Abstract
During ladle refining process, argon gas is purged into the ladle for stirring the molten steel bath to eliminate thermal and composition gradients and to achieve inclusion flotation. Operating parameters like purging location, porous plug configuration and argon flow rate primarily affect liquid steel refining. The efficiency of ladle processing is often quantified through mixing time. To optimize the mixing time and the associated process parameters for improved bath homogenization and inclusion flotation under different operating conditions, water modeling studies using 0.2 scale perspex model and computational fluid dynamics studies using ANSYS CFX v14.5 have been carried out through fluid profile assessment and mixing time comparison. Comparative study was made between single plug, dual plug and top lance purging configurations. The studies helped in identifying the optimum argon purging rates and configurations under normal operational practices. Under abnormal operating conditions involving purging failure from either of the two porous plugs, usage of a top lance along with the single working porous plug has been investigated and found to improve mixing and inclusion flotation in the ladle equivalent to dual plug operation. The lab scale studies have been validated on plant scale through inclusion mapping and found to be in close agreement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mazumdar D and Guthrie R I L 1995 The Physical and Mathematical Modelling of Gas Stirred Ladle Systems. ISIJ Int. 35: 1–20
Mazumdar N, Mahadevan A, Madan M and Mazumdar D 2005 Impact of Ladle Design on Bath Mixing. ISIJ Int. 45: 1940–1942
Castello-Branco Marco A S C and Schwerdtfeger K 1994 Large-scale measurements of the physical characteristics of round vertical bubble plumes in liquids. Metallurgical and Materials Trans. B 25: 359–371
Sahai Y and Guthrie R I L 1982 Hydrodynamics of gas stirred melts: Part II. Axisymmetric flows. Metallurgical and Materials Trans. B 13: 203–211
Dian-qiao Geng, Lei H and Ji-cheng He 2010 Optimization of mixing time in a ladle with dual plugs. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials 17: 709–714
Schwarz M P 1996 Simulation of gas injection into liquid melts. Applied Mathematical Modelling 20: 41–51
Haiyan T, Xiaochen G, Guanghui Wu and Yong W 2016 Effect of Gas Blown Modes on Mixing Phenomena in a Bottom Stirring Ladle with Dual Plugs. ISIJ Int. 56: 2161–2170
Xie J, Zhu X, Liao Q, Wang H and Yu-Dong Ding 2012 Dynamics of bubble formation and detachment from an immersed micro-orifice on a plate. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 55: 3205–3213
Cao Q and Nastac L 2018 Mathematical Investigation of Fluid Flow, Mass Transfer, and Slag-steel Interfacial Behavior in Gas-stirred Ladles. Metallurgical and Materials Trans. B 49: 1388–1404
Patil S P, Satish D, Peranandhanathan M and Mazumdar D 2010 Mixing Models for Slag Covered, Argon Stirred Ladles. ISIJ Int. 50: 1117–1124
Amaro-Villeda A M, Ramirez-Argaez M A and Conejo A N 2014 Effect of Slag Properties on Mixing Phenomena in Gas-stirred Ladles by Physical Modeling. ISIJ Int. 54: 1–8
González-Bernal R, Solorio-Diaz G, Banderas J A R, Torres-Alonso E, Hernández-Bocanegra C A and Zenit R 2018 Effect of the Fluid-Dynamic Structure on the Mixing Time of a Ladle Furnace. Steel Research Int. 89: 1700281
Chen M, Wang N, Yao Y, Geng J and Xiong K 2008 Optimal Mixing Effect of LF Bottom-Blown Stirring by Two Nozzles. Steel Research Int. 78: 468–472
Liu Z, Li L and Li B 2017 Modeling of Gas-Steel-Slag Three-Phase Flow in Ladle Metallurgy: Part I Physical Modeling. ISIJ Int. 57: 1971–1979
Ganguly S and Chakraborty S 2008 Numerical modelling studies of flow and mixing phenomena in gas stirred steel ladles. Ironmaking & Steelmaking 35: 524–530
Fan C M and Hwang W S 2002 Study of optimal Ca-Si injection position in gas stirred ladle based on water model experiment and flow simulation. Ironmaking & Steelmaking 29: 415–426
Gomez A S, Conejo A and Zenit R 2018 Effect of separation angle and nozzle radial position on mixing time in ladles with two nozzles. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics 11: 11–20
Chattopadhyay K, SenGupta A, Ajmani S K, Lenka S N and Singh V 2009 Optimisation of dual purging location for better mixing in ladle: a water model study. Ironmaking & Steelmaking 36: 537–542
Yang F, Jin Y, Zhu C, Dong X, Lin P, Cheng C, Li Y, Sun L, Pan J and Cai Q 2019 Physical Simulation of Molten Steel Homogenization and Slag Entrapment in Argon Blown Ladle. Processes 7: 479
Mandal J, Patil S, Madan M and Mazumdar D 2005 Mixing time and correlation for ladles stirred with dual porous plugs. Metallurgical and Materials Trans. B 36: 479–487
Johansen S T and Boysan F 1988 Fluid dynamics in bubble stirred ladles: part II. Mathematical modeling. Metallurgical and Materials Trans. B 19: 755–764
Krishnakumar K, Ballal N B, Sinha P K, Sardar M K and Jha K N 1999 Water Model Experiments on Mixing Phenomena in a VOD Ladle. ISIJ Int. 39: 419–425
Li L, Liu Z, Li B, Matsuura H and Tsukihashi F 2015 Water Model and CFD-PBM Coupled Model of Gas-Liquid-Slag Three-Phase Flow in Ladle Metallurgy. ISIJ Int. 55: 1337–1346
Zhang L, Aoki J and Thomas B G 2006 Inclusion removal by bubble flotation in a continuous casting mold. Metallurgical and Materials Trans. B 37: 361–379
Hoang Q N, Ramírez-Argáez M A, Conejo A N, Blanpain B and Dutta A 2018 Numerical Modeling of Liquid-Liquid Mass Transfer and the Influence of Mixing in Gas-Stirred Ladles. The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 70: 2109–2118
Krishnapisharody K and Irons G A 2006 Modeling of slag eye formation over a metal bath due to gas bubbling. Metallurgical and Materials Trans. B 37: 763–772
Pfister M and Hager W H 2014 History and Significance of the Morton Number in Hydraulic Engineering. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 140: 02514001
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank secondary steelmaking operations team at JSW Steel Ltd. Vijaynagar Works for the help and support extended during this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Symbols
Symbols
- CPC:
-
Calcined petroleum coke
- LHF:
-
Ladle heating furnace
- \(g\) :
-
Gravitational acceleration
- \(t\) :
-
Time
- \(T\) :
-
Temperature
- \(C_{D}\) :
-
Drag coefficient
- \(R_{e}\) :
-
Reynolds number
- \(d\) :
-
Distance or length
- \(d_{\beta }\) :
-
Mean particle diameter of phase \(\beta\)
- \(A_{{\alpha \beta }}\) :
-
Interfacial area density
- \(p\) :
-
Gauge pressure
- \(P_{k}\) :
-
Turbulence production due to viscous forces
- \(r\) :
-
Location vector
- \(r_{\beta }\) :
-
Volume fraction of phase \(\beta\)
- \(S_{M}\) :
-
Momentum source
- \(S_{{M,buoy}}\) :
-
Momentum source due to buoyancy
- \(P_{{kb}}\), \(P_{{\varepsilon b}}\):
-
Buoyancy production & dissipation terms (represent influence of the buoyancy forces)
- \(C_{{\varepsilon 1}}\), \(C_{{\varepsilon 2}}\):
-
\(k - \varepsilon\) Turbulence model constants
- \(u\) :
-
Fluctuating velocity component in turbulent flow
- \(U\) :
-
Vector of velocity \(U_{{x,y,z}}\)
- \(U_{t}\) :
-
Turbulent velocity scale
- \(l_{t}\) :
-
Turbulence length scale
- \(\alpha\) :
-
Subscript indicating phase \(\alpha\)
- \(\beta\) :
-
Subscript indicating phase \(\beta\)
- \(\rho\) :
-
Density
- \(\rho _{{ref}}\) :
-
Reference density
- \(\sigma _{k}\) :
-
Turbulence model constant for the \(k\) equation
- \(\sigma _{\varepsilon }\) :
-
\(k - \varepsilon\) Turbulence model constant
- \(\tau\) :
-
Shear stress
- \(\delta\) :
-
Identity matrix or Kronecker Delta function
- \(k\) :
-
Turbulence kinetic energy per unit mass
- \(\varepsilon\) :
-
Turbulence dissipation rate
- \(\mu\) :
-
Molecular (dynamic) viscosity
- \(\mu _{t}\) :
-
Turbulent viscosity
- \(\nabla\) :
-
Gradient
- \(\cdot\) :
-
Scalar product
- \(\otimes\) :
-
Tensor product
- \(d_{b}\) :
-
Bubble diameter
- Q :
-
Flowrate (Nm3/s)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
TRIPATHI, P.K., KUMAR, D.S., SARKAR, A. et al. Optimization of bath mixing and steel cleanliness during steel refining through physical and mathematical modeling. Sādhanā 46, 146 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01663-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01663-8