Modeling avian eggshell microstructure to predict ontogenetic age and reveal patterns of human-avifauna interaction
Introduction
The archaeological record is replete with evidence of the importance of birds to human communities, extending to at least the Middle Stone Age in Africa when ostrich eggshell was engraved (Assefa et al., 2018; Texier et al., 2013; Texier et al., 2010) and the Upper Paleolithic in Europe when bird bones were transformed into some of the earliest known flutes (Conard et al., 2009). Birds are integral to human interaction, subsistence, ritual, migration and navigation, and the recovery and analysis of bird remains from archaeological sites yields crucial insights into the human past (Dirrigl et al., 2020; Serjeantson, 2009). Bird remains in archaeological sites include bones, gizzard stones, pellets, feathers, and eggshell. Despite the importance of birds to human societies and the abundance of bird remains in many archaeological sites around the world, several scholars have noted that avian eggshell remains an understudied component of the archaeological record (Beacham and Durand, 2007; Stewart et al., 2013a).
This paper describes approaches for high-resolution 3D imaging of avian eggshell and a statistical model for predicting eggshell ontogenetic age built using a time series of ostrich eggs (Struthio camelus). The aim of developing these methods is to increase archaeologists’ ability to derive information about human-avifauna interactions from archaeological eggshell. Eggshell is a commonly recorded material in archaeological deposits and has been used successfully as a paleoenvironmental proxy and dating material through the analysis of eggshell geochemistry (Brooks et al., 1990; Donaire and López-Martínez, 2009; Ecker et al., 2015; Freundlich et al., 1989; Higham, 1994; Janz et al., 2009; Johnson et al., 1998; Clarke et al., 2007; Long et al., 1983; Vogel et al., 2001). Molecular techniques, including ancient DNA analysis (aDNA) and proteomics of archaeological avian eggshell elucidate bird population dynamics and taxonomy (Stewart et al., 2013a; Jacomb et al., 2014; Allentoft et al., 2014; Stewart et al., 2013b; Oskam et al., 2012; Oskam et al., 2010).
Relative to most other classes of archaeofaunal remains, however, morphological analysis of avian eggshell has rarely been used to understand human-avifauna interactions, including egg harvesting and husbandry practices. The first effort to encourage the morphological study of archaeological avian eggshell resulted in a manual for ootaxonomic identification, covering a range of avian families and species, based on Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) imagery (Sidell, 1993). Although ootaxonomic identification through morphological analysis of avian eggshell has proven challenging (Buss and Keiss, 2009), morphological analysis of anthropogenic modification of eggshell (esp. in the production of artifacts like eggshell beads and liquid containers) has enabled the study of human symbolic expression, craft production, interaction and exchange (Texier et al., 2013; Kandel and Conard, 2005; Wei et al., 2017; Jacobson, 1987). Others have distinguished anthropogenic modification in the production of liquid containers from similar patterns produced by carnivore predation (Kandel, 2004). Additional modifications on archaeological avian eggshell result from intentional and unintentional heat treatment (Miller et al., 2016; Taivalkoski and Holt, 2016).
Previous work to estimate the ontogenetic age of archaeological eggshell investigated potential husbandry of turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) in the ancient American Southwest and suggested that changes in eggshell microstructures were time-dependent and correlated with stages of embryonic growth (Beacham and Durand, 2007). During the course of incubation, developing avian embryos derive a substantial portion of the calcium they require for growth (>80%) by resorbing calcium carbonate from the surrounding eggshell (Carey, 1983). This process of resorption is enabled by the interaction between eggshell mammillary conesmicrostructures on the interior surface of avian eggshell (Fig. 1) — and the shell membranes (Burley and Vadehra, 1989). As a result of this process of resorption, the surface structure of eggshell mammillary cones changes over the course of incubation (Fig. 2). Furthermore, because resorption of eggshell calcium carbonate is linked to the development of the avian embryo (Blom and Lilja, 2004), changes in eggshell mammillary cone surface structure are hypothesized to be time-dependent, and thus indicative of the ontogenetic age of the embryo (Beacham and Durand, 2007).
