Review
Bone mineral density surveillance for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: evidence-based recommendations from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00173-XGet rights and content

Summary

Childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors are at increased risk of reduced bone mineral density. Clinical practice surveillance guidelines are important for timely diagnosis and treatment of these survivors, which could improve bone mineral density parameters and prevent fragility fractures. Discordances across current late effects guidelines necessitated international harmonisation of recommendations for bone mineral density surveillance. The International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group therefore established a panel of 36 experts from ten countries, representing a range of relevant medical specialties. The evidence of risk factors for very low and low bone mineral density and fractures, surveillance modality, timing of bone mineral density surveillance, and treatment of very low and low bone mineral density were evaluated and critically appraised, and harmonised recommendations for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors were formulated. We graded the recommendations based on the quality of evidence and balance between potential benefits and harms. Bone mineral density surveillance is recommended for survivors treated with cranial or craniospinal radiotherapy and is reasonable for survivors treated with total body irradiation. Due to insufficient evidence, no recommendation can be formulated for or against bone mineral density surveillance for survivors treated with corticosteroids. This surveillance decision should be made by the survivor and health-care provider together, after careful consideration of the potential harms and benefits and additional risk factors. We recommend to carry out bone mineral density surveillance using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at entry into long-term follow-up, and if normal (Z-score > −1), repeat when the survivor is aged 25 years. Between these measurements and thereafter, surveillance should be done as clinically indicated. These recommendations facilitate evidence-based care for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors internationally.

Introduction

The survival of children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer has greatly improved over recent decades, with current 5-year overall survival rates approximating 80% in high-income countries.1, 2 However, childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors often experience long-term side effects.3, 4 Previous studies suggest an increased proportion of survivors with low (Z-score ≤–1) and very low (Z-score ≤–2) bone mineral density compared with the general population5, 6 as well as an increased fracture rate.7, 8 Bone mineral density deficits could occur due to the cancer itself, its treatment, or consequences such as endocrine defects (eg, hypogonadism, growth hormone deficiency, malnutrition or consequences such as endocrine defects (eg, hypogonadism, growth hormone deficiency), malnutrition or malabsorption, and sedentary lifestyles.9, 10, 11 These factors can lead to impaired bone accrual, resulting in a lower peak bone mass, usually achieved in people aged between 20 and 30 years.12, 13 Because peak bone mass predicts osteoporosis in adulthood and affects the age of osteoporosis onset,14 it is hypothesised that as the current childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivor population ages, more survivors might experience fragility fractures at relatively young ages.15 These fragility fractures could cause substantial morbidity such as reduced mobility, chronic pain, and difficulty with performing activities of daily living.16

General population studies have shown that early detection and treatment of very low and low peak bone mass acquisition might overcome suboptimal peak bone density acquisition and prevent fractures.17, 18 Therefore, several North American and European groups have implemented bone mineral density surveillance in their clinical practice survivorship guidelines.19, 20, 21, 22 However, these guidelines have not systematically analysed the literature. Thus, definitions of high-risk groups, timing of surveillance, and treatment recommendations vary considerably, which impedes effective international implementation and adherence. To overcome such limitations, the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group (IGHG) was established.23 This collaborative endeavor aimed to establish a common vision and integrated strategy for surveillance of chronic health problems in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors. This IGHG report summarises available evidence and provides the first harmonised recommendations for bone mineral density surveillance among childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors.

Section snippets

Guideline panel

The guideline panel was composed of 36 experts from ten countries, representing several pediatric oncology and other related societies, as well as a broad range of medical specialties (appendix 1 pp 2–3). Three dedicated working groups addressed the following topics (appendix 1, p 4): 1) who needs bone mineral density surveillance?; 2a) what surveillance modality should be used?; 2b) when should surveillance be initiated and at what frequency should it be done?; and 3) what should be done when

Results

Appendix 1 (pp 7–8) shows the evaluation of concordant and discordant areas between the existing survivorship guidelines. Because the panel felt that both concordant and discordant areas required systematic, in-depth review of the evidence, clinical questions were drafted for all areas (appendix 1, pp 9–12). 74 studies in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors (figure) and three clinical practice guidelines in related populations (two childhood cancer guidelines and one general

Discussion

This study provides a comprehensive bone mineral density surveillance strategy for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors, which could enhance early identification and adequate treatment and follow-up of survivors with very low or low bone mineral density in a variety of long-term follow-up settings, with the goal to prevent clinically relevant fractures and their consequences. In addition, the guideline panel identified gaps in the current literature that could guide future

Conclusion

This IGHG guideline provides harmonised recommendations for bone mineral density surveillance that might improve health outcomes by facilitating more consistent long-term follow-up care for childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. In addition, it promotes strategically planned research that will inform future guideline updates.

Declaration of interests

LMW received grants and personal fees from Novartis and Amgen (with funds to the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute). KKN received grants from the National Institutes of Health and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities. All other authors declare no competing interests.

References (127)

  • M Le Meignen et al.

    Bone mineral density in adult survivors of childhood acute leukemia: impact of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and other treatment modalities

    Blood

    (2011)
  • W Pluskiewicz et al.

    Skeletal status in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia assessed by quantitative ultrasound: a pilot cross-sectional study

    Ultrasound Med Biol

    (2002)
  • W Pluskiewicz et al.

    Skeletal status in survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia assessed by quantitative ultrasound at the hand phalanges: a longitudinal study

    Ultrasound Med Biol

    (2004)
  • S Dhakal et al.

