Validation of an optimized HPLC–UV method for the quantification of formononetin and biochanin A in Trifolium pratense extract

Abstract

Here, two important isoflavones present in Trifolium pratense, formononetin and biochanin A, were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with UV (HPLC–UV). These isoflavones are marker compounds with anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and anti-oxidant properties, and are also potent phytoestrogens that can be used in hormonal therapies. Till date, no study regarding rapid identification and quantification of T. pratense extract has been conducted. This study developed and validated an optimized method for quantifying formononetin and biochanin A using HPLC–UV. The results showed excellent linearity of the calibration curve (r² ≥ 0.999), and good resolutions of chromatographic peaks were obtained. Other validation parameters such as specificity, accuracy, and precision demonstrated that our method had good reliability and sensitivity. Furthermore, our method for quantifying formononetin and biochanin A in T. pratense extract is convenient.

Introduction

Plant-derived compounds, which are diverse, have been a subject of interest since the discovery of their crucial role in drug development. Many reports have shown that among the various classes of compounds, flavonoids exhibit different pharmacological activities [1]. Flavonoids are one of the most common components of the human diet. They are generally present in foods in the form of O-glycosides with sugars bound at the C-3 position [2]. These compounds help regulate cellular activity and eliminate free radicals that cause oxidative stress. Studies also reported that flavonoid consumption reduces the risk of cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes [3, 4]. Flavonoids are known to interact with various cellular targets, such as those involved in free-radical scavenging and anti-oxidant activities, and exhibit anti-inflammatory, anti-viral, and anti-cancer properties [5].

Trifolium pratense, also known as red clover, is an herbaceous plant of the Fabaceae family. It is short-lived and varies in size from 20 to 80 cm. It has a deep taproot, due to which it is drought tolerant and positively affects soil structuring. T. pratense is native to Asia minor, China, Europe, and Southern Africa, and North-Central Africa; however, it has also been planted and naturalized in most parts of the world [6, 7].

Trifolium pratense has been widely used as a dietary supplement, food, or medicine for treating several ailments such as epilepsy, heart problems, high cholesterol, inflammatory diseases, cancer, sexually transmitted diseases, reproductive system problems, and skin related diseases [8,9,10]. Its usage is attributed to high contents of estrogenic isoflavones, such as formononetin, biochanin A, daidzein, and genistein. It is considered to be potentially useful as a natural form of hormone replacement therapy for menopause. Therefore, the plant could be utilized as a cheap alternative source for producing isoflavone-rich food supplements for females with menopausal issues [10]. Herbalists have employed this plant as an expectorant, blood cleaner, alterative and sedative [10, 11].

Isoflavones derived from many edible plants have been reported to possess significant estrogenic, anti-oxidant, and tyrosine kinase inhibitory activities [12]. Isoflavones found in T. pratense, such as formononetin and biochanin A have been known to exhibit various pharmacological effects, such as anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, anti-oxidant, lipid metabolism modulatory, and neuroprotective effects [13, 14].

Simultaneous identification of formononetin and biochanin A along with other isoflavones such as genistein and daidzein in T. pratense ethanol extract (TPE), has already been reported using HPLC [15]. A study on the contents of isoflavone in TPE indicated that formononetin and biochanin A are the main isoflavone while genistein and daidzein are only present in small amounts [11]. Different methods were utilized to analyze the contents of formononetin and biochanin A in TPE. For example, Xiu et al. analyzed biochanin A and formononetin using HPLC coupled with ELSD and DAD and total biochanins A using HPLC–UV [16]. Despite the research efforts, to date, the rapid identification and quantification of formononetin and biochanin A contents in T. pratense using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has not been achieved. This study aims to establish a convenient technique in quantifying the two marker compounds in TPE by applying our validated and optimized HPLC method.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and extraction procedure

The T. pratense used in this study was obtained and verified by M. J. Kim from Teazen Co., Ltd., Haenam, Korea. A voucher specimen (No. LEE2017-05) was deposited at the Department of Plant Science and Technology Herbarium, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea. The plant was extracted with ethanol under reflux for 3 h and repeated 3 times. It was filtered and concentrated in vacuo to obtain the TPE.

Instrumentation, chemicals, and reagents

All analyses were carried out using an Agilent series 1290 HPLC consisting of a quaternary pump equipped with UV detector (Santa Clara, CA, USA). Samples were separated using an INNO C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm). HPLC-grade acetonitrile, water and glacial acetic acid were purchased from J.T. Baker (Avantor, Radnor, PA, USA). Formononetin and biochanin A (Fig. 1) were purchased from the Natural Product Institute of Science and Technology (www.nist.re.kr), Anseong, Korea.

Fig. 1

Chemical structures of formononetin (1) and biochanin A (2)

Preparation of samples and standard solutions for HPLC

The test solution was prepared by dissolving 10.0 mg of TPE in 1 mL methanol (MeOH). The standard stock solutions were prepared by dissolving 1.0 mg formononetin and biochanin A in MeOH. The resulting solutions were serially diluted and used to obtain a calibration curve.

HPLC–DAD conditions

Chromatography was performed using a gradient elution system composed of 1% acetic acid in water (A) and acetonitrile (B). The gradient elution program started with the mobile phase (A) concentration at 80%, and this concentration was decreased to 63% after 35 min. The concentration of solvent A was further decreased to 0% after 45 min and maintained until 50 min. It increased from 0 to 80% at 51 min and was maintained until 61 min. The mobile phase flow rate was 1 mL/min and the injection volume was 10 μL. The UV absorption was measured at 270 nm and the column temperature was maintained at 30 °C.

Method validation

The method used to analyze formononetin and biochanin A was validated using different parameters such as specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, and LOQ. Specificity was evaluated to ensure that the method used for separation was free from interference and analyte impurities. The linearity between the peak area and concentration was analyzed by injecting five concentrations of the standard mixtures three times repeatedly. A calibration curve was plotted using the peak areas measured at 270 nm on the chromatogram against the known concentration of the standard solutions, and the accuracy of the method was assessed using recovery assays carried out by adding the standard solutions to four different concentrations (0.015–0.125 mg/mL) of the test solutions. The measurements were obtained five times and the percent recovery was calculated. The precision of the method was investigated in terms of its inter-day and intra-day variation. Intra-day precision was measured by injecting each sample five times in 1 day. Inter-day precision was measured using the same method but was also conducted in a different laboratory to determine the degree of closeness between the values obtained. The LOQ, the lowest analyte amount that can be quantitated with a signal-to-noise ratio of 10, was determined using the values of the standard deviation of the intercept (σ) and the slope (S). The following equation was used to calculate the LOQ: LOQ = 10 (σ/S).

Calibration curves

Different concentrations of formononetin and biochanin A (0.00781 to 0.125 mg/mL) were prepared by serially diluting the standard stock solutions. For each compound, the calibration curve, the peak area (Y) was plotted against the concentration (X, mg/mL). The analyte concentrations in the samples were calculated using the calibration equation. All values are reported as means (n = 3) ± standard deviation.

Results and discussion

Trifolium pratense ethanol extract (TPE) has been extensively investigated in phytochemistry and the results that revealed that formononetin, biochanin A, daidzein and genistein as its main active components. Several studies have analyzed the contents of formononetin and biochanin A in TPE using different methods [15, 16]. Our study aimed to develop a simple and optimized HPLC method for identifying and quantifying the two marker compounds formononetin and biochanin A. The effectiveness of the developed method was validated using different parameters.

The specificity of the method was assessed by analyzing and comparing the chromatograms of the standard compounds and sample solutions. Figures 2 and 3 depict the chromatograms of the standard compounds versus that of TPE. The retention times of standard formononetin and biochanin A compounds were 31.8 min and 36.3 min, respectively (Figs. 2A and 3A). The chromatograms in Figs. 2B and 3B show an efficient separation between the peaks of formononetin and biochanin A found in TPE. As there were no impurity peaks detected close to their retention times of formononetin and biochanin A, we can say that our method is highly specific. All impurities as well as formononetin and biochanin A were best detected at 270 nm in a single run.

