Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:16:26.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reassessing the CASP-19 adapted for Brazilian Portuguese: insights from a population-based study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2021

Larissa Pruner Marques*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina State, Brazil
João Luiz Bastos
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina State, Brazil
Eleonora d'Orsi
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina State, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. Email: larissapm90@gmail.com

Abstract

The study reassessed the configural and metric structures of the Brazilian version of the Control, Autonomy, Self-realization and Pleasure (CASP-19) quality-of-life scale. Data came from the EpiFloripa Ageing Study, which included 1,131 respondents from Southern Brazil. The original and two recently factorial solutions for the Brazilian CASP-19 were initially examined. Exploratory Factor Analyses and Exploratory Structural Equation Models were estimated in the first half of the sample, selected at random. In the second half, Confirmatory Factor Analyses determined the most tenable configural and metric model for the instrument. Neither the original nor the two Brazilian solutions were supported by our data. Instead, we suggest that two factors underlie CASP-19's configural structure: while the first one groups the control and autonomy dimensions, the second combines self-realization and pleasure. Except for four items, all others presented moderate to strong loadings, and only two showed a theoretically meaningful and sufficiently large residual correlation, which was worthy of inclusion in the final model. Cross-loadings were not detected. When assessed in a population-based sample of older respondents, this Brazilian version of the CASP-19 appeared to have two factors, moderate to strong loadings and a pair of redundant items. Future studies should evaluate the consistency of these findings, examine the scalar structure of the instrument, and assess configural, metric and scalar invariance across social groups.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bischoping, K and Dykema, J (1999) Toward a social psychological programme for improving focus group methods of developing questionnaires. Journal of Official Statistics 15, 495-516.Google Scholar
Bowling, A (1995) The most important things in life: comparisons between older and younger population age groups by gender. Results from a national survey of the public's judgements. International Journal of Health Sciences 6, 169-175.Google Scholar
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (2015) Population Estimation. Available at http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?novapop/cnv/popbr.def.Google Scholar
Brown, TA (2015) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Campanelli, P (1994) Training: An Exploration of the Word and Concept with an Analysis of the Implications for Survey Design. Moorfoot, England: Employment Department, https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A22329.Google Scholar
Confortin, SC, Schneider, IJC, Antes, DL, Cembranel, F, Ono, LM, Marques, LP, Borges, LJ, Krug, RdR and d'Orsi, E (2017) Life and health conditions among elderly: results of the EpiFloripa Idoso cohort study. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde 26, 305-317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyal, L and Gough, I (1991) A Theory of Human Need. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16, 3, 199-208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, FJ and Roman, AM (1992) A Study of Approaches to Survey Question Evaluation. Boston: SCPR.Google Scholar
Hair, JFJ, Black, WC, Babin, BJ and Anderson, RE (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. Harlow, UK: Pearson.Google Scholar
Hennessy, C, Moriarty, D, Zack, M, Scherr, P and Brackbill, R (1994) Measuring health-related quality of life for public health surveillance. Public Health Reports 109, 665-672.Google ScholarPubMed
Higginson, IJ and Carr, AJ (2001) Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. British Medical Journal 322, 1297-1300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgs, P, Hyde, M, Wiggins, R and Blane, D (2003) Researching quality of life in early old age: the importance of the sociological dimension. Social Policy and Administration 37, 239-252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, M, Wiggins, RD, Higgs, P and Blane, DB (2003) A measure of quality of life in early old age: the theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging & Mental Health 7, 186-194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyde, M, Higgs, P, Wiggins, RD and Blane, D (2015) A decade of research using the CASP scale: key findings and future directions. Aging & Mental Health 19, 571-575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute for Applied Economic Research (2010) United Nations Development Programme in Brazil. Atlas of Human Development. Available at http://atlasbrasil.org.br/2013/pt/consulta/.Google Scholar
Jary, D, Savage, M, Levitas, R, Lyon, D, Chaney, D, Jancovich, M, DeNora, T, Macdonald, S, Burke, P, Witz, A, Tribe, K, Shore, C, Turner, BS, McCrone, D, Allen, J, Currie, K, Prout, A, James, A, Christian, H and Bauman, Z (1991) The consequences of modernity. The Sociological Review 39, 365-412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, GR, Netuveli, G, Blane, D, Peasey, A, Malyutina, S, Simonova, G, Kubinova, R, Pajak, A, Croezen, S, Bobak, M and Pikhart, H (2015) Psychometric properties and confirmatory factor analysis of the CASP-19, a measure of quality of life in early old age: the HAPIEE study. Aging & Mental Health 19, 595-609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, RA (1994) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lima, F, Hyde, M, Chungkham, H, Correia, C, Campos, AS, Campos, M, Novaes, M, Laks, J and Petribu, K (2014) Quality of life amongst older Brazilians: a cross-cultural validation of the CASP-19 into Brazilian-Portuguese. PLOS ONE 9, e94289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maslow, AH (1968) Toward a Psychology of Being. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Minayo, MCdS and Coimbra, CE Jr (2002) Antropologia, saúde e envelhecimento. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Fiocruz.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, DL (1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neri, A, Borim, F, Batistoni, S, Cachioni, M, Rabelo, D, Fontes, A and Yassuda, M (2018) New semantic-cultural validation and psychometric study of the CASP-19 scale in adult and elderly Brazilians. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 34, e00181417.Google ScholarPubMed
Pasquali, L (1998) Principles of elaboration of psychological scales. Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica 25, 206-213.Google Scholar
Pasquali, L (2010) Instrumentação psicológica: fundamentos e práticas. São Paulo, Brazil: Artmed.Google Scholar
Patrick, BC, Skinner, EA and Connell, JP (1993) What motivates children's behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65, 781-791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez-Rojo, G, Martín, N, Noriega, C and López, J (2018) Psychometric properties of the CASP-12 in a Spanish older community dwelling sample. Aging & Mental Health 22, 700-708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pett, MA, Lackey, NR and Sullivan, JJ (2003) Making Sense of Factor Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, PM, MacKenzie, SB, Lee, J-Y and Podsakoff, NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 879-903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryff, CD and Keyes, CLM (1995) The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69(4), 719727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, IJC, Confortin, SC, Bernardo, CdO, Bolsoni, CC, Antes, DL, Pereira, KG, Ono, LM, Marques, LP, Borges, LJ and Giehl, MWC (2017) EpiFloripa Aging cohort study: methods, operational aspects, and follow-up strategies. Revista de Saúde Pública 51, 104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sexton, E, King-Kallimanis, BL, Conroy, RM and Hickey, A (2013) Psychometric evaluation of the CASP-19 quality of life scale in an older Irish cohort. Quality of Life Research 22, 2549-2559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sim, J, Bartlam, B and Bernard, M (2011) The CASP-19 as a measure of quality of life in old age: evaluation of its use in a retirement community. Quality of Life Research 20, 997-1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steptoe, A, Deaton, A and Stone, AA (2015) Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. Lancet 385, 640-648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoner, CR, Orrell, M and Spector, A (2019) The psychometric properties of the control, autonomy, self-realisation and pleasure scale (CASP-19) for older adults with dementia. Aging & Mental Health 23, 643-649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Towers, A, Yeung, P, Stevenson, B, Stephens, C and Alpass, F (2015) Quality of life in indigenous and non-indigenous older adults: assessing the CASP-12 factor structure and identifying a brief CASP-3. Quality of Life Research 24, 193-203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, B (1995) Aging and identity. Some reflections on the somatization of the self. In Featherstone, M and Wernick, A (eds), Images of Aging. London: Routledge, pp. 245-260.Google Scholar
Vanhoutte, B and CCSR Manchester (2012) Measuring subjective well-being in later life: a review. Manchester: CCSR, University of Manchester. Available at https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:195190.Google Scholar
Vanhoutte, B (2014) The multidimensional structure of subjective well-being in later life. Journal of Population Ageing 7, 1-20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ware, JE Jr and Sherbourne, CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 30, 473-483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggins, RD, Netuveli, G, Hyde, M, Higgs, P and Blane, D (2008) The evaluation of a self-enumerated scale of quality of life (CASP-19) in the context of research on ageing: a combination of exploratory and confirmatory approaches. Social Indicators Research 89, 6177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, RD, Brown, M and Ploubidis, GB (2017) A Measurement Evaluation of a Six Item Measure of Quality of Life (CASP6) Across Different Modes of Data Collection in the 1958 National Child Development Survey (NCDS) Age 55 Years. Available at https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/CLS-WP-20172.pdf.Google Scholar