    Bone density changes after radiation for extremity sarcomas: exploring the etiology of pathologic fractures

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2011)
  • N Howlader et al.

    SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2017. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute

  • MM Hudson et al.

    Clinical ascertainment of health outcomes among adults treated for childhood cancer

    JAMA

    (2013)
  • MM Geenen et al.

    Medical assessment of adverse health outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood cancer

    JAMA

    (2007)
  • W Chemaitilly et al.

    Endocrine late effects in childhood cancer survivors

    J Clin Oncol

    (2018)
  • JE van Atteveld et al.

    Prediction of low and very low bone mineral density among adult survivors of childhood cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2019)
  • N Liuhto et al.

    Diseases of renal function and bone metabolism after treatment for early onset cancer: A registry-based study

    Int J Cancer

    (2020)
  • BA Mueller et al.

    Hospitalization and mortality among pediatric cancer survivors: a population-based study

    Cancer Causes Control

    (2018)
  • MA den Hoed et al.

    Bone mineral density after childhood cancer in 346 long-term adult survivors of childhood cancer

    Osteoporos Int

    (2015)
  • L van Iersel et al.

    Hypothalamic-pituitary disorders in childhood cancer survivors: prevalence, risk factors and long-term health outcomes

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (2019)
  • V Lemay et al.

    Prevention of long-term adverse health outcomes with cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors

    J Pediatr Hematol Oncol

    (2019)
  • CJ Hernandez et al.

    A theoretical analysis of the relative influences of peak BMD, age-related bone loss and menopause on the development of osteoporosis

    Osteoporos Int

    (2003)
  • GT Armstrong et al.

    Aging and risk of severe, disabling, life-threatening, and fatal events in the childhood cancer survivor study

    J Clin Oncol

    (2014)
  • O Johnell et al.

    An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures

    Osteoporos Int

    (2006)
  • Long term follow up of survivors of childhood cancer: a national clinical guideline (SIGN Guideline No 132)

  • Long-term follow-up guidelines for survivors of childhood, adolescent and young adult cancers, version 5.0

  • Richtlijn follow-up na kinderkanker meer dan 5 jar na diagnose

  • LCM Kremer et al.

    A worldwide collaboration to harmonize guidelines for the long-term follow-up of childhood and young adult cancer survivors: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group

    Pediatr Blood Cancer

    (2013)
  • D Atkins et al.

    Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

    BMJ

    (2004)
  • P Alonso-Coello et al.

    GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines

    BMJ

    (2016)
  • RJ Gibbons et al.

    American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice guidelines: Part I: where do they come from?

    Circulation

    (2003)
  • AJ Esbenshade et al.

    Screening for vitamin D insufficiency in pediatric cancer survivors

    Pediatr Blood Cancer

    (2014)
  • PL Gawade et al.

    Association of bone mineral density with incidental renal stone in long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    J Cancer Surviv

    (2012)
  • JG Gurney et al.

    Bone mineral density among long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study

    Pediatr Blood Cancer

    (2014)
  • RC Henderson et al.

    Bone density in survivors of childhood malignancies

    J Pediatr Hematol Oncol

    (1996)
  • PB Hesseling et al.

    Bone mineral density in long-term survivors of childhood cancer

    Int J Cancer Suppl

    (1998)
  • GM Hobusch et al.

    Do long term survivors of ewing family of tumors experience low bone mineral density and increased fracture risk?

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (2014)
  • G Holzer et al.

    Bone mineral density in long-term survivors of highly malignant osteosarcoma

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (2003)
  • MM Hudson et al.

    Clinical ascertainment of health outcomes among adults treated for childhood cancer

    JAMA

    (2013)
  • S Isaksson et al.

    Low bone mineral density is associated with hypogonadism and cranial irradiation in male childhood cancer survivors

    Osteoporos Int

    (2020)
  • SC Kaste et al.

    Changes in bone mineral density in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Pediatr Blood Cancer

    (2006)
  • SC Kaste et al.

    QCT versus DXA in 320 survivors of childhood cancer: association of BMD with fracture history

    Pediatr Blood Cancer

    (2006)
  • SC Kaste et al.

    Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma survivors at negligible risk for significant bone mineral density deficits

    Pediatr Blood Cancer

    (2009)
  • SC Kaste et al.

    Calcium and cholecalciferol supplementation provides no added benefit to nutritional counseling to improve bone mineral density in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)

    Pediatr Blood Cancer

    (2014)
  • W Leung et al.

    A prospective cohort study of late sequelae of pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

    Medicine (Baltimore)

    (2007)
  • K Mandel et al.

    Skeletal morbidity in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    J Clin Oncol

    (2004)
  • Y Miyoshi et al.

    Endocrinological analysis of 122 Japanese childhood cancer survivors in a single hospital

    Endocr J

    (2008)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Risk and determinants of low and very low bone mineral density and fractures in a national cohort of Dutch adult childhood cancer survivors (DCCSS-LATER): a cross-sectional study

      2023, The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Notably, a 1 SD reduction in BMD was associated with vertebral fracture, which is similar to observations in the general older population.22 Our results support BMD surveillance for adult childhood cancer survivors treated with cranial or craniospinal radiotherapy or total body irradiation, as recently presented by the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group.12 Additionally, we found that low BMD was associated with a higher dose of cranial radiotherapy, although we did not observe a safe cranial radiotherapy dose (ie, a dose that was not significantly associated with low BMD).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Shared last authorship

    View full text