Skip to main content
Log in

Space Weather Monitoring on Ground-based Magnetic Observations (PC Index)

  • Published:
Russian Meteorology and Hydrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polar cap magnetic activity (PC index) is an indicator of solar wind energy that enters the magnetosphere (Resolutions of XXII IAGA Assembly, 2013). Usually, the PC index follows changes in the interplanetary electric field \(E_{KL}\), that is estimated from measurement data on solar wind parameters at the Lagrange point L1 (available at the OMNI website). However, during the period of magnetic field perturbations, the correspondence between \(E_{KL}\)and PC is often disturbed. To reveal the regularity of disturbances, the correlation was analyzed between the PC index and the computed field \(E_{KL}\) during magnetic substorms, which are considered as an independent indicator of the impact of perturbed solar wind on the magnetosphere. The independent analysis for the PCN and PCS indices demonstrated that the magnetic activity in the winter polar cap (PCwinter) provides statistically more correct results than the magnetic activity in the summer cap (PCsummer). The correlation between the PCwinter and the computed field \(E_{KL}\) (\(R> 0.5\)) was observed for \(\sim \)80% of the analyzed substorms. In the other cases (20%), the correlation was low or even negative, even though substorms were evidently associated with the PC index growth. So, in these cases, the computed field \(E_{KL}\) did not contact with the magnetosphere. Hence, the PC index allows verifying the real field \(E_{KL}\) affecting the magnetosphere and checking in such way whether the solar wind registered at the Lagrange point contacted with the magnetosphere (data from the OMNI website).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. S. I. Akasofu, “The Development of the Auroral Substorms,” Planet. Space Sci., 12 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P. F. Bythrow and T. A. Potemra, “The Relationship of Total Birkeland Currents to the Merging Electric Field,” Geophys. Res. Lett., 10 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Chapman and J. Bartels, Geomagnetism (Clarendon Press, Oxford, London, 1940).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. M. Du, B. T. Tsurutani, and W. Sun, “Anomalous Geomagnetic Storm of 21–22 January 2005: A Storm Main Phase during Northward IMF,” J. Geophys. Res., 113 (2008).

  5. T. Iijima and T. A. Potemra, “Field-aligned Currents in the Day-side Cusp Observed by Triad,” J. Geophys. Res., 81 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Iijima and T. A. Potemra, “The Amplitude Distribution of Field-aligned Currents at Northern High Latitudes Observed by Triad,” J. Geophys. Res., 81 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Iijima and T. A. Potemra, “The Relationship between Interplanetary Quantities and Birkeland Current Densities,” Geophys. Res. Lett., 4 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. R. Kan and L. C. Lee, “Energy Coupling Function and Solar Wind–Magnetosphere Dynamo,” Geophys. Res. Lett., 6 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Kullen and T. Karlsson, “On the Relation between Solar Wind, Pseudobreakups, and Substorms,” J. Geophys. Res., 109 (2004).

  10. D. Y. Lee, K. C. Choi, S. Ohtani, J. H. Lee, K. C. Kim, K. S. Park, and K. H. Kim, “Can Intense Substorms Occur under Northward IMF Conditions?”, J. Geophys. Res., 115 (2010).

  11. I. B. McDiarmid, J. R. Burrows, and M. D. Wilson, “Magnetic Field Perturbations in the Dayside Cleft and Their Relationship to the IMF,” J. Geophys. Res., 83 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Miyashita, C. Wu, K. Liou, Y. Kamide, A. Ieda, S. Machida, T. Mukai, Y. Saito, C. Meng, G. Parks, and F. Creutzberg, “Substorms during Prolonged Northward Interplanetary Magnetic Field,” in 3rd Annual General Meeting, Asia Oceania Geosci. Soc., Singapure, 2006.

  13. O. A. Troshichev, Polar Cap Magnetic Activity (PC Index) and Space Weather Monitoring (Editions Universitaires Europeennes, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. O. A. Troshichev, V. G. Andrezen, S. Vennerstrom, and E. Friis-Christensen, “Magnetic Activity in the Polar Cap—A New Index,” Planet. Space Sci., 36 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. O. Troshichev and A. Janzhura, “Physical Implications of Discrepancy between Summer and Winter PC Indices Observed in the Course of Magnetospheric Substorms,” Adv. Space Res., 50 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O. Troshichev, A. Janzhura, and P. Stauning, “Unified PCN and PCS Indices: Method of Calculation, Physical Sense and Dependence on the IMF Azimuthal and Northward Components,” J. Geophys. Res., 111 (2006).

  17. O. A. Troshichev, N. A. Podorozhkina, and A. S. Janzhura, “Invariability of Relationship between the Polar Cap Magnetic Activity and Geoeffective Interplanetary Electric Field,” Ann. Geophys., 29 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O. A. Troshichev, N. A. Podorozhkina, and A. S. Janzhura, “Relationship between PC Index and Magnetospheric Substorms Observed under Conditions of Northward IMF,” J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 73 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O. A. Troshichev, N. A. Podorozhkina, D. A. Sormakov, and A. S. Janzhura, “PC Index as a Proxy of the Solar Wind Energy that Entered into the Magnetosphere: (1) Development of Magnetic Substorms,” J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 119 (2014).

  20. O. A. Troshichev and D. A. Sormakov, “PC Index as a Proxy of the Solar Wind Energy that Entered into the Magnetosphere: (2) Relation to the Interplanetary Electric Field EKL,” Earth Planets Space, 67 (2015).

  21. O. A. Troshichev and D. A. Sormakov, “PC Index as a Proxy of the Solar Wind Energy that Entered into the Magnetosphere: 3. Development of Magnetic Storms,” J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 180 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. O. Troshichev, D. Sormakov, and R. Behlke, “Relationship between PC Index and Magnetospheric Field-aligned Currents Measured by Swarm Satellites,” J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 168 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. V. Vochmyanin, N. A. Stepanov, and V. A. Sergeev, “On the Evaluation of Data Quality in the OMNI Interplanetary Magnetic Field Database,” Space Weather, 17 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. C. C. Wu, K. Liou, R. P. Lepping, and C. I. Meng, “Observations of Substorms during Prolonged Northward IMF Conditions,” in Sixth International Conference on Substorms, Ed. by R. M. Winglee (University of Washington Press, Seattle, 2002).

  25. A. J. Zmuda and J. C. Armstrong, “The Diurnal Flow Pattern of Field-aligned Currents,” J. Geophys. Res., 79 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. A. Troshichev.

Additional information

Translated from Meteorologiya i Gidrologiya, 2021, No. 3, pp. 12-27. https://doi.org/10.52002/0130-2906-2021-3-12-27.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Troshichev, O.A., Sormakov, D.A. Space Weather Monitoring on Ground-based Magnetic Observations (PC Index). Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol. 46, 139–149 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373921030018

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373921030018

Keywords

Navigation