Elsevier

Environmental Science & Policy

Volume 124, October 2021, Pages 593-603
Environmental Science & Policy

Who is attracted to purchase green products through information provision: A nationwide social experiment to promote eco-friendly coffee

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • General information provision about eco-friendly coffee stimulates purchase.

  • Its impact is diminished by controlling the association with consumer’ demographics.

  • Verbal information provision increases sales in environmentally conscious areas.

  • There was no significant association with socioeconomic status of consumers.

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of the provision of information about environmentally friendly coffee on consumers’ actual purchasing behavior, focusing on the association of information provision with consumers’ environmentally conscious and socioeconomic status (education, income, and unemployment). A unique aspect of this study is that we utilized a dataset from a nationwide social experiment in Japan involving more than 10,000 vending machines serving brewed coffee. Although we found that in general, informing consumers about the product’s eco-friendliness stimulated consumers’ purchasing behavior, its significance was diminished after controlling the association between the information provision and consumers’ characteristics. In contrast, the sales of eco-friendly coffee significantly increased only when we provided verbal information to consumers in highly environmentally conscious regions, while there was no significant association with consumers’ socioeconomic status.

Introduction

Climate change has been recognized as the foremost environmental issue and the various types of risk caused by climate change are raised in recent studies, such as threatening health and way of living, increasing extreme weather events, and damaging eco-systems (O’Neill et al., 2017; Rogelj et al., 2019; Shindell et al., 2012; Xu and Ramanathan, 2017). Because food consumption is one important cause of greenhouse gases emission (Ivanova et al., 2016), promoting food consumption leading the reduction of negative environmental impacts, also known as sustainable food consumption, is essential (Asioli et al., 2017; Azzurra et al., 2019; Feil et al., 2020; Reisch et al., 2013; Vermeir and Verbeke, 2008; Vermeir et al., 2020).

In order to stimulate sustainable food consumption, eco-label certification schemes have increasingly been adopted for various types of agricultural products (hereafter, “green products”) (Darnall et al., 2018; Nash, 2009). In these schemes, international non-governmental organizations (NGOs) typically provide certifications to producers engaged with environmentally friendly practices, allowing these producers to use eco-labels that confirm their products’ eco-friendliness. Particularly in recent years, the interaction between eco-label certification schemes and coffee production has received increased attention from conservation and development institutions (Fleischer and Varangis, 2002; Hundera et al., 2013; Perfecto et al., 2005; Philpott and Dietsch, 2003; Takahashi et al., 2018; Taylor, 2005).

The coffee industry is viewed as a pioneer in eco-label certifications and adopts mainly three types of certification programs, such as shade-grown certification, fair trade certification, and organic certification (hereafter, we define coffee receiving at least one certification as “eco-friendly coffee”) (Ponte, 2004; Reinecke et al., 2012; Stellmacher and Grote, 2011). In shade-grown certification programs, also known as forest coffee certification, coffee is produced under a canopy of trees or in forests while maintaining harmony with other species and conserving the soil and water conditions (Takahashi and Todo, 2014). In fact, recent empirical studies have found that forest coffee certification contributes to environmental conservation in producer countries, such as Ethiopia, Colombia, and Costa Rica. (Blackman and Naranjo, 2012; Ibanez and Blackman, 2016; Rueda et al., 2015; Takahashi and Todo, 2013, 2014, 2017).

In addition, the market share for eco-friendly coffee is growing substantially (Potts et al., 2014). In 2018, a global share of forest coffee production was 6 percent, while the share of fair trade and organic coffee were 7 percent and 4 percent, respectively (Meier et al., 2020). Between 2017 and 2020, the global production and sales volumes of one type of forest coffee, such as the Rainforest Alliance coffee, grew by 38 percent and 39 percent, respectively (Rainforest Alliance, 2021). Furthermore, many empirical studies have found that a majority of consumers are willing to pay extra for eco-friendly coffee (Galarraga and Markandya, 2011; Lingnau et al., 2019). For example, Loureiro and Lotade (2005) found that the WTP for forest coffee is 2.5–3.3 percent higher than that for regular coffee in the United States. Van Loo et al. (2015) confirmed that consumers in the United States are willing to pay an additional 0.84 US dollars for forest coffee. Similar findings were observed for fair trade coffee (De Pelsmacker et al., 2005; Hainmueller et al., 2015; Rotaris and Danielis, 2011; Yang et al., 2012) and organic coffee (Lee et al., 2015; Maaya et al., 2018).

To further promote sustainable food consumption, major attention is devoted to identify the determinants of consumers’ purchasing behavior for eco-friendly coffee (Andorfer and Liebe, 2015; Arnot et al., 2006; Takahashi et al., 2018). Related literature indicates that information provision about eco-friendliness of products is one important determinant factor (Bray et al., 2011; Obermiller et al., 2009; Peattie, 2010; Pickett‐Baker and Ozaki, 2008; Vermeir and Verbeke, 2008). However, its effectiveness on consumers’ purchasing behavior for eco-friendly coffee is not clear (Samoggia and Riedel, 2018). Although several empirical studies showed that consumers’ purchasing behavior was stimulated through information provision (Arnot et al., 2006; Lange et al., 2015; Loureiro and Lotade, 2005; Stratton and Werner, 2013), others indicated that the effect of information provision is limited or influenced by consumers’ demographic characteristics (Andorfer and Liebe, 2015; Lingnau et al., 2019; Takahashi et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2014). In particular, it is unclear how the effect of information provision about eco-friendliness of coffee is associated with consumers’ different demographic characteristics.

This paper provides new evidence on the impact of the provision of information about the eco-friendliness of products on the sales of one type of eco-friendly coffee, such as forest coffee. A unique aspect of this study is that we conducted a nationwide social experiment in Japan involving more than 10,000 vending machines serving brewed coffee. By integrating the vending machine-level sales data and demographic data from governmental statistics, this study particularly focuses on the association between the information provision and the demographic characteristics of consumers.

There are two advantages of this experiment. First, it allows us to determine a clear impact of the information provision. In Japan, consumers’ awareness of eco-friendly coffee is considerably low, at only 3.6 percent (Fair Trade Forum Japan, 2015). Because of consumers’ low awareness, the information provision interventions enabled the generation of an awareness gap between consumers with and without an intervention, allowing an estimation of the impact of the information provision. Second, both eco-friendly and non-certified regular coffee (hereafter, “regular coffee”) were available within the same vending machines at the same price. Therefore, consumers in both the treatment and control groups could choose their coffee based on their preference.

This study reveals that in general, the provision of information about the eco-friendliness of coffee did not stimulate purchasing behavior for forest coffee. However, when we provided information to consumers in regions with higher environmental consciousness, the sales of forest coffee were significantly increased. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to implement a nationwide social experiment to investigate the effect of the association between information provision and the demographic characteristics of consumers on the sales of forest coffee.

Section snippets

An overview of previous studies

As mentioned, eco-friendly certification programs usually include forest coffee certification, fair trade certification, and organic certification (Ponte, 2004; Reinecke et al., 2012; Stellmacher and Grote, 2011). Although each certification program consider environmental conservation of coffee production areas, the main goals are different (Giovannucci and Ponte, 2005; Jha et al., 2014; Ponte, 2004). While fair trade certification primarily aims to establish a price floor for marginal

Experimental design and data collection

To empirically test the above hypotheses, we conducted the experiment in collaboration with a company that operates paper-cup-style beverage vending machines (Fig. 1). Because the company installs its vending machines throughout Japan, except in Okinawa Prefecture, our experimental scale was nationwide.

In the experiment, two types of coffee were available within the same vending machines. The first coffee variety was called “Brazil”, a forest coffee certified by the Rainforest Alliance. The

Benchmark estimation

To understand what kind of consumers are incentivized to purchase forest coffee through environmental information provision, we estimate the panel data regressions of the impact of the association between each information provision strategy and the demographic characteristics of consumers. Following Gibson and McKenzie (2014), we begin with the following DID specification:ΔYim=α+γInfoim+δDemoi+λInfoXDemoim+φTreati+m=69τm+εimwhere ΔYim is the change in the outcome of interest (i.e., the change

Results of the association between the information provision and demographic characteristics of consumers

After estimating the propensity scores from the probit estimation, the observations with propensity scores outside the rage [0.1, 0.9] were dropped. A total of 4499 observations were eliminated from the pre-screening procedure: 234 in the treatment group and 42,654 in the control group. Therefore, we use the remaining 5976 vending machines as observations for the pre-screening regression (1218 treatment vending machines and 4758 control machines).

Table 2 shows the results of the pre-screening

Conclusion

This study investigated the association between the provision of information about one type of eco-friendly coffee (i.e., forest coffee) and the demographic characteristics of consumers. Although we found that both forest coffee sales and total vending machine sales increased by providing information about the eco-friendliness of coffee to consumers, its significance was diminished when we included the interaction terms between the information provision and demographic characteristics of

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Ryo Takahashi: Conceptualization, methodology, software, investigation, writing, visualization, and funding acquisition.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) Number 15K21001. The author would like to thank M. Mukai, F. Rin, and J. Nakane for their help with the implementation of experiment and data collection.

References (92)

  • K.G. Grunert et al.

    Sustainability labels on food products: consumer motivation, understanding and use

    Food Policy

    (2014)
  • K. Hundera et al.

    Both forest fragmentation and coffee cultivation negatively affect epiphytic orchid diversity in Ethiopian moist evergreen Afromontane forests

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2013)
  • M. Ibanez et al.

    Is eco-certification a win–Win for developing country agriculture? Organic coffee certification in Colombia

    World Dev.

    (2016)
  • C. Lange et al.

    Impact of information and in-home sensory exposure on liking and willingness to pay: the beginning of Fairtrade labeled coffee in France

    Food Res. Int.

