Abstract
Pectobacterium parmentieri (former Pectobacterium wasabiae) is an emerging pectinolytic bacterial pathogen causing losses in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) worldwide. Until now, there are no effective measures to protect crops from infections caused by P. parmentieri. Likewise, little is known about lytic bacteriophages that can infect and kill P. parmentieri, and that could be used in the (bio)control of this pathogen in agricultural applications. A novel lytic bacteriophage vB_Ppp_A38 (ϕA38), belonging to the order Caudovirales, was isolated and characterised in our previous studies. This report provides information about its complete genome sequence and accompanying phylogenomics. The genome of vB_Ppp_A38 consists of 75,764-bp-length, linear, double-stranded DNA with an average GC content of 48.7% and is predicted to have 97 open reading frames (ORFs), with an average length of 732 nucleotides. The open reading frames were classified into functional groups, including structural units, packing, DNA metabolism, regulation and additional (miscellaneous) functions. Comparative genomic analyses based on the whole-genome sequence indicated that the phage vB_Ppp_A38 is most similar to N4-like viruses of the family Schitoviridae, genus Cbunavirus, sharing more than 90% identity with the phages vB_PatP_CB1, vB_PatP_CB3 and vB_PatP_CB4 infecting P. atrosepticum. The bacteriophage vB_Ppp_A38 is the first Cbunavirus bacteriophage infecting other Pectobacterium spp. hosts than P. atrosepticum. As vB_Ppp_A38 is a lytic virus able to kill plant-pathogenic P. parmentieri, it can be used in the biological control of this pathogen in agricultural applications.
Main text
Plant pathogenic necrotrophic bacteria belonging to the Soft Rot Pectobacteriaceae (SRP) family (Pectobacterium spp. and Dickeya spp., former pectinolytic Erwinia spp.) are a constant threat to global agriculture (Charkowski, 2018; Pérombelon, 2002). In potato, these pathogens cause blackleg in field-growing plants as well as soft rot of potato tubers during storage and transit (van der Wolf & de Boer, 2007). Pectobacterium spp. and Dickeya spp. are recognised among the top 10 most important agricultural bacterial pathogens globally (Mansfield et al., 2012). Recently, P. parmentieri (former name: P. wasabiae) (Pitman et al., 2010) has been recognised as a threat to potato cultivation in Europe (Faure et al., 2016; Pasanen et al., 2013; Suárez et al., 2017). After the first characterisation of this species as a potato pathogen in New Zeeland in 2010 (Pitman et al., 2010), P. parmentieri has since been reported to cause severe blackleg outbreaks in potato-cultivating regions worldwide (Kastelein et al., 2020; Khayi et al., 2016).
The control of SRP bacteria, including emerging potato pathogens (e.g., P. parmentieri), is, so far, ineffective (Czajkowski et al., 2011). Thus, the use of bacterial viruses (other names: bacteriophages or phages) in agriculture has been recognised as an alternative way to control bacterial infections (for review, see: (Jones et al., 2007)). Phage-based biological control has already been proposed to manage diseases caused by several species of SRP bacteria (Adriaenssens et al., 2012; Czajkowski et al., 2013). However, knowledge of lytic bacteriophages infecting P. parmentieri is scarce (Czajkowski, 2016). A new lytic bacteriophage, vB_Ppp_A38 (earlier name: ϕA38), infecting P. parmentieri strains has been isolated in our former studies (Smolarska et al., 2017) and in detail characterised for phenotypic features that may be potentially important in biological control applications against its host in potato. In the proof-of-concept experiments, vB_Ppp_A38 efficiently protected potato tubers against rotting caused by P. parmentieri (Smolarska et al., 2017).
Despite the growing interest in using lytic bacteriophages to control SRP bacteria and, specifically, P. parmentieri, overall, there is still very little information present on phage genomes, including their organization and structure (Czajkowski, 2016). Until now, there is only one complete P. parmentieri phage genome available in the NCBI GenBank database, i.e., the genome of the phage vB_PpaP_PP74 (accession: KY084243) (Kabanova et al., 2018). To our knowledge, no further information is present in the literature about genomes of other bacteriophages, specifically those infecting members of P. parmentieri. Phage genomic data, including high-quality, complete and annotated phage genomes, are of great importance as they may accelerate and facilitate the development of bacteriophage-based biological control procedures (Bardina et al., 2016). For example, such data may be used to modify the phage life cycles and/or their environmental viability, develop new phage delivery strategies and/or to understand better and change their host ranges (Huss and Raman, 2020).
The vB_Ppp_A38 (ϕA38) bacteriophage (Smolarska et al., 2017) was isolated from a soil sample collected in an arable field in the northern part (Pomorskie Province) of Poland, using P. parmentieri strain SCC3193 (Pirhonen et al., 1988) as a primary host. In our previous studies, phage vB_Ppp_A38 has been characterised for its morphological and phenotypic features, including biological control properties. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed that this bacteriophage belongs to the order Caudovirales, with a Podoviridae capsid morphology (Smolarska et al., 2017).
In this study, to obtain a high phage titre (1014–1015 plaque-forming units (pfu) ml−1) for genomic DNA purification, the phage was enriched in P. parmentieri SCC3193 cultures as described previously (Czajkowski et al., 2013). After enrichment, SCC3193 cells were removed by centrifugation (10,000×g, 20 min), and the subsequent viral suspension (50 ml) was filter-sterilised using a sterile 0.22-μm membrane filter (cellulose acetate, VWR) to remove bacterial debris. The resulting suspension containing phage particles was treated with DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich; final concentration, 0.5 mg ml−1) for 60 min at 37 °C with shaking (80 rpm) to digest residual bacterial DNA. Phage particles were further concentrated by precipitation, as described elsewhere (Czajkowski et al., 2015). Finally, the obtained high-titre phage suspension (1.5–2 ml) was used for phage genomic DNA isolation as described previously (Clokie & Kropinski, 2009).
Phage vB_Ppp_A38 genomic DNA was sequenced using two next-generation sequencing techniques: short paired-end read sequencing was done on MiSeq (Illumina), and long 2D-reads nanopore sequencing was done on MinION (Oxford Nanopore). For MiSeq genomic library preparation, the Nextera XT DNA kit (Illumina) was used. During the machine run, 799,310 paired reads of the target size 2 × 300 were generated. These data were sufficient to obtain mean coverage on final contigs equal to 1309.6 and 1311.2 (Std = 335.3). The MinION sequencing libraries were also prepared according to the manufacturer’s guidelines, using the SQK-NSK007 Nanopore Sequencing Kit (R9) for the Native Barcode procedure. In brief, the isolated genomic DNA was tested for purity, concentration and quality on a TapeStation 2200 (Agilent) and a Quantus Fluorometer (Promega). After this, genomic DNA was fragmented in g-TUBE (Covaris) with a speed of 5000 rpm, cleaned up using 0.4 x AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter), repaired and further prepared following the standard manufacturer protocol. The Poretools software (Loman and Quinlan 2014) was used for extracting 2028 reads (passed quality threshold) that were longer than 1000 bp, with a total mean length of 7049.8 bp. These data were sufficient to obtain a mean coverage on final contigs equal to 179.5 and 165.6 (Std = 46.5). For genome assembly of the vB_Ppp_A38 genome, we performed a hybrid approach with the SPAdes software 3.6.2 (Bankevich et al., 2012) in a single run, using error correction and long reads as a gap filler. This procedure produced single contigs of 75,764 bp for vB_Ppp_A38, which were further manually inspected and curated. The putative open reading frames (ORFs) were found using Glimmer (auto gene model) (Delcher et al., 1999) and then manually verified and compared to other known phage sequences. Repetitive genetic elements were searched using Geneious (Kearse et al., 2012). Finally, BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi), InterProScan (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/pfa/iprscan/) and HMMER (phmmer, UniProtKB) (Finn et al., 2011) (http://hmmer.org/) were used to annotate the vB_Ppp_A38 genome. The obtained structural and functional annotations were retested using the automated pipeline of the Institute for Genome Sciences (IGS), University of Maryland School of Medicine Annotation Service, accessed via http://ae.igs.umaryland.edu/cgi/index.cgi, as well as re-analysed and curated using RAST (Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (http://rast.nmpdr.org/) (Aziz et al., 2008).
The genome of vB_Ppp_A38 (ϕA38) (GenBank accession: KY083726) is a linear double-stranded, 75,764-bp-long DNA sequence (Fig. 1). It consists of 97 predicted open reading frames (ORFs: predicted protein-encoding genes [PEGs]) and an average GC content of 48.7%. The predicted average gene length was 732 nucleotides, and 93.7% of the genome consisted of coding sequences. Of the 97 putative PEGs, 17 (17.5%) had assigned functions, another 17 (17.5%) were unclassified with no assigned category, 58 (59.8%) were classified as conserved hypothetical, and 5 (5.2%) PEGs had unknown functions (Supplementary Table 1). The vB_Ppp_A38 genome encodes only one tRNA (position: (5′)63,863–63,780 (3′)), and for the majority of genes (88.7%), the start codon for transcription is ATG, whereas CTG and TTG are start codons in only 10.3 and 1.0% of the genes, respectively. The majority of functions of the vB_Ppp_A38 genes could not be identified via screening for homology with known sequences, probably due to the lack of respective phage annotation data present in the international genome sequence databases.
