Abstract
Many homologous reaction series present linear correlations between the enthalpy (\(\Delta H_{{ \ne {\text{,i}}}}^{{\text{o}}}\)) and entropy (\(\Delta S_{{ \ne {\text{,i}}}}^{{{\text{ o}}}}\)) of activation (kinetic compensation effect), the slope being the isokinetic temperature of the series (Tiso), so that at T = Tiso, all the reactions of the family share the same value of the rate constant. However, the random errors committed in the laboratory in the determination of \(\Delta H_{{ \ne {\text{,i}}}}^{{\text{o}}}\) and \(\Delta S_{{ \ne {\text{,i}}}}^{{{\text{ o}}}}\) are interrelated, and so tend to produce false isokinetic relationships. As a result, the existence of physically meaningful isokinetic relationships is a topic of lasting controversy. Here, it is shown that both the LFER (linear free energy relationships)-type and isokinetic linear correlations are direct consequences of two other correlations, those of \(\Delta H_{{ \ne {\text{,i}}}}^{{\text{o}}}\) vs. \(\sigma _{{\text{i}}}\) and \(\Delta S_{{ \ne {\text{,i}}}}^{{{\text{ o}}}}\) vs. \(\sigma _{{\text{i}}}\), where the abscissa is the Hammett (or Taft) substituent parameter. A mathematical model has been developed, according to which Tiso can be interpreted as the temperature at which the reaction constant obtained as the slope of the LFER-type straight line takes a zero value (ρ = 0). Moreover, the numerical simulations performed indicated that the \(\log {\text{ }}k_{{{\text{ T}}}}\) vs. \(\sigma _{{\text{i}}}\) and \(\Delta H_{{ \ne {\text{,i}}}}^{{\text{o}}}\) vs. \(\Delta S_{{ \ne {\text{,i}}}}^{{{\text{ o}}}}\) linear plots can be visualized as two faces of the same coin, since, if the kinetic data obey the first with a correlation coefficient high enough, the probability of fulfillment of the second will be very high. Finally, it has been found that values of Tiso and Tδ (the slope of the linear correlation between the enthalpy–entropy deviations) very close to the mean working temperature, as well as correlation coefficients of the \(\Delta H_{{ \ne {\text{,i}}}}^{{\text{o}}}\) vs. \(\Delta S_{{ \ne {\text{,i}}}}^{{{\text{ o}}}}\) linear plots much higher than those corresponding to the \(\Delta H_{{ \ne {\text{,i}}}}^{{\text{o}}}\) vs. \(\sigma _{{\text{i}}}\) and \(\Delta S_{{ \ne {\text{,i}}}}^{{{\text{ o}}}}\) vs. \(\sigma _{{\text{i}}}\) plots, are all indicative of false isokinetic relationships, highly contaminated by the statistical correlation between the enthalpy and entropy experimental errors.
Graphic abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gonzalez G, Lahuerta P, Martinez M, Peris E, Sanau M (1994) J Chem Soc Dalton Trans (4):545
Perez-Benito JF, Martinez-Cereza G (2018) J Phys Chem A 122:7962
Bhooshan M, Rajanna KC, Govardhan D, Venkanna P, Kumar MS (2019) Int J Chem Kinet 51:445
Vlasov VM (2018) Monatsh Chem 149:2161
Petersen RC, Markgraf JH, Ross SD (1961) J Am Chem Soc 83:3819
Leffler JE (1955) J Org Chem 20:1202
Akhtar MA, Li CZ (2020) Fuel 263:116632
Cao HQ, Duan QL, Chai H, Li XX, Sun JH (2020) J Hazard Mater 384:121297
Linert W (1987) Chem Phys 114:457
Sugihara G, Shigematsu DS, Nagadome S (2000) Langmuir 16:1825
Davidovits P, Jayne JT, Duan SX, Wornsop DR, Zahinser MS, Kolb CE (1991) J Phys Chem 95:6337
Nathanson GM, Davidovits P, Wornsop DR, Kolb CE (1996) J Phys Chem 100:13007
Chen YF, Pu WF, Li YB, Liu XL, Jin FY, Hui J, Gong XL, Guo C (2018) Energy Fuels 32:12308
Shimakawa K, Aniya M (2013) Monatsh Chem 144:67
Sagotra AK, Chu D, Cazorla C (2019) Phys Rev Mater 3:035405
Sedivy L, Belas E, Grill R, Musiienko A, Vasylchenko I (2019) J Alloys Compd 788:897
Wang LF, Sun B, Liu HF, Lin DY, Song HF (2019) J Nucl Mater 526:151762
Crine JP (2013) Monatsh Chem 144:11
Crandall RS (1991) Phys Rev B 43:4057
Srivastava A, Sharma SD, Metha N (2018) Ceram Int 44:20827
Engstrom O (2013) Monatsh Chem 144:73
Rosenberg B, Bhowmik BB, Harder HC, Postow E (1968) J Chem Phys 49:4108
Ashraf IM, El-Zahhar AA (2018) Results Phys 11:842
He Q, Xu X, Gu Y, Cheng X, Xu J, Jiang Y (2018) ACS Appl Nano Mater 1:6959
Kumar A, Mehta N (2018) J Phys Chem Solids 121:49
Biswas D, Singh LS, Das AS, Bhattacharya S (2019) J Non-Cryst Solids 510:101
Braun A, Chen Q, Yelon A (2019) Chimia 73:936
Wojcik NA, Kupracz P, Barczynski RJ (2019) Solid State Ion 341:115055
Moyano PC, Zuñiga RN (2004) J Food Eng 63:57
McBane GC (1998) J Chem Educ 75:919
Sharp K (2001) Prot Sci 10:661
Cornish-Bowden A (2002) J Biosci 27:121
Starikov EB, Norden B (2007) J Phys Chem B 111:14431
Cornish-Bowden A (2017) J Biosci 42:665
Krug RR, Hunter WG, Grieger RA (1976) Nature 261:566
Krug RR, Hunter WG, Grieger RA (1976) J Phys Chem 80:2335
Krug RR, Hunter WG, Grieger RA (1976) J Phys Chem 80:2341
Barrie PJ (2012) Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:318
Perez-Benito JF (2013) Monatsh Chem 144:49
Barrie PJ (2012) Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:327
Koudriavtsev AB, Linert W (2013) Match-Commun Math Co 70:7
Perez-Benito JF, Mulero-Raichs M (2016) J Phys Chem A 120:7598
Liu L, Guo QX (2001) Chem Rev 101:673
Keane MA, Larsson R (2009) Catal Lett 129:93
Keane MA, Larsson R (2012) React Kinet Mech Catal 106:267
Larsson R (2013) Monatsh Chem 144:21
Larsson R (2015) Molecules 20:2529
Larsson R (2018) Catalysts 8:97
Yelon A, Movaghar B, Crandall RS (2006) Rep Prog Phys 69:1145
Yelon A, Sacher E, Linert W (2011) Catal Lett 141:954
Abdel-Wahab F, Yelon A (2013) J Appl Phys 114:023707
Yelon A (2017) MRS Adv 2:425
Linert W (1986) Aust J Chem 39:199
Linert W, Sapunov VN (1988) Chem Phys 119:265
Harifi-Mood AR, Khorshahi H (2019) Int J Chem Kinet 51:511
Meadows MK, Sun XL, Kolesnichenko IV, Hinson CM, Johnson KA, Anslyn EV (2019) Chem Sci 10:8817
Perez-Benito JF, Lee DG (1987) J Org Chem 52:3239
Oh H, Ching WM, Kim J, Lee WZ, Hong S (2019) Inorg Chem 58:12964
Perez-Benito JF (1987) Chem Scr 27:433
El Guesmi N, Boubaker T, Goumont R (2010) Int J Chem Kinet 42:203
Kumar MS, Rajanna KC, Venkateswarlu M, Rao KL (2016) Int J Chem Kinet 48:171
Srinivas P, Suresh M, Rajanna KC, Krishnaiah G (2017) Int J Chem Kinet 49:209
Manjari PS, Suresh M, Reddy CS (2011) Transition Met Chem 36:707
Manjunatha AS, Dakshayani S, Vaz N, Puttaswamy (2016) Korean J Chem Eng 33:697
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perez-Benito, J.F., Clavero-Masana, A. Interdependence of the Hammett and isokinetic relationships: a numerical simulation approach. Monatsh Chem 152, 939–949 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-021-02804-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-021-02804-9