Thecamoeba astrologa n. sp. – A new species of the genus Thecamoeba (Amoebozoa, Discosea, Thecamoebida) with an unusually polymorphic nuclear structure
Introduction
Amoebae of the genus Thecamoeba Fromentel, 1874 are widespread in the environment and can be isolated from freshwater and marine habitats, soil, leaf litter, and plant surfaces, especially from dead grass remnants (Kudryavtsev and Hausmann, 2009, Mesentsev and Smirnov, 2019, Mesentsev et al., 2020, Page, 1977, Page, 1983, Page, 1988). Members of this amoeba genus are relatively easy to recognize because of their remarkably folded and/or wrinkled dorsal surface (Page, 1977, Page, 1988). During locomotion, amoebae of the genus Thecamoeba move as a whole and do not form discrete pseudopodia or subpseudopodia. They are flattened in locomotion; the outline of the locomotive cell varies from ovoid, elongated in the direction of movement to broad, fan-shaped. By the morphology of the locomotive form, they belong to the rugose or striate morphotype (Smirnov and Goodkov, 1999, Smirnov and Brown, 2004).
In the modern system of Amoebozoa, the genus Thecamoeba belongs to class Discosea, subclass Flabellinia, order Thecamoebida, family Thecamoebidae (Smirnov et al. 2011). The same position it occupies in the system by Adl et al. (2019), except for the absence of ranks in the latter one. At the moment, the genus includes 11 well-described species and 14 less studied species (Kudryavtsev and Hausmann, 2009, Mesentsev and Smirnov, 2019, Mesentsev et al., 2020, Page, 1971, Page, 1977, Smirnov, 1999a, Smirnov, 1999b). The morphology of the locomotive form, cell size, the size of the nucleus, and the organization of nucleolar material are the main characters used for Thecamoeba identification (Page, 1977, Page, 1983, Page, 1988, Page, 1991). Detailed data on the ultrastructure are available only for some species (Dyková et al., 2008, Dyková and Kostka, 2013, Houssay and Prenant, 1970, Kamyshatskaya et al., 2018, Kudryavtsev and Hausmann, 2009, Mesentsev et al., 2020). For other species, ultrastructural data are limited to the glycocalyx images (Page and Blakey, 1979, Smirnov, 1999a, Smirnov, 1999b, Smirnov et al., 2011). Based on these data, new genera were established in the family, but almost no new characters useful for species distinction were found (Page and Blakey 1979).
Several recent studies described sibling species of the genus Thecamoeba, which can hardly be distinguished by light-microscopic morphology. These species can be reliably identified only by molecular methods (Kudryavtsev and Hausmann, 2009, Mesentsev and Smirnov, 2019, Mesentsev et al., 2020). However, molecular data are still available for a minor part of Thecamoeba species. There are eight sequences of the 18s rRNA gene in GenBank, and they belong to five Thecamoeba species only (Dyková and Kostka, 2013, Fahrni et al., 2003, Mesentsev and Smirnov, 2019, Mesentsev et al., 2020, Michel et al., 2006, Smirnov et al., 2011). Getting more SSU sequences may become a problem; in our experiments, the DNA of some species of Thecamoeba does not reply to any of a very wide set of eukaryotic primers. Among the thecamoebids, there are species where even deep next-generation sequencing did not provide any sufficiently long sequence of the 18s rRNA gene (Melton et al. 2019).
During the study of the diversity of amoebae from terrestrial habitats, we isolated the strain marked as Ta117. Amoebae of this strain usually have peripherally located asterisks-like nucleoli of a complex organization. However, detailed studies show that the nuclear structure undergoes drastic changes depending on the age of the culture. By phylogenetic analysis, the strain Ta117 appears to be a relative of Thecamoeba species, normally demonstrating a vesicular nucleus. Here we present the morphological description of this new species and the results of the molecular phylogenetic analysis.
Section snippets
Isolation and light microscopy
Strain Ta117, which is the subject of the present paper, was isolated from the sample containing dead plant parts and leaf litter collected near Langinkoski (Kotka, Finland, 60°29′21.3″N 26°53′06.2″E). To isolate cells, tiny (2–4 mm across) pieces of collected substratum were placed in sterile 60 mm Petri dishes filled with wMY agar (Spiegel et al. 1995). Cells were cloned by cutting off tiny fragments of the agar containing the single amoeba cell, well isolated from others. These fragments
Light microscopy (Figs. 1–3, Fig. S2 and video S1)
During locomotion, amoebae of the strain Ta117 were flattened. They did not form pseudopodia or subpseudopodia, were elongated in the direction of movement, and had smooth outlines (Fig. 1A–J). The anterior end of the cell was slightly elongated (Fig. 1C), rounded (Fig. 1A, D), or widened (Fig. 1F). The frontal area of the hyaloplasm occupied up to 1/3 of the total cell length and lasted along the lateral sides, reaching the posterior end of the cell. The anterior (Fig. 1D, F) or the middle
Strain Ta117 represents a new species – Thecamoeba astrologa n. sp.
The characteristic features of the locomotive form, such as smooth outlines elongated in the direction of movement and the presence of longitudinal dorsal ridges, indicate the strain Ta117 belongs to amoebae of striate morphotype (Smirnov and Goodkov, 1999, Smirnov and Brown, 2004). Flexible but seemingly rigid cell coat, the single nucleus, and the dorsal surface with ridges and wrinkles show that this strain belongs to the genus Thecamoeba. (Page, 1988, Page, 1991, Pussard, 1973). Among
Author contributions
Both authors contributed equally to the present study and writing of the paper.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Y. Mesentsev: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing - review & editing. A. Smirnov: Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - review & editing.
Acknowledgments
Supported by RSF 20-14-00195 project (molecular studies) and RFBR 19-34-90155 project (sampling, culturing, and microscopy). The present study utilized equipment of the Core facility centres “Development of molecular and cell technologies” and “Culture collection of microorganisms” of the Research Park of Saint Petersburg State University. We are grateful to Surkova Alina for her help in making the permanent hematoxylin-stained preparation.
References (32)
- et al.
Amplification primers of SSU rDNA for soil protists
Soil Biol. Biochem.
(2014) - et al.
Living together: The marine amoeba Thecamoeba hilla Schaeffer, 1926 and its endosymbiont Labyrinthula sp.
Eur. J. Protistol.
(2008) - et al.
The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions
Gene
(1988) - et al.
Phylogenomics of Thecamoebida (Discosea, Amoebozoa) with the description of Stratorugosa tubuloviscum gen. nov. sp. nov., a freshwater amoeba with a perinuclear MTOC
Protist
(2019) - et al.
Thecamoeba cosmophorea n. sp. (Amoebozoa, Discosea, Thecamoebida) — An example of sibling species within the genus Thecamoeba
Eur. J. Protistol.
(2019) - et al.
Thecamoeba foliovenanda n. sp. (Amoebozoa, Discosea, Thecamoebida) – One more case of sibling species among amoebae of the genus Thecamoeba
Eur. J. Protistol.
(2020) - et al.
Culturing of Amoeba proteus on Tetrahymena
Exp. Cell Res.
(1955) Re-description of Thecamoeba munda Schaeffer 1926 (Gymnamoebia, Thecamoebidae), isolated from the Baltic Sea
Eur. J. Protistol.
(1999)- et al.
A revised classification of naked lobose amoebae (Amoebozoa: Lobosa)
Protist
(2011) - et al.
Revisions to the classification, nomenclature, and diversity of eukaryotes
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
(2019)