprofit organizations’ use of the internet: A content analysis of communication trends on the internet sites of the philanthropy. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(1), 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. D., & Lo, K. D. (2012). Exploring the impact of culture in the social media sphere: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ use of facebook. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 41(3), 297–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorn, T. E., Grant, S., & Henderson, A. (2013). Strengthening resource mobilization chains: Developing the social media competencies of community and voluntary organizations in New Zealand. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(3), 666–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, H., & Ye, S. (2019). Legitimacy, worthiness, and social network: An empirical study of the key factors influencing crowdfunding outcomes for nonprofit projects. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(4), 849–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayelet Oreg.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oreg, A., Babis, D. Digital Ethnography in Third Sector Research. Voluntas 34, 12–19 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00397-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00397-9

Keywords

Navigation