Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling daily surface runoff, sediment and nutrient loss at watershed scale employing Arc-APEX model interfaced with GIS: a case study in Lesser Himalayan landscape

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was carried out to evaluate performance of Agricultural Policy Environmental eXtender (APEX) integrated with GIS as ArcAPEX model in simulating surface runoff, sediment and nutrients loss from a watershed located in lesser Himalayan region in Uttarakhand state, India. Daily surface runoff, sediment and nutrient loss data measured at watershed level for the year 2010–2011. Measurement at watershed revealed average daily sediment loss in range of 1.0–1.32 t ha−1 was measured with peak of 3.04 t ha−1 on daily time-step. The loss of total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) were estimated from 0.49 to 0.58 kg ha−1 and 0.16 to 01.7 kg ha−1, respectively from the watershed on daily basis for the rainfall considered for the modelling. A total of 40 rainy days surface runoff and sediment data were collected and of which half of the events data were used for calibration and remaining for validation. The calibration was done by changing the sensitive parameters. Analysis showed that SCS CN number was found most sensitive to runoff, followed by saturated hydraulic conductivity, available water-holding capacity, CN retention parameter and C factor whereas erosion control practice (P) factor was found to be most sensitive, followed by C factor, sediment routing coefficient, average upland slope and soil erodibility (K) factor for the sediment and nutrient loss. APEX model calibrated for the watershed and it predicted quite well for the surface runoff (r = 0.92, NSE = 0.50), sediment loss (r = 0.88, NSE = 0.61 and nutrients of total carbon (r = 0.78, NSE = 0.59) and fairly for total nitrogen (r = 0.77, NSE = 0.19). The calibration and validation results indicate that APEX model can be satisfactorily used for predicting runoff, sediment and nutrient (TC) loss at watershed scale on daily time-step. The landscape is prone landslips/ collapse of field terraces etc. occurring at high rainfall events was not accounted by the model that may be a reason for under prediction of sediment loss by the model. The study suggests to incorporate landslips/collapse of field terraces, etc., processes in future improved versions of APEX for improving sediment yield prediction in the Himalayan landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adeuya RK, Lim KJ, Engel BA, Thomas MA (2005) Modeling the average annual nutrient losses of two watersheds in Indiana using GLEAMS-NAPRA. Trans ASAE 48(5):1739–1749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part i: model development. JAWRA 34(1):73–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunbabu E, Logeswari K (2018) Study of evaluation of soil and water conservation measures on soil erosion at micro-watershed scale using RUSLE model and GIS. Indian J Soil Cons 46(3):312–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari AB, Nelson NO, Sweeney DW, Baffaut C, Lory JA, Senaviratne GMMMA et al (2017) Calibration of the APEX model to simulate management practice effects on runoff, sediment, and phosphorus loss. J Environ Qual. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2016.07.0272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya R, Ghosh BN, Mishra PK, Mandal B, Rao CS, Sarkar D, Das K, Anil KS, Lalitha M, Hati KM et al (2015) Soil degradation in India: Challenges and potential. Sustainability 7:3528–3570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake GR (1965) Bulk density. In: Methods of soil analysis, part I. Am. Soc. Agronomy, Inc. pp. 374–390

  • Bloschl G, Sivapalan M (1995) Scale issues in hydrological modeling: a review. Hydrol Proc 9:251–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung SW, Gassman PW, Kramer LA, Williams JR, Gu R (1999) Validation of EPIC for two watersheds in southwest Iowa. J Environ Qual 28(3):971–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung SW, Gassman PW, Gu R, Kanwar RS (2002) Evaluation of epic for assessing tile flow and nitrogen losses for alternative agricultural management systems. Trans ASAE 45:1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSWCR&TI (2011) Vision, 2030: vision document of the central soil and water conservation research and training institute. Allied Publisher, Dehradun, pp 1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel EB, Camp JV, LeBoeuf EJ, Penrod JR, Dobbins JP, Abkowitz MD (2011) Watershed modeling and its applications: a state-of-the-art review. Open Hydrol J 5:26–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vente J, Poesen J, Verstraeten G, Govers G, Vanmaercke M, Van Rompaey A, Arabkhedri M, Boix-Fayos C (2013) Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at regional scales: where do we stand? Earth Sci Rev 127:16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekwueme BN, Agunwamba JC (2020) Modeling the influence of meteorological variables on runoff in a tropical watershed. Civil Eng J 6(12):2344–2351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro V, Minacapilli M (1995) Sediment delivery processes at basin scale. Hydrolog Sci J 40(6):703–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster GR, Highhill RE (1983) Effects of terraces on soil loss: USLE P factor values for terraces. J Soil Water Conserv 38(11):48–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Garde RJ and Kothyari UC (1986) Erosion in Indian catchments, 3rd Int. Symposium on River Sedimentation, Jackson (Miss), USA

  • Gassman PW, Williams JR, Benson VW, Izaurralde RC, Flowers JD (2005) Historical development and applications of the EPIC and APEX models working paper 05-WP 397: Centre for agricultural and rural development. Iowa State University, Ames

