Abstract
In this article I interact with the narratives of five Pākehā (European) secondary school teachers, who choose to teach Aotearoa New Zealand histories including about Te Tiriti o Waitangi at senior level (years 11–13). I highlight characteristics of the active stance adopted by participants towards teaching and learning the difficult histories of home, central to which are the effects of colonisation and Indigenous Māori–settler entanglements. Drawing on Sara Ahmed’s (2015) understanding of the key role played by emotion in shaping social and political attachments, I argue that emotional work was just as important as intellectual effort on the part of participants for helping form and fortify their stance. Subject knowledge and effective pedagogical skills are crucial, but neither transcend the affective realm, where teacher orientation toward the content itself can influence the quality of student engagement. To provide background context for participants’ narratives, I outline active elements in history education discourse featuring Pākehā positionality and the practice of ignorance in relation to school curricula and settler constructions of history. This study has implications for teacher professional development as schools prepare to respond to forthcoming changes in national curriculum policy making the study of New Zealand histories compulsory for primary and junior secondary students.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Names attributed to all research participants are pseudonyms.
The research was part of a Royal Society Te Apārangi Marsden-funded project entitled Tāngata Tiriti: Learning the trick of standing upright here, which focused on engagement with Te Tiriti o Waitangi amongst non-Māori from a range of professions.
Te Tiriti o Waitangi (‘Te Tiriti’ or ‘the Treaty’ for short) refers to the Māori language text of the 1840 agreement, which the majority of Māori leaders signed.
‘Entanglement’ serves also as “an analytical metaphor” in history writing to explore complex, large-scale “webs of interdependence” (see Ballantyne, 2014, p. 17).
See Waitangi Tribunal (2016) for an introduction to the differences between the Māori and English language versions of the Treaty and associated politics.
For a detailed discussion on the kinds of emotions that may surface in the senior history classroom within a New Zealand context, see pages 192 to 199 in Harcourt (2020b).
Refer also to Sheehan (2017b) and the views of international and New Zealand teachers of history in the ‘replies’ section.
A history textbook for primary school children published in 1930 from the series Our Nation’s Story (Whitcombe & Tombs Limited) presents British colonisation as a source of pride claiming that “[t]he bond between the white New Zealanders and the brown is a very strong one” (p. 40).
See Barton and McCully (2007) for a critique of the view that “teachers should not reveal their own positions on controversial issues, lest they unduly influence students” (p. 16).
Tāngata Tiriti refers to non-Māori citizens of New Zealand as opposed to tangata whenua (original people of the land/indigenous Māori).
References
Ahmed, S. (2015). The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed) Routledge.
Anderson, A.; Binney, J.; & Harris, A. (2014). Tangata whenua: An illustrated history. Bridget Williams Books.
Andrews, M., Squire, C., & Tamboukou, M. (Eds) (2008). Doing Narrative Research. Sage Publications California
Armitage, D. (2014, July 27). David Armitage on the plight of history. Radio New Zealand. http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/sunday/audio/20143251/david-armitage-on-the-plight-of-history
Ballantyne, T. (2014). Entanglements of empire: Missionaries, Māori, and the question of the body. Auckland University Press.
Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268. https://doi.org/10.3366/E1754850010000813
Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Barton, K., & McCully, A. (2007). Teaching controversial issues…where controversial issues really matter. Teaching History, 127, 13–19.
Belgrave, M. (2005). Historical frictions. Auckland University Press.
Bennett, J. (2010) Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things Duke University Press Durham
Belich, J. (1996). Making peoples: A history of the New Zealanders. Penguin Books.
Bell, A. (2004). ‘Cultural vandalism’ and Pākehā politics of guilt and responsibility. In P. Spoonley, C. Macpherson, & D. Pearson (Eds.), Tangata Tangata: The changing ethnic contours of New Zealand (pp. 89–107). Thomson.
Bell, A. (2006) Bifurcation or entanglement?: Settler identity and biculturalism in Aotearoa New Zealand. Continuum Journal of Media & Culture Studies, 20(2): 253–268
Bell, A. (2020a). Reverberating historical privilege of a “middling” sort of settler family. Genealogy, 4(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy4020046
Bell, A. (2020b, June 16). The truth is not set in stone. Ideasroom/Newsroom. https://www.newsroom.co.nz/ideasroom/the-truth-is-not-set-in-stone
Bell, L. (2020). History demands a personal reckoning. E-tangata. https://e-tangata.co.nz/reflections/history-demands-a-personal-reckoning/
Binney, J. (2009). History and memory: The wood of the whau tree, 1766–2005. In G. Byrnes (Ed.), The new Oxford history of New Zealand (pp. 73–98). Oxford University Press.
Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. Routledge.