    (2015)
  • M.L. Loureiro et al.

    Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience?

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2005)
  • M.K. Magnusson et al.

    Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour

    Appetite

    (2003)
  • H.A. Nash

    The European Commission’s sustainable consumption and production and sustainable industrial policy action plan

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2009)
  • I. Perfecto et al.

    Biodiversity, yield, and shade coffee certification

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2005)
  • P.M. Rothwell

    External validity of randomised controlled trials:“to whom do the results of this trial apply?”

    Lancet

    (2005)
  • A. Samoggia et al.

    Coffee consumption and purchasing behavior review: insights for further research

    Appetite

    (2018)
  • S.E. Sexton et al.

    Conspicuous conservation: the Prius halo and willingness to pay for environmental bona fides

    J. Environ. Econ. Manage.

    (2014)
  • B.E. Steiner et al.

    Multi-product category choices labeled for ecological footprints: exploring psychographics and evolved psychological biases for characterizing latent consumer classes

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2017)
  • R. Takahashi et al.

    The impact of a shade coffee certification program on forest conservation: a case study from a wild coffee forest in Ethiopia

    J. Environ. Manage.

    (2013)
  • R. Takahashi et al.

    The impact of a shade coffee certification program on forest conservation using remote sensing and household data

    Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.

    (2014)
  • R. Takahashi et al.

    Coffee certification and forest quality: evidence from a wild coffee forest in Ethiopia

    World Dev.

    (2017)
  • R. Takahashi et al.

    How can we motivate consumers to purchase certified forest coffee? Evidence from a laboratory randomized experiment using eye-trackers

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2018)
  • P.L. Taylor

    A fair trade approach to community forest certification? A framework for discussion

    J. Rural Stud.

    (2005)
  • E.J. Van Loo et al.

    Sustainability labels on coffee: consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2015)
  • I. Vermeir et al.

    Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2008)
  • P. Vlaeminck et al.

    Food labeling and eco-friendly consumption: experimental evidence from a Belgian supermarket

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2014)
  • G. Akehurst et al.

    Re-examining green purchase behaviour and the green consumer profile: new evidences

    Manage. Decis.

    (2012)
  • B. Allen

    Eco-labelling: Legal, decent, honest and truthful?

    Green Chem.

    (2000)
  • S. Alsmadi

    Green marketing and the concern over the environment: measuring environmental consciousness of Jordanian consumers

    J. Promot. Manag.

    (2007)
  • J.D. Angrist et al.

    Mostly Harmless Econometrics: an Empiricist’s Companion

    (2008)
  • C. Arnot et al.

    Do ethical consumers care about price? A revealed preference analysis of fair trade coffee purchases

    Can. J. Agric. Econ./Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie

    (2006)
  • A.K. Basu et al.

    Label performance and the willingness to pay for Fair Trade coffee: a cross‐national perspective

    Int. J. Consum. Stud.

    (2008)
  • A. Beldad et al.

    Determinants of fair trade product purchase intention of Dutch consumers according to the extended theory of planned behaviour

    J. Consum. Policy

    (2018)
  • J. Berenguer et al.

    Rural-urban differences in environmental concern, attitudes, and actions

    Eur. J. Psychol. Assess.

    (2005)
  • V. Bezençon et al.

    Segmenting the market through the determinants of involvement: the case of fair trade

    Psychol. Mark.

    (2011)
  • J. Bray et al.

    An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption

    J. Bus. Ethics

    (2011)
  • P. Cailleba et al.

    A quantitative study on the fair trade coffee consumer

    J. Appl. Bus. Res.

    (2009)
  • G. Cicia et al.

    Valuing consumer preferences with the CUB model: a casestudy of fair trade coffee

    Int. J. Food Syst. Dyn.

    (2010)
  • R. Cookson

    Willingness to pay methods in health care: a sceptical view

    Health Econ.

    (2003)
  • R.K. Crump et al.

    Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects

    Biometrika

    (2009)
  • N. Darnall et al.

    Third-party certification, sponsorship, and consumers’ ecolabel use

    J. Bus. Ethics

    (2018)
  • P. De Pelsmacker et al.

    Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee

    J. Consum. Aff.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Show me the impact: Communicating “behavioral impact message” to promote pro-environmental consumer behavior

      2023, Sustainable Production and Consumption
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, if information provision successfully reduces incomplete information of consumers about behavioral impacts and increases the awareness of the environmental consequences of a particular behavior, the chance of behavior change becomes greater. Several studies disclosing behavioral impact information have supported this idea (Campbell-Arvai et al., 2014; Takahashi, 2021; Morren et al., 2021). Moreover, Li et al. (2021) showed that when consumers realize what they gain from using a product or what they lose from not using it, the exact awareness of the consequences makes them feel more morally obligated to take action, which enhances green purchase behavior.

    • The Impact of Online Environmental Platform Services on Users’ Green Consumption Behaviors

      2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
    View full text