  • Gassman PW, Osei E, Saleh A, Rodecap J, Norvell S, Williams JR (2006) Alternative practices for sediment and nutrient loss control on livestock farms in northeast Iowa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 117(2–3):135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassman PW, Reyes M, Green CH, Arnold JG (2007) The soil and water assessment tool: historical development applications and future directions. Trans ASABE 50(4):1211–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassman PW, Williams JR, Wang X, Saleh A, Osei E, Hauck L, Izaurralde C, Flowers J (2010) The agricultural policy environmental extender (APEX) model: an emerging tool for landscape and watershed environmental analyses. Trans ASABE 53(3):711–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiamel IA, Lee HS (2020) Watershed modelling of the mindanao river basin in the philippines using the SWAT for water resource management. Civil Eng J 6(4):626–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICAR (2010) Degraded and wastelands of India-status and spatial distribution. Directorate of information and publications of agriculture. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Izaurralde RC, Williams JR, MacGill WB, Rosenberg NJ (2006) Simulating soil-C dynamics with EPIC: model description and testing against long-term data. Eco Model 192(3–4):362–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javadinejad S, Dara R, Jafary F (2020) Climate change scenarios and effects on Snow-melt runoff. Civil Eng J 6(9):2676–6957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Udawatta RP, Anderson SH, Mugdal A (2011) APEX model simulation of runoff and sediment losses for grazed pasture watersheds with agroforestry buffers. Agrofor Syst 83(1):51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Singh A, Shrestha DP (2016) Modelling spatially distributed surface runoff generation using SWAT-VSA: a case study in a watershed of the north-west Himalayan landscape. Model Earth Syst Environ 2(4):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (1995) Erosion-crop productivity relationships for soils of Africa. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:661–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2015) Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability 7:5875–5895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7055875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin D, Guo H, Lian F, Gao Y, Yue Y, Wang JA (2016) A quantitative method for long-term water erosion impacts on productivity with a lack of field experiments: a case study in Huaihe Watershed, China. Sustainability 8(7):675–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Williams JR, Zehnder AJB, Yang H (2007) GEPIC-modelling wheat yield and crop water productivity with high resolution on a global scale. Agric Syst 94(2):478–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal D, Sharda VN (2011) Assessment of permissible soil loss in India employing a quantitative bio-physical model. Curr Sci 100:383–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Matson PA, Parton WJ, Power AG, Swift MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy AD, Chiu SY, Nebgen JW (1976) Loading functions for assessment of water pollution from nonpoint sources. Environ Prot Tech Serv 600(2):76–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt WS, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2003) A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environ Model Softw 18(8):761–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris MD (1991) Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33:161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA, Govers G, Darrell NL (1999) Variability in Soil erosion data from replicated plots. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63(6):1829–1835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson NO, Baffaut C, Lory JA, Anomaa S, G.M.M.M.; Bhandari, AB, Udawatta RP, Sweeney DW, Helmers MJ, Van Liew MW, Mallarino AP, Wortmann CS (2017) Multisite evaluation of APEX for water quality: II. Regional Parameterization. Agronomy and Horticulture—Faculty Publications, 1082.

  • Onstad CA, Foster GR (1975) Erosion modeling on a watershed. Trans ASAE 18(2):288–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A, Himanshu SK, Mishra SK, Singh VP (2016) Physically based soil erosion and sediment yield models revisited. CATENA 147:595–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Ale S, Teague WR, Jeong J (2017) Evaluating the ranch and watershed scale impacts of using traditional and adaptive multi-paddock grazing on runoff, sediment and nutrient losses in North Texas USA. Agric Ecosyst Environ 240:32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Burgess M (2013) Soil erosion threatens food production. Agriculture 3:443–463. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture3030443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Harvey C, Resosudarmo P, Sinclair K, Kurz D, McNair M, Crist S, Shpritz L, Fitton L, Saffouri R, Blair R (1995) Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science 267:1117–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe DE, Reid DK, Blombäck K, Bolster CH, Collick AS, Easton ZM, Smith DR (2015) Applicability of models to predict phosphorus losses in drained fields: a review. J Environ Qual 44:614–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanarayanan TS, Williams JR, Dugas WA, Hauck LM, McFarland AMS (1997) Using APEX to identify alternative practices for animal waste management, ASAE Paper no. 972209. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph, MI.

  • Ramirez-Avila JJ, Radcliffe DE, Osmond D, Bolste C, Sharpley A, Ortega-Achury SL, Forsberg A, Oldham JL (2017) Evaluation of the APEX model to simulate runoff quality from agricultural fields in the Southern Region of the United States. J Environ Qual 46:1357–1364. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2017.07.0258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh A, Arnold JG, Gassman PW, Hauck LW, Rosenthal WD, Williams JR, McFarland AMS (2000) Application of SWAT for the upper North Bosque River watershed. Trans ASAE 43(5):1077–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh A, Williams JR, Wood JC, Hauck LM, Blackburn WH (2004) Application of APEX for forestry. Trans ASAE 47(3):751–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer TJ, Logsdon SD (2002) Hydraulic and physical properties of stony soils in a small watershed. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1947–1956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharda VN, Ojasvi PR (2016) A revised soil erosion budget for India: role of reservoir sedimentation and land-use protection measures. Earth Surf Process Landf 41(14):2007–2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheila F, Christopher JL, Tank UH, Mahl HY, Arnold JG, Trentman MT, Sowa SP, Herbert ME, Ross JA, White MJ, Royer TV (2017) Modeling nutrient removal using watershed-scale implementation of the two-stage ditch. Ecol Eng 108(Part B):358–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Simanton JR, Rawitz E, Shirley ED (1984) Effects of rock fragments on erosion of semiarid rangeland soils. Erosion and Productivity of Soils Containing Rock Fragments. Soil Sci.soc Am 7:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, Babu R, Narain P, Bhushan LS, Abrol IP (1992) Soil erosion rates in India. J Soil Water Conserv 47:97–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava P, Migliaccio KW, Simunek J (2007) Landscape models for simulating water quality at point, field, and watershed scales. Trans ASABE 50(5):1683–1693. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steglich E, Williams J (2013) Agricultural policy environmental extender model user’s manual. Version 0806. Blackland Res. Ext. Center, Temple, TX.

  • Tuppad P, Winchell MF, Wang X, Srinivasan R, Williams JR (2009) ARCAPEX: ArcGIS interface for agricultural policy environmental extender (APEX) hydrology/water quality model. Int Agric Eng J 18(1–2):59–71

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (1972) National engineering handbook. Hydrology section 4. Chapters 4–10. USDA, Washington, D.C

  • Verma TS, Sharma PK (2000) Effects of organic residue management on productivity of the rice-wheat cropping system. Long-Term Soil Fert Exp Rice Wheat Crop Syst 163:171

    Google Scholar 

  • Verstraeten G, Poesen J, de Vente J, Koninckx X (2003) Sediment yield variability in Spain: a quantitative and semiqualitative analysis using reservoir sedimentation rates. Geomorphology 50:327–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang E, Xin C, Williams JR, Xu C (2006a) Predicting soil erosion for alternative land uses. J Environ Qual 35:459–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Harmel RD, Williams JR, Harman WL (2006b) Evaluation of epic for assessing crop yield, runoff, sediment and nutrient losses from watersheds with poultry litter fertilization. Trans ASABE 49(1):47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Gassman PW, Williams JR, Potter S, Kemanian AR (2008) Modeling the impacts of soil management practices on runoff, sediment yield, maize productivity, and soil organic carbon using APEX. Soil Till Res 101(1–2):78–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Williams JR, Gassman PW, Baffaut C, Izaurralde RC, Jeong J, Kiniry JR (2012) EPIC and APEX: model use calibration, and validation. Trans ASABE 55:1447–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Yen H, Jeong J, Williams JR (2015) Accounting for conceptual soil erosion and sediment yield modeling uncertainty in the APEX model using bayesian model averaging. J Hydrol Eng 20(6):C4014010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Flanagan DC, Wang Z, Cherkauer KA (2018) Climate change impacts on nutrient losses of two watersheds in the great lakes region. Water 10:442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR (1990) The erosion productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model: a case history. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 329:421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Hann RW (1978). Optimal operation of large agricultural watersheds with water quality constraints. Texas Water Resources Institute, Texas A&M Univ., Tech. Rept. No. 96

  • Williams JR, Izaurralde RC, Steglich EM (2008) Agricultural policy/environmental eXtender model: theoretical documentation version 0604 (draft). BREC report # 2008–17. Texas AgriLIFE Research, Texas A&M University, Temple, TX.

  • Williams JR, Izaurralde RC, Steglich, EM (2008) “Agricultural policy/environmental extender model: theoretical documentation. Version0604.” BRECRep.2008–17,Black land Research and Extension Center (BREC), Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Temple, TX.

  • Wishmeier WH, Smith DH (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses—a guide to conservation planning. Agric. Handbook No. 537. USDA, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin L, Wang X, Pan J, Gassman PW (2009) Evaluation of apex for daily runoff and sediment yield from three plots in the middle Huaihe river watershed, China. Trans ASABE 52(6):1833–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L (2019) Big data, knowledge mapping for sustainable development: a water quality index case study. Emerg Sci J 3(4):249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) for providing financial support under Earth Observation Applications Mission (EOAM) Project (ISRO/DOS) on “Mountain Ecosystem Processes and Services” to carry out the research work. We are thankful to the Director, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS) for providing necessary facilities to carry out the research work. Authors sincerely acknowledge the technical support of Shri R. K. Arya Sr. Technical Officer from ICAR-IISWC and Ex. Head, CMD IIRS for developing watershed observatory at the site.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Indian Space Research Organization, 4 Kalidas Road, Dehradun, 248001, India

    Suresh Kumar, Ravinder Pal Singh & Justin George Kalambukattu

Authors
  1. Suresh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ravinder Pal Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Justin George Kalambukattu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suresh Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, S., Singh, R.P. & Kalambukattu, J.G. Modeling daily surface runoff, sediment and nutrient loss at watershed scale employing Arc-APEX model interfaced with GIS: a case study in Lesser Himalayan landscape. Environ Earth Sci 80, 498 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09791-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09791-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation