Skip to main content
Log in

Divergent responses of plant biomass and its allocation to the altered precipitation regimes among different degraded grasslands in China

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Climate models predict shifts in precipitation patterns characterized by increased precipitation amount and decreased frequency for semi-arid grasslands in northeast China. However, under these novel climatic conditions, potential differences in plant biomass and its allocation among different degraded grasslands remain unclear.

Methods

We conducted a mesocosm experiment to test the effects of higher precipitation amount (increased by 50% from the long-term mean) and lower frequency (decreased by 50%) on plant biomass and allocation in the lightly, moderately, and severely degraded grasslands.

Results

Lower precipitation frequency promoted belowground biomass but reduced aboveground biomass through enhancing soil water variability. Higher precipitation amount enhanced aboveground biomass in the lightly and moderately degraded grasslands, but not in the severely degraded grassland due to lower soil nitrogen availability. Lower precipitation frequency weakened or ended the positive effects of higher precipitation amount on aboveground and belowground biomass, and higher precipitation amount suppressed the enhancement of lower precipitation frequency on belowground biomass, which could be attributed to temporary waterlogging. Plants in the moderately degraded grassland preferred to adjust root vertical distribution, which was impacted by the changes in plant community composition. However, adjustment of aboveground biomass vs. belowground biomass was the primary biomass allocation strategy in the other two grasslands.

Conclusions

Our findings emphasized the importance of considering the degradation level of grasslands when predicting responses of ecosystem functions to the projected changes in precipitation regimes. These findings are critical for making feasible decisions for the sustainable management of degraded grasslands.

Graphical abstract

Legend: + and − indicate positive and negative relationships, respectively

LDG, MDG and SDG-lightly degraded, moderately degraded and severely degraded grasslands, respectively

DPF-decreased precipitation frequency treatment, IPA-increased precipitation amount treatment

SWC and CVSWC-mean and variation of soil water content, respectively

SINC-soil inorganic nitrogen content

AGB and BGB-aboveground and belowground biomass, respectively

fAGB-AGB / total biomass

BGB0–10 (%)-belowground biomass proportion in the 0–10 cm soil layer, \({{{\text{BGB}}_{{0 - 10}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\text{BGB}}_{{0 - 10}} } {{\text{BGB}}_{{0 - 30}} {\text{~}} \times 100}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\text{BGB}}_{{0 - 30}} \times 100}}\)

RAGB-relative aboveground biomass

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

LDG:

Lightly degraded grassland

MDG:

Moderately degraded grassland

SDG:

Severely degraded grassland

CPF:

Control precipitation frequency

CPA:

Control precipitation amount

DPF:

The decreased precipitation frequency treatment

IPA:

The increased precipitation amount treatment

AGB:

Aboveground biomass (g pot−1)

BGB0–10 :

Belowground biomass in the 0–10 cm soil layer (g pot−1)

BGB10–30 :

Belowground biomass in the 10–30 cm soil layer (g pot−1)

BGB0–30 :

Belowground biomass in the 0–30 cm soil layer (g pot−1)

TB:

Total biomass (g pot−1)

BGB0–10 (%):

BGB proportion in the 0–10 cm soil layer (%), \({{{\text{BGB}}_{{0 - 10}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\text{BGB}}_{{0 - 10}} } {{\text{BGB}}_{{0 - 30}} {\text{~}} \times 100}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\text{BGB}}_{{0 - 30}} \times 100}}\)

f AGB :

AGB / TB (%)

SWC:

Mean of soil water content (%)

CVSWC :

Variation of soil water content

SINC:

Soil inorganic content (mg kg−1)

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870456, 32001182), the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (YDZJ202101ZYTS004), the Science and Technology Project of the Jilin Provincial Education Department (JJKH20211294KJ) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2412020QD021). We thank Shicheng Jiang, Xiuquan Yue, and Yanan Li for help during laboratory analyses. We would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870456, 32001182), the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (YDZJ202101ZYTS004), the Science and Technology Project of the Jilin Provincial Education Department (JJKH20211294KJ) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2412020QD021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TY-Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing-original draft, Writing-review & editing; JC-Formal analysis, Writing-original draft, Writing-review & editing; XZ-Investigation, Writing-review & editing; XY-Investigation, Writing-review & editing; GW-Investigation, Writing-review & editing; YY-Investigation; WS-Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing-original draft, Writing-review & editing; MS-Writing-review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Sun.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Linghao Li.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 596 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, T., Chen, J., Zhong, X. et al. Divergent responses of plant biomass and its allocation to the altered precipitation regimes among different degraded grasslands in China. Plant Soil 473, 149–166 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05029-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05029-1

Keywords

Navigation