Abstract
Our novel approach enriches the general additive monopolistic competition model with a space of product characteristics: consumers’ “ideal varieties”. This paper bridges two traditions in modelling markets with horizontal product differentiation: the Hotelling’s (Econ J 39(153):41–57, 1929) “address economy” and Chamberlinian Dixit–Stiglitz monopolistic competition. Unlike Hotelling, our partially localised competition involves intersecting zones of service among producers. When population grows, increasing/decreasing elasticity of elementary utility governs increasing/decreasing prices. Increasing market size induces an increase in the firm density, but with the presence of transport cost, the firm’s range of service decreases, consumers concentrate their consumption closer to their ideals, and there are savings in transport costs. Thereby, finer matching among buyers/sellers becomes the important welfare benefit from a thicker market. That is, our model sets a finer matching of goods to tastes as a new source of gains rather than variety being the only reason for gains. Free entry remains socially excessive, under natural preferences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, T., Arkolakis, C.: Trade and the topography of the spatial economy. Q. J. Econ. 129(3), 1085–1140 (2014)
Arkolakis, C., Muendler, M.A.: Exporters and their products: a collection of empirical regularities. CESifo Econ. Stud. 59(2), 223–248 (2013)
Arkolakis, C., Costinot, A., Donaldson, D., Rodríguez-Clare, A.: The elusive pro-competitive effects of trade. Rev. Econ. Stud. 86(1), 46–80 (2019)
Behrens, K., Robert-Nicoud, F.: Agglomeration theory with heterogeneous agents. Handb. Reg. Urban Econ. 5, 171–245 (2015)
Berry, S., Eizenberg, A., Waldfogel, J.: Optimal product variety in radio markets. Rand J. Econ. 47(3), 463–497 (2016)
Carballo, J., Ottaviano, G.I., Martincus, C.V.: The buyer margins of firms’ exports. J. Int. Econ. 112, 33–49 (2018)
Castro, S.B., Correia-da Silva, J., Gaspar, J.M.: Economic geography meets Hotelling: the home-sweet-home effect. Econ. Theory (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-020-01331-8
Chamberlin, E.: The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1933)
Chen, Y., Riordan, M.H.: Price and variety in the spokes model. Econ. J. 117(522), 897–921 (2007)
Christopoulou, R., Vermeulen, P.: Markups in the euro area and the us over the period 1981–2004: a comparison of 50 sectors. Empir. Econ. 42(1), 53–77 (2012)
Couture, V.: Valuing the Consumption Benefits of Urban Density. Mimeographed (2016)
Dhingra, S.: Trading away wide brands for cheap brands. Am. Econ. Rev. 103(6), 2554–84 (2013)
Dhingra, S., Morrow, J.: Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity under firm heterogeneity. J. Polit. Econ. 127(1), 196–232 (2019)
Di Giovanni, J., Levchenko, A.A.: Firm entry, trade, and welfare in zipf’s world. J. Int. Econ. 89(2), 283–296 (2013)
Dixit, A.K., Stiglitz, J.E.: Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am. Econ. Rev. 67(3), 297–308 (1977)
Eaton, B.C., Lipsey, R.G.: On the Foundations of Monopolistic Competition and Economic Geography: The Selected Essays of B. Edward Elgar Press, Cheltenham, Curtis Eaton and Richard G. Lipsey (1977)
Eaton, J., Kortum, S., Kramarz, F.: An anatomy of international trade: evidence from French firms. Econometrica 79(5), 1453–1498 (2011)
Eckel, C.: Endogenous sunk costs, flexible manufacturing and the productivity effects of international trade. Scand. J. Econ. 111(2), 369–386 (2009)
Eckel, C., Neary, J.P.: Multi-product firms and flexible manufacturing in the global economy. Rev. Econ. Stud. 77(1), 188–217 (2010)
Eckel, C., Irlacher, M.: Multi-product offshoring. Eur. Econ. Rev. 94, 71–89 (2017)
Feenstra, R.C., Ma, H.: Optimal choice of product scope for multi-product firms under monopolistic competition. In: Helpman, E., Marin, D., Verdier, T. (eds.) The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy, pp. 173–199. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2008)
Gabszewicz, J.J., Thisse, J.-F.: Spatial competition and the location of firms. In: Fujitam M., Schweizer, U. (eds.) Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics. Harwood, Amsterdam (1977)
Handbury, J., Weinstein, D.E.: Goods prices and availability in cities. Rev. Econ. Stud. 82(1), 258–296 (2015)
Helpman, E.: International trade in the presence of product differentiation, economies of scale and monopolistic competition: a chamberlin-heckscher-ohlin approach. J. Int. Econ. 11(3), 305–340 (1981)
Helpman, E.: Increasing returns, imperfect markets, and trade theory. In: Helpman, E., Marin, D., Verdier, T. (eds.) Handbook of International Economics, vol. 1, pp. 325–365. Elsevier, New York (1984)
Hotelling, H.: Stability in competition. Econ. J. 39(153), 41–57 (1929)
Kaldor, N.: Market imperfection and excess capacity. Economica 2(5), 33–50 (1935)
Kokovin, S.G., Sharapudinov, S., Tarasov, A., Ushchev, P.: A theory of monopolistic competition with horizontally heterogeneous consumers. Technical report, CESifo Working Paper No. 8082 (2020)
Krugman, P.: Increasing returns and economic geography. J. Polit. Econ. 99(3), 483–499 (1991)
Lancaster, K.: Socially optimal product differentiation. Am. Econ. Rev. 65(4), 567–585 (1975)
Lancaster, K.J.: A new approach to consumer theory. J. Polit. Econ. 74(2), 132–157 (1966)
Mayer, T., Melitz, M.J., Ottaviano, G.I.P.: Market size, competition, and the product mix of exporters. Am. Econ. Rev. 104(2), 495–536 (2014)
Melitz, M.J.: The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6), 1695–1725 (2003)
Mrázová, M., Neary, J.P.: Together at last: trade costs, demand structure, and welfare. Am. Econ. Rev. 104(5), 298–303 (2014)
Picard, P.M., Tabuchi, T.: Self-organized agglomerations and transport costs. Econ. Theory 42(3), 565 (2010)
Salop, S.C.: Monopolistic competition with outside goods. Bell J. Econ. 10, 141–156 (1979)
Schiff, N.: Cities and product variety: evidence from restaurants. J. Econ. Geogr. 15(6), 1085–1123 (2015)
Weyl, E.G., Fabinger, M.: Pass-through as an economic tool: principles of incidence under imperfect competition. J. Polit. Econ. 121(3), 528–583 (2013)
Zhelobodko, E., Kokovin, S., Parenti, M., Thisse, J.-F.: Monopolistic competition: beyond the constant elasticity of substitution. Econometrica 80(6), 2765–2784 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The authors express gratitude for comments and suggestions to Michal Fabinger, Andrea Galeotti, Jakub Steiner and to the participants of 5-th Conference “Industrial Organization and Spatial Economics”—2016, especially Kristian Behrens, Svetlana Demidova, Gabriel Felbermayr, Yasusada Murata, Mathieu Parenti and Alexander Tarasov. Support from the Basic Research Program of the HSE University is gratefully acknowledged.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goryunov, M., Kokovin, S. & Tabuchi, T. Continuous spatial monopolistic competition: matching goods with consumers. Econ Theory 74, 793–832 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-021-01380-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-021-01380-7