Skip to main content
Log in

Deconstructing Hunting Returns: Can We Reconstruct and Predict Payoffs from Pursuing Prey?

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Explaining variation in hunter-gatherer livelihoods hinges on our ability to predict the tradeoffs and opportunities of pursuing different kinds of prey. Central to this problem is the commonly held assumption that larger animals provide higher returns upon encounter than smaller ones. However, to test this assumption, actualistic observations of hunting payoffs must be comparable across different social, technological, and ecological contexts. In this meta-analysis, we revisit published and unpublished estimates of prey return rates (n = 217 from 181 prey types) to assess, first, whether they are methodologically comparable, and second, whether they correlate with body size. We find systematic inter-study differences in how carcass yield, energetic content, and foraging returns are calculated. We correct for these inconsistencies first by calculating new estimates of energetic yield (kcals per kg live weight) and processing costs for over 300 species of terrestrial and avian game. We then recalculate on-encounter returns using a standardized formula. We find that body size is a poor predictor of on-encounter return rate, while prey characteristics and behavior, mode of procurement, and hunting technology are better predictors. Although prey body size correlates well with processing costs and edibility, relationships with pursuit time and energetic value per kilogram are relatively weak.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvard, M. S. (1993a). Testing the ecologically noble savage hypothesis: conservation and subsistence hunting by the Piro of Amazonian Peru. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of New Mexico.

  • Alvard, M. S. (1993b). Testing the “ecologically noble savage” hypothesis: interspecific prey choice by Piro hunters of Amazonian Peru. Human Ecology, 21(4), 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvard, M. S. (1995). Shotguns and sustainable hunting in the Neotropics. Oryx, 29(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605300020883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvard, M. S., & Kaplan, H. (1991). Procurement technology and prey mortality among indigenous neotropical hunters. In M. C. Stiner (Ed.), Human predators and prey mortality (pp. 79–104). Westview Press.

  • Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 533(7604), 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayham, F. E. (1977). Analysis of faunal remains and animal exploitation in Copper Basin. In Archaeology in Copper Basin, Yavapai county, Arizona: model building for the prehistory of the Prescott region (pp. 339–367). Arizona State University, Anthropological Research Paper No. 11.

  • Bayham, F. E. (1979). Factors influencing the Archaic pattern of animal exploitation. Kiva, 44(2–3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00231940.1979.11757918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton, J. M. (1973). The nature of aboriginal exploitation of mollusc populations in southern California. Unpublished M.A. thesis. University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles.

  • Ben-Dor, M., & Barkai, R. (2020). The importance of large prey animals during the Pleistocene and the implications of their extinction on the use of dietary ethnographic analogies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 59, 101192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2020.101192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Dor, M., Gopher, A., Hershkovitz, I., & Barkai, R. (2011). Man the fat hunter: the demise of Homo erectus and the emergence of a new hominin lineage in the Middle Pleistocene (ca. 400 kyr) Levant. PLoS ONE, 6(12), e28689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger, R. L., Malhi, R., & McCarthy, H. (1997). Central place models of acorn and mussel processing. Journal of Archaeological Science, 24(10), 887–899. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1996.0168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, D. W., & Bliege Bird, R. (1997). Contemporary shellfish gathering strategies among the Meriam of the Torres Strait Islands, Australia: testing predictions of a central place foraging model. Journal of Archaeological Science, 24(1), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1995.0095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, D. W., & Bliege Bird, R. (2005). Mardu children’s hunting strategies in the Western Desert, Australia: foraging and the evolution of human life histories. In B. S. Hewlett & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Hunter gatherer childhoods (pp. 129–146). Aldine de Gruyter.

  • Bird, D. W., Bliege Bird, R., & Codding, B. F. (2009). In pursuit of mobile prey: Martu hunting strategies and archaeofaunal interpretation. American Antiquity, 74(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, D. W., Codding, B. F., Bliege Bird, R., & Zeanah, D. W. (2012). Risky pursuits: Martu hunting and the effects of prey mobility: reply to Ugan and Simms. American Antiquity, 77(1), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.77.1.186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, D. W., Codding, B. F., Bliege Bird, R., Zeanah, D. W., & Taylor, C. J. (2013). Megafauna in a continent of small game: archaeological implications of Martu camel hunting in Australia’s Western Desert. Quaternary International, 297, 155–166 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104061821300027X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birket-Smith, K. (1928). The Greenlanders of the present day. In M. Vahl, G. C. Amdrup, L. Bobé, & A. S. Jensen (Eds.), Greenland. The past and present population of Greenland. Volume II (pp. 1–207). Oxford University Press.

  • Bliege Bird, R., & Bird, D. W. (2005). Human hunting seasonality. In D. K. Brockman & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Seasonality in primates: studies of living and extinct human and non-human primates (pp. 243–266). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542343.010.

  • Bliege Bird, R., & Bird, D. W. (2008). Why women hunt. Current Anthropology, 49(4), 655–693. https://doi.org/10.1086/587700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliege Bird, R., & Smith, E. A. (2005). Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 46(2), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/427115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliege Bird, R., Smith, E. A., & Bird, D. W. (2001). The hunting handicap: costly signaling in human foraging strategies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650100338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliege Bird, R., Ready, E., & Power, E. A. (2018). The social significance of subtle signals. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(7), 452–457. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0298-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blurton Jones, N. G. (1984). A selfish origin for human food sharing: tolerated theft. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(84)90030-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, J. M. (1994). Late Holocene resource intensification in the Sacramento Valley, California: the vertebrate evidence. Journal of Archaeological Science, 21(4), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1994.1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, J. M., Cannon, M. D., Bayham, F. E., & Byers, D. A. (2011). Prey body size and ranking in zooarchaeology: theory, empirical evidence, and applications from the northern Great Basin. American Antiquity, 76(3), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.76.3.403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, H. T. (2007). Butchering backstraps and bearing backbones: insights from Hadza foragers and implications for Paleolithic archaeology. In T. R. Pickering, K. Schick, & N. Toth (Eds.), Breathing life into fossils: taphonomic studies in honor of C.K. (Bob) Brain (pp. 269–279). Stone Age Institute Press.

  • Bunn, H. T., Bartram, L. E., & Kroll, E. M. (1988). Variability in bone assemblage formation from Hadza hunting, scavenging, and carcass processing. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 7(4), 412–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(88)90004-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003). Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Codding, B. F., Bird, D. W., & Bliege Bird, R. (2010). Interpreting abundance indices: some zooarchaeological implications of Martu foraging. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(12), 3200–3210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.07.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruze, N., Singh, B., Mookerjee, A., Harrington, L. A., & Macdonald, D. W. (2018). A socio-economic survey of pangolin hunting in Assam, Northeast India. Nature Conservation, 30, 83–105. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.30.27379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez-Rodrigo, M., Bunn, H. T., Mabulla, A. Z. P., Baquedano, E., Uribelarrea, D., Pérez-González, A., Gidna, A., Yravedra, J., Diez-Martin, F., Egeland, C. P., Barba, R., Arriaza, M. C., Organista, E., & Ansón, M. (2014). On meat eating and human evolution: a taphonomic analysis of BK4b (Upper Bed II, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania), and its bearing on hominin megafaunal consumption. Quaternary International, 322–323, 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.08.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, H. (1917). Pioneering the West: 1846 to 1878. Skelton Publishing.

  • Fowler, C. S. (1989). Willard Z. Park’s ethnographic notes on the Northern Paiute of western Nevada, 1933–1940. University of Utah Press.

  • Frison, G. C. (2004). Survival by hunting: prehistoric human predators and their animal prey. University of California Press.

  • Hames, R. B. (1979). A comparison of the efficiencies of the shotgun and the bow in neotropical forest hunting. Human Ecology, 7(3), 219–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hara, H. S. (1980). The Hare Indians and their world. National Museums of Canada.

