Elsevier

European Journal of Control

Volume 63, January 2022, Pages 14-27
European Journal of Control

Robust synchronization of uncertain Markovian jumping complex interconnected neural networks via adaptive fault-tolerant control

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcon.2021.07.003Get rights and content

Abstract

This article inspects the problem of robust synchronization for uncertain Markovian jumping complex interconnected neural networks with randomly occurring uncertainties and time delays. The uncertainties considered here occur randomly and are assumed to follow certain mutually uncorrelated Bernoulli distributed white noise sequences. The presence of sensor faults may cause degradation or even instability of the entire network. Therefore, control laws are designed with sensor faults to ensure the controlled synchronization of the complex interconnected neural networks. Three types of fault-tolerant controls are designed based on the Lyapunov stability theory and adaptive schemes which include passive and adaptive fault-tolerant control laws. By constructing a new Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional (LKF) and by using Jensen’s inequality with a free-weighting matrix approach, some new delay-dependent synchronization criteria are obtained in terms of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). By using the Lyapunov stability theory, the existence condition for the adaptive controller that guarantees the robust mean-square synchronization of complex interconnected neural networks in terms of LMIs are derived. Finally, a numerical example is presented to demonstrate the performance of the developed approach.

Introduction

During the last few years, complex dynamical networks have received considerable attention from various scientific communities, due to their broad applications in many fields including secure communication, information science, sociology, biological science, etc. The set of interconnected nodes which interact in different ways form the complex dynamical networks. Complex networks aid in modeling many practical systems, such as World Wide Web (WWW), food webs, social networks, electric power grids and so on [1], [12], [45]. In particular, synchronization is the most intriguing phenomenon in complex networks. The phenomena of synchronization appear in many real systems, such as in an array composing of identical delayed neural networks, biological systems and information sciences. The synchronization problem for coupled networks has been receiving increasing research attention and the results have been proposed in the existing literature [4], [31], [32], [43], [47], [60]. In [4], global synchronization in arrays of delayed neural networks with constant and delayed coupling has been investigated. Synchronization of coupled connected neural networks with delays has been studied in [32]. In [31], authors have analyzed the self-synchronization of Hopfield neural networks with randomly switching connections. Synchronization for an array of coupled stochastic discrete-time neural networks with mixed delays has been established in [43]. The fixed-time synchronization-based secure communication issue with a two-layer hybrid coupled networks are discussed in [47], [60] which deals with both delay-free impulses and delayed impulses to the synchronization of coupled neural networks. Synchronization of complex interconnected neural networks has also been studied extensively and corresponding results have been reported in the existing literature [5], [17], [35].

At the same time, in the real-world applications of systems, there exist time delay naturally due to the finite information processing speed and the finite switching speed of amplifiers. It is well known that time delay often causes undesirable dynamic behaviors such as performance degradation and instability of the systems. Synchronization of coupled neural networks with time delay has been discussed in [2], [3], [24], [29], [41], [40]. For instance, Cao et al. [2] deals with the global synchronization in an array of delayed neural networks with hybrid coupling, Cao and Li [3] interprets the synchronization in an array of hybrid coupled neural networks with delay. Moreover, the exponential synchronization for arrays of coupled neural networks with delayed couplings has been established in [29]. The problem of synchronization of Lur’e systems for chaotic secure communication systems with interval time-varying delay feedback control has been proposed in [24] and quasi-synchronization problem for reaction-diffusion neural networks was discussed in [40] with hybrid coupling and parameter mismatches via sampled-data control technique. However, the dynamics of complex interconnected neural networks with delayed coupling have been analyzed in recent years [27], [28]. In [27], the synchronization stability result for a class of complex dynamical networks (CDNs) with coupling delays has been established. In [28], a class of dynamical networks with different coupling delays has been considered and the authors have established several theorems on the synchronization properties by using the definition of matrix measure. Furthermore, system modeling consists of two powerful complexities such as nonlinearities and uncertainties. In the real world, nonlinear disturbances and parameter uncertainties may be subject to random changes in environmental circumstances, for instance, network-induced random failures and repairs of components, sudden environmental disturbances, and so on. Therefore, both the nonlinearities and uncertainties may occur in a probabilistic way with certain types and intensity, which is especially true in a networked environment. Therefore, robust stability analysis of neural networks with randomly occurring uncertainties (ROUs) and time delays have been studied in the existing literature [18], [23], [25], [26], [33], [53]. New delay-dependent robust stability criterion for uncertain neural networks with time-varying delays has been analyzed in [23]. In [33], a robust adaptive control scheme based on neural networks has been proposed for a class of delayed uncertain nonlinear systems. In [18], robust sliding mode control problem for a class of uncertain nonlinear stochastic systems with mixed time delays has been investigated. Recently, the authors in [39], [42] interested to study the stability analysis of semi-Markov jump systems and hybrid neutral stochastic systems respectively.

Moreover, Markovian jump systems have the advantage of modeling dynamic systems due to random abrupt variation in their structures. These systems can model physical systems with abrupt structural changes accurately, such as fault-tolerant control systems, economic systems, communication systems and other practical systems. Many researchers have made a lot of progress in Markovian jump systems with time delay, see [11], [52], [55], [56], [61]. For instance, in [52] focus the event-triggered filter design problem for delayed Markovian jump systems. Robust adaptive stabilization of uncertain stochastic jumping dynamical networks with mode-dependent mixed delays has been investigated in [56]. In [11], authors have focused on the stochastic stabilization of a class of Markovian jump systems with time delay. A general model of coupled neural networks with Markovian jumping and random coupling strengths has been introduced in [55]. The authors in [48]-[46] investigated Sliding model control and fuzzy controller design for nonlinear singularly perturbed MJSs.

On the other hand, the synchronization of complex networks is generally achieved through transferring information among interconnected nodes via couplings. Moreover, the synchronization of complex networks and adaptive control methods have been described in [10], [16], [19], [20], [22], [34], [57], [58], [59]. In [20], adaptive lag synchronization for uncertain CDNs with delayed coupling has been analyzed. The adaptive synchronization of two nonlinearly coupled CDNs with delayed coupling has been investigated in [59]. Based on Lyapunov stability theory the performance of adaptive learning control scheme for complex dynamical networks was studied in [10] and adaptive event-triggered synchronization control problem for a class of complex networks is investigated [34]. In [58], authors pointed out the projective synchronization of drive-response delayed CDNs with time-varying coupling and adaptive approach. In [22], adaptive synchronization problem for a class of uncertain dynamical complex networks against network deterioration has been studied and an adaptive approach has been proposed to adjust unknown coupling factors for the deteriorated networks. In [57], authors have proposed robust adaptive synchronization of uncertain complex networks with multiple time-varying coupled delays. Adaptive synchronization of uncertain CDN using fuzzy disturbance observer has been established in [19].

In addition, faults generally occur in actuators and sensors. Actuator faults act on the system, resulting in the fluctuation of the process variables. Sensor faults act on the sensors that calculate the system variables and do not influence the process immediately. These sensor faults will affect the process if the measurement signals are used to cause the input control signal. fault-tolerant control for complex networks have received increasing research attention in recent years, for example [9], [13], [14], [21], [44], [49]. In [21], the authors studied the adaptive fault-tolerant tracking control of near-space vehicle using T-S fuzzy models. In [14], authors have considered the active fault-tolerant control design for reusable launch vehicle using adaptive sliding mode technique and in [44] studied sliding mode fault-tolerant control for networked control systems. In [49], the problem of fault-tolerant synchronization for a class of complex interconnected neural networks with constant delay has been analyzed and fault-tolerant control laws have been designed. Recently, some interesting works on stochastic systems, memristive neural networks and stochastic reaction-diffusion neural networks have been discussed in [6], [7], [8]. Very recently, the authors in [36], [37], [38] have prominently studied the coupled NNs with Markovian jumping parameters with time-varying delays via round-robin protocol and gain scheduling approach. To the best of the author’s knowledge, the adaptive fault-tolerant synchronization for complex interconnected neural networks with constant time delays under the case of sensor faults has not yet been studied in the literature.

Motivated by the above analysis, in this paper,

  • (1)

    Robust synchronization for uncertain complex interconnected neural networks with ROUs and time delay under the case of sensor faults is investigated.

  • (2)

    Also, passive fault-tolerant controller is designed to contract the network synchronization under the sensor faults and adaptive fault-tolerant control laws are designed based on Lyapunov stability theory and adaptive control theory.