Byrnes, G. (2009). Introduction: Reframing New Zealand history. In G. Byrnes (Ed.), The new Oxford history of New Zealand. Oxford University Press.
Chase, S. (2005). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 651–679). Sage Publications.
Education Counts. (2020). Teacher Numbers 2019 [Ethnicity]. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/statistics/teacher-workforce#1
Education Gazette (2021, February 25). Discovering our histories. https://gazette.education.govt.nz/articles/discovering-our-histories/
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Sage Publications.
Gibbons, P. (2002). Cultural colonization and national identity. New Zealand Journal of History, 36(1), 5–17.
Harcourt, M. (2017). Teaching ‘difficult history’ in an era of high curriculum autonomy: A New Zealand case study. Yesterday and Today, (18), 128–144. http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/yt/n18/12.pdf
Harcourt, M. (2020a). ‘But wait, there was a war in the Waikato?!’: Settler colonialism, white ignorance and the New Zealand History curriculum. In N. Fink, M. Furrer, & P. Gautschi (Eds.), The Teaching of the History of One’s Own Country: International Experiences in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 291–308). Wochenschau Verlag.
Harcourt, M. (2020b). Teaching and learning New Zealand’s difficult history of colonisation in secondary school contexts. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Victoria, Wellington, New Zealand.
Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222–237). Lawrence & Wishart.
Hancock, F., Lee-Morgan, J. B. J., Newton, P., & McCreanor, T. (2020). The case of Ihumātao: Interrogating competing corporate and Indigenous visions of the future. New Zealand Sociology, 35(2), 15–45.
Harris, A. (2004). Hīkoi: Forty years of Māori protest. Huia.
Harris, A. (2019, February 10). Don’t get me started on compulsion. E-tangata. https://e-tangata.co.nz/history/dont-get-me-started-on-compulsion/
Jones, A. (2020). This pākehā life: An unsettled memoir. Bridget Williams Books
Jones, A., & Jenkins, K. (2008). Rethinking collaboration: Working the indigene-colonizer hyphen. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 471–486). Sage Publications.
Keenan, D. (Ed.). (2012). Huia histories of Māori: Ngā Tāhuhu Kōrero. Huia Publishers.
Kukutai, T., & Rata, A. (2017). From mainstream to manaaki: Indigenising our approach to immigration. In D. Hall (Ed.), Fair Borders? Migration policy in the twenty-first century (pp. 26–45). Bridget Williams Books.
King, M. (2003). The Penguin History of New Zealand. Penguin Books.
Kunowski, M. (2006). Teaching about the Treaty of Waitangi and related issues in the Social Studies classroom. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 41(2), 223–239.
MacDonald, L. (2020). Teaching the New Zealand wars: Iwi- and hapū-led histories. Set, 2, 38–42.
Matthewman, S. (2017). Pākehā ethnicity: The politics of white privilege. In A. Bell, V. Elizabeth, T. McIntosh, & M. Wynyard (Eds.), A land of milk and honey (pp. 83–94). Auckland University Press.
Metge, J. (1990). Te kohao o te ngira: Culture and learning. Learning Media/Ministry of Education.
Metge, J. (2015a). Talk Treaty: Kōrerotia te Tiriti [Audio file]. http://talktreaty.org.nz/thetreaty-in-context/
Middleton, S., & May, H. (1997). Teachers talk teaching 1915–1995: Early childhood, schools and teachers’ colleges. Dunmore Press.
Ministry of Education. (2015). Te takanga o te wā/Māori history: Guidelines for Years 1 to 8. Ministry of Education/New Zealand Government.
Ministry of Education. (2020). Achievement Objectives. New Zealand Curriculum Guides: Senior Secondary. https://seniorsecondary.tki.org.nz/Social-sciences/History/Achievement-objectives
Ministry of Education. (2021a). Public consultation on the draft curriculum document. Aotearoa New Zealand’s histories in our national curriculum. https://www.education.govt.nz/our-work/changes-in-education/aotearoa-new-zealand-histories-in-our-national-curriculum/
Ministry of Education. (2021b). Aotearoa New Zealand's histories: Supporting school leaders to understand and plan for Aotearoa New Zealand's histories in social sciences. Leading local curriculum guide series.https://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/Strengthening-local-curriculum/Leading-local-curriculum-guide-series
New Zealand History Teachers Association. (2019a, February 20). “Give me my history” NZHTA petition [media release]. NZHTA. https://nzhta.org.nz/news/give-me-my-history-nzhta-petition/
New Zealand History Teachers Association (2019b, June 11). Petition reason. Petition of Graeme Ball on behalf of the New Zealand History Teachers' Association: “Give me my history!”: Teaching our nation's past in our schools. New Zealand Parliament/Pāremata Aotearoa. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/petitions/document/PET_83795/petition-of-graeme-ball-on-behalf-of- the-new-zealand-history
O’Malley, V. (2018). Learning (and not learning) about the New Zealand wars [opinion]. The Spinoff. https://thespinoff.co.nz/atea/11-06-2018/learning-and-not-learning-about-the-new-zealand-wars/
O’Malley, V. & Kidman, J. (2018) Settler colonial history, commemoration and white backlash:Remembering the New Zealand Wars. Settler Colonial Studies, 8(3), 298–313.https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2017.1279831
Orange, C. (2017). Introduction. In Archives New Zealand, National Library of New Zealand & Bridget
Williams Books (Eds.), Te Tiriti o Waitangi: The Treaty of Waitangi, 1840 (pp. 8–22). Bridget Williams Books.
Penetito, W. (2009). Place-based education: Catering for curriculum, culture and community. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 18, 5–29.
Radio New Zealand. (2019, August 28). MPs urged to make teaching New Zealand history in schools Compulsory. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/397655/mps-urged-to-make- teaching-new-zealand-history-in-schools-compulsory
Sharples, P. (2014, December 11). Pita Sharples: Cultural wisdom can bridge gaps. NZ Herald. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/pita-sharples-cultural-wisdom-can-bridge-gaps/3Y3R6MIVKY7J6WUSFOQI27XX2M/
Sheehan, M. (2010). The place of ‘New Zealand’ in the New Zealand history curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(5), 671–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.485247
Sheehan, M. (2017a). A matter of choice: Controversial histories, citizenship, and the challenge of a high-autonomy curriculum. Curriculum Matters, 13, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.18296/cm.0023
Sheehan, M. (2017b) A Matter of Choice–Biculturalism. Public History Weekly https://doi.org/10.1515/phw-2017-8094
Sheehan, M. (2020). Historical thinking, ‘difficult histories’, and Māori perspectives of the past. In C. W. Berg & T. M. Christou (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of History and Social Studies Education (pp. 497–510). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37210-1_19
Sheehan, M., Epstein, T., & Harcourt, M. (2018). “People are still grieving”: Māori and non-Māori adolescents’ perceptions of the Treaty of Waitangi. In T. Epstein & C. L. Peck (Eds.), Teaching and learning difficult histories in international contexts: A critical sociocultural approach (pp. 109–122). Routledge.
Te Kete Ipurangi. (2017). Māori history: Māori History in the NZ Curriculum. [New Zealand Government]http://maorihistory.tki.org.nz/en/why-teach-maori-history/
Tallon, R. (2016). Paying attention to emotions: Understanding the affective dimension in the social studies classroom. In M. Harcourt, A. Milligan, & B. Wood (Eds.), Teaching social studies for critical, active citizenship in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 102–117). NZCER Press.
Turner, S. (1999). Settlement as forgetting. In K. Neumann, N. Thomas, & H. Ericksen (Eds.), Quicksands: Foundational histories in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 20–38). UNSW Press.
Walker, R. (2004). Ka whawhai tonu matou: Struggle without end (Revised ed.). Penguin Books.
Waitangi Tribunal. (2016). The Treaty of Waitangi/Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Waitangi Tribunal/Te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti o Waitangi. https://www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz/treaty-of-waitangi/meaning-of-the-treaty/
Whitcombe & Tombs. (1930). Our nation’s story: A course of British history (Standard V). Whitcombe & Tombs.
Young, W., & Caine, J. (2021). Foreword. In Report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Terrorist Attack on Christchurch Mosques 15 March 2019. Retrieved February 25 from https://christchurchattack.royalcommission.nz/the-report/foreword-and-acknowledgments/foreword/
Zembylas, M. (2005). Teaching with emotion. Information Age Publishing.
Zembylas, M. (2017a). Teacher resistance to engage with ‘alternative’ perspectives of difficult histories: The limits and prospects of affective disruption. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, Vol 38, No. 5, 659–675
Zembylas, M. (2017b). Wilful ignorance and the emotional regime of schools. British Journal of Education Studies, 65(4), 499–515.
Acknowledgements
My heartfelt appreciation to the five teachers featured in the article and to the other five participants I interviewed but could not include here – all of your narratives contributed to my thinking. Thanks to the anonymous reviewer for their thoughtful comments. For collegial support, my thanks also to Avril Bell, Lincoln Dam, Frances Hancock, Alison Jones, Billie Lythberg and Christine Woods. This research was funded through a Royal Society Te Apārangi Marsden grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yukich, R. Feeling Responsible Towards Aotearoa New Zealand’s Past: Emotion at Work in the Stance of Five Pākehā History Teachers. NZ J Educ Stud 56, 181–199 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-021-00218-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-021-00218-z