Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Feeling Responsible Towards Aotearoa New Zealand’s Past: Emotion at Work in the Stance of Five Pākehā History Teachers

  • Article
  • Published:
New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article I interact with the narratives of five Pākehā (European) secondary school teachers, who choose to teach Aotearoa New Zealand histories including about Te Tiriti o Waitangi at senior level (years 11–13). I highlight characteristics of the active stance adopted by participants towards teaching and learning the difficult histories of home, central to which are the effects of colonisation and Indigenous Māori–settler entanglements. Drawing on Sara Ahmed’s (2015) understanding of the key role played by emotion in shaping social and political attachments, I argue that emotional work was just as important as intellectual effort on the part of participants for helping form and fortify their stance. Subject knowledge and effective pedagogical skills are crucial, but neither transcend the affective realm, where teacher orientation toward the content itself can influence the quality of student engagement. To provide background context for participants’ narratives, I outline active elements in history education discourse featuring Pākehā positionality and the practice of ignorance in relation to school curricula and settler constructions of history. This study has implications for teacher professional development as schools prepare to respond to forthcoming changes in national curriculum policy making the study of New Zealand histories compulsory for primary and junior secondary students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Names attributed to all research participants are pseudonyms.

  2. The research was part of a Royal Society Te Apārangi Marsden-funded project entitled Tāngata Tiriti: Learning the trick of standing upright here, which focused on engagement with Te Tiriti o Waitangi amongst non-Māori from a range of professions.

  3. Te Tiriti o Waitangi (‘Te Tiriti’ or ‘the Treaty’ for short) refers to the Māori language text of the 1840 agreement, which the majority of Māori leaders signed.

  4. ‘Entanglement’ serves also as “an analytical metaphor” in history writing to explore complex, large-scale “webs of interdependence” (see Ballantyne, 2014, p. 17).

  5. See Waitangi Tribunal (2016) for an introduction to the differences between the Māori and English language versions of the Treaty and associated politics.

  6. For an introduction to the sociology of emotion specifically within the field of education, refer to Boler (1999) and Zembylas (2005).

  7. For example, see Harcourt (2020b) and Kunowski (2006).

  8. For a detailed discussion on the kinds of emotions that may surface in the senior history classroom within a New Zealand context, see pages 192 to 199 in Harcourt (2020b).

  9. For examples of pedagogical approaches that involve engaging with emotional content in History and Social Studies, see Barton and McCully (2007), Harcourt (2017, p. 140), MacDonald (2020) and Tallon (2016).

  10. Refer also to Sheehan (2017b) and the views of international and New Zealand teachers of history in the ‘replies’ section.

  11. A history textbook for primary school children published in 1930 from the series Our Nation’s Story (Whitcombe & Tombs Limited) presents British colonisation as a source of pride claiming that “[t]he bond between the white New Zealanders and the brown is a very strong one” (p. 40).

  12. Some examples include Belich (1996), King (2003), Harris, (2004), Walker (2004), Byrnes (2009), Keenan (2012), Ballantyne (2014), and Anderson et al (2014).

  13. See Barton and McCully (2007) for a critique of the view that “teachers should not reveal their own positions on controversial issues, lest they unduly influence students” (p. 16).

  14. Tāngata Tiriti refers to non-Māori citizens of New Zealand as opposed to tangata whenua (original people of the land/indigenous Māori).

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2015). The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed) Routledge.

  • Anderson, A.; Binney, J.; & Harris, A. (2014). Tangata whenua: An illustrated history. Bridget Williams Books.

  • Andrews, M., Squire, C., & Tamboukou, M. (Eds) (2008). Doing Narrative Research. Sage Publications California

  • Armitage, D. (2014, July 27). David Armitage on the plight of history. Radio New Zealand. http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/sunday/audio/20143251/david-armitage-on-the-plight-of-history

  • Ballantyne, T. (2014). Entanglements of empire: Missionaries, Māori, and the question of the body. Auckland University Press.

  • Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268. https://doi.org/10.3366/E1754850010000813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, K., & McCully, A. (2007). Teaching controversial issues…where controversial issues really matter. Teaching History, 127, 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belgrave, M. (2005). Historical frictions. Auckland University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010) Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things Duke University Press Durham

  • Belich, J. (1996). Making peoples: A history of the New Zealanders. Penguin Books.

  • Bell, A. (2004). ‘Cultural vandalism’ and Pākehā politics of guilt and responsibility. In P. Spoonley, C. Macpherson, & D. Pearson (Eds.), Tangata Tangata: The changing ethnic contours of New Zealand (pp. 89–107). Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. (2006) Bifurcation or entanglement?: Settler identity and biculturalism in Aotearoa New Zealand. Continuum Journal of Media & Culture Studies, 20(2): 253–268

  • Bell, A. (2020a). Reverberating historical privilege of a “middling” sort of settler family. Genealogy, 4(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy4020046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. (2020b, June 16). The truth is not set in stone. Ideasroom/Newsroom. https://www.newsroom.co.nz/ideasroom/the-truth-is-not-set-in-stone

  • Bell, L. (2020). History demands a personal reckoning. E-tangata. https://e-tangata.co.nz/reflections/history-demands-a-personal-reckoning/

  • Binney, J. (2009). History and memory: The wood of the whau tree, 1766–2005. In G. Byrnes (Ed.), The new Oxford history of New Zealand (pp. 73–98). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. Routledge.

  • Byrnes, G. (2009). Introduction: Reframing New Zealand history. In G. Byrnes (Ed.), The new Oxford history of New Zealand. Oxford University Press.

  • Chase, S. (2005). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 651–679). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Counts. (2020). Teacher Numbers 2019 [Ethnicity]. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/statistics/teacher-workforce#1

  • Education Gazette (2021, February 25). Discovering our histories. https://gazette.education.govt.nz/articles/discovering-our-histories/

  • Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Sage Publications.

  • Gibbons, P. (2002). Cultural colonization and national identity. New Zealand Journal of History, 36(1), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, M. (2017). Teaching ‘difficult history’ in an era of high curriculum autonomy: A New Zealand case study. Yesterday and Today, (18), 128–144. http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/yt/n18/12.pdf

  • Harcourt, M. (2020a). ‘But wait, there was a war in the Waikato?!’: Settler colonialism, white ignorance and the New Zealand History curriculum. In N. Fink, M. Furrer, & P. Gautschi (Eds.), The Teaching of the History of One’s Own Country: International Experiences in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 291–308). Wochenschau Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, M. (2020b). Teaching and learning New Zealand’s difficult history of colonisation in secondary school contexts. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Victoria, Wellington, New Zealand.

  • Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222–237). Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, F., Lee-Morgan, J. B. J., Newton, P., & McCreanor, T. (2020). The case of Ihumātao: Interrogating competing corporate and Indigenous visions of the future. New Zealand Sociology, 35(2), 15–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2004). Hīkoi: Forty years of Māori protest. Huia.

  • Harris, A. (2019, February 10). Don’t get me started on compulsion. E-tangata. https://e-tangata.co.nz/history/dont-get-me-started-on-compulsion/

  • Jones, A. (2020). This pākehā life: An unsettled memoir. Bridget Williams Books

  • Jones, A., & Jenkins, K. (2008). Rethinking collaboration: Working the indigene-colonizer hyphen. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 471–486). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, D. (Ed.). (2012). Huia histories of Māori: Ngā Tāhuhu Kōrero. Huia Publishers.

  • Kukutai, T., & Rata, A. (2017). From mainstream to manaaki: Indigenising our approach to immigration. In D. Hall (Ed.), Fair Borders? Migration policy in the twenty-first century (pp. 26–45). Bridget Williams Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. (2003). The Penguin History of New Zealand. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunowski, M. (2006). Teaching about the Treaty of Waitangi and related issues in the Social Studies classroom. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 41(2), 223–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, L. (2020). Teaching the New Zealand wars: Iwi- and hapū-led histories. Set, 2, 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthewman, S. (2017). Pākehā ethnicity: The politics of white privilege. In A. Bell, V. Elizabeth, T. McIntosh, & M. Wynyard (Eds.), A land of milk and honey (pp. 83–94). Auckland University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metge, J. (1990). Te kohao o te ngira: Culture and learning. Learning Media/Ministry of Education.

  • Metge, J. (2015a). Talk Treaty: Kōrerotia te Tiriti [Audio file]. http://talktreaty.org.nz/thetreaty-in-context/

  • Middleton, S., & May, H. (1997). Teachers talk teaching 1915–1995: Early childhood, schools and teachers’ colleges. Dunmore Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2015). Te takanga o te wā/Māori history: Guidelines for Years 1 to 8. Ministry of Education/New Zealand Government.

  • Ministry of Education. (2020). Achievement Objectives. New Zealand Curriculum Guides: Senior Secondary. https://seniorsecondary.tki.org.nz/Social-sciences/History/Achievement-objectives

  • Ministry of Education. (2021a). Public consultation on the draft curriculum document. Aotearoa New Zealand’s histories in our national curriculum. https://www.education.govt.nz/our-work/changes-in-education/aotearoa-new-zealand-histories-in-our-national-curriculum/

  • Ministry of Education. (2021b). Aotearoa New Zealand's histories: Supporting school leaders to understand and plan for Aotearoa New Zealand's histories in social sciences. Leading local curriculum guide series.https://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/Strengthening-local-curriculum/Leading-local-curriculum-guide-series

  • New Zealand History Teachers Association. (2019a, February 20). “Give me my history” NZHTA petition [media release]. NZHTA. https://nzhta.org.nz/news/give-me-my-history-nzhta-petition/

