Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Urban scale air quality analysis due to coal-based residential heating

  • Published:
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The environmental effects of air pollutants released to the atmosphere from coal-based residential heating should be regarded as one of the primary environmental concerns in cities. Unfortunately, in Turkey, hundreds of medical cases still occur due to gas poisoning from coal-based conventional stoves used for heating purposes. This study attempts to investigate the effects of coal-based residential heating on CO and SO2 air quality in a city of the south Marmara Region located between Europe and Asia. A total of 138 chimneys were sampled in the heating season that falls from October 1st through March 31st in the city. Ambient air pollutants released from those chimneys were analyzed to evaluate the background air quality variations in the city. The mean of CO concentrations was approximately 11,000 mg/m3, with variations from nearly 9500 to 12,500 mg/m3, while the mean of SO2 concentrations was roughly 173 mg/Nm3 ranging from 108 to 240 mg/Nm3 in the sampled chimneys. The AERMOD predicted the maximum daily mean CO concentration for the model was 41.5 μg/m3 on February 29th at midnight for the downtown area and exceeded the official limits. The predicted highest periodic SO2 concentration was 45.1 μg/m3 on February 29th at midnight in the heating season. The highest periodic SO2 concentration was observed in the old settlements of the downtown, where the most coals were utilized for residential heating with antiquated systems. It is confirmed that the AERMOD results are valid by using meteorological and air pollution data for the modeling study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig.4
Fig.5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abril GA, Diez SC, Pignata ML, Britch J (2016) Particulate matter concentrations originating from industrial and urban sources: validation of atmospheric dispersion modeling results. Atmos Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2015.08.009

  • ADMGO (2016) Air dispersion modeling guideline for Ontario, Version 3.0. Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Akgun M (2017) Analysis of the chimney related carbon monoxide poisoning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of 13. National Installation Engineering Conference. Izmir, Turkey. April 19–22, 2017

  • Borm PJA (1997) Toxicity and occupational health hazards of coal fly ash (CFA). A review of data and comparison to coal mine dust. Ann Occup Hyg 41(6):659–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CAAP (2018) The clean air action plan for Balikesir City. The Center of Marmara Clean Air Division, Balikesir

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang JC (2002) Methodologies for evaluating performance and assessing the uncertainty of atmospheric dispersion models. Dissertation, George Mason University

  • Chang JC, Hanna SR (2004) Air quality model performance evaluation. Meteorol Atmos Phys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-003-0070-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dresser AL, Huizer RD (2011) CALPUFF and AERMOD Model Validation Study in the Near Field: Martins Creek Revisited. J Air Waste Manage. https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.61.6.647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzioubinski O, Chipman R (1999) Trends in consumption and production: household energy consumption. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) Discussion Paper No. 6. http://www.sustainabledevelopment.un.org. Accessed 14 Sep 2018

  • Economopoulos AP (1997) Management of space heating emissions for effective abatement of urban smoke and SO2 pollution. Atmos Environ 31(9):1327–1337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelman RB (2004) Potential health impacts of burning coal beds and waste banks. Int J Coal Geol 59(1–2):19–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelman RB, Orem W, Castranova V, Tatu CA, Belkin HE, Zheng BS, Lerch HE, Maharaj SV, Bates AL (2002) Health impacts of coal and coal use: possible solutions. Int J Coal Geol 50:425–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox DG (1984) Uncertainty in air quality modeling. Bull Amer Meteorol Soc. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1984)

  • Gibson MD, Kundu S, Satish M (2013) Dispersion model evaluation of PM2.5, NOX, and SO2 from point and major line sources in Nova Scotia, Canada using AERMOD Gaussian plume air dispersion model. Atmos Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2013.016

  • Hanna SR (1993) Uncertainties in air quality model predictions. Bound-Layer Meteorology 62:3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna S, Chang J (2012) Acceptance criteria for urban dispersion model evaluation. Meteorol Atmospheric Phys 116:133–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna SR, Strimaitis DG, Chang JC (1991) Hazard response modeling uncertainty (A quantitative method), vol. I: User’s guide for software for evaluating hazardous gas dispersion models; vol. II: evaluation of commonly-used hazardous gas dispersion models; vol. III: components of uncertainty in hazardous gas dispersion models. Report no. A119/A120. Prepared by Earth Tech, Inc. Washington, DC USA

  • IBM-SPSS (2016) Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. IBM Corp, Armonk

    Google Scholar 

  • llten N, Selici AT (2008) Investigating the impacts of some meteorological parameters on air pollution in Balikesir, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9865-1

  • Irwin JS (2014) A suggested method for dispersion model evaluation. J Air Waste Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2013.833147

  • Jingchao Z, Kotani Z, Saijo T (2018) Public acceptance of environmentally friendly heating in Beijing: A case of a low-temperature air source heat pump. Enerji Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerimray A, Rojas-Solórzano L, Torkmahalleh MA, Hopke PK, Ó Gallachóiref BP (2017) Coal use for residential heating: Patterns, health implications and lessons learned. Energy Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.05.005

  • Kesarkar AP, Dalvi M, Kaginalkar A, Ojha A (2007) Coupling of the weather research and forecasting model with AERMOD for pollutant dispersion modeling. A case study for PM10 dispersion over Pune, India. Atmos Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.042

  • Kumar A, Dixit S, Varadarajan C, Vijayan A, Masuraha A (2006) Evaluation of the AERMOD dispersion model as a function of atmospheric stability for an urban area. Environmental Progress 25(2):141–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lakes Environmental Software (2017) AERMOD Processor, Version 9.4.0, Ontario, Canada

  • Langner C, Klemm O (2011) A comparison of model performance between AERMOD and AUSTAL2000. J Air Waste Manag. https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.61.6.640

  • Li D, Wu D, Xu F, Lai J, Shao L (2018) Literature overview of Chinese research in the field of better coal utilization. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.216

  • Li H, You S, Zhang H, Zheng W, Zou L (2018) Analysis of the impacts of heating emissions on the environment and human health in North China. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.013

  • Li S, Feng K, Li M (2017) Identifying the main contributors of air pollution in Beijing. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.127

  • Liu ZY, He XZ, Chapman RS (1991) Smoking and other risk factors for lung cancer in Xuanwei, China. Int J Epidemiol 20:26–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis D, Grosse Y, Lauby-Secretan B, Ghissassi FE, Bouvard V, Benbrahim-Tallaa L et al (2013) The carcinogenicity of outdoor air pollution. Lancet Oncol 14(13):1262–1263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng K, Xu X, Cheng X, Xu X, Qu X, Zhu W et al (2018) Spatio-temporal variations in SO2 and NO2 emissions caused by heating over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region constrained by an adaptive nudging method with OMI data. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.021

  • Metin S, Yildiz S, Cakmak S, Demirbas S (2011) Frequency of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning in Turkey. TAF Prev Med Bull 10(5):587–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutlu A (2019) Hava Kalitesi ve Meteoroloji: Korelasyon, Trend ve Epizot Analizleri. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.563848

  • NAQI (2016) National Air Quality Index. Ministry of Environmental and Urbanization. Ankara, Turkey. http://www.havaizleme.gov.tr/hava.html. Accessed 3 Sep 2019

  • O’Shaughnessy and Altmaier, 2011O’Shaughnessy PT, Altmaier R (2011) Use of AERMOD to determine a hydrogen sulfide emission factor for swine operations by inverse modeling. Atmos Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.061

  • Perry SG, Cimorelli AJ, Paine RJ, Brode RW, Weil JC, Venkatram A (2004) AERMOD: a dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part II: Model performance against 17 field study databases. J Appl Meteorol 44:694–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAQAM (2008) Regulation on air quality assessment and management. Ministry of Environmental and Urbanization. Ankara, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • RCAPCH (2005) Regulation on control of air pollution caused by heating. Ministry of Environmental and Urbanization. Ankara, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • Saffari A, Daher N, Samara C, Voutsa D, Kouras A (2013) Increased biomass burning due to the economic crisis in Greece and its adverse impact on wintertime air quality in Thessaloniki. Environ Sci Technol 47:13313–13320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sari D, Bayram A (2013) Quantification of emissions from domestic heating in residential areas of İzmir, Turkey and assessment of the impact on local/regional air-quality. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.033

  • Schipper L, Ketoff A, Kahane A (1985) Explaining residential energy use by international bottom-up comparisons. Annu Rev Energy 10:341–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seangkiatiyuth K, Surapipith V, Tantrakarnapa K, Lothongkum AW (2011) Application of the AERMOD modeling system for environmental impact assessment of NO2 emissions from a cement complex. J Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60499-8

  • Sickles JE, Shadwick DS (2015) Air quality and atmospheric deposition in the eastern US: 20 years of change. Atmos Chem Phys 15:173–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith K, Bruce N, Balakrishnan K, Adair-Rohani H, Balmes J, Chafe Z (2014) Millions dead: how do we know and what does it mean? Methods used in the comparative risk assessment of household air pollution. Annu Rev Public Health 35:185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein AF, Wyngaard JC (2001) Fluid modeling and the evaluation of inherent uncertainty. J Appl Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450

