Change in ‘first-trial’ performance after protective step practice in people with multiple sclerosis
Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, debilitating, neurodegenerative disorder that affects approximately one million people in the United States and over two million people worldwide (Wallin et al., 2019). It is usually diagnosed in young adulthood and is the most common, non-traumatic cause of disability in young adults in the U.S. and Europe (Tullman, 2013). Although MS can cause manifold symptoms, chief among these are gait, balance, and mobility problems (Heesen et al., 2008; Zwibel, 2009). These concerns mean that falling, and suffering injury and even death as a result (Brønnum-Hansen et al., 2006), are problems that affects those with MS frequently—with studies showing that over 50% of those with MS are fallers (Gunn et al., 2014; Nilsagård et al., 2015) and 37% are classified as frequent fallers (Nilsagård et al., 2015). Further, 50% of those with MS have reported an injurious fall (Bazelier et al., 2012) and over half of falls are injurious (Peterson et al., 2008). These facts make gait and balance dysfunction and the risk of falling important targets for intervention in this population.
One aspect of gait and balance dysfunction that may be particularly important with respect to fall risk is impaired reactive balance (Cameron and Lord, 2010; Sturnieks et al., 2013). Reactive balance is a construct that evaluates one's ability to regain their balance following postural perturbations. Individuals with MS have been shown to have notable deficits in reactive balance (Peterson et al., 2016) and gait and balance deficits in general have been shown to manifest before clinical disability (Benedetti et al., 1999; Comber et al., 2017, Comber et al., 2018). A recent meta-analysis found that individuals with MS can experience acute improvements in reactive balance through training (Mohamed Suhaimy et al., 2020). Further, there is evidence that interventions aiming to improve reactive balance can decrease fall risk in other neurological populations—such as in individuals recovering from stroke (Mansfield et al., 2015), as well as older adults (Carty et al., 2015; Gerards et al., 2017; Lurie et al., 2020). Early evidence also exists suggesting aspects of protective steps—quick steps to regain balance after a loss of balance—can be modified through exposure in those with MS from static stance (Van Liew et al., 2019) and during gait (Yang et al., 2019).
Many of these previous studies assess reactive stepping as the average performance on several trials. However, in terms of fall risk, a patient's performance on the first exposure to a slip may be particularly meaningful (Nanhoe-Mahabier et al., 2012). Although any improvements in reactive balance performance likely bode well for decreasing fall risk, in everyday life, there is only one “trial” or slip that may result in a fall. Therefore, the ability of an individual to respond effectively the first time their balance is perturbed following exposure to reactive balance practice may suggest a smaller likelihood that an individual would fall if they experienced a loss of balance in the real world. Said differently, a single, ineffective protective step in the real world can be the difference between a non-injurious trip or slip and a potentially injurious fall. Although first-trial responses have not been evaluated in MS, previous work in people with PD suggests that such first-trial responses may be adaptable to change (Barajas and Peterson, 2018).
Among those with MS, individual responsiveness to physical activity and exercise interventions varies (Baird and Motl, 2019), but understanding which patients are more likely to receive benefit from such interventions could improve efficiency of care. It is likely that such considerations would apply in reactive balance training as well, but no studies have investigated variables related to responsiveness to reactive stepping practice. Identifying factors that predict responsiveness to training is particularly important for people with MS given the high degree of heterogeneity in this population (Baird and Motl, 2019). Thus, the aims of the present study are 1) to explore changes in first-trial performance after 1 day of repeated reactive balance challenges and 2) to evaluate the correlates of changes experienced in first-trial performance to evaluate factors that may predict who may be most likely to respond to such training.
Section snippets
Method
Data reported here are from a larger collection that has been published on previously (Van Liew et al., 2019). Although participants are the same across the previous and current study, the “first-trial” data reported here have not been reported previously.
Results
Participant characteristic data are shown in Table 1. Although data were collected on 14 participants, two individuals were excluded from analyses because they required harness support on day 1 which made obtaining reliable outcomes untenable. Therefore, all data reported below (including in Table 1) is from the 12 remaining participants. It is worth noting that no participants used harness support on the first trial on day 2.
Participants were mild to moderate in MS disease severity, but with
Discussion
In this study, we sought to determine 1) the change in first-trial stepping performance in individuals with MS and 2) whether these changes related to a variety of possible clinical correlates. Our previous analyses of this dataset (Van Liew et al., 2019) indicates that, on average, people with MS can improve average (of 5 trials) on reactive stepping performance. While identifying average or aggregate effects of training is promising, knowing whether exposures to perturbations result in
Declaration of Competing Interest
There are no conflicts of interest to support. This study was support by National Multiple Sclerosis Society Pilot Award (PP-1512-07101).
References (40)
- et al.
Gait deficits in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gait Posture
(2017) - et al.
Postural control deficits in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gait Posture
(2018) - et al.
Practice effects and outcome of cognitive training: preliminary evidence from a memory training course
Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry
(2010) - et al.
Frequency, characteristics, and consequences of falls in multiple sclerosis: findings from a cohort study
Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.
(2014) - et al.
The condition for dynamic stability
J. Biomech.
(2005) - et al.
Repeated exposure to the threat of perturbation induces emotional, cognitive, and postural adaptations in young and older adults
Exp. Gerontol.
(2019) - et al.
Retention of improvement in gait stability over 14 weeks due to trip-perturbation training is dependent on perturbation dose
J. Biomech.
(2019) - et al.
Do measures of reactive balance control predict falls in people with stroke returning to the community?
Physiotherapy
(2015) - et al.
First-trial reactions and habituation rates over successive balance perturbations in Parkinson’s disease
Neuroscience
(2012) - et al.
Injurious falls among middle aged and older adults with multiple sclerosis
Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.
(2008)
Characterization of compensatory stepping in people with multiple sclerosis
Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.
Protective stepping in multiple sclerosis: impacts of a single session of in-place perturbation practice
Multiple Scler. Relat. Disord.
Adaptation to repeated gait-slip perturbations among individuals with multiple sclerosis
Multiple Scler. Relat. Disord.
European validation of a standardized clinical description of multiple sclerosis
J. Neurol.
Response heterogeneity with exercise training and physical activity interventions among persons with multiple sclerosis
Neurorehabil. Neural Repair
First-trial protective step performance before and after short-term perturbation practice in people with Parkinson’s disease
J. Neurol.
Risk of fractures in patients with multiple sclerosis: a population-based cohort study
Neurology
Gait abnormalities in minimally impaired multiple sclerosis patients
Mult. Scler. J.
Fatal accidents among Danes with multiple sclerosis
Mult. Scler. J.
Postural control in multiple sclerosis: implications for fall prevention
Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep.
Cited by (1)
Perturbation-based Balance Training to improve postural responses and falls in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial
2023, Disability and Rehabilitation