Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Decision Strategies of Adolescents with Different Emotional Stabilities in Unfair Situations

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Neuroscience Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Eysenck HJ, Eysenck S. Manual for the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: University of London Press, 1975.

  2. Koenigs M, Tranel D. Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: Evidence from the Ultimatum Game. J Neurosci 2007, 27: 951–956.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Egidi G, Caramazza A. Mood-dependent integration in discourse comprehension: Happy and sad moods affect consistency processing via different brain networks. NeuroImage 2014, 103: 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. You X, Ju C, Wang M, Zhang B, Liu P. Age differences in the influence of induced negative emotion on decision-making: The role of emotion regulation. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2019, 74: 796–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lauriola M, Levin IP. Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: An exploratory study. Pers Individ Differ 2001, 31: 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sawyer SM, Afifi RA, Bearinger LH, Blakemore SJ, Dick B, Ezeh AC. Adolescence: a foundation for future health. Lancet 2012, 379: 1630–1640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirk U, Downar J, Montague PR. Interoception drives increased rational decision-making in meditators playing the ultimatum game. Front Neurosci 2011, 5: 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang YY, Xu L, Liang ZY, Wang K, Hou B, Zhou Y, et al. Separate neural networks for gains and losses in intertemporal choice. Neurosci Bull 2018, 34: 725–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Si YJ, Li FL, Li F, Tu JW, Yi CL, Tao Q, et al. The growing from adolescence to adulthood influences the decision strategy to unfair situations. IEEE Trans Cogn Dev Syst 1512, PP: 1.

  10. Camerer CF. Behavioural studies of strategic thinking in games. Trends Cogn Sci 2003, 7: 225–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanfey AG, Rilling JK, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science 2003, 300: 1755–1758.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peterburs J, Voegler R, Liepelt R, Schulze A, Wilhelm S, Ocklenburg S, et al. Processing of fair and unfair offers in the ultimatum game under social observation. Sci Rep 2017, 7: 44062.

  13. Wu Y, Zhou YQ, van Dijk E, Leliveld MC, Zhou XL. Social comparison affects brain responses to fairness in asset division: An ERP study with the ultimatum game. Front Hum Neurosci 2011, 5: 131.

  14. Harmon-Jones E, Gable PA, Peterson CK. The role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in emotion-related phenomena: A review and update. Biol Psychol 2010, 84: 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tian Y, Zhang H, Jiang Y, Li P, Li Y. A fusion feature for enhancing the performance of classification in working memory load with single-trial detection. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2019, 27: 1985–1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wei LQ, Duan XJ, Yang Y, Liao W, Gao Q, Ding JR, et al. The synchronization of spontaneous BOLD activity predicts extraversion and neuroticism. Brain Res 2011, 1419: 68–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sherman RA, Rauthmann JF, Brown NA, Serfass DG, Jones AB. The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol 2015, 109: 872–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Corbetta M, Patel G, Shulman GL. The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron 2008, 58: 306–324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tian Y, Ma L. Auditory attention tracking states in a cocktail party environment can be decoded by deep convolutional neural networks. J Neural Eng 2020, 17: 036013.

  20. Ghuman AS, Bar M, Dobbins IG, Schnyer DM. The effects of priming on frontal-temporal communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105: 8405–8409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Peelen MV, Kastner S. A neural basis for real-world visual search in human occipitotemporal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108: 12125–12130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61961160705, U19A2082, and 61901077), the National Key Research and Development Plan of China (2017YFB1002501), the Key Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province, China (2018B030339001), and the Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau Special Administrative Region, China (0045/2019/AFJ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, Ministry of Education Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China

    Yajing Si, Lin Jiang, Chanlin Yi, Qi Zhang, Cunbo Li, Fali Li, Dezhong Yao & Peng Xu

  2. School of Life Science and Technology, Center for Information in Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China

    Yajing Si, Lin Jiang, Chanlin Yi, Qi Zhang, Cunbo Li, Fali Li, Dezhong Yao & Peng Xu

  3. School of Psychology, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, 453003, China

    Yajing Si

  4. Chengdu Mental Health Center, The Fourth People’s Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, 610000, China

    Qi Zhang

  5. Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China

    Jing Yu

  6. School of Bioinformatics, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing, 400065, China

    Peiyang Li

  7. Institute for Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, 610101, China

    Qiang Liu

  8. Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Macau, 999078, Special Administrative Region, China

    Feng Wan

Authors
  1. Yajing Si
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lin Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chanlin Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cunbo Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jing Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Peiyang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Qiang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Feng Wan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Fali Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Dezhong Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Peng Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fali Li or Peng Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (PDF 135 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Si, Y., Jiang, L., Yi, C. et al. The Decision Strategies of Adolescents with Different Emotional Stabilities in Unfair Situations. Neurosci. Bull. 37, 1481–1486 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-021-00758-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-021-00758-w

Search

Navigation