  • Stein AF, Isakov V, Godowitch J, Draxler RR (2007) A hybrid modeling approach to resolve pollutant concentrations in the urban area. Atmos Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.004

  • Tartakovsky D, Stern E, Broday DM (2016) Dispersion of TSP and PM10 emissions from quarries in complex terrain. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.133

  • Tecer LH (2009) A factor analysis study: Air pollution, meteorology, and hospital admissions for respiratory diseases. Toxicol Environ Chem. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772240902732316

  • Tian J, Ni H, Han Y, Shen Z, Wang Q, Long X, Zhang Y, Cao J (2018) Primary PM2.5 and trace gases emissions from residential coal combustion: Assessing semi-coke briquette for emission reduction in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Atmos Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.031

  • TSMS (2018) Turkish state meteorological service. Ankara, Turkey. https://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?k=undefined&m=BALIKESIR. Accessed 3 Nov 2019

  • TUIK (2017) The population of provinces by years 2000–2017. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist. Accessed 12 Aug 2018

  • Tuygun GT, Altug H, Elbir T, Gaga EE (2017) Modeling of air pollutant concentrations in an industrial region of Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8492-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US CB (2011) Historical census of housing tables: house heating fuel [website]. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/fuels.html. Accessed 22 May 2021

  • US EPA (1998) Revised draft user’s guide for the AMS/EPA regulatory model-AERMOD. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Emissions. Monitoring, and Analysis Division. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

  • US EPA (2003) AERMOD: Latest Features and Evaluation Results. US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-454/R-03–003. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

  • US EPA (2004) AERMOD: Description of Model Formula. US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

  • US EPA (2009) AERMOD Implementation Guide. US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

  • US EPA (2018) User's Guide for the AERMOD Terrain Preprocessor (AERMAP). US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Air Quality Modeling Group. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

  • US EPA (2019) AERMOD Implementation Guide. US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

  • Van der Lans R, Glarborg P, Dam-Johansen K, Knudsen P, Hesselmann G, Hepburn P (1998) Influence of coal quality on combustion performance. Fuel. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(98)00037-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatram A (1979) The expected deviation of observed concentrations from predicted ensemble means. Atmos Environ 11:1547–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil JC, Sykes RI, Venkatram A (1992) Evaluating air-quality models: Review and outlook. J Appl Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organization) (2015) Residential heating with wood and coal. Health impacts and policy options in Europe and North America. Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Yun X, Shen G, Shen H, Meng W, Chen Y, Xu H et al (2020) Residential solid fuel emissions contribute significantly to air pollution and associated health impacts in China. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba7621

  • Zhang J, Smith KR (2007) Household air pollution from coal and biomass fuels in China: measurements, health impacts, and interventions. Environ Health Perspect. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9479

  • Zhang Y, Schauer JJ, Zhang Y, Zeng L, Wei Y, Liu Y, Shao M (2008) Characteristics of Particulate Carbon Emissions from Real-World Chinese Coal Combustion. Environ Sci Technol 42:5068–5073

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Liu L, Xu L, Lin Q, Zhao H, Wang Z et al (2020) Exploring wintertime regional haze in northeast China: role of coal and biomass burning. Atmos Chem Phys.https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5355-2020

  • Zhao C, Luo K (2018) Household consumption of coal and related sulfur, arsenic, fluorine and mercury emissions in China. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou B, Zhan B, Wilson JG, Zeng Y (2010) Performance of AERMOD at different time scales. Simul Model Theory. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2010.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to express my sincere gratitude to the Balikesir University for the financial support, the Balikesir Metropolitan Municipality, and the Provincial Environmental Agency for their cooperation in order to complete this study.

Funding

This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the official or commercial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Engineering, Balikesir University, Balikesir, 10145, Turkey

    Atilla Mutlu & O. Mert Bayraktar

Authors
  1. Atilla Mutlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. Mert Bayraktar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The corresponding author conceived and designed the study. All data including air quality and meteorological have been analyzed in this study by the corresponding author and dispersion modeling steps have been carried out by the authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atilla Mutlu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mutlu, A., Bayraktar, O.M. Urban scale air quality analysis due to coal-based residential heating. Air Qual Atmos Health 14, 1487–1503 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-021-01063-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-021-01063-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation