Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling Methods for Nanoscale Semiconductor Devices

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Silicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growing demand for miniaturized transistors with increased performance and low power consumption has scaled down the device to the nanoscale regime. The design and modeling of such small devices need a reliable computing technique for simulation. Since the flow of electrons in such short channels is due to differences in electrochemical potential between source and drain which of ballistic transport. The study of novel micro and nano-scaled electronic device using the classical approach is inaccurate whose results are not reliable. The complexity of the current formulation increase as the size of the device is reduced. The general concept for the current in the FET device is considered due to the drift and diffusion of carriers in the device. But in modern concepts, the flow of electrons is explained as a combination of two different processes which are termed elastic transfer and heat generation. The elastic transfer is force driven and the heat generation is entropy-driven. Considering the above-mentioned process the transport of electron is studied by two theories, Semi-classical transport theory, and quantum transport theory. The semi-classical transport theory explains the flow of electrons by a combination of Newtonian mechanics for force-driven and thermodynamics for entropy-driven, called Boltzmann transport equation (BTE). In mesoscopic physics, the quantum transport theory approach is used in which the force-driven transport of electrons is well explained by quantum mechanics. The quantum transport theory is the advanced one that properly describes the current flow in the electronic device and is reliable. In the quantum transport theory, force-driven flow is expressed using the Schrödinger wave equation and thermodynamics for entropy-driven, and the formal integration of these two processes is obtained by the Non-Equilibrium Green’s Function (NEGF) method. The NEGF utilized the process of many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) to explain the dispersed entropy-generating practices, which are dependent upon the second quantization language. In both the equilibrium and non-equilibrium conditions, NEGF has been evolved to examine the many-particle quantization systems. The application of NEGF formalism in the field of quantum optics, quantum correction of BTE, transport in bulk systems corresponding to the high field, quantum electron and holes transport in different materials and devices, resonant tunnel diodes of III-V groups, electron waveguides, quantum cascade lasers, Si nano-pillars, carbon nanotubes, graphene nanoribbons, metal wires, organic molecules, spintronic devices, thermal and thermoelectric devices. A meticulous framework is provided by the NEGF method to deal with whole interaction either elastic (non-dissipative) or inelastic (dissipative) with the help of MBPT which occurs in the channel. This paper will provide a comprehensive understanding of the accurate carrier transport model which can be employed with advanced nanoscale devices where the classical theory fails is. And it is capable to set a strong background for the readers and researchers groups who are actively working in the quantum and ballistic transport regime. It would also be beneficial to graduate/undergraduate students, and industry people who are pursuing the same domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Current submission does not contain the pool data of the manuscript but the data used in the manuscript will be provided on request.

References

  1. Kadanoff LP, Martin PC (1961) Theory of many-particle systems. II. Superconductivity. Phys Rev 124(3):670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martinez A, Bescond M, Barker JR, Svizhenko A, Anantram MP, Millar C, Asenov A (2007) A self-consistent full 3-D real-space NEGF simulator for studying nonperturbative effects in nano-MOSFETs. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 54(9):2213–2222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Datta S Lessons from nanoelectronics : a new perspective on transport, ISSN: 2301–3354, Purdue University, USA

  4. Vaníček J, Heller EJ (2003) Uniform semiclassical wave function for coherent two-dimensional electron flow. Phys Rev E 67(1):016211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dirac PAM (1930) A theory of electrons and protons. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing papers of a mathematical and physical character, 126(801):360–365

  6. Peng LM (1999) Electron atomic scattering factors and scattering potentials of crystals. Micron 30(6):625–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Levi AC, Suhl H (1979) Quantum theory of atom-surface scattering: Debye-Waller factor. Surf Sci 88(1):221–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Datta S (1997) Electronic transport in mesoscopic systems. Cambridge university press

    Google Scholar 

  9. Papior N, Lorente N, Frederiksen T, García A, Brandbyge M (2017) Improvements on non-equilibrium and transport green function techniques: the next-generation transiesta. Comput Phys Commun 212:8–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. van Leeuwen R, Dahlen NE (2005) An introduction to nonequilibrium green functions, Theoretical Chemistry Materials Science Centre Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

  11. Perfetto, E., Uimonen, A.M., van Leeuwen, R. and Stefanucci, G., 2016. Time-resolved photoabsorption in finite systems: a first-principles negf approach. J Phys Conf Ser ( 696, 012004)

  12. Zeng L, He Y, Povolotskyi M, Liu X, Klimeck G, Kubis T (2013) Low rank approximation method for efficient Green's function calculation of dissipative quantum transport. J Appl Phys 113(21):213707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Datta S (2000) Nanoscale device modeling: the Green’s function method. Superlattice Microst 28(4):253–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Anantram MP, Lundstrom MS, Nikonov DE (2008) Modeling of nanoscale devices. Proc IEEE 96(9):1511–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gee B (1969) Georg Simon Ohm 1789–1854. Phys Educ 4(2):106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta MS (1980) Georg Simon ohm and Ohm's law. IEEE Trans Educ 23(3):156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Datta S (2005) Quantum transport: atom to transistor. Cambridge university press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Areshkin D, Gunlycke D, White C (2007) Ballistic transport in graphene nanostrips in the presence of disorder: importance of edge effects. Nano Lett 7(1):204–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Joshi AA, Majumdar A (1993) Transient ballistic and diffusive phonon heat transport in thin films. J Appl Phys 74(1):31–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chklovskii DB, Matveev KA, Shklovskii BI (1993) Ballistic conductance of interacting electrons in the quantum hall regime. Phys Rev B 47(19):12605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Haug H, Jauho AP (2008) Quantum kinetics in transport and optics of semiconductors, vol 2. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  22. Santos E (1969) A Lagrangian formulation of the theory of random motion. Il Nuovo Cimento B (1965–1970) 59(1):65–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hänsch W (2012) The drift diffusion equation and its applications in MOSFET modeling. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar R, Bala S, Kumar A (2021) Study and analysis of advanced 3D multi-gate junctionless transistors. Silicon:1–15

  25. Singh J (2021) Wadhawa, G. novel linear graded binary metal alloy PαQ1-α gate electrode and middle N+ pocket Si0.5Ge0.5 vertical TFET for high performance. Silicon, Springer 13:2137–2144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh J, Raj B (2019) Tunnel current model of asymmetric MIM structure levying various image forces to analyze the characteristics of filamentary Memristor. Appl Phys A, Springer 125(3):203–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bonitz M (2016) Quantum kinetic theory, vol 412. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Rammer J, Smith H (1986) Quantum field-theoretical methods in transport theory of metals. Rev Modern Phys 58(2):323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Goldsman N, Henrickson L, Frey J (1991) A physics-based analytical/numerical solution to the Boltzmann transport equation for use in device simulation. Solid State Electron 34(4):389–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jacoboni C (2010) Theory of electron transport in semiconductors: a pathway from elementary physics to nonequilibrium green functions (Vol. 165). Springer Science & Business Media

  31. Camsari KY, Chowdhury S, Datta S (2020) The non-equilibrium green function (NEGF) method. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.01275

  32. Pourfath M (2014) The non-equilibrium Green's function method for nanoscale device simulation. Springer, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dong SH, Garcia-Ravelo J (2007) Exact solutions of the s-wave Schrödinger equation with manning–Rosen potential. Phys Script 75(3):307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dick R (2012) Advanced quantum mechanics. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Fetter AL, Walecka JD (2012) Quantum theory of many-particle systems. Courier Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mahan GD (2013) Many-particle physics. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mattuck RD (1992) A guide to Feynman diagrams in the many-body problem. Courier Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chandler C, Gibson AG (1977) N-body quantum scattering theory in two Hilbert spaces. I The basic equations. J Math Phys 18(12):2336–2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kadanoff LP (2018) Quantum statistical mechanics. CRC Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Orenstein M, Fan S (2020) Two-level quantum system as a macroscopic scatterer for ultraconfined two-dimensional photonic modes. Phys Rev A 102(1):013717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Meng Q, Schröder M, Meyer HD (2021) High-dimensional quantum dynamics study on excitation-specific surface scattering including lattice effects of a five-atom surface cell. J Chem Theory Comput 17(5):2702–2713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have equally participated in the preparing of the manuscript during implementation of ideas, findings results, and writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeetendra Singh.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Standard

The Authors accepted principles of ethical standard and they have no conflict of interest.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent.

Consent for Publication

Consent is granted.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, J., Verma, C. Modeling Methods for Nanoscale Semiconductor Devices. Silicon 14, 5125–5132 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01323-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01323-w

Keywords

Navigation