Skip to main content
Log in

Study on the Implementation of Single Pressure Balance with Iterative A-B-A-B-A Method in the Differential Pressure Calibration of Ventilator Tester

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
MAPAN Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differential pressure measurement is of increasing importance for many industrial applications, for example in oil and gas industry, as well as in the medical application such as the differential pressure application in the ventilator and ventilator tester. The demands of accuracy in differential pressure measurement are increasing as well through the traceability chain into the primary standard. In this study, two differential pressure calibration methods have been successfully implemented in the “Standar Nasional Satuan Ukuran-Badan Standardisasi Nasional (SNSU-BSN)” as the national metrology institute of Indonesia to calibrate the differential pressure of the ventilator tester. The first method is by generating the differential pressure reference value from two pressure balances and the second one is by using a single pressure balance with the aid of air reservoir, precise digital pressure monitor, and the iterative A-B-A-B-A methods from the previous study. Both methods measurement results show good agreement by each other with the Normalized Error less than 1.0 from 0 to 100 mbar. The major uncertainty contributions in both methods came from the hysteresis of the DUT. However, the expanded uncertainty in single pressure balance method is larger than the double pressure balance method due to the instability of the pressure line that affects the variation of DUT indication. It can be concluded that either two pressure balances or single pressure balance can be used by the laboratory for differential pressure calibration, regardless by considering the available facility and the ease of performing the calibration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.E. Hall, N. Tiliakos, J. Brown, T. Worst and R.B. Foster, True downhole measurement of differential pressure, offshore technology conference, 04–07 May, Houston, Texas, USA, (2015).https://doi.org/10.4043/25772-MS.

  2. A.K. Doran, M. Rapa, G. Laske, J. Babcok and S. McPeak, Calibration of differential pressure gauges through in situ testing. Earth Sp. Sci., 6 (2019) 2663–2670. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000783.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. J.M. Pearce, A review of open source ventilators for COVID-19 and future pandemics [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research, 9 (2020) 218. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22942.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Bonzon, K. Kambara, D. Bertrand and P. Renaud, Micropipette calibration by differential pressure changes. Meas. Sci. Technol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab162b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. EURAMET e.V., Guidelines on the calibration of electromechanical and mechanical manometers EURAMET calibration guide no. 17 version 4.0 (04/2019), Germany, (2019).

  6. M. Kojima, T. Kobata, K. Saitou and M. Hirata, Development of small differential pressure standard using double pressure balances. Metrologia, 42 (2005) S227–S230.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Kobata, M. Kojima, K. Saitou, M. Fitzgerald. D. Jack and C. Sutton, Final report on key comparison APMP.M.P-K5 in differential pressure from 1 Pa to 5000 Pa. Metrologia, 44 (2007) 07001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/44/1A/07001.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Rosendahl, R.S. Nazareth, M.R. Magalhaes, W.S. Silva, P.L.S. Ferreira, J.M. Gouveia, M.H. Farias, J.S. Oliveira and P.R.G. Couto, New calibration procedure for differential pressure using twin pressure balances for flowrate measurement, 2017 IMEKO TC1-TC7-TC13 joint symposium. IOP Conf. Ser. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1044 (2018) 012053. IOP Publishing, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1044/1/012053.

  9. R.R.A. Samodro, A.V. Ega and Hafid, Calculation of effective area based on dimensional measurement for 35 mm diameter piston-cylinder unit of KIM-LIPI pressure standard, XXI IMEKO world congress “measurement in research and industry", 1632–1635, Prague, ISBN: 978-80-01-05793-3 (2015).

  10. A.V. Ega and R.R.A. Samodro, Evaluation on the consistency of calibration results between reference standards of pneumatic pressure balance based on non-full range calibration. J. Stand., 21 (2019) 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Kojima, K. Saitou and T. Kobata, Study on calibration procedure for differential pressure transducers, IMEKO 20th TC3, 3rd TC16 and 1st TC22 international conference cultivating metrological knowledge, Merida, Mexico, (2007).

  12. M. Kojima, K. Saitou and T. Kobata, Newly developed mass-loading device for generating small differential pressure, SICE-ICASE international joint conference 2006 Oct. 18–21, 2006 in Bexco, Busan, Korea, (2006).

  13. P. Otal, Workshop training on piston gauge theory in differential and negative pressure method 3, EU-Indonesia Trade Support Programme II (TSP2), Presented in KIM-LIPI, Serpong, (2015).

  14. M.N. Islam, P. Cheng and B. Oelmann, The effects of temperature gradient on transient behavior of low-range differential air pressure calibration setup. 2015 IEEE international conference on industrial technology (ICIT), 1488–1494, Seville, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2015.7125307.

  15. J. Scherschligt, D.A. Olson, R.G. Driver and Y. Yang, Pressure balance cross-calibration method using a pressure transducer as transfer standard. NCSLI Meas., 11 (2016) 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315775.2016.1149003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R.R.A. Samodro, A.V. Ega, G. Ginanjar and S. Hariyadi, A study on the combination of TAC and common crossfloat method to determine the balancing mass on the calibration of pressure balances, Proceedings of Asia-Pacific symposium on measurement of mass, force & torque (APMF 2017) metrology moving towards foundation, Krabi, Kingdom of Thailand, (2017).

  17. A.V. Ega and R.R.A. Samodro, TAC method to overcome the practical difficulty in the calibration of DWT with insensitive piston. J. Instrum., 43 (2019) 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R.R.A. Samodro and A.V. Ega, Metode TAC semi-otomatis sederhana untuk memandu kalibrasi DWT pnumatik. J. Stand., 19 (2018) 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. DKD, Guideline DKD-R 6-1: calibration of pressure gauges edition 03/2014. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany, (2014).

  20. Rigel Medical, VenTest 800 series datasheet (2015). https://www.rigelmedical.com/gb/products/ventilator-testing/ventilator-testers/ventest-800-series/#specifications.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to express his special thanks to “Beasiswa Saintek Pusat Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Kementerian Riset dan Teknologi/Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional”, Mr. Pierre Otal from LNE-France for his contribution in the training of Differential and Negative Pressure which was held by EU-TSP2 in 2015. Special thanks also to the management of SNSU-BSN for providing and maintaining the facilities in the pressure laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adindra Vickar Ega.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ega, A.V., Ginanjar, G., Firmansyah, E. et al. Study on the Implementation of Single Pressure Balance with Iterative A-B-A-B-A Method in the Differential Pressure Calibration of Ventilator Tester. MAPAN 36, 629–638 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-021-00499-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-021-00499-1

Keywords

Navigation