Elsevier

Brain Stimulation

Volume 14, Issue 5, September–October 2021, Pages 1174-1183
Brain Stimulation

Analgesia induced by anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS over the motor cortex: Immediate and sustained effects on pain perception

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2021.07.011Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Effects of a-tDCS and high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset on pain were assessed.

  • A single-session a-tDCS induced immediate analgesic effects.

  • A single-session tRNS induced both immediate and sustained analgesic effects.

  • Analgesic effects of a-tDCS were greater when pain was expected with uncertainty.

  • Analgesic effects of tRNS were mediated by decreasing pain expectation.

Abstract

Background

Many studies have shown effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) and high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on elevating cortical excitability. Moreover, tRNS with a direct current (DC)-offset is more likely to lead to increases in cortical excitability than solely tRNS. While a-tDCS over primary motor cortex (M1) has been shown to attenuate pain perception, tRNS + DC-offset may prove as an effective means for pain relief.

Objective

This study aimed to examine effects of a-tDCS and high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset over M1 on pain expectation and perception, and assess whether these effects could be influenced by the certainty of pain expectation.

Methods

Using a double-blinded and sham-controlled design, 150 healthy participants were recruited to receive a single-session a-tDCS, high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset, or sham stimulation over M1. The expectation and perception of electrical stimulation in certain and uncertain contexts were assessed at baseline, immediately after, and 30 min after stimulation.

Results

Compared with sham stimulation, a-tDCS induced immediate analgesic effects that were greater when the stimulation outcome was expected with uncertainty; tRNS induced immediate and sustained analgesic effects that were mediated by decreasing pain expectation. Nevertheless, we found no strong evidence for tRNS being more effective for attenuating pain than a-tDCS.

Conclusions

The analgesic effects of a-tDCS and tRNS showed different temporal courses, which could be related to the more sustained effectiveness of high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset in elevating cortical excitability. Moreover, expectations of pain intensity should be taken into consideration to maximize the benefits of neuromodulation.

Keywords

Pain
Analgesia
Expectation
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS)
Primary motor cortex (M1)

Cited by (0)

1

These authors contributed equally.