  • Hawkes, K. (1991). Showing off: tests of an hypothesis about men’s foraging goals. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(91)90011-E.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K. (2016). Ethnoarchaeology and Plio-Pleistocene sites: some lessons from the Hadza. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 44, 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2016.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., Hill, K., & O’Connell, J. F. (1982). Why hunters gather: optimal foraging and the Aché of eastern Paraguay. American Ethnologist, 9(2), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1982.9.2.02a00100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., & Blurton Jones, N. G. (1991). Hunting income patterns among the Hadza: big game, common goods, foraging goals and the evolution of the human diet. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 334(1270), 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., & Blurton Jones, N. G. (2018). Hunter-gatherer studies and human evolution: a very selective review. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 165(4), 777–800. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrikson, L. S. (2004). Frozen bison and fur trapper’s journals: building a prey choice model for Idaho’s Snake River Plain. Journal of Archaeological Science, 31(7), 903–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2003.12.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. (1982). Hunting and human evolution. Journal of Human Evolution, 11(6), 521–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(82)80107-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. (1988). Macronutrient modifications of optimal foraging theory: an approach using indifference curves applied to some modern foragers. Human Ecology, 16(2), 157–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., & Hawkes, K. (1983). Neotropical hunting among the Aché of eastern Paraguay. In R. B. Hames & W. T. Vickers (Eds.), Adaptive responses of native Amazonians (pp. 139–188). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-321250-4.50009-9.

  • Hill, K., Hawkes, K., Hurtado, A. M., & Kaplan, H. (1984). Seasonal variance in the diet of Ache hunter-gatherers in Eastern Paraguay. Human Ecology, 12(2), 101–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., Kaplan, H., Hawkes, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1987). Foraging decisions among Aché hunter-gatherers: new data and implications for optimal foraging models. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, G. (1984). The archaeology of human origins: studies of the Lower Pleistocene in East Africa 1971–1981. Advances in World Archaeology, 3, 1–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M. A., & Hill, K. (2014). Benefits of grouping and cooperative hunting among Ache hunter-gatherers: insights from an agent-based foraging model. Human Ecology, 42(6), 823–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-014-9693-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. L. (2007). Sexual division of labor and group-effort hunting: the archaeology of pronghorn traps and point accumulations in the Great Basin. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis. California State University, Sacramento.

  • Jones, E. L. (2006). Prey choice, mass collecting, and the wild European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 25(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2005.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. H., Bird, R. B., & Bird, D. W. (2013). To kill a kangaroo: understanding the decision to pursue high-risk/high-gain resources. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1767), 20131210 http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/280/1767/20131210.abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H., & Hill, K. (1992). The evolutionary ecology of food acquisition. In E. A. Smith & B. Winterhalder (Eds.), Evolutionary ecology and human behavior (pp. 167–201). Aldine de Gruyter.

  • Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Lancaster, J., & Hurtado, A. M. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 9(4), 156–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6505(2000)9:4<156::AID-EVAN5>3.0.CO;2-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Hurtado, A. M., & Lancaster, J. (2001). The embodied capital theory of human evolution. In P. T. Ellison (Ed.), Reproductive ecology and human evolution (pp. 293–317). Aldine de Gruyter.

  • Koster, J. M. (2007). Hunting and subsistence among the Mayangna and Miskito of Nicaragua’s Bosawas Biosphere Reserve. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Pennsylvania State University.

  • Koster, J. M. (2008). Hunting with dogs in Nicaragua: an optimal foraging approach. Current Anthropology, 49(5), 935–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchikura, Y. (1987). Subsistence ecology among Semaq Beri hunter-gatherers of Peninsular Malaysia. Hokkaido Behavioral Science Reports.

  • Kuchikura, Y. (1988). Efficiency and focus of blowpipe hunting among Semaq Beri hunter-gatherers of peninsular Malaysia. Human Ecology, 16(3), 271–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00888448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchikura, Y. (1996). Fishing in the tropical rain forest: utilization of aquatic resources among the Semaq Beri hunter-gatherers of Peninsular Malaysia. Senri Ethnological Studies, 42, 147–174. https://doi.org/10.15021/00002983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledger, H. P. (1968). Body composition as a basis for a comparative study of some East African mammals. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 21, 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, T., Shepard Jr., G. H., Ohl-Schacherer, J., Peres, C. A., & Yu, D. W. (2009). Modelling the long-term sustainability of indigenous hunting in Manu National Park, Peru: landscape-scale management implications for Amazonia. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46(4), 804–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01661.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg, L. (2006). Persistence hunting by modern hunter-gatherers. Current Anthropology, 47(6), 1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1086/508695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstedt, S. L., & Boyce, M. S. (1985). Seasonality, fasting endurance, and body size in mammals. The American Naturalist, 125(6), 873–878. https://doi.org/10.1086/284385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowie, R. H. (1924). Minor ceremonies of the Crow Indians. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, XXI(V), 323–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowie, R. H. (1939). Ethnographic notes on the Washo. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 36, 301–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupo, K. D., & Schmitt, D. N. (2002). Upper Paleolithic net-hunting, small prey exploitation, and women’s work effort: a view from the ethnographic and ethnoarchaeological record of the Congo Basin. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 9(2), 147–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupo, K. D., & Schmitt, D. N. (2005). Small prey hunting technology and zooarchaeological measures of taxonomic diversity and abundance: ethnoarchaeological evidence from Central African forest foragers. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 24(4), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2005.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupo, K. D., & Schmitt, D. N. (2016). When bigger is not better: the economics of hunting megafauna and its implications for Plio-Pleistocene hunter-gatherers. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 44, 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2016.07.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupo, K. D., Schmitt, D. N., & Madsen, D. B. (2020). Size matters only sometimes: the energy-risk trade-offs of Holocene prey acquisition in the Bonneville basin, western USA. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 12(8), 160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01146-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966). On optimal use of a patchy environment. The American Naturalist, 100(916), 603–609. https://doi.org/10.1086/282454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, D. B., & Schmitt, D. N. (1998). Mass collecting and the diet breadth model: a Great Basin example. Journal of Archaeological Science, 25(5), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1997.0245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, D., & Barlow, K. R. (1992). A model for exploring the optimal tradeoff between field processing and transport. American Anthropologist, 94(2), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1992.94.2.02a00040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2012). Reassessing Paleolithic subsistence: the Neandertal and modern human foragers of Saint-Césaire. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139150972.

  • Morin, E., & Laroulandie, V. (2012). Presumed symbolic use of diurnal raptors by Neanderthals. PLoS One, 7(3), e32856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E., Bliege Bird, R., & Bird, D. W. (2020). Mass procurement and prey rankings: insights from the European rabbit. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 12(11), 262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01212-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, C. (2011). Using Euro-American hunting data to assess western Great Plains biogeography. Great Plains Research, 21(1), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenskiöld, A. E. (1882). The voyage of the Vega around Asia and Europe. MacMillan and Co.

  • Noss, A. J. (1997). The economic importance of communal net hunting among the BaAka of the Central African Republic. Human Ecology, 25(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021935903440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, J. F., & Hawkes, K. (1984). Food choice and foraging sites among the Alyawara. Journal of Anthropological Research, 40(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.40.4.3629795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, J. F., & Marshall, B. (1989). Analysis of kangaroo body part transport among the Alyawara of Central Australia. Journal of Archaeological Science, 16(4), 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4403(89)90014-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, J. F., Hawkes, K., & Blurton Jones, N. G. (1988). Hadza scavenging: implications for Plio/Pleistocene hominid subsistence. Current Anthropology, 29(2), 356–363 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2743414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, J. F., Hawkes, K., Lupo, K. D., & Blurton Jones, N. G. (2002). Male strategies and Plio-Pleistocene archaeology. Journal of Human Evolution, 43(6), 831–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T. S. (1896). The jack rabbits of the United States. Government Printing Office.

