Original research articleDo renewable energy communities deliver energy justice? Exploring insights from 71 European cases
Introduction
Over the last two decades, renewable energy communities (RECs) have become critical players driving a citizen-led European energy transition [1], [2], [3]. Organised collectively, RECs engage with local households, enable local citizen participation [4] and raise social acceptance for energy transition [5], [6], [7], [8]. Pooling their members’ resources, they develop local renewable energy projects [4], [9], [10], [11]. In doing so, energy communities contribute to energy decentralisation [11], and by enabling citizen participation, they contribute to energy democratisation [12], [13]. Furthermore, by investing in renewable energy projects locally, they increase awareness of energy transition and create value locally by improving income streams, developing skills, building capacity and reducing CO2 emissions [9], [14], [15], [16], [17]. RECs may also facilitate community regeneration and autonomy [18].
Concerning equity and justice, RECs are increasingly discussed as taking a central role in overcoming energy-related injustices with a democratic, equity enhancing approach [19], [20], [21]. In Europe, up to 82 million households struggle to pay their energy bills [22]. Threatened by energy poverty, energy vulnerable groups [23] are often excluded from shaping energy transition [22]. In theory, RECs can engage with vulnerable groups and address energy poverty, e.g. by providing lower tariffs and increased energy efficiency [24]. The European legislator takes up these elements, highlights RECs’ social role in energy transition and stipulates “opportunities for renewable energy communities to advance energy efficiency at household level and (…) fight energy poverty” in the recast of the renewable energy directive (RED II) [25]. RED II further links an enabling framework “to promote and facilitate the development of renewable energy communities” [25] with the obligation to ensure the participation of all “consumers, including those in low-income or vulnerable households” [25].
However, RED II refrains from providing details on how to achieve RECs’ social role in practice. The national energy and climate plans (NECPs) should entail each member-state’s approach to transposing RED II. Until now, only the NECPs of Portugal, Spain, Italy and Greece link RECs with energy poverty alleviation1. Further, the extent to which above raised beneficial outcomes and RECs’ social role materialise beyond good practice examples is debatable [19], [26], [27]. Some scholars criticise a ‘romanticised’ narrative of energy communities [28], [29] which may be hiding shortcomings, e.g. how local communities benefit [30], [31]. Especially vulnerable communities face challenges to engage in, benefit from and develop their own local renewable energy production [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]. Currently, only some social groups have the means (e.g. economic capital, time and know-how) to participate in RECs and benefit (e.g. through enabling frameworks) from the transition to clean energy [37]. In Germany, for instance, REC members are typically middle-aged men with high income and a technical, higher education background [38]. Other groups, predominantly low-income and (energy) vulnerable groups [23], remain underrepresented [39].
In this light, the energy justice framework [40], [41] is increasingly applied to analyse RECs social contributions in different countries [42], [43], [44], [45]. Still, empirical evidence of RECs capacity to include underrepresented and vulnerable groups and mitigate energy poverty as a particular form of energy justice [46], [47], [48] remains scarce. Drawing on data collected among 71 European RECs, our exploratory research investigates how RECs engage in this social role.
We apply the energy justice framework [40] as our conceptual and analytical framework [41] to study our main research questions: Do RECs in our sample aim to facilitate vulnerable groups’ participation and energy poverty alleviation? If yes, how do they achieve their aim? If no, what challenges do RECs face? To answer our research questions, we apply a mixed-method approach. First, we conducted nine exploratory interviews with executive members of RECs to understand their perspectives on our research questions. Through the interviews, we got a feeling for the language and terminology used by RECs, especially for their understanding of ‘underrepresented groups’ and ‘energy poverty’. Second, we applied the terminology used by RECs to design an online survey. Finally, in an explorative approach, we distributed the survey mainly in Germany, France, and the Netherlands and beyond using the authors’ professional networks and the Engager2 network to share the survey. Given the plurality of REC schemes [4], [19], [26] and to avoid a definition debate, we define ‘REC’ according to RED II. As a result, RECs in this paper are defined as legal entities, “(a) which, in accordance with the applicable national law, is based on open and voluntary participation, is autonomous, and is effectively controlled by shareholders or members that are located in the proximity of the renewable energy projects that are owned and developed by that legal entity3; (b) the shareholders or members of which are natural persons, SMEs or local authorities, including municipalities; (c) the primary purpose of which is to provide environmental, economic or social community benefits for its shareholders or members or for the local areas where it operates, rather than financial profits” [25]. For example, reducing CO2 emissions with increased energy efficiency is an environmental benefit; generating dividends for members an economic benefit and promoting energy democracy and investing in energy poverty mitigation a social benefit [50]. In the following, we mainly explore RECs’ social role and thus how RECs in our sample provide social benefits to different social groups.
Following this introduction, the next section introduces our conceptual approach. The methodological section 3 describes our research approach and data collection. Section 4 summarises the survey’s results. In section 5, we apply the results to the energy justice framework and our research questions. Finally, section 6 concludes and points out a need for further research.
Section snippets
Conceptual approach
This section introduces the conceptual framework of this paper, linking the energy poverty debate with the energy justice theoretical framework. It describes our approach to operationalise the energy justice framework to explore how RECs fulfil the above outlined social role. Based on our research questions, we review current literature to (i) identify different elements of the three energy justice tenets (distributive, recognitional and procedural justice) and (ii) describe indicators used to
Methodology
While this paper draws upon the energy justice framework to shed light on the extent to which RECs fulfil a social role and mitigate energy poverty, the empirical data used to support this insight is derived from two approaches, semi-structured expert interviews (n = 9) [91] and an online survey (n = 71). This data was collected over six months, from mid-2020 to the end of 2020. Expert interviews were used to gain familiarity with RECs’ perspective and challenges to include underrepresented
Empirical results
The following section presents the results of the online survey. We structure the results according to the surveys’ initial design.
Implications for energy justice
We apply the survey’s results to assess the extent to which RECs in our sample contribute to prior-specified elements of procedural, distributional and recognitional energy justice. We assess the extent to which RECs in our sample engage in a social role by addressing underrepresented and vulnerable groups and energy poverty. Further, we discuss opportunities for RECs to increase their capacity to contribute to energy justice. In doing so, we acknowledge that our sample does not fully reflect
Conclusion
The liberalisation of the energy market, although very competitive, has enabled entrants such as RECs to become new energy actors. To differentiate their role from other incumbents, they are expected to combine cost-effective and cost-competitive clean energy with greater equity and a social role. Our research engages with the high expectations set on RECs to become democratic, transformative and equity-enhancing actors for a just transition.
RECs actively contributing to energy justice by
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
The authors like to express their acknowledgements to the respondents of the survey and the key experts they interviewed. This article is based upon work from COST Action European Energy Poverty: Agenda Co-Creation and Knowledge Innovation (ENGAGER 2017-2021, CA16232) supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology – www.cost.eu).
References (99)
- et al.
Exploring the transition potential of renewable energy communities
Futures.
(2015) - et al.
Community renewable energy: What should it mean?
Energy Policy.
(2008) - et al.
A case-control study of support/opposition to wind turbines: Perceptions of health risk, economic benefits, and community conflict
Energy Policy.
(2013) - et al.
Does change in ownership affect community attitudes toward renewable energy projects?
Evidence of a status quo bias, Energy Policy.
(2019) - et al.
“His main platform is ‘stop the turbines’ ”: Political discourse, partisanship and local responses to wind energy in Canada
Energy Policy.
(2018) - et al.
Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept
Energy Policy.
(2007) - et al.
Séverine Saintier, Renewable energy communities as ‘socio-legal institutions’: A normative frame for energy decentralization?
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
(2020) - et al.
Energy democracy as a process, an outcome and a goal: A conceptual review
Energy Research & Social Science.
(2020) - et al.
From private lives to collective action: Recruitment and participation incentives for a community energy program
Energy Policy.
(2010) - et al.
Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development
Global Environmental Change.
(2013)
Communities matter: Institutional preconditions for community renewable energy
Energy Policy.
Scale, history and justice in community wind energy: An empirical review
Energy Research & Social Science.
Taking stock of the local impacts of community owned renewable energy: A review and research agenda
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
Procedural justice and the implementation of community wind energy projects: A case study from South Yorkshire
UK, Land Use Policy.
Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy?
A case study from south-west Scotland, Land Use Policy.
Windfalls for whom? The evolving notion of ‘community’ in community benefit provisions from wind farms
Geoforum.
Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy
Energy Policy.
Proximities of energy justice: contesting community energy and austerity in England
Energy Research & Social Science.
Renewable energy injustice: The socio-environmental implications of renewable energy consumption
Energy Research & Social Science.
Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators?
Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda, Energy Research & Social Science.
Energy justice: A conceptual review, Energy Research & Social
Science.
Energy justice: Conceptual insights and practical applications
Applied Energy.
Energy justice at the end of the wire: Enacting community energy and equity in Wales
Energy Policy.
Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance
Energy Policy.
‘Successful’ low-carbon energy transitions at the community level?
An energy justice perspective, Applied Energy.
Fuel poverty as injustice: Integrating distribution, recognition and procedure in the struggle for affordable warmth
Energy Policy.
Are renewables affecting income distribution and increasing the risk of household poverty?
Energy.
Energy justice as a search light for gender-energy nexus: Towards a conceptual framework
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
Does (Co-)ownership in renewables matter for an electricity consumer’s demand flexibility?
Empirical evidence from Germany, Energy Research & Social Science.
New frontiers and conceptual frameworks for energy justice
Energy Policy.
Embodied energy injustices: Unveiling and politicizing the transboundary harms of fossil fuel extractivism and fossil fuel supply chains
Energy Research & Social Science.
Citizens’ willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects: The role of community and trust in Germany
Energy Research & Social Science.
Explaining the diversity of motivations behind community renewable energy
Energy Policy.
An exploration of the boundaries of ‘community’ in community renewable energy projects: Navigating between motivations and context
Energy Policy.
Engaging men and women in energy production in Norway and the United Kingdom: The significance of social practices and gender relations
Energy Research & Social Science.
Household energy literacy: A critical review and a conceptual typology
Energy Research & Social Science.
Justice in energy transitions
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.
Energy communities and their ecosystems: A comparison of France and the Netherlands
Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
Analysing the potential of citizen-financed community renewable energy to drive Europe’s low-carbon energy transition
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
Harnessing Community Energies: Explaining and Evaluating Community-Based Localism in Renewable Energy Policy in the UK
Global Environmental Politics.
Community Energy: A Social Architecture for an Alternative Energy Future
Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society.
Decentralising energy: comparing the drivers and influencers of projects led by public, private, community and third sector actors
Contemporary Social Science.
What factors enable community leadership of renewable energy projects?
Lessons from a woodfuel heating initiative, Local Economy.
Teddy bears and tigers: How renewable energy can revitalise local communities
Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit.
Energy Democracy, Springer International Publishing
Cham
Negotiating energy democracy in practice: governance processes in community energy projects
Environmental Politics.
Towards an inclusive energy transition in the European Union: confronting energy poverty amidst a global crisis
Energy Poverty and Vulnerability: A Global Perspective
Cited by (97)
Perceptions of competing agendas in carbon neutrality policies in Portugal: Adverse impacts on vulnerable population groups
2024, Energy Research and Social ScienceExploring the academic landscape of energy communities in Europe: A systematic literature review
2024, Journal of Cleaner ProductionGrowth in energy justice: Exploring impacts of Residential Solar Incentive Program on rooftop solar adoption growth rates in Connecticut
2024, Energy Research and Social Science