Skip to main content
Log in

Application of Semi-active TMD to Tilted High-Rise Building Structure Subjected to Seismic Loads

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landmark structures are commonly constructed as tall buildings with complex shapes, such as twisted, tilted, and tapered towers. Although the appearances of these buildings are attractive, their structural safety must be investigated more carefully in comparison with conventional high-rise buildings. Especially in the case of a tilted high-rise building, lateral displacement even occurs from its own weight. Therefore, seismic response reduction is a very important issue for a tilted-form tower to secure structural safety. In this study, a semi-active tuned mass damper (SATMD) was employed for a tilted high-rise building subjected to seismic excitations, and its dynamic-response reduction capacity was evaluated. Two 300-kN magnetorheological (MR) dampers were employed to make a SATMD, which was installed on the top of a 100-story tilted example building. A fuzzy inference system controller (FISC) was used to make appropriate command voltages to control the SATMD. The various design parameters of the FISC were optimized by an evolutionary multiobjective optimization technique. A conventional semi-active groundhook controller was also used for comparison. The control performance of the proposed SATMD was compared to that of a conventional optimal passive TMD. The numerical results show that the fuzzy-controlled SATMD provided the best control performance. The proposed SATMD provided similar control performance while using only less than 30% of the mass quantity compared to passive TMD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bathaei, A., Zahrai, S. M., & Ramezani, M. (2018). Semi-active seismic control of an 11-DOF building model with TMD+MR damper using type-1 and -2 fuzzy algorithms. Journal of Vibration and Control, 24(13), 2938–2953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bońkowski, P. A., Zembaty, Z., & Minch, M. Y. (2019). Seismic effects on leaning slender structures and tall buildings. Engineering Structures, 198, 109518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coello, C. A. C., Brambila, S. G., Gamboa, J. F., Tapia, M. G. C., & Gómez, R. J. (2020). Evolutionary multiobjective optimization: Open research areas and some challenges lying ahead. Complex and Intelligent System, 6, 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agrawal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dormand, J., & Prince, P. (1980). A family of embedded Runge-Kutta formulae. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 6(1), 19–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, D., & Matsagar, V. (2017). Research developments in vibration control of structures using passive tuned mass dampers. Annual Reviews in Control, 44, 129–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erakovic, N., Dawson, T., & Cossette, K. (2010). “The leaning towers of Vegas,” Structure, June, pp. 26–28.

  • Hrovat, D., Barak, P., & Rabins, M. (1983). Semi-active versus passive or active tuned mass damper for structural control. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 190(3), 691–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J. W., Kim, H. S., & Lee, D. G. (2011). Mitigation of wind response of a tall building using semi-active tuned mass dampers. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 20, 552–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. S., & Kang, J. W. (2012a). An efficient structural analysis of super tall mega frame buildings using a multi-level condensation method. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 11, 343–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. S., & Kang, J. W. (2012b). Semi-active fuzzy control of a wind-excited tall building using multi-objective genetic algorithm. Engineering Structures, 41, 242–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. S., & Kang, J. W. (2018). MOGA-based structural design method for Diagrid structural control system subjected to wind and earthquake loads. International Journal of Steel Structures, 18(5), 1598–1606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, J. H., Setareh, M., & Murray, T. M. (2004). In search of suitable control methods for semi-active tuned vibration absorbers. Journal of Vibration and Control, 10, 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, K. S. (2014). Comparative evaluation of structural systems for tilted tall buildings. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 3(2), 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murudi, M. M., & Mane, S. M. (2004). “Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass damper (TMD) for different ground motion parameters,” 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.

  • Nagarajaiah, S., & Narasimhan, S. (2006). Smart base-isolated benchmark building. Part II: Phase I sample controllers for linear isolation systems. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 12, 589–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakai, T., Kurino, H., Yaguchi, T., & Kano, N. (2019). Control effect of large tuned mass damper used for seismic retrofitting of existing high-rise building. Japan Architectural Review, 2(3), 269–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., Farnsworth, D., Jackson, M., & Clark, M. (2007). The effects of complex geometry on tall towers. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 16, 441–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J. (2011). “Deflection limits in tall buildings—are they useful?,” Proceedings of the 2011 Structures Congress, Las Vegas, Nevada.

  • Sues, R. H., Mau, S. T., & Wen, Y. K. (1988). System identification of degrading hysteretic restoring forces. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 114(5), 833–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton, G. B. (1982). Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 10, 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, W. Jr., & Johnston, P. R. (1987). Structural dynamics by finite elements. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

  • Yi, F., Dyke, S. J., Caicedo, J. M., & Carlson, J. D. (2001). Experimental verification of multi-input seismic control strategies for smart dampers. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 127(11), 1152–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant and funded by the Korean government (MEST) (grant number NRF-2020R1A2B5B01002117).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joo-Won Kang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, HS., Kang, JW. Application of Semi-active TMD to Tilted High-Rise Building Structure Subjected to Seismic Loads. Int J Steel Struct 21, 1671–1679 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-021-00528-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-021-00528-4

Keywords

Navigation