Skip to main content
Log in

Minimizing the total tardiness and job rejection cost in a proportionate flow shop with generalized due dates

  • Published:
Journal of Scheduling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study a scheduling problem involving both partitioning and scheduling decisions. A solution for our problem is defined by (i) partitioning the set of jobs into a set of accepted and a set of rejected jobs and (ii) scheduling the set of accepted jobs in a proportionate flow shop scheduling system. For a given solution, the jth largest due date is assigned to the job with the jth largest completion time. The quality of a solution is measured by two criteria, one for each set of jobs. The first is the total tardiness of the set of accepted jobs, and the second is the total rejection cost. We study two problems. The goal in the first is to find a solution minimizing the sum of the total tardiness and the rejection cost, while the goal in the second is to find a solution minimizing the total rejection cost, given a bound on the total tardiness. As both problems are \({\mathcal {N}}{\mathcal {P}}\)-hard, we focus on the design of both exact algorithms and approximation schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chubanov, S., Kovalyov, M., & Pesch, E. (2006). An FPTAS for a single-item capacity economic lot-sizing problem with monotone cost structure. Mathematical Programming, Series A, 106, 453–466.

  • Cordone, R., Hosteins, P., & Righini, G. (2017). A branch-and-bound algorithm for the prize-collecting single-machine scheduling problem with deadlines and total tardiness minimization. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 30(1), 168–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordone, R., & Hosteins, P. (2019). A bi-objective model for the single-machine scheduling problem with rejection cost and total tardiness minimization. Computers and Operations Research, 102, 130–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, W., Eppstein, D., Goodrich, M. T., & Lueker, G. S. (2009). On the approximability of geometric and geographic generalization and the min-max bin covering problem. In F. Dehne, M. Gavrilova, J. R. Sack, & C. D. T òth (Eds.) Algorithms and Data Structures. WADS. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 5664). Springer.

  • Du, J., & Leung, J. Y. T. (1990). Minimizing Total Tardiness on One Machine is NP-hard. Mathematics of Operations Research, 15, 483–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstl, E., & Mosheiov, G. (2017). Single machine scheduling problems with generalised due-dates and job-rejection. International Journal of Production Research, 55(11), 3164–3172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstl, E., & Mosheiov, G. (2020). Single machine scheduling to maximize the number of on-time jobs with generalized due-dates. Journal of Scheduling, 23(3), 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, N. G. (1986). Scheduling problems with generalized due dates. IIE Transactions, 18, 220–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, N. G., Sethi, S. P., & Sriskandarajah, C. (1991). On the complexity of generalized due-date scheduling problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 51, 100–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermelin, D., Pinedo, M., Talmon, N., & Shabtay, D. (2019). On the parameterized tractability of single machine scheduling with rejection. European Journal of Operations Research, 273(1), 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, O. H., & Kim, C. E. (1975). Fast approximation algorithms for the knapsack and sum of subset problems. Journal of the ACM, 22, 463–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mor, B., & Mosheiov, G. (2018). A note: Minimizing total absolute deviation of job completion times on unrelated machines with general position-dependent processing times and job-rejection. Annals of Operations Research, 271(2), 1079–1085.

  • Mor, B., & Mosheiov, G.A Note: Flowshop scheduling with linear deterioration and job-rejection. 4OR- A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-020-00436-z.

  • Mor, B., Mosheiov, G., & Shapira, D. (2019). Flowshop scheduling with learning effect and job rejection. Journal of Scheduling. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-019-00612-y.

  • Mor, B., & Shapira, D. (2020). Regular scheduling measures on proportionate flowshop with job rejection. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 39(2), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosheiov, G., & Oron, D. (2004). A note on the SPT heuristic for solving scheduling problems with generalized due dates. Computers and Operations Research, 31(5), 645–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oron, D. (2020). Two-agent scheduling problems under rejection budget constraints. Omega,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, X., Yu, G., & Bard, J. F. (2002). Single machine scheduling with assignable due dates. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 122(1–3), 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahni, S. (1976). Algorithms for scheduling independent tasks. Journal of the ACM, 23(1), 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabtai, G., Raz, D., & Shavitt, Y. (2018). A relaxed FPTAS for chance-constrained knapsack. In 29th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation.

  • Shabtay, D., Gaspar, N., & Yedidsion, L. (2012). A bicriteria approach to scheduling a single machine with rejection and positional penalties. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 23(4), 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabtay, D., Gaspar, N., & Kaspi, M. (2013). A survey on offline scheduling with rejection. Journal of scheduling, 16(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakhlevich, N., Hoogeveen, H., & Pinedo, M. (1998). Minimizing total weighted completion time in a proportionate flow shop. Journal of Scheduling, 1, 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriskandarajah, C. (1990). A note on the generalized due-dates scheduling problems. Naval Research Logistics, 37, 587–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, K., & Vlach, M. (1997). Single machine scheduling to minimize the maximum lateness with both specific and generalized due dates. Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, 80(3), 557–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, K., & Vlach, M. (1999). Minimizing maximum absolute lateness and range of lateness under generalized due-dates on a single machine. Annals of Operations Research, 86, 507–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Yin, Y., & Jin, Y. (2020). Parallel-machine rescheduling with job unavailability and rejection. Omega, 81, 246–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Y., Cheng, S. R., Cheng, T. C. E., Wu, C. C., & Wu, W. H. (2012). Two-agent single-machine scheduling with assignable due-dates. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219, 1674–1685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Lu, L., & Yuan, J. (2010). Single-machine scheduling under the job rejection constraint. Theoretical Computer Science, 411, 1877–1882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The second author was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (grant No.2505/19), by the Recanati Fund of The School of Business Administration, and by Charles I. Rosen Chair of Management, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baruch Mor.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mor, B., Mosheiov, G. & Shabtay, D. Minimizing the total tardiness and job rejection cost in a proportionate flow shop with generalized due dates. J Sched 24, 553–567 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-021-00697-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-021-00697-4

Navigation