Elsevier

Journal of Number Theory

Volume 234, May 2022, Pages 391-403
Journal of Number Theory

General Section
Multiplicative functions on shifted primes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2021.06.027Get rights and content

Abstract

Let f be a positive multiplicative function and let k2 be an integer. We prove that if the prime values f(p) converge to 1 sufficiently slowly as p+, in the sense that p|f(p)1|=, there exists a real number c>0 such that the k-tuples (f(p+1),,f(p+k)) are dense in the hypercube [0,c]k or in [c,+)k. In particular, the values f(p+1),,f(p+k) can be put in any increasing order infinitely often. Our work generalises previous results of De Koninck and Luca.

Introduction

The understanding of the local behavior of arithmetic functions has been the subject of research of many mathematicians. Part of this research involves the study of the values of an arithmetic function on consecutive integers. For example, if we denote the divisor function by τ, in 1952 Erdös and Mirsky [1] asked whether the equation τ(n)=τ(n+1) admits infinitely many solutions in the set of natural numbers, a question that can be considered as a close relative of the twin prime conjecture. It remained open for about thirty years until Heath-Brown [3] answered it affirmatively in 1984 by showing that#{nx:τ(n)=τ(n+1)}x(logx)7.

The method of Heath-Brown also yielded that there exist infinitely many positive integer solutions to the equation Ω(n)=Ω(n+1), where Ω counts the number of prime factors of n with multiplicity. His method, however, was not successful in proving that the analogous equation ω(n)=ω(n+1) has infinitely many positive integer solutions for the function ω which counts the number of distinct prime factors of n. It was Schlage-Puchta [8] who proved for the first time that even the equality ω(n)=ω(n+1) holds for infinitely many natural numbers n.

In 2011, Goldston, Graham, Pintz and Yildirim [2] made a significant breakthrough. They did not just prove