Fig. 2

HPLC Chromatograms and UV spectra of formononetin (A) and TPE (B)

Fig. 3

HPLC Chromatograms and UV spectra of biochanin A (A) and TPE (B)

Accuracy was measured by spiking the test solution with known concentrations of formononetin and biochanin A. The recovery of each substance was determined using the amount found and original amount. The analyses were carried out at least 5 times. As shown in Table 1, the recovery rates % for formononetin and biochanin A were 84.58–91.27% and 99.63–106.36%, respectively. All the obtained values were within the acceptable range, suggesting that our method is highly accurate.

Table 1 Accuracy of formononetin (1) and biochanin A (2) quantification

The precision of the method was evaluated using intra- and inter-day precision analyses. Tables 2 and 3 show that the coefficient of variation was 0.37–1.03 for formononetin and 0.58–1.09 for biochanin A. These values were less than 2% which indicates that the proposed analytical method was reliable and accurate.

Table 2 Intra-day precision for the quantification of formononetin (1) and biochanin A (2)

Table 3 Inter-day precision for the quantification of formononetin (1) and biochanin A (2)

Linearity was evaluated by plotting the peak area against the concentration of the standard compounds expressed in mg/mL. The correlation coefficient r², and the values of compounds formononetin and biochanin A were 0.999 indicating a strong linear relationship between the peak area and the concentration of the two compounds (Table 4). The LOQ value represents the lowest concentration of an analyzed compound that can be quantified using an instrument or analytical method with acceptable precision and accuracy. As shown in Table 4, the LOQ values of formononetin and biochanin A were 0.016 and 0.019 mg/mL, respectively. As the LOQ values for our method fell within acceptable limits, it can be said that our analytical method had good sensitivity.

Table 4 Linearity and LOQ for formononetin (1) and biochanin A (2)

Determination of the chemical composition of medicinal plants has been a challenge because of the structural diversity of compounds contained by them [17]. Therefore, developing a standardized analytical technique is crucial for identifying compounds present in plant extracts [18]. Validation of an optimized method should conform to the required established protocols. The methods described in previous literatures propose a complex sample preparation and HPLC chromatographic conditions. In this study, we developed a simple yet reliable HPLC–UV analytical method for quantifying two of the most important isoflavones present in TPE, formononetin and biochanin A. Developing an efficient HPLC system is highly in demand for the quality control of pharmaceutical products. Our developed HPLC system has been optimized such that efficient separation and quantification can still be achieved considering that we used a simple method compared to other studies [15, 16]. These include fast sample preparation, cheaper solvents, optimized mobile phase system, and simpler chromatographic conditions without compromising the results.

Formononetin and biochanin A are said to be responsible for many biological effects of TPE. For instance, formononetin is a very potent phytoestrogen and has many benefits in hormone therapy. It is well-documented to have anti-tumor, anti-proliferative, growth inhibitory, vasorelaxant, neuro-protective, anti-apoptotic, cardio-protective, mammary gland proliferative, anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory, and anti-oxidant activities [14, 17, 19,20,21,22]. Biochanin A plays complex roles in controlling various biological functions by binding to DNA as well as several specific proteins. It also functions as a competitive substrate for some enzymes [23]. It has been shown to have chemopreventive activity against various cancer cell lines and plays a therapeutic role in metabolic and hormonal disorders [24]. It also showed anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects [17, 24].

Here, formononetin and biochanin A were successfully quantified using HPLC–UV. The excellent results in terms of specificity, accuracy, precision, and linearity of our proposed analytical method were validated using various parameters. This supports the use of our method for accurately identifying and quantifying formononetin and biochanin A as the marker compounds of TPE.