Skip to main content
Log in

Nitrous oxide emission factors in conventionally and naturally simulated cattle urine patches

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 07 October 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

We quantified nitrous oxide emission factors (N2O EFs) for cattle urine patches established using two simulation methods: (1) a uniformly wetted area (UWA) and (2) a naturally expanding effective area (NEEA). Field experiments were conducted on long-term grasslands in New Zealand (NZ1 and NZ2) and Ireland (IRE) for varying urine nitrogen (N) application rates in two initial soil moisture regimes (below field capacity and field capacity). Nitrous oxide emissions were measured using static chambers for a period of 120, 133 and 85 days at NZ1, NZ2 and IRE, respectively. Nitrous oxide EFs were unaffected by patch type (UWA = 0.99%; NEEA = 1.07%) across varying urine N application rates in NZ1 whereas in NZ2, EFs varied with urine N application rate only for the NEEA patches in below field capacity soils (P < 0.05). In IRE, we observed a ~ fourfold difference in the mean N2O EF between the UWA (0.67 ± 0.24%) and NEEA (0.18 ± 0.04%) patches in below field capacity soils (P < 0.05) but no significant differences in EFs were detected between the UWA (0.75 ± 0.14%) and NEEA (0.53 ± 0.08%) patches at field capacity soils. Our study suggests that patch simulation method and initial soil water content can independently affect N2O EFs in urine-affected pasture but factor effects may be largely site and/or soil specific.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the New Zealand Government to support the objectives of the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases. The authors would like to thank technical and laboratory staff at Massey University, AgResearch Ruakura Hamilton, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute and Teagasc Johnstown Castle for their technical support. We thank Dr. Donna Giltrap, Dr. Kamal Adhikari, Damian Collins, and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. O’Neill.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 91 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Neill, M., Saggar, S., Richards, K.G. et al. Nitrous oxide emission factors in conventionally and naturally simulated cattle urine patches. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 121, 129–147 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-021-10162-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-021-10162-5

Keywords

Navigation