Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 27, 2021

Second trimester prediction of gestational diabetes: maternal analytes as an additional screening tool

  • Meryl M. Sperling ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Dena Towner , James Davis and Kelly Yamasato

Abstract

Objectives

Early diagnosis of gestational diabetes can lead to greater optimization of glucose control. We evaluated associations between maternal serum analytes (alpha-fetoprotein [AFP], free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin [beta-hCG], inhibin, and estriol) and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study identified single-ton pregnancies with available second trimester serum analytes between 2009 and 2017. GDM was identified by ICD-9 and -10 codes. We examined the associations between analyte levels and GDM and to adjust for potential confounders routinely collected during genetic serum screening (maternal age, BMI, and race) using logistic regression. Optimal logistic regression predictive modeling for GDM was then performed using the analyte levels and the above mentioned potential confounders. The performance of the model was assessed by receiver operator curves.

Results

Out of 5,709 patients, 660 (11.6%) were diagnosed with GDM. Increasing AFP and estriol were associated with decreasing risk of GDM, aOR 0.76 [95% CI 0.60–0.95] and aOR 0.67 [95% CI 0.50–0.89] respectively. Increasing beta-hCG was associated with a decreasing risk for GDM(aOR 0.84 [95% CI 0.73–0.97]). There was no association with inhibin. The most predictive GDM predictive model included beta-hCG and estriol in addition to the clinical variables of age, BMI, and race (area under the curve (AUC 0.75), buy this was not statistically different than using clinical variables alone (AUC 0.74) (p=0.26).

Conclusions

Increasing second trimester AFP, beta-hCG, and estriol are associated with decreasing risks of GDM, though do not improve the predictive ability for GDM when added to clinical risk factors of age, BMI, and race.


Corresponding author: Meryl M. Sperling, MD MA, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Fellow, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA, E-mail:

Funding source: National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIH

Award Identifier / Grant number: U54MD007601

Award Identifier / Grant number: U54MD007584

Funding source: University of Hawaii John A Burns School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health

Acknowledgments

Statistical analysis was funded by the University of Hawaii John A Burns School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health and NIH infrastructural grants U54MD007584 and U54MD007601.

  1. Research funding: Statistical analysis was funded by the University of Hawaii John A Burns School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health and NIH infrastructural grants U54MD007584 and U54MD007601.

  2. Author contributions: 1. Meryl Sperling – study design, data collection, manuscript writing. 2. Dena Towner – study design, manuscript editing. 3. James Davis – study design, statistical analysis. 4. Kelly Yamasato – study design, data collection, manuscript editing. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: All protocols performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Hawaii and in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. For this retrospective study, formal consent was not required as per the Institutional Review Board.

References

1. Hill, DJ. Placental control of metabolic adaptations in the mother for an optimal pregnancy outcome. What goes wrong in gestational diabetes? Placenta 2018;69:162–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2018.01.002.Search in Google Scholar

2. Di Cianni, G, Miccoli, R, Volpe, L, Lencioni, C, Del Prato, S. Intermediate metabolism in normal pregnancy and in gestational diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2003;19:259–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.390.Search in Google Scholar

3. Chandra, S, Scott, H, Dodds, L, Watts, C, Blight, C, Van den Hof, M. Unexplained elevated maternal serum α-fetoprotein and/or human chorionic gonadotropin and the risk of adverse outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:775–81. https://doi.org/10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00769-5.Search in Google Scholar

4. Ganapathy, R, Lamont, RF, Bassett, P. Unexplained elevated maternal serum β-HCG concentration and adverse pregnancy outcome. Prenat Diagn 2007;27:995–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.1813.Search in Google Scholar

5. Gonen, R, Perez, R, David, M, Dar, H, Merksamer, R, Sharf, M. The association between unexplained second-trimester maternal serum hCG elevation and pregnancy complications. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:83–6.Search in Google Scholar

6. Williams, MA, Hickok, DE, Zingheim, RW, Luthy, DA, Kimelman, J, Nyberg, DA, et al.. Elevated maternal serum α-fetoprotein levels and midtrimester placental abnormalities in relation to subsequent adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:1032–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(12)80033-0.Search in Google Scholar

7. Yaron, Y, Cherry, M, Kramer, RL, O'Brien, JE, Hallak, M, Johnson, MP, et al.. Second-trimester maternal serum marker screening: maternal serum α-fetoprotein, β-human chorionic gonadotropin, estriol, and their various combinations as predictors of pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:968–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70334-0.Search in Google Scholar

8. Hsieh, T, Hung, T, Hsu, J, Shau, W, Su, C, Hsieh, F. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by maternal serum screening for down syndrome in an asian population. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:937–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00151-8.Search in Google Scholar

9. Huttly, W, Rudnicka, A, Wald, NJ. Second-trimester prenatal screening markers for Down syndrome in women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Prenat Diagn 2004;24:804–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.994.Search in Google Scholar

10. Wald, J, Watt, HC, George, L. Maternal serum Inhibin-A in pregnancies with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: implications for screening for Down's Syndrome. Prenat Diagn 1996;16:923–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199610)16:10<923::aid-pd970>3.0.co;2-a.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199610)16:10<923::AID-PD970>3.0.CO;2-ASearch in Google Scholar

11. Crossley, JA, Berry, E, Aitken, DA, Connor, JM. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and prenatal screening results: current experience from a regional screening programme. Prenat Diagn 1996;16:1039–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199611)16:11<1039::aid-pd985>3.0.co;2-#.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199611)16:11<1039::AID-PD985>3.0.CO;2-#Search in Google Scholar

12. Räty, R, Anttila, L, Virtanen, A, Koskinen, P, Laitinen, P, Mörsky, P, et al.. Maternal midtrimester free β-HCG and AFP serum levels in spontaneous singleton pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy-induced hypertension or obstetric cholestasis: maternal Serum β-hCG and AFP Levels in GDM, PIH or ICP. Prenat Diagn 2003;23:1045–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.751.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Donovan, BM, Nidey, NL, Jasper, EA, Robinson, JG, Bao, W, Saftlas, AF, et al.. First trimester prenatal screening biomarkers and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qu H-Q, editor. PLOS ONE 2018;13:e0201319 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201319.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Caliskan, R, Atis, A, Aydin, Y, Acar, D, Kiyak, H, Topbas, F. PAPP-A concentrations change in patients with gestational diabetes. J Obstet Gynaecol 2020;40:190–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2019.1615041.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Hur, J, Cho, E-H, Baek, K-H, Lee, KJ. Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus by unconjugated estriol levels in maternal serum. Int J Med Sci 2017;14:123–7. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.17321.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Synder, B, Baer, R, Oltman, S, Robinson, J, Breheny, P, Saftlas, A, et al.. Early pregnancy prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus risk using prenatal screening biomarkers in nulliparous women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020;163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108139.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2021-02-01
Accepted: 2021-06-30
Published Online: 2021-07-27
Published in Print: 2022-01-27

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2021-0054/html
Scroll to top button