  • Pond, C. M. (1992). An evolutionary and functional view of mammalian adipose tissue. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 51(3), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS19920050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prange, H. D., Anderson, J. F., & Rahn, H. (1979). Scaling of skeletal mass to body mass in birds and mammals. The American Naturalist, 113(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1086/283367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R., & Charnov, E. L. (1977). Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 52(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1086/409852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwait, L. (1987). Socioeconomic implications of Australian aboriginal net hunting. Man, 22(4), 613. https://doi.org/10.2307/2803355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984). Scaling. Why is animal size so important? Cambridge University Press.

  • Schoener, T. W. (1974). The compression hypothesis and temporal resource partitioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 71(10), 4169–4172. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.71.10.4169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W. (1987). A brief history of optimal foraging ecology. In A. C. Kamil, J. R. Krebs, & H. R. Pulliam (Eds.), Foraging behavior (pp. 5–67). Plenum Press.

  • Shaffer, C. A., Milstein, M. S., Yukuma, C., Marawanaru, E., & Suse, P. (2017). Sustainability and comanagement of subsistence hunting in an indigenous reserve in Guyana. Conservation Biology, 31(5), 1119–1131. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih, A. (1979). Optimal diet: the relative importance of the parameters. The American Naturalist, 113(3), 460–463 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2460113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih, A. (1980). Optimal foraging: partial consumption of prey. The American Naturalist, 116(2), 281–290 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2460676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih, A., & Christensen, B. (2001). Optimal diet theory: when does it work, and when and why does it fail? Animal Behaviour, 61(2), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silberbauer, G. B. (1981). Hunter and habitat in the central Kalahari desert. Cambridge University Press.

  • Simms, S. R. (1987). Behavioral ecology and hunter-gatherer foraging: an example from the Great Basin. BAR International Series 381.

  • Smith, E. A. (1980). Evolutionary ecology and the analysis of human foraging behavior: an Inuit example from the east coast of Hudson Bay. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Cornell University.

  • Smith, E. A. (1991). Inujjuamiut foraging strategies. Evolutionary ecology of an Arctic hunting economy. Aldine de Gruyter.

  • Smith, E. A., & Winterhalder, B. W. (1992). Evolutionary ecology and human behavior. Aldine de Gruyter.

  • Speck, F. G., & Schaeffer, C. E. (1950). The deer and the rabbit hunting drive in Virginia and the Southeast. Southern Indian Studies, 2, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speth, J. D. (1989). Early hominid hunting and scavenging: the role of meat as an energy source. Journal of Human Evolution, 18(4), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(89)90035-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speth, J. D. (2010). The paleoanthropology and archaeology of big-game hunting: protein, fat, or politics? Springer.

  • Speth, J. D. (2020). Paleoindian bison hunting on the North American Great Plains—Two critical nutritional constraints. PaleoAnthropology, 2020, 74–97. https://doi.org/10.4207/PA.2020.ART143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton University Press.

  • Stiner, M. C., Munro, N. D., Surovell, T. A., Tchernov, E., & Bar-Yosef, O. (1999). Paleolithic population growth pulses evidenced by small animal exploitation. Science, 283(5399), 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5399.190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symonds, M. R. E., & Moussalli, A. (2011). A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(1), 13–21.

  • Tanno, T. (1976). The Mbuti net-hunters in the Ituri Forest, Eastern Zaire—their hunting activities and band composition. Kyoto University African Studies, 10, 101–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. H. (2008). Native American landscapes of St. Catherines Island, Georgia. New York: anthropological papers of the American Museum of Natural History, no. 88. American Museum of Natural History.

  • Ugan, A. (2005). Does size matter? Body size, mass collecting, and their implications for understanding prehistoric foraging behavior. American Antiquity, 70(1), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugan, A., & Simms, S. R. (2012). On prey mobility, prey rank, and foraging goals. American Antiquity, 77(1), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.77.1.179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, S. L., & Lancaster, C. S. (1968). The evolution of hunting. In R. B. Lee & I. DeVore (Eds.), Man the hunter (pp. 293–303). Aldine.

  • West, G. B., & Brown, J. H. (2005). The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology from genomes to ecosystems: towards a quantitative unifying theory of biological structure and organization. Journal of Experimental Biology, 208(9), 1575–1592. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T. E. (1953). A method of calculating the dietary percentage of various food animals utilized by aboriginal peoples. American Antiquity, 18(4), 396–398. https://doi.org/10.2307/277116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, D. S., & Curran, B. (1991). Why do Mbuti hunters use nets? Ungulate hunting efficiency of archers and net-hunters in the Ituri rain forest. American Anthropologist, 93(3), 680–689 http://www.jstor.org/stable/679942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmsen, E. D., & Durham, D. (1988). Food as a function of seasonal environment and social history. In I. de Garine & G. A. Harrison (Eds.), Coping with uncertainty in food supply (pp. 52–87). Clarendon Press.

  • Winterhalder, B. W. (1977). Foraging strategy adaptation of the boreal forest Cree: an evaluation of theory and models from evolutionary ecology. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.

  • Winterhalder, B. W. (1981). Foraging strategies in the boreal forest: An analysis of Cree hunting and gathering. In B. W. Winterhalder & E. A. Smith (Eds.), Hunter-gatherer foraging strategies: ethnographic and archaeological analyses (pp. 66–98). University of Chicago Press.

  • Winterhalder, B. W. (1983). Boreal foraging strategies. In J. A. Theodore Steegmann (Ed.), Boreal forest adaptations: the northern Algonkians (pp. 3–54). Plenum Press.

  • Winterhalder, B. W., & Smith, E. A. (1981). Hunter-gatherer foraging strategies: ethnographic and archeological analyses. University of Chicago Press.

  • Yessner, D. R. (1981). Archeological applications of optimal foraging theory: harvest strategies of Aleut hunter-gatherers. In B. W. Winterhalder & E. A. Smith (Eds.), Hunter-gatherer foraging strategies: ethnographic and archeological analyses (pp. 148–170). University of Chicago Press.

  • Yost, J. A., & Kelly, P. M. (1983). Shotguns, blowguns, and spears: the analysis of technological efficiency. In R. B. Hames & W. T. Vickers (Eds.), Adaptive responses of native Amazonians. Academic Press.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The following people provided various insights concerning the biology of various species: Alessandra Bertassoni, Hani Bizri, Richard Blob, Craig Byron, Avril Figueroa, Paul Garber, Jean Huot, Peter Jarman, Harriet Kuhnlein, Erica Nol, Caroline Pond, Stephen Secor, Lisa Shapiro, Denis Youlatos, Jesse Young, and Pete Zani. Many thanks to Andrew Ugan for generously helping us replicate some of his return rates. The ideas expressed here were greatly improved through comments and discussions with Michael Alvard, Jack Broughton, Jose Capriles, Brian Codding, James Conolly, Sheryl Gerety, Kristen Hawkes, James Holland Jones, Jeremy Koster, Karen Lupo, Jim O’Connell, Michael Price, Elspeth Ready, Eric Smith, John Speth, Todd Surovell, Paul Szpak, and Blake Vernon. The analyses we present were supported by a SSHRC Explore Grant (#25816, internal grant, Trent University). Those focused on Martu hunting strategies were supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (BCS-1459880, BCS-0850664, BCS-0314406).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugène Morin.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 57 kb)

ESM 2

(XLSX 264 kb)

ESM 3

(XLSX 11 kb)

ESM 4

(XLSX 53 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morin, E., Bird, D., Winterhalder, B. et al. Deconstructing Hunting Returns: Can We Reconstruct and Predict Payoffs from Pursuing Prey?. J Archaeol Method Theory 29, 561–623 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-021-09526-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-021-09526-6

Keywords

Navigation