This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Change history
20 August 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00337-2
References
Amoroso, D., & Tamburrini, G. (2019). What Makes Human control Over Weapon Systems “Meaningful”? ICRAC Working Paper Series #4. https://www.icrac.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Amoroso-Tamburrini_Human-Control_ICRAC-WP4.pdf
Bernholz, L., Landemore, H., & Reich, R. (2021). Digital technology and democratic theory. Chicago: Chicago Press.
Blok, V. (2014). Look who’s talking: Responsible innovation, the paradox of dialogue and the voice of the other in communication and negotiation processes. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.924239
Kiran, A. H. (2012). Does responsible innovation presuppose design instrumentalism? Examining the case of telecare at home in the Netherlands. Technology in Society, 34(3), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2012.07.001
Matthias, A. (2004). The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(3), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-004-3422-1
Naastepad, C. W. M., & Mulder, J. M. (2018). Robots and us : Towards an economics of the ‘ Good Life.’ Review of Social Economy, 6764, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2018.1432884
Nagenborg, M. (2009). Designing spheres of informational justice. Ethics and Information Technology, 11(3), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9200-3
Oosterlaken, I. (2013). Taking a capability approach to technology and its design: A philosophical exploration. Delft: Delft University of Technology.
Santoni de Sio, F., & Mecacci, G. (2021). Four responsibility gaps with artificial intelligence: Why they matter and how to address them. Philosophy and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00450-x
Santoni de Sio, F., & van den Hoven, J. (2018). Meaningful human control over autonomous systems: A philosophical account. Frontiers in Robotics and A, I, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00015
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
Taylor, L., Floridi, L., & van der Sloot, B. (2017). Group privacy: New challenges of data technologies. Berlin: Springer.
Thompson, D. F. (1980). Moral responsibility of public officials: The problem of many hands. The American Political Science Review, 74(4), 905–916.
Van de Poel, I., Royakkers, L. M. M., & Zwart, S. D. (2015). Moral responsibility and the problem of many hands. Oxfordshire: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315734217
Van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P. E., & van de Poel, I. (2015). Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design: Sources, theory, values and application domains. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6970-0
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: In this article the title and running title were incorrectly given as ‘Marc Coeckelbergh, AI Ethics, Mit Press, 2021’ but should have been ‘Mark Coeckelbergh, AI Ethics, Mit Press, 2021’.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santoni de Sio, F. Mark Coeckelbergh, AI Ethics, Mit Press, 2021. Sci Eng Ethics 27, 50 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00323-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00323-8