Elsevier

Agricultural Systems

Volume 193, October 2021, 103241
Agricultural Systems

Research paper
Data sharing platforms: How value is created from agricultural data

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103241Get rights and content

Highlights

  • When you create value from data, you operate a data sharing platform.

  • Creating value from data requires a community of stakeholders, a faciliatory system, and data on, and for, the community.

  • Agricultural datanomics is the interdisciplinary study of data as an economic good created by, and for, agriculture.

  • Data sharing platforms enable managers to answer the question, ‘how do I increase the value of Smart Farming data?’

  • This paper evaluates common data management techniques and proposes strategies that increase the value created from data.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Across agriculture, data is produced, enriched, and consumed through the centuries-old practices of producing food and fibre. The adoption of Smart Farming and its connected services and techniques accelerates agriculture's dependence on data, yet the process of creating value from data is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

What assets and management decisions comprise the process of creating value from data? What are the properties of this process, and where should resources be invested to increase the value created from agricultural data?

METHODS

We extend platform economics theory with the results from a recent systematic literature review of Big Data in Smart Farming to show the creation of value from data occurs in Data Sharing Platforms.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Data sharing platforms are systems that connect the layers of the ‘platform stack’ with pertinent management tasks to create value from data. We illustrate this arrangement as a sectioned, three-circle Venn Diagram and evaluate the efficacy of common data management techniques in the creation of value from data. This paper concludes that value is created from data only when each of the components of data sharing platforms are present and that the operation of a data sharing platform describes the process that takes data as an input and produces value as an output. Further conclusions relate to commercial and institutional aspects of the creation of value from Smart Farming data.

SIGNIFICANCE

The proposed model is useful for evaluating production processes that create value from data. This paper details several avenues for extension. Productive models of systems that rely on data as a core asset may now be assembled. Policies that trade off technical characteristics of data with social impacts of data may now be approached. Questions surrounding data ownership may be considered with greater clarity.

Introduction

Agriculture 4.0 has signalled a proliferation of connected sensors across farms and throughout value chains whose streams of data offer the alure of value to those who possess the requisite skills or acumen. Staple farm equipment such as rain gauges and soil moisture probes are transformed into Internet of Things (IoT) devices that document the farming system in constant and ever-changing data flows (Friess, 2016). Meanwhile, traditional farm machinery such as tractors or livestock weigh stations are connected to non-agricultural products like smartphone apps to leverage on- and off-farm data (Barrett, 2021). These devices digitise farms and create new opportunities for agricultural value creation through the data-driven “optimization of agricultural production systems, value chains and food systems” (Klerkx et al., 2019, p. 2). In turn, data-based opportunities present farms with operational models that are radically different from previous generations. Farming machinery is subsumed into the sharing-economy (Daum et al., 2021; Venkataraman, 2016), robotic workforces operate alongside human labourers (Christiaensen et al., 2021) and provide insurance against labour shortages (Barrett, 2021), while a single farm's access to finance can be hedged against whole-of-chain performance (AgriDigital, 2021; Jakku et al., 2019). In each case, a common belief in the value of agricultural data connects traditional agricultural problems with solutions from – often – non-agricultural communities. Where value creation in agriculture was once inseparable from labour- and capital-intensive activities, value creation in Smart Farming is now unavoidably, data intensive.

The data produced by Smart Farming intertwines agriculture and business in new ways. Where Smart Farming is the application of information technology to optimise the farming system, and agribusiness, the science of making value-adding decisions regarding the agricultural assets in that system, we propose agricultural datanomics as the interdisciplinary study focused on the treatment of data as a valuable resource created by, and for, agriculture. Accordingly, agricultural datanomics includes consideration of the sources of value creation (Kieti et al., 2021) through to market design (Agyekumhene et al., 2020) where stakeholders act as both producers and consumers of the value produced by Smart Farming data. Transparency is vital for embryonic digital markets (Jakku et al., 2019) as buyers and sellers often collaborate around data-products to extend value created by their exchange (Faulkner et al., 2014). Stakeholders multi-home (Rochet and Tirole, 2003) with digital goods (Barrett, 2021) as their products or services participate in multiple markets simultaneously. This creates highly fragmented markets as ad hoc, agricultural platforms (Klerkx et al., 2019), whose primary advantage is access to crowd-sourced resources (Parker et al., 2016), compete with the ‘pipeline’ businesses (Choudary, 2015) that traditionally dominated agriculture. There is widespread agreement in the centrality of digitisation in agriculture's future (Jakku et al., 2019; Klerkx et al., 2019), and considerable research into the science of managing the value produced by those processes (Birner et al., 2021; Wiseman et al., 2019) but the issue of how value is created from Smart Farming data is only beginning to be addressed (Darnell et al., 2018; Rojo-Gimeno et al., 2019; Wiseman and Sanderson, 2019). The study of this issue requires consideration of both technical and economic properties of data (Birner et al., 2021; Fleming et al., 2018b; Nikander et al., 2020), in conjunction with agribusiness assets and associated management responses (Chen et al., 2014; Wolfert et al., 2017). In this context, this paper aims to address two of the fundamental questions for scholars of agricultural datanomics: (i) what assets and managerial tasks are required to support the creation of value from Smart Farming data, and (ii) what properties must the process of creating value from Smart Farming data possess? We approach both questions in parallel, initially collating extant academic literature to establish a framework of seven components required to create value from Smart Farming data, before examining how their arrangement dictates that value creation process.

Value created from data, V, may be understood as the difference between the benefits enabled by the data, B, less the costs incurred to realise those benefits, , or, V=B. This approach is widely adopted (Chesbrough, 2003) and is well-established in agriculture. Value created from cropping or livestock production is the difference between the sum of market and non-market benefits less the associated costs of bringing those goods to market. Benefits enabled through the adoption of new technology or management techniques increase the value of the underlying agricultural assets through more effective observations, measurements or analysis. Likewise, a reduction in the costs of optimising the farming system through the application of Smart Farming increases the value of farming operations by improving access to, and application of, data across the farm. Investment in key assets or accompanying management tasks increases value created from Smart Farming data as benefits are increased, or the cost of achieving those benefits is reduced.

Data produced by Smart Farming is the core resource that enables value, is often the good exchanged, and even the currency that finances interactions throughout agricultural value webs (Darnell et al., 2018). While agricultural data is at least an asset and “must be managed like any other [asset]” (Wiseman and Sanderson, 2019, p. 3) unlike other classes of assets data possesses near-infinite economies of scale (Arrow, 1996). However, this property of data does not confer corresponding economies to the resulting value. Additional factors such as stakeholder's decision rules, social intentions, and the technology used to transform data into information, set bounds on the value created from Smart Farming data (Rojo-Gimeno et al., 2019). Value that is created from Smart Farming data is contingent on adoption and utilisation of that data by a heterogeneous community of stakeholders who assemble according to a congruous goal (Wysel, 2019). Bearing some resemblance to integrated value systems (Papazoglou et al., 2000), stakeholders voluntarily exchange data with one another provided their individual benefits exceed both their search costs and transaction costs (Kieti et al., 2021). In this way, the farming system acts as a platform upon which a community meets to exchange data. However, stakeholder's participation in data sharing platforms is more than transactional (Agyekumhene et al., 2020); value can be created from Smart Farming data as stakeholders collaborate around data (Birner et al., 2021), conduct arbitrage with data (Jensen, 2007), or compete for data (Jakku et al., 2019). Additionally, the data and value created on a data sharing platform can be treated as a private good (Wiseman et al., 2019), club good (Fleming et al., 2018b) or public good (Sanderson et al., 2017).

Therefore, the creation of value from Smart Farming data requires more than individuals or agricultural collectives investing in digital assets or technology management. An understanding of both the complimentary assets – that must exist beside data – and the management tasks required to develop these assets is an important first step in investigating the process of creating value from Smart Farming data. The remainder of this paper is organised as follows: Section 2 situates this work among the current state-of-art academic and management literature on the creation of value from data and the results from Wolfert et al. (2017)’s recent systematic literature review on Big Data in Smart Farming. Section 3 presents an intuitive framework placing each of the seven components required to create value from Smart Farming data. Section 4 examines the interplay between each component and assembles a model that describes their effect on value creation. Section 5 discusses the implications of the model for scholars and practitioners as they analyse and manage value created from Smart Farming data. Section 6 concludes with several avenues for extension.

Section snippets

Literature: Platforms, data sharing, and mobilising value from data

Platform business models describe organisations that broker valuable connections between typically external stakeholders (Evans and Gawer, 2016). In their simplest form, businesses that operate a platform business model, or more simply platforms, utilise data to create value for the participant stakeholders that assemble ‘on’ the platform. In platforms, managers use proprietary business processes to mobilise stakeholder's latent physical or labour assets according to some shared goal. Varying

The data sharing platform framework: ssets, management tasks, and created value

Combining the ‘platform stack’ from Fig. 1 with the interventions required to manage Smart Farming data from Fig. 2 and valuable interactions as the nexus of value creation in socio-economic platforms, the components required to create value from Smart Farming data may be depicted as in Fig. 3. Data sharing platforms consist of three assets together with three management tasks that span each pair of assets to enable valuable interactions across the platform. The three core assets data sharing

Operationalising the data sharing platform model

In order to apply the proposed framework in Fig. 3, we must first examine the value-creation properties of each of the seven components in data sharing platforms and how each component interacts. As introduced in Section 3.5, we can summarise the benefits the community receives as a function of the extent to which data enables stakeholders to achieve their goals. That is, the parameter ρ describes the organisation of the community, and μ the relative allocation of benefits and costs between the

Implications for managing the value created from data in smart farming

The creation of value from data produced by Smart Farming occurs in data sharing platforms as stakeholders in a community are brought together by a faciliatory system. As interactions are the base activity from which all platforms create value, the creation of value from data is typically evaluated per interaction. Taking the partial derivative of Eq. (2) with respect to interactions across the platform, k, we have,Vk=BCkρkμk+BDkρkεk+BSkεkμkCk+Dk+Sk

This represents the net value created by

Conclusions and extensions

The rapid growth in the role of data produced by Smart Farming has centralised the task of ‘creating value from data’ in agriculture. There are both complimentary assets and specific managerial decisions that must be accounted for in the creation of value from data. Key decisions must be made by management regarding investment in assets or expenditure of effort on managing those assets if the value created from Smart Farming data is to remain efficient. Even those firms that are aware of some

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (57)

  • C.A. Sims

    Implications of rational inattention

    J. Monet. Econ.

    (2003)
  • L. Wiseman et al.

    Farmers and their data: an examination of farmers’ reluctance to share their data through the lens of the laws impacting smart farming

    NJAS-Wageningen J. Life Sci.

    (2019)
  • S. Wolfert et al.

    Big data in smart farming–a review

    Agric. Syst.

    (2017)
  • AgriDigital

    Waypath

  • C. Agyekumhene et al.

    Making smallholder value chain partnerships inclusive: exploring digital farm monitoring through farmer friendly smartphone platforms

    Sustainability

    (2020)
  • K.J. Arrow

    The economics of information: an exposition

    Empirica

    (1996)
  • D. Baker et al.

    Investment in agri-food digital transformation: avoiding the technical fallacy

  • C.B. Barrett

    Overcoming global food security challenges through science and solidarity

    Am. J. Agric. Econ.

    (2021)
  • R. Birner et al.

    Who drives the digital revolution in agriculture? A review of supply-side trends, players and challenges

    Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy.

    (2021)
  • M. Bonchek et al.

    Three elements of a successful platform strategy

    Harv. Bus. Rev.

    (2013)
  • A. Caplin et al.

    Revealed preference, rational inattention, and costly information acquisition

    Am. Econ. Rev.

    (2015)
  • M. Chen et al.

    Big data: a survey

    Mobile Networks Appl.

    (2014)
  • H.W. Chesbrough

    Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology

    (2003)
  • S.P. Choudary

    Platform Scale: How an Emerging Business Model Helps Startups Build Large Empires with Minimum Investment

    (2015)
  • S. Cook et al.

    Embedding digital agriculture into sustainable Australian food systems: pathways and pitfalls to value creation

    Int. J. Agric. Sustain.

    (2021)
  • R. Darnell et al.

    The current and future state of Australian agricultural data

    Farm Policy J.

    (2018)
  • D.S. Evans

    How Catalysts Ignite: The Economics of Platform-Based Start-Ups

    (2009)
  • P.C. Evans et al.

    The Rise of the Platform Enterprise: A Global Survey

    (2016)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Impacts of digitalization on value creation and capture: Evidence from the agricultural value chain

      2022, Agricultural Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      Indeed, Chesbrough et al. (2018) propose that, for an open innovation context, UV and EV should be combined with value creation and capture in a matrix, resulting in four value processes. While we found this approach important, for the purpose of this research, we adopted a more straightforward view of value, following Wysel et al. (2021): value is the benefit of something minus its cost (V = B - C). Thus, in a value chain, the participation of the actors – companies or individuals – depends on their perception of the transaction's or relationship's value.

    • Big data in agriculture: Between opportunity and solution

      2022, Agricultural Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      At the same time, it is broadly recognized that data alone are not enough to make applications successful (Kamble et al., 2020; Lezoche et al., 2020; Saggi and Jain, 2018; Wysel et al., 2021). Wysel et al. (2021) summarize this requirement concisely as “Creating value from data requires a community of stakeholders, a faciliatory system, and data on, and for, the community”. Our findings show that end user or stakeholder involvement, although certainly accounted for in the project, was not yet a main priority for the use cases, at least not within the scope of this project.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Matthew Wysel is grateful for the support of the Agricultural Business Research Institute through the Arthur Rickards Innovation in Agribusiness Scholarship. The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest relating to this manuscript. Specifically, the authors are grateful to, but are not affiliated in any way with, AuctionsPlus Pty Ltd.

    View full text