  • (3)

    New LKF is proposed and some sufficient conditions for synchronization are derived in the form of LMIs by using Jensen’s inequality and free-weighting matrix approach.

  • (4)

    Finally, a numerical example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Notations: Rn denotes the n-dimensional Euclidean space and Rn×m be the set of all n×m real matrices. For real symmetric matrices X and Y, XY (respectively, X>Y) means that the matrix XY is a positive-semi definite (respectively, positive definite) matrix. Let AT stands for the transpose of matrix A. The superscript T denotes the transposition of the matrix of appropriate dimension. I is the identity matrix. diag() stands for block diagonal matrix. For an arbitrary matrix B and two symmetric matrices A and C, [AB*C] denotes a symmetric matrix, where * denotes the symmetric terms in a symmetric matrix. Let (Ω,F,P) be a complete probability space with filtration {Ft}t0 satisfying usual conditions, where Ω is a sample space, F is the σ-algebra of subset of the sample space and P is the probability measure on F. Denote by LF0P([ς,0]) the family of all F0-measurable C([ς,0];Rn)-valued random variables φ={φ(s):ςs0} such that supςs0Eφ(s)P<. E{.} stands for the mathematical expectation operator with respect to some probability measure P.

Section snippets

Problem formulation and preliminaries

Consider the following Markovian jumping uncertain complex interconnected neural networks with ROUs consisting of N identical node network with time delayz˙p(t)=(A(r(t))+γ(t)ΔA(r(t)))zp(t)+(B(r(t))+γ(t)ΔB(r(t)))g(zp(t)+q=1NcpqΥ1zq(t)+q=1NdpqΥ2zq(th),where zp(t)=(zp1(t),zp2(t),,zpn(t))T depicts the state vector of pth node. In the network, the activation function is g(zp(t)=(g1(zp1(t)),g2(zp2(t)),,gn(zpn(t)))T. Υ1=diag(χ11,χ12,,χ1n) and Υ2=diag(χ21,χ22,,χ2n) are positive diagonal

Synchronization of Markovian jumping complex interconnected neural networks with randomly occuring uncertainties and sensor faults

This section regards the controlled synchronization of the uncertain Markovian jumping complex interconnected neural networks (2) with ROUs and the external controller up(t),z˙p(t)=(Ai+γ(t)ΔAi)zp(t)+(Bi+γ(t)ΔBi)g(zp(t))+q=1NcpqΥ1zq(t)+q=1NdpqΥ2zq(th)+Epup(t),where Ep is a matrix with appropriate dimension, and the controller up(t)=Kpzp(t) indicates the control law to be designed, where Kp is a matrix with appropriate dimensions. We consider the sensor fault matrix FpΩp={fpq/Fp=diag(fp1,fp2,

Synchronization of Markovian jumping drive‐Response networks with randomly occurring uncertainties and sensor faults via adaptive fault‐tolerant control

This section establishes the synchronization of complex networks based on the drive-response concept. In general, a controller requires to be designed in the response networks to synchronize the drive networks. Designing adaptive fault-tolerant control laws in the response networks is essential to assure synchronization. Consider the complex networks (2) as the drive networks and establish the following response networksz¯˙p(t)=(Ai+γ(t)ΔAi)z¯p(t)+(Bi+γ(t)ΔBi)g(z¯p(t))+q=1Nc¯pq(t)Υ1z¯q(t)+q=1Nd

Adaptive fault‐tolerant control for synchronization of drive‐response networks with random occurring uncertainties

In this section, we consider the following drive networkss˙(t)=(Ai+γ(t)ΔAi)s(t)+(Bi+γ(t)ΔBi)g(s(t))+q=1NcpqΥ1s(t)+q=1NdpqΥ2s(th)=(Ai+γ(t)ΔAi)s(t)+(Bi+γ(t)ΔBi)g(s(t)).The response networks are defined asz˙p(t)=(Ai+γ(t)ΔAi)zp(t)+(Bi+γ(t)ΔBi)g(zp(t))+q=1NcpqΥ1zq(t)+q=1NdpqΥ2zq(th)+Epup(t),p=1,2,,N.In order to ensure the synchronization between drive networks (49) and the response networks (50), we define the following error systemz^˙p(t)=(Ai+γ(t)ΔAi)z^p(t)+(Bi+γ(t)ΔBi)g(z^p(t))+q=1NcpqΥ1z^q