The BLASTN analysis, based on the whole genome sequences, indicated more than 90% sequence identity between phage vB_Ppp_A38 and N4-like bacteriophages infecting SRP bacteria (phage vB_PatP_CB1, phage vB_PatP_CB3 and phage vB_PatP_CB4). Phylogenomic analysis based on whole-genome sequences of vB_Ppp_A38 and other Pectobacteria N4-like viruses viz. viruses: vB_PatP_CB1 (GenBank accession: KY514264.1), vB_PatP_CB3 (KY514265.1) and vB_PatP_CB4 (KY549659.1) (Buttimer et al., 2018), belonging to the family Schitoviridae (Wittmann et al., 2020), was performed using MEGA X (Kumar et al., 2018). The genome sequence of Escherichia virus N4 (NC_008720.1), belonging to the family Schitoviridae, subfamily Enquatrovirinae, genus Enquatrovirus, was used as a reference (Fig. 2). Phylogenomic analysis was conducted using the Maximum Likelihood method and the Tamura-Nei model (Tamura & Nei, 1993). Initial tree(s) were obtained by employing Neighbor-Join and BioNJ procedures to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Tamura-Nei model and then selecting the tree topology with a superior log-likelihood value. This analysis involved five genome sequences of five bacteriophages. The positions of codons were 1st + 2nd + 3rd + noncoding. In total, there were 80,198 positions in the final dataset. Phylogenomic analysis indicated that vB_Ppp_A38 is closely related to the other Pectobacteria N4-like viruses (Fig. 2) described previously (Buttimer et al., 2018). To examine the global, genome-wide organisation (= synteny amongst large blocks of genome sequences) of phage vB_Ppp_A38, phage vB_PatP_CB1, phage vB_PatP_CB3, phage vB_PatP_CB4 and Escherichia virus N4, multiple genome alignments were performed using the MAUVE software as described elsewhere (Darling et al., 2010). The alignment demonstrated a high synteny level between genomes of vB_Ppp_A38 and other N4-like Pectobacteria viruses (Fig. 3). Likewise, comparative genomics analysis was done using EDGAR (https://edgar3.computational.bio.uni-giessen.de/cgi-bin/edgar_login.cgi) (Blom et al., 2009) to obtain insight into the core genome shared between N4-like Pectobacteria and vB_Ppp_A38 bacteriophage. The core (common) genome of phage vB_Ppp_A38, phage vB_PatP_CB1 and phage vB_PatP_CB3 consisted of 80 genes, whereas only 12, 5 and five genes were specific for phages vB_Ppp_A38 vB_PatP_CB1 and vB_PatP_CB3, respectively (Fig. 4). Also, phage vB_Ppp_A38 shared 20 common genes with Escherichia virus N4 (data not shown).
To our knowledge, P. parmentieri lytic bacteriophage vB_Ppp_A38 (ϕA38) is the first Pectobacteria N4-like virus from the genus Cbunavirus infecting other hosts than P. atrosepticum. Likewise, this is only the second (after phage vB_PpaP_PP74 (Kabanova et al., 2018)) report of the P. parmentieri-specific lytic bacteriophage that can be used for biological control applications of this pathogen. We believe that this high-quality whole-genome sequence and the associated phylogenomic data will provide new helpful information for fundamental advanced molecular research targeting phage-host interactions. In addition, the information may be used to design better control strategies to protect potato crop from infections caused by the pathogen.
References
Adriaenssens, E. M., Van Vaerenbergh, J., Vandenheuvel, D., Dunon, V., Ceyssens, P. J., De Proft, M., et al. (2012). T4-related bacteriophage LIMEstone isolates for the control of soft rot on potato caused by ‘Dickeya solani’. PLoS One, 7(3), e33227.
Aziz, R. K., Bartels, D., Best, A. A., DeJongh, M., Disz, T., Edwards, R. A., Formsma, K., Gerdes, S., Glass, E. M., Kubal, M., Meyer, F., Olsen, G. J., Olson, R., Osterman, A. L., Overbeek, R. A., McNeil, L. K., Paarmann, D., Paczian, T., Parrello, B., Pusch, G. D., Reich, C., Stevens, R., Vassieva, O., Vonstein, V., Wilke, A., & Zagnitko, O. (2008). The RAST server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics, 9(75), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-75.
Bankevich, A., Nurk, S., Antipov, D., Gurevich, A. A., Dvorkin, M., Kulikov, A. S., Lesin, V. M., Nikolenko, S. I., Pham, S., Prjibelski, A. D., Pyshkin, A. V., Sirotkin, A. V., Vyahhi, N., Tesler, G., Alekseyev, M. A., & Pevzner, P. A. (2012). SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. Journal of Computational Biology, 19, 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2012.0021.
Bardina, C., Colom, J., Spricigo, D. A., Otero, J., Sánchez-Osuna, M., Cortés, P., & Llagostera, M. (2016). Genomics of three new bacteriophages useful in the biocontrol of salmonella. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7(545). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00545.
Blom, J., Albaum, S., Doppmeier, D., Puhler, A., Vorholter, F.-J., Zakrzewski, M., et al. (2009). EDGAR: A software framework for the comparative analysis of prokaryotic genomes. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 154.
Buttimer, C., Hendrix, H., Lucid, A., Neve, H., Noben, J.-P., Franz, C., O’Mahony, J., Lavigne, R., & Coffey, A. (2018). Novel N4-like bacteriophages of Pectobacterium atrosepticum. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 11, 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph11020045.
Charkowski, A. (2018). The changing face of bacterial soft-rot diseases. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 56, 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-045906.
Clokie, M. R. J., & Kropinski, A. M. (2009). Bacteriophages: Methods and protocols, volume 1: Isolation, characterization, and interactions. Humana Press.
Czajkowski, R. (2016). Bacteriophages of soft rot Enterobacteriaceae – A mini-review. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 363(363), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnv230.
Czajkowski, R., Pérombelon, M. C. M., van Veen, J. A., & van der Wolf, J. M. (2011). Control of blackleg and tuber soft rot of potato caused by Pectobacterium and Dickeya species: A review. Plant Pathology, 60, 999–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02470.x.
Czajkowski, R., Ozymko, Z., & Lojkowska, E. (2013). Isolation and characterization of novel soilborne lytic bacteriophages infecting Dickeya spp. biovar 3 (‘D. solani’). Plant Pathology, 63, 758–772.
Czajkowski, R., Ozymko, Z., & Lojkowska, E. (2015). Application of zinc chloride precipitation method for rapid isolation and concentration of infectious Pectobacterium spp. and Dickeya spp. lytic bacteriophages from surface water and plant and soil extracts. Folia Microbiologica, 61, 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-015-0411-1.
Darling, A. E., Mau, B., & Perna, N. T. (2010). Progressivemauve: Multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One, 5(6), e11147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011147.
Delcher, A. L., Harmon, D., Kasif, S., White, O., & Salzberg, S. L. (1999). Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Research, 27, 4636–4641. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/27.23.4636.
Faure, D., Khayi, S., Cigna, J., Chong, T. M., Quêtu-Laurent, A., Chan, K. G., et al. (2016). Transfer of the potato plant isolates of Pectobacterium wasabiae to Pectobacterium parmentieri sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 66, 5379–5383.
Finn, R. D., Clements, J., & Eddy, S. R. (2011). HMMER web server: Interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Research, 39, W29–W37. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr367.
Huss, P., & Raman, S. (2020). Engineered bacteriophages as programmable biocontrol agents. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 61, 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2019.11.013.
Jones, J. B., Jackson, L. E., Balogh, B., Obradovic, A., Iriarte, F. B., & Momol, M. T. (2007). Bacteriophages for plant disease control. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 45, 245–262.
Kabanova, A., Shneider, M. M., Bugaeva, E., Ha, V. T. N., Miroshnikov, K. A., Korzhenkov, A., et al. (2018). Genomic characteristics of vB_PpaP_PP74, a T7-like Autographivirinae bacteriophage infecting a potato pathogen of the newly proposed species Pectobacterium parmentieri. Archives of Virology, 163, 1691–1694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-018-3766-1.
Kastelein, P., Förch, M. G., Krijger, M. C., van der Zouwen, P. S., van den Berg, W., & van der Wolf, J. M. (2020). Systemic colonization of potato plants resulting from potato haulm inoculation with Dickeya solani or Pectobacterium parmentieri. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 43, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2020.1777465.
Kearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A., Stones-Havas, S., Cheung, M., Sturrock, S., Buxton, S., Cooper, A., Markowitz, S., Duran, C., Thierer, T., Ashton, B., Meintjes, P., & Drummond, A. (2012). Geneious basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics, 28, 1647–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199.
Khayi, S., Cigna, J., Chong, T. M., Quêtu-Laurent, A., Chan, K.-G., Hélias, V., et al. (2016). Transfer of the potato plant isolates of Pectobacterium wasabiae to Pectobacterium parmentieri sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 66, 5379–5383. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001524.
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., & Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35, 1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096.
Loman, N. J., & Quinlan, A. R. (2014). Poretools: a toolkit for analyzing nanopore sequence data. Bioinformatics, 30(23), 3399–3401. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu555.
Mansfield, J., Genin, S., Magori, S., Citovsky, V., Sriariyanum, M., Ronald, M., et al. (2012). Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology, 13, 614–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.x.
Pasanen, M., Laurila, J., Brader, G., Palva, E. T., Ahola, V., van der Wolf, J., Hannukkala, A., & Pirhonen, M. (2013). Characterisation of Pectobacterium wasabiae and Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum isolates from diseased potato plants in Finland. Annals of Applied Biology, 163, 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12076.
Pérombelon, M. C. M. (2002). Potato diseases caused by soft rot Erwinias: An overview of pathogenesis. Plant Pathology, 51, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0032-0862.2001.
Pirhonen, M., Heino, P., Helander, I., Harju, P., & Palva, E. T. (1988). Bacteriophage T4 resistant mutants of the plant pathogen Erwinia carotovora. Microbial Pathogenesis, 4, 359–367.
Pitman, A. R., Harrow, S. A., & Visnovsky, S. B. (2010). Genetic characterisation of Pectobacterium wasabiae causing soft rot disease of potato in New Zealand. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 126, 423–435.
Schito, G. C. (1974). Development of coliphage N4: Ultrastructural studies. Journal of Virology, 13, 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.13.1.186-196.1974.
Smolarska, A., Rabalski, L., Narajczyk, M., & Czajkowski, R. (2017). Isolation and phenotypic and morphological characterization of the first Podoviridae lytic bacteriophages ϕA38 and ϕA41 infecting Pectobacterium parmentieri (former Pectobacterium wasabiae). European Journal of Plant Pathology, 150, 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-017-1289-3.
Suárez, M. B., Feria, F. J., Martín-Robles, M. J., del Rey, F. J., & Palomo, J. L. (2017). Pectobacterium parmentieri causing soft rot on potato tubers in southern Europe. Plant Disease, 101, 1029–1029. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-17-0013-PDN.
Tamura, K., & Nei, M. (1993). Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 10, 512–526.
van der Wolf, J. M., & de Boer, S. H. (2007). Bacterial pathogens of potato. Potato biology and biotechnology, advances and perspectives. Elsevier, pp. 595-619.
Wittmann, J., Turner, D., Millard, A. D., Mahadevan, P., Kropinski, A. M., & Adriaenssens, E. M. (2020). From orphan phage to a proposed new family–the diversity of N4-like viruses. Antibiotics, 9, 663–674.
Acknowledgements
The work was financially supported by the National Center for Research and Development, Poland (Narodowe Centrum Badan i Rozwoju – NCBR, Polska), via a LIDER research grant (LIDER/450/L-6/14/NCBR/2015) to R. C and by the National Science Center, Poland (Narodowe Centrum Nauki, Polska), via a research grant NCN OPUS 13 (2017/25/B/NZ9/00036) to R. C. The authors would like to express their gratitude to Sylwia Jafra (University of Gdansk, Poland) and Dorota M. Krzyzanowska (University of Gdansk, Poland) for their valuable comments on the manuscript and the editorial work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical statement
All authors are fully aware of this submission and have declared that they have no competing interests.
The results presented in this manuscript did not involve any protected and/or endangered species, field studies, human participants, specimens or tissue samples or vertebrate animals, embryos or tissues.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(PDF 395 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Czajkowski, R., Rabalski, L., Kosinski, M. et al. Complete genome sequence and phylogenomic analysis of the first N4-like lytic bacteriophage vB_Ppp_A38 (ϕA38) infecting Pectobacterium parmentieri. Eur J Plant Pathol 161, 483–489 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-021-02334-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-021-02334-4