  • New Zealand History Teachers Association (2019b, June 11). Petition reason. Petition of Graeme Ball on behalf of the New Zealand History Teachers' Association: “Give me my history!”: Teaching our nation's past in our schools. New Zealand Parliament/Pāremata Aotearoa. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/petitions/document/PET_83795/petition-of-graeme-ball-on-behalf-of- the-new-zealand-history

  • O’Malley, V. (2018). Learning (and not learning) about the New Zealand wars [opinion]. The Spinoff. https://thespinoff.co.nz/atea/11-06-2018/learning-and-not-learning-about-the-new-zealand-wars/

  • O’Malley, V. & Kidman, J. (2018) Settler colonial history, commemoration and white backlash:Remembering the New Zealand Wars. Settler Colonial Studies8(3), 298–313.https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2017.1279831

  • Orange, C. (2017). Introduction. In Archives New Zealand, National Library of New Zealand & Bridget

  • Williams Books (Eds.), Te Tiriti o Waitangi: The Treaty of Waitangi, 1840 (pp. 8–22). Bridget Williams Books.

  • Penetito, W. (2009). Place-based education: Catering for curriculum, culture and community. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 18, 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radio New Zealand. (2019, August 28). MPs urged to make teaching New Zealand history in schools Compulsory. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/397655/mps-urged-to-make- teaching-new-zealand-history-in-schools-compulsory

  • Sharples, P. (2014, December 11). Pita Sharples: Cultural wisdom can bridge gaps. NZ Herald. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/pita-sharples-cultural-wisdom-can-bridge-gaps/3Y3R6MIVKY7J6WUSFOQI27XX2M/

  • Sheehan, M. (2010). The place of ‘New Zealand’ in the New Zealand history curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(5), 671–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.485247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, M. (2017a). A matter of choice: Controversial histories, citizenship, and the challenge of a high-autonomy curriculum. Curriculum Matters, 13, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.18296/cm.0023

  • Sheehan, M. (2017b) A Matter of Choice–Biculturalism. Public History Weekly https://doi.org/10.1515/phw-2017-8094

  • Sheehan, M. (2020). Historical thinking, ‘difficult histories’, and Māori perspectives of the past. In C. W. Berg & T. M. Christou (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of History and Social Studies Education (pp. 497–510). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37210-1_19

  • Sheehan, M., Epstein, T., & Harcourt, M. (2018). “People are still grieving”: Māori and non-Māori adolescents’ perceptions of the Treaty of Waitangi. In T. Epstein & C. L. Peck (Eds.), Teaching and learning difficult histories in international contexts: A critical sociocultural approach (pp. 109–122). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Te Kete Ipurangi. (2017). Māori history: Māori History in the NZ Curriculum. [New Zealand Government]http://maorihistory.tki.org.nz/en/why-teach-maori-history/

  • Tallon, R. (2016). Paying attention to emotions: Understanding the affective dimension in the social studies classroom. In M. Harcourt, A. Milligan, & B. Wood (Eds.), Teaching social studies for critical, active citizenship in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 102–117). NZCER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. (1999). Settlement as forgetting. In K. Neumann, N. Thomas, & H. Ericksen (Eds.), Quicksands: Foundational histories in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 20–38). UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. (2004). Ka whawhai tonu matou: Struggle without end (Revised ed.). Penguin Books.

  • Waitangi Tribunal. (2016). The Treaty of Waitangi/Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Waitangi Tribunal/Te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti o Waitangi. https://www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz/treaty-of-waitangi/meaning-of-the-treaty/

  • Whitcombe & Tombs. (1930). Our nation’s story: A course of British history (Standard V). Whitcombe & Tombs.

  • Young, W., & Caine, J. (2021). Foreword. In Report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Terrorist Attack on Christchurch Mosques 15 March 2019. Retrieved February 25 from https://christchurchattack.royalcommission.nz/the-report/foreword-and-acknowledgments/foreword/

  • Zembylas, M. (2005). Teaching with emotion. Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zembylas, M. (2017a). Teacher resistance to engage with ‘alternative’ perspectives of difficult histories: The limits and prospects of affective disruption. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, Vol 38, No. 5, 659–675

  • Zembylas, M. (2017b). Wilful ignorance and the emotional regime of schools. British Journal of Education Studies, 65(4), 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

My heartfelt appreciation to the five teachers featured in the article and to the other five participants I interviewed but could not include here – all of your narratives contributed to my thinking. Thanks to the anonymous reviewer for their thoughtful comments. For collegial support, my thanks also to Avril Bell, Lincoln Dam, Frances Hancock, Alison Jones, Billie Lythberg and Christine Woods. This research was funded through a Royal Society Te Apārangi Marsden grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rose Yukich.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yukich, R. Feeling Responsible Towards Aotearoa New Zealand’s Past: Emotion at Work in the Stance of Five Pākehā History Teachers. NZ J Educ Stud 56, 181–199 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-021-00218-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-021-00218-z

Keywords

Navigation