Using two-dimensional (2D) SEM images of eggshell, Beacham and Durand qualitatively assessed changes in eggshell microstructures and demonstrated the possibility of identifying eggshell from hatched versus un-hatched turkey eggs in archaeological contexts (Beacham and Durand, 2007). Their work built upon previous documentation of the presence of turkey eggshell in Chaco Canyon deposits (Windes, 1987); they interpreted the high proportion of archaeological eggshell showing signs of significant resorption as evidence that ancient Chacoan communities were hatching turkey eggs, in order to raise chicks, as opposed to harvesting and consuming the egg contents (Beacham and Durand, 2007). Following this innovative approach, further studies were conducted on archaeological eggshell from the American Southwest (M. gallopavo), Oaxaca (M. gallopavo), and eastern Europe (Gallus gallus), further elucidating processes of avian domestication, the importance of bird husbandry, particularly during periods of climate downturn, and the ritual significance of fertilized eggs as grave goods (Conrad et al., 2016; Lapham et al., 2016; Jonuks et al., 2017).
Successful prediction of eggshell ontogenetic age has great potential to reveal archaeological patterns of human exploitation of avian taxa. As indicated by the studies referenced above, a primary question for archaeologists is whether we can use eggshell morphology to successfully distinguish between eggs from which a chick hatched naturally and eggs for which normal chick development was halted at some ontogenetic stage prior to hatching, potentially as a consequence of harvesting by people. Further questions regarding human behavior can also be posed, if our analytical methods allow us to identify more precisely the ontogenetic timing of egg harvesting. Evidence for the harvesting of fertilized eggs during later stages of embryogenesis, for example, may indicate dietary preferences (e.g. a preference for consuming a more developed chick embryo, as opposed to yolk and albumen).
In this paper, we develop a highly resolved ontogenetic time series of Common Ostrich (Struthio camelus) eggshell and a statistical model to predict the ontogenetic age of unknown eggshell samples. Although chicken is the classic model species in bird developmental biology, we selected ostrich as our model species to expand analytical possibilities with regard to ratites. Several ratite taxa have gone extinct over the course of the Holocene, including New Zealand's moa (Dinornithiformes) and Madagascar's elephant birds (Aepyornithidae). These extinctions often followed human dispersals to islands, and we know little regarding the potential contribution of ratite egg harvesting to the success of human communities in colonizing new environments, or to subsequent ratite population declines. Our work furthers the study of archaeological eggshell in three important ways:
- 1.
We demonstrate the utility of capturing high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) eggshell surfaces using advanced imaging modalities (Optical Profilometry [OP], SEM, digital microscopy, Micro-Computed Tomography [micro-CT]), in order to quantitatively model changes in eggshell microstructures that are correlated with ontogeny. This allows us to compare different imaging instruments and techniques, and evaluate the reliability of qualitative visual inspection of 2D images, as compared to a statistical modeling approach using 3D data.
- 2.
We test whether our statistical model, derived from an ostrich time series, successfully predicts the ontogenetic age of eggshell of other avian taxa and identify limitations of this proxy approach. The ability to use ostrich as a model oospecies would greatly expand the utility of these methods to the study of extinct ratite species and extant species for which high-resolution eggshell ontogenetic time series are not available. Generating an ontogenetic time series of eggshell requires sacrificing fertilized eggs with developing embryos and known lay dates. As such, creating the necessary comparative samples is often neither feasible nor ethical for the particular species of interest.
- 3.
We conduct a sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of our model, providing an approach to the issue of archaeological eggshell diagenesis. This is particularly important in archaeological contexts where taphonomic factors lead to poor preservation of eggshell remains.
Section snippets
Sample description
Fragments of eggshell belonging to farm-reared birds of the southern African sub-species of ostrich (Struthio camelus australis) were obtained from the Oudtshoorn Research Farm of the Western Cape Government Department of Agriculture, South Africa. These eggshell fragments were a by-product of ongoing research at Oudtshoorn aimed at reducing levels of reproductive failure (e.g. incidence of dead-in-shell (DIS) chicks) and improving the economic viability of the commercial ostrich production
Comparison of imaging methods
All imaging methods successfully generated high-resolution 3D data of eggshell microstructures. Data capture and processing are quickest using the Keyence VK-X laser scanning confocal microscope (1–3min per sample), followed by the Keyence VHX-7000 digital microscope (3–6min per sample) and Zygo Nexview 3D optical profilometer (20min scan time + 10min postprocessing per sample). All three of these instruments operate with proprietary software packages that generate surface roughness
Conclusions
Using ostrich (Struthio c. australis) as our model species, our objectives were to 1) quantitatively model changes in eggshell microstructures that are correlated with ontogeny and compare a statistical approach with visual identification, 2) test whether our statistical model successfully predicts the ontogenetic age of eggshell of other avian taxa, and 3) conduct a sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of our model given the issue of archaeological eggshell diagenesis. This work
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
Funding and research permissions.
This work was supported by a Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History Peter Buck Postdoctoral Fellowship (KD) and a National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship in Biology (#1523857; TF).
Dr. Annie Antonites (the Heritage Foundation, Pretoria, SA) and Dr. Xander Antonites (University of Pretoria) provided input and assisted with the export of Struthio eggshell samples from South Africa. Mr. Chris Milensky (Smithsonian, NMNH) assisted with the import
References (53)
- et al.
Engraved ostrich eggshell from the middle stone age contexts of goda Buticha, Ethiopia
J. Archaeol. Sci.: Report
(2018) - et al.
Ultrastructure of avian eggshell during resorption following egg fertilization
J. Struct. Biol.
(2009) - et al.
The geochronological potential of isoleucine epimerisation in cassowary and megapode eggshells from archaeological sites
J. Archaeol. Sci.
(2007) - et al.
Bone isotopes, eggshell and Turkey husbandry at arroyo hondo pueblo
J. Archaeol. Sci.: Report
(2016) - et al.
Porosity of late paleocene ornitholithus eggshells (tremp Fm, south-central pyrenees, Spain): palaeoclimatic implications
Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.
(2009) Radiocarbon dating New Zealand prehistory with moa eggshell: some preliminary results
Quat. Sci. Rev.
(1994)- et al.
High-precision dating and ancient DNA profiling of moa (Aves: Dinornithiformes) eggshell documents a complex feature at Wairau Bar and refines the chronology of New Zealand settlement by Polynesians
J. Archaeol. Sci.
(2014) - et al.
Dating North Asian surface assemblages with ostrich eggshell: implications for palaeoecology and extirpation
J. Archaeol. Sci.
(2009) - et al.
Stable isotopes in modern ostrich eggshell: a calibration for paleoenvironmental applications in semi-arid regions of southern Africa
Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta
(1998) Modification of ostrich eggs by carnivores and its bearing on the interpretation of archaeological and paleontological finds
J. Archaeol. Sci.
(2004)
Production sequences of ostrich eggshell beads and settlement dynamics in the Geelbek Dunes of the Western Cape, South Africa
J. Archaeol. Sci.
Turkey husbandry and use in Oaxaca, Mexico: a contextual study of Turkey remains and SEM analysis of eggshell from the Mitla Fortress
J. Archaeol. Sci.: Report
Ancient DNA analyses of early archaeological sites in New Zealand reveal extreme exploitation of moa (Aves: Dinornithiformes) at all life stages
Quat. Sci. Rev.
ZooMS: making eggshell visible in the archaeological record
J. Archaeol. Sci.
The effects of cooking on avian eggshell microstructure
J. Archaeol. Sci.: Report
The context, form and significance of the MSA engraved ostrich eggshell collection from Diepkloof Rock Shelter, Western Cape, South Africa
J. Archaeol. Sci.
A technological and morphological study of Late Paleolithic ostrich eggshell beads from Shuidonggou, North China
J. Archaeol. Sci.
Categorical Data Analysis
Extinct New Zealand megafauna were not in decline before human colonization
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am.
Further improving hatchability in artificial incubation of ostrich eggs
Eggshell and the archaeological record: new insights into Turkey husbandry in the American southwest
J. Archaeol. Sci.
Atlas of Chick Development
A comparative study of growth, skeletal development and eggshell composition in some species of birds
J. Zool.
Studies on Embryonic Development and Hatchability of Ostrich Eggs
Embryonic development in the ostrich (Struthio camelus) during the first 7 days of artificial incubation
Br. Poultry Sci.
Ostrich (Struthio camelus) embryonic development from 7 to 42 days of incubation
Br. Poultry Sci.
Cited by (7)
The identification of bird eggshell by scanning electron microscopy
2023, Journal of Archaeological Science