Correction to: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
The original article contained symbol mistakes regarding formulas (10) and (11):
Where xj and δ are the average value and standard deviation of j-th variable, n and m are the numbers of samples and variables, respectively.
where N is the number of testing samples, yi is the average value of measured shifting position, \( {\hat{y}}_i \) and yi are the predicted and measured shifting positions, respectively.
The correct symbols regarding formulas (10) and (11) are shown below:
Where \( \overline {x^j} \) and δ are the average value and standard deviation of j-th variable, n and m are the numbers of samples and variables, respectively.
where N is the number of testing samples, \( \overline{y_i} \) is the average value of measured shifting position, \( {\hat{y}}_i \) and yi are the predicted and measured shifting positions, respectively.
The original article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07395-7
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, G., Gong, D., Xing, J. et al. Correction to: Optimization of CVC shifting mode for hot strip mill based on the proposed LightGBM prediction model of roll shifting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 116, 1507 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07508-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07508-2