Numerical example

Example 1

Consider the Markovian jumping complex interconnected neural networks (2) with ROUs and time delay with the parametersA1=A2=[1001],B1=[1.50.20.21.3],B2=[10.60.41.2],C=[211121011],D=[110121101],Υ1=[1001],Υ2=[2002],E1=E2=E3=[1001],π=[2255].The nonlinear function is taken as g(z(t))=tanh(z(t)). The time delay is chosen to be h=0.9, When there is no external controller, (i.e.) up(t)=0, the trajectories of interconnected networks (2) are described in Fig. 1.

We design the controller up(t)=Kz

Conclusion

In this paper, as robust synchronization problem for a class of uncertain Markovian jumping complex interconnected neural networks with ROUs and time delay has been studied. Presuming the systems with uncertainties is more beneficial from the application point of view. Additionally, environmental circumstances cause the system uncertainties to undergo random changes, for example, network-induced random failures and repairs of components and sudden environmental disturbances. Thus, we have

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors whose names are listed immediately below certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements). or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

References (61)

  • C.G. Li et al.

    Synchronization in general complex dynamical networks with coupling delays

    Phys. A

    (2004)
  • C.P. Li et al.

    Synchronization of complex dynamical networks with time delays

    Phys. A

    (2006)
  • B. Liu et al.

    Global almost sure self-synchronization of Hopfield neural networks with randomly switching connections

    Neural Netw.

    (2011)
  • R. Pan et al.

    Adaptive event-triggered synchronization control for complex networks with quantization and cyber-attacks

    Neurocomputing

    (2020)
  • H.-A. Tang et al.

    Impulsive control for passivity and exponential synchronization of coupled neural networks with multiple weights

    J. Frankl. Inst.

    (2019)
  • H. Wang et al.

    Synchronization for an array of coupled stochastic discrete-time neural networks with mixed delays

    Neurocomputing

    (2011)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Dynamic event-triggered fault estimation and sliding mode fault-tolerant control for networked control systems with sensor faults

    Appl. Math. Comput.

    (2021)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Synchronization of coupled neural networks under mixed impulsive effects: a novel delay inequality approach

    Neural Netw.

    (2020)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Sliding mode control for singularly perturbed Markov jump descriptor systems with nonlinear perturbation

    Automatica

    (2021)
  • W. Xia et al.

    Event-triggered filtering for discrete-time Markovian jump systems with additive time-varying delays

    Appl. Math. Comput.

    (2021)
  • S. Zheng et al.

    Adaptive synchronization of two nonlinearly coupled complex dynamical networks with delayed coupling

    Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.

    (2012)
  • L. Zhou et al.

    A fixed-time synchronization-based secure communication scheme for two-layer hybrid coupled networks

    Neurocomputing

    (2021)
  • Q. Zhu et al.

    Stability analysis for stochastic neural networks of neutral type with both Markovian jump parameters and mixed time delays

    Neurocomputing

    (2010)
  • J. Cao et al.

    Global synchronization in an array of delayed neural networks with hybrid coupling

    IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B

    (2008)
  • G. Chen et al.

    Global synchronization of coupled delayed neural networks and applications to chaos cellular neural networks models

    Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos

    (2004)
  • K. Ding et al.

    Impulsive method to reliable sampled-data control for uncertain fractional-order memristive neural networks with stochastic sensor faults and its applications

    Nonlinear Dyn.

    (2020)
  • K. Ding et al.

    A generalized system approach to intermittent nonfragile control of stochastic neutral time-varying delay systems

    IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst.

    (2020)
  • K. Ding et al.

    Extended dissipativity stabilization and synchronization of uncertain stochastic reaction-diffusion neural networks via intermittent non-fragile control

    J. Frankl. Inst.

    (2019)
  • D. Du et al.

    Sensor fault estimation and compensation for time-delay switched systems

    Int. J. Syst. Sci.

    (2012)
  • A. Fan et al.

    Adaptive learning control synchronization for unknown time-varying complex dynamical networks with prescribed performance

    Soft Comput.

    (2021)
  • Cited by (3)

    • Robust Passivity and Control for Directed and Multiweighted Coupled Dynamical Networks

      2023, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
    View full text