Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Ethnography is a rich research tradition originating from sociocultural anthropology that aims to vividly represent cultural meaning through fieldwork and thick description. Ethnographic fieldwork is known for unearthing surprises, and ethnographers are often convinced that, had they used another approach, they would have been unable to explain fully what was going on in the research setting. Ethnography in nonprofit studies is increasing, but sparse. This article argues that introducing more tales of the nonprofit field could deepen the analysis of how nonprofit organizing works, bridge the nonprofit research–practice divide, challenge the Western ethnocentricity of nonprofit studies, bring the sector’s periphery to the forefront and enhance nonprofit management education. However, to benefit from ethnographic work, the nonprofit field must embrace alternative norms of composition and rigor. The starting point is conversation and community among nonprofit ethnographers to foster such work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Multiple searches were conducted in Web of Science for English articles focused on the topics of ethnog* or autoethnog*. A search combining these topics with nonprofit topics (e.g., “nonprofit,” “nongovernmental,” “voluntary,” see Maier et al., 2016 for the full list) revealed 1,264 articles, which amounts to 1.0% of all articles written on nonprofit topics and 2.2% of all articles focusing on (auto)ethnography. For comparison, 2.8% of sociology articles, 6.6% of anthropology and 0.4% of management articles draw on ethnography. Similar calls have been made to increase the use of ethnography in management (Watson, 2011).

  2. Because the objective of this article is to establish a conversation among (potential) ethnographers that identify as nonprofit scholars, not to offer a systematic literature review, this article focuses on research published in the top three nonprofit studies journals – VOLUNTAS, Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly and Nonprofit Management and Leadership – instead of focusing on nonprofit ethnographies published in other disciplines or in books.

References

  • Baines, D. (2010). Neoliberal Restructuring, Activism/Participation and Social Unionism in the Nonprofit Social Services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(1), 10–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bate, S. P. (1997). Whatever Happened to Organizational Anthropology? A Review of the Field of Organizational Ethnography and Anthropological Studies. Human Relations, 50(9), 1147–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton, E. E. (2021). No Margin, No Mission: How Practitioners Justify Nonprofit Managerialization. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32, 695–708.

  • Boas, F., & Stocking, G. W. (1989). A Franz Boas reader: The shaping of American anthropology, 1883–1911. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushouse, B. K., & Sowa, J. E. (2012). Producing Knowledge For Practice: Assessing NVSQ 2000–2010. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(3), 497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography: A School of American Research advanced seminar. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasoph, N. (2009). Top-Down Civic Projects Are Not Grassroots Associations: How The Differences Matter in Everyday Life. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 20(3), 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Field Notes (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.

  • Eriksson, E. (2018). Incorporation and Individualization of Collective Voices: Public Service User Involvement and the User Movement’s Mobilization for Change. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(4), 832–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinn, J. (2011). Ethnographic Methods in Nonprofit Management. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(3), 420–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1989). On fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18(2), 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grazioli, M., & Caciagli, C. (2018). Resisting to the Neoliberal Urban Fabric: Housing Rights Movements and the Re-appropriation of the “Right to the City” in Rome. Italy. Voluntas, 29(4), 697–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, A., & Henriksen, L. S. (2019). On the Changing Civic Landscape in Denmark and its Consequences for Civic Action. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(1), 62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. D. (1999). The Work of Many Hands: A Response to Stanley N. Katz on the Origins of the “Serious Study” of Philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(4), 522–534.

  • Hammersley, M. (1990). What’s Wrong with Ethnography? The Myth of Theoretical Description. Sociology, 24(4), 597–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (2006). Ethnography: Problems and prospects. Ethnography and Education, 1(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in Practice. Tavistock Publications.

  • Jacobs, A. M., Büthe, T., Arjona, A., Arriola, L. R., Bellin, E., Bennett, A., Björkman, L., Bleich, E., Elkins, Z., Fairfield, T., Gaikwad, N., Greitens, S. C., Hawkesworth, M., Herrera, V., Herrera, Y. M., Johnson, K. S., Karakoç, E., Koivu, K., Kreuzer, M., … Yashar, D. J. (2021). The Qualitative Transparency Deliberations: Insights and Implications. Perspectives on Politics, 19(1), 171–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. S. (2017). Why Can’t You Just Follow the Rules? Volunteer Rule Breaking and Disruptive Behavior. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(1), 26–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. (2017). Becoming Business-Like: Governing the Nonprofit Professional. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(2), 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1999). Revealing, widening, deepening? A review of the existing and potential contribution of anthropological approaches to" third-sector" research. Human Organization, 58(1), 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (2002). Organization and Management in the Third Sector: Toward a Cross-Cultural Research Agenda. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 13(1), 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichterman, P. (2016). Interpretive reflexivity in ethnography. Ethnography, 18(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J., & Konrath, S. (2018). A Century of Nonprofit Studies: Scaling the Knowledge of the Field. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(6), 1139–1158.

  • Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2016). Nonprofit Organizations Becoming Business-Like A Systematic Review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 64–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCurdy, D. W., Spradley, J. P., & Shandy, D. J. (2005). The cultural experience: Ethnography in complex society (2nd ed.). Waveland Press.

  • Milofsky, C. (2000). Transparent research. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirabella, R. M., Gemelli, G., Malcolm, M.-J., & Berger, G. (2007). Nonprofit and Philanthropic Studies: International Overview of the Field in Africa, Canada, Latin America, Asia, the Pacific and Europe. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4_suppl), 110S-135S.

  • Mitchell, S.-L., & Clark, M. (2021). Telling a different story: How nonprofit organizations reveal strategic purpose through storytelling. Psychology & Marketing, 38(1), 142–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A. K., Jerolmack, C., & Smith, D. (2021). Ethnography, Data Transparency and the Information Age. Annual Review of Sociology, 47(1).

  • Nelson, K., & Child, C. (2016). Adding the Organizational Perspective: How Organizations Shape Service Work Abroad. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(2), 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, P. (2003). The Return of the Native: Organizational Discourses and the Legacy of the Ethnographic Imagination. In A. Prasad (Ed.), Postcolonial Theory and Organizational Analysis: A Critical Engagement (pp. 149–170). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, P. (2005). Crafting qualitative research: Working in the postpositivist traditions. Routledge.

  • Reed-Danahay, D. (1997). Auto/ethnography. Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rios, V. M. (2015). On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City by Alice Goffman. American Journal of Sociology, 121(1), 306–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the Field: An introduction to qualitative research. Sage.

  • Safouane, H. (2017). Manufacturing Striated Space for Migrants: An Ethnography of Initial Reception Centers for Asylum Seekers in Germany. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(5), 1922–1939.

  • Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1992). In search of the non-profit sector II: The problem of classification. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 3(3), 267–309.

  • Sanders, M. L. (2015). Being Nonprofit-Like in a Market Economy: Understanding the Mission-Market Tension in Nonprofit Organizing. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(2), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. A. (2006). An interdisciplinary conversation on research method best practices for nonprofit studies. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 16(4), 387–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shachar, I. Y. (2014). The White Management of “Volunteering”: Ethnographic Evidence from an Israeli NGO. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(6), 1417–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, C. H., & Adhikari, R. (2010). Antipolitics and Counterpolitics in Nepal’s Civil Society: The Case of Nepal’s Citizens’ Movement. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(3), 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. L. (2015). De-Exoticizing Ghetto Poverty: On the Ethics of Representation in Urban Ethnography. City & Community, 14(4), 352–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. H. (1997). The Rest of the Nonprofit Sector: Grassroots Associations as the Dark Matter Ignored in Prevailing “Flat Earth” Maps of the Sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(2), 114–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S. B. (2011). Culture as Structure in Emerging Civic Organizations in Russia. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(6), 1073–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toraldo, M. L., Contu, A., & Mangia, G. (2016). The Hybrid Nature of Volunteering: Exploring Its Voluntary Exchange Nature at Music Festivals. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(6), 1130–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1979). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 539–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1994). An end of innocence: The ethnography of ethnography. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Representation in Ethnography (pp. 1–35). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (2011a). Ethnography as Work: Some Rules of Engagement. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 218–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (2011b). Tales of the Field: On writing ethnography. University of Chicago Press.

  • Van Maanen, J., & de Rond, M. (2017). The Making of a Classic Ethnography: Notes on Alice Goffman’s On the Run. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 396–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, M., Sr. (2015). Cognition, Culture and Charity: Sociolinguistics and “Donor Dissonance” in a Baptist Denomination. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(2), 574–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. J. (2011). Ethnography, Reality and Truth: The Vital Need for Studies of ‘How Things Work’ in Organizations and Management. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 202–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (1999). Ethnography: A way of seeing. Rowman Altamira.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erynn E. Beaton.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to report and no human participants were involved in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

E. Beaton, E. Ethnography: Tales of the Nonprofit Field. Voluntas 33, 1196–1203 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00394-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00394-y

Keywords

Navigation