Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Magnetic Actuated Shape-memory Helical Microswimmers with Programmable Recovery Behaviors

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inspired by bacterial flagella in nature, magnetic helical microswimmer is an ideal model to perform complex task in a low Reynolds number environments. Shape Memory Polymers (SMPs) with desirable properties are considered as one of the most preferred options for the development of small-scale robots. However, fabricating and programming strategies are still challenging. Here, we report an approach to fabricate helical microswimmers based on thermoplastic SMP (polylactic acid). Melt-spun polylactic acid fibers containing magnetic particles were enwound to form helical microstructures. Their shape recovery behaviors were programmed by annealing and pre-deformation. Three forms of helical microswimmers (constant-helix-angle conical helix, constant-pitch conical helix, and straight helix) with controlled morphological parameters were tailored. The obtained microswimmers showed 3D locomotion capability under rotating magnetic fields. The maximum swimming velocity of microswimmers was nearly six body lengths per second, and the near-wall swimming of conical helixes along their sharp end exhibited a smaller drift. Moreover, we demonstrated programmed shape-switching processes (spring-like contraction and elongation, coiling and uncoiling) and self-repairing of the microswimmers. As demonstrations of potential applications, tasks of mobile microstent, cargo delivery, and minimally invasive injection were carried out. The multifunctional shape-memory microswimmers have immense potential in a variety of applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sitti M, Ceylan H, Hu W Q, Giltinan J, Turan M, Yim S, Diller E. Biomedical applications of untethered mobile milli/microrobots. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2015, 103, 205–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmidt C K, Medina-Sanchez M, Edmondson R J, Schmidt O G. Engineering microrobots for targeted cancer therapies from a medical perspective. Nature Communications, 2020, 11, 5618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Park J, Jin C, Lee S, Kim J Y, Choi H. Magnetically actuated degradable microrobots for actively controlled drug release and hyperthermia therapy. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2019, 8, 1900213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim D I, Lee H, Kwon S H, Sung Y J, Song W K, Park S. Bilayer hydrogel sheet-type intraocular microrobot for drug delivery and magnetic nanoparticles retrieval. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2020, 9, 2000118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li J X, Esteban-Fernández de Ávila B, Gao W, Zhang L F, Wang J. Micro/nanorobots for biomedicine: Delivery, surgery, sensing, and detoxification. Science Robotics, 2017, 2, eaam6431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Soto F, Wang J, Ahmed R, Demirci U. Medical micro/nanorobots in precision medicine. Advanced Science, 2020, 7, 2002203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson B J, Kaliakatsos I K, Abbott J J. Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2010, 12, 55–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diller E, Sitti M. Three-dimensional programmable assembly by untethered magnetic robotic micro-grippers. Advanced Functional Materials, 2014, 24, 4397–4404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim H, Ali J, Cheang U K, Jeong J, Kim J S, Kim M J. Micro manipulation using magnetic microrobots. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2016, 13, 515–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang L, Peyer K E, Nelson B J. Artificial bacterial flagella for micromanipulation. Lab on a Chip, 2010, 10, 2203–2215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang T Y, Qiu F, Tung H W, Chen X B, Nelson B J, Sakar M S. Generating mobile fluidic traps for selective three-dimensional transport of microobjects. Applied Physics Letters, 2014, 105, 114102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen X Z, Jang B, Ahmed D, Hu C Z, De Marco C, Hoop M, Mushtaq F, Nelson B J, Pane S. Small-scale machines driven by external power sources. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30, 1705061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jang D, Jeong J, Song H, Chung S K. Targeted drug delivery technology using untethered microrobots: A review. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2019, 29, 053002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peyer K E, Zhang L, Nelson B J. Bio-inspired magnetic swimming microrobots for biomedical applications. Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 1259–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Go G, Nguyen V D, Jin Z, Park J O, Park S. A thermo-electromagnetically actuated microrobot for the targeted transport of therapeutic agents. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 2018, 16, 1341–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li H, Go G, Ko S Y, Park J O, Park S. Magnetic actuated pH-responsive hydrogel-based soft micro-robot for targeted drug delivery. Smart Materials and Structures, 2016, 25, 027001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang H W, Sakar M S, Petruska A J, Pane S, Nelson B J. Soft micromachines with programmable motility and morphology. Nature Communications, 2016, 7, 12263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshida K, Onoe H. Soft spiral-shaped microswimmers for autonomous swimming control by detecting surrounding environments. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 2020, 2, 2000095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leng J S, Lan X, Liu Y J, Du S Y. Shape-memory polymers and their composites: Stimulus methods and applications. Progress in Materials Science, 2011, 56, 1077–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lendlein A, Langer R. Biodegradable, elastic shape-memory polymers for potential biomedical applications. Science, 2002, 296, 1673–1676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Medina-Sánchez M, Magdanz V, Guix M, Fomin V M, Schmidt O G. Swimming microrobots: Soft, reconfigurable, and smart. Advanced Functional Materials, 2018, 28, 1707228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Carmela D M, Salvador P, Nelson B J. 4D printing and robotics. Science Robotics, 2018, 3, eaau0449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsang A C H, Demir E, Ding Y, Pak O S. Roads to smart artificial microswimmers. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 2020, 2, 1900137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Peyer K E, Tottori S, Qiu F, Zhang L, Nelson B J. Magnetic helical micromachines. Chemistry, 2013, 19, 28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Qiu F, Nelson B J. Magnetic helical micro- and nanorobots: Toward their biomedical applications. Engineering, 2015, 1, 021–026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Abbott J J, Peyer K E, Lagomarsino M C, Zhang L, Dong L X, Kaliakatsos I K, Nelson B J. How should microrobots swim?. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2009, 28, 1434–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang L, Abbott J J, Dong L X, Kratochvil B E, Bell D, Nelson B J. Artificial bacterial flagella: Fabrication and magnetic control. Applied Physics Letters, 2009, 94, 064107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ghosh A, Fischer P. Controlled propulsion of artificial magnetic nanostructured propellers. Nano Letters, 2009, 9, 2243–2245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tottori S, Zhang L, Qiu F, Krawczyk K K, Franco-Obregon A, Nelson B J. Magnetic helical micromachines: Fabrication, controlled swimming, and cargo transport. Advanced Materials, 2012, 24, 811–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zeeshan M A, Grisch R, Pellicer E, Sivaraman K M, Peyer K E, Sort J, Ozkale B, Sakar M S, Nelson B J, Pane S. Hybrid helical magnetic microrobots obtained by 3D template-assisted electrodeposition. Small, 2014, 10, 1284–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gao W, Feng X M, Pei A, Kane C R, Tam R, Hennessy C, Wang J. Bioinspired helical microswimmers based on vascular plants. Nano Letters, 2014, 14, 305–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gong D, Cai J, Celi N, Feng L, Jiang Y G, Zhang D Y. Bio-inspired magnetic helical microswimmers made of nickel-plated spirulina with enhanced propulsion velocity. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2018, 468, 148–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu Y R, Shang L R, Gao W, Zhao Z, Wang H, Zhao Y J. Microfluidic lithography of bioinspired helical micromotors. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2017, 56, 12127–12131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gagon D K, Denn M M. Computer simulation of steady polymer melt spinning. Polymer Engineering and Science, 2010, 21, 844–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Purcell E M. Life at low Reynolds number. American Journal of Physics, 1977, 45, 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. da Silva D, Kaduri M, Poley M, Adir O, Krinsky N, Shainsky-Roitman J, Schroeder A. Biocompatibility, biodegradation and excretion of polylactic acid (PLA) in medical implants and theranostic systems. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 340, 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang X W, Lu Y. Centrifugal spinning: An alternative approach to fabricate nanofibers at high speed and low cost. Polymer Reviews, 2014, 54, 677–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Blachowicz T, Ehrmann A. Most recent developments in electrospun magnetic nanofibers: A review. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 2020, 15, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang L F, Xu H C, Zhai W H, Huang B S, Rong W B. Design and characterization of magnetically actuated helical swimmers at submillimeter-scale. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2017, 14, 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xin C, Yang L, Li J W, Hu Y H, Qian D D, Fan S Y, Hu K, Cai Z, Wu H, Wang D W, Wu D, Chu J R. Conical hollow microhelices with superior swimming capabilities for targeted cargo delivery. Advanced Materials, 2019, 31, 1808226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Peyer K E, Zhang L, Kratochvil B E, Nelson B J. Non-ideal swimming of artificial bacterial flagella near a surface. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, USA, 2010, 96–101.

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51521003), NSAF (No. U1930110), and the Self-Planned Task (No. SKLRS201909B) of State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System (HIT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150080, China

    Fu Zhao, Weibin Rong, Lefeng Wang & Lining Sun

Authors
  1. Fu Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Weibin Rong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lefeng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lining Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weibin Rong or Lining Sun.

Supplementary file

Magnetic Actuated Shape-memory Helical Microswimmers with Programmable Recovery Behaviors

Supplementary material, approximately 6.43 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 8.92 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 12.9 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 23 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 16.1 MB.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, F., Rong, W., Wang, L. et al. Magnetic Actuated Shape-memory Helical Microswimmers with Programmable Recovery Behaviors. J Bionic Eng 18, 799–811 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-021-0063-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-021-0063-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation