Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Copper and manganese substituted hydroxyapatite/chitosan–polyvinyl pyrrolidone biocomposite for biomedical applications

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The key challenge in tissue engineering is to develop structures with sufficient characteristics that will replicate the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) to promote tissue regeneration. Copper and manganese minerals substituted hydroxyapatite (CuMn-HA)/chitosan (CTS)–polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVD) were fabricated by sol–gel and solvent casting techniques, respectively. Fabricated biocomposites have been identified by the use of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for the analysis of functional groups, crystalline phases and surface morphology. The XRD and FTIR spectra of the biocomposite revealed the existence of functional groups and crystalline phases in the biocomposites. The SEM images revealed biocomposite and inclusion of CuMn-HA in rough morphology. Physicochemical characteristics such as swelling and compressive strength have been examined in the preparation of biocomposite materials. Biocomposites (10, 20, 30 wt% of CuMn-HA biocomposite) exhibited great material characteristics where 30% displayed the minimum swelling and a compressive property of 71 MPa was tested. It displayed the highest inhibition zone towards bacteria population and was also found to be blood-compatible with a haemolytic value of only about 2.5% relative to other compounds. Finally, in-vitro cell cultures were performed in biocomposite scaffolds to determine the effects of CuMn-HA on the proliferation of osteoblast cells, resulting in biocomposites contrast to pristine PVD/CTS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bharati S, Sinha M K and Basu D 2005 Bull. Mater. Sci. 28 617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baptista R, Gadelha D, Bandeira M, Arteiro D, Delgado M I, Ferro A C et al 2016 Bull. Mater. Sci. 39 263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morsy R 2016 Bull. Mater. Sci. 39 1273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh G, Singh H and Sidhu B S 2014 Bull. Mater. Sci. 37 1519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shariatinia Z 2019 Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 263 131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rabiee S M 2013 Bull. Mater. Sci. 36 171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ouyang Q Q, Zhao S, Li S D and Song C 2017 Mar. Drugs 15 322

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tan L J, Zhu W and Zhou K 2020 Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 2003062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chocholata P, Kulda V and Babuska V 2019 Materials 12 568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang W and Yeung K W 2017 Bioact. Mater. 2 224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Milazzo M, Contessi Negrini N, Scialla S, Marelli B, Farè S, Danti S et al 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1903055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Graziani G, Boi M and Bianchi M 2018 Coatings 8 269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Erol M M, Mouriňo V, Newby P, Chatzistavrou X, Roether J A, Hupa L et al 2012 Acta Biomater. 8 792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Radovanović Ž, Jokić B, Veljović D, Dimitrijević S, Kojić V, Petrović R et al 2014 Appl. Surf. Sci. 307 513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ananth K P, Sun J and Bai J 2018 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19 2340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fourie J, Taute F, du Preez L and De Beer D 2020 Regen. Eng. Transl. Med. 1 21

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mobika J, Rajkumar M, Sibi S L and Priya V N 2021 Spectrochim. Acta A 244 118836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Abd El-Mohdy H L and Ghanem S 2009 J. Polym. Res. 16 1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Abou Taleb M F, Alkahtani A and Mohamed S K 2015 Polym. 72 725

  20. Wei Y S, Chen K S and Wu L T 2016 J. Inorg. Biochem. 164 17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Priyadarshini B and Vijayalakshmi U 2018 Adv. Powder Technol. 29 2792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Utara S and Klinkaewnarong J 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 14860

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. El Boujaady H, Mourabet M, El Rhilassi A, Bennani-Ziatni M, El Hamri R and Taitai A 2016 J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 7 4049

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chaudhuri B, Mondal B, Ray S K and Sarkar S C 2016 Colloids Surf. B 143 71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang Y and Lu J 2008 Cryst. Growth Des. 8 2101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rapacz-Kmita A, Paluszkiewicz C, Ślósarczyk A and Paszkiewicz Z 2005 J. Mol. Struct. 744 653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang L J, Feng X S, Liu H G, Qian D J, Zhang L, Yu X L et al 2004 Mater. Lett. 58 719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Narayana Reddy C L, Swamy B Y, Prasad C V, Madhusudhan Rao K, Prabhakar M N, Aswini C et al 2012 Int. J. Polym. Mater. 61 424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Girão A F, Semitela Â, Ramalho G, Completo A and Marques P A 2018 Composit. Part B: Eng. 154 99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar M, Isloor A M, Todeti S R, Nagaraja H S, Ismail A F and Susanti R 2021 Chem. Eng. J. 405 126809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Munir M U, Ahmed A, Usman M and Salman S 2020 Int. J. Nanomed. 15 7329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lemire J A, Harrison J J and Turner R J 2013 Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11 371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Alaarg A, Schiffelers R, van Solinge W W and Van Wijk R 2013 Front. Physiol. 4 365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tavakkoli-Gilavan M, Abdizadeh H and Golobostanfard M R 2018 Appl. Surf. Sci. 458 988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Souza L, Lopes J H, Encarnação D, Mazali I O, Martin R A, Camilli J A et al 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 1

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nie L, Li X, Wang Z, Hu K, Cai R, Li P et al 2020 Biomimetic Nanobiomater. 9 122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P Lavanya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lavanya, P., Vijayakumari, N. Copper and manganese substituted hydroxyapatite/chitosan–polyvinyl pyrrolidone biocomposite for biomedical applications. Bull Mater Sci 44, 222 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-021-02511-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-021-02511-5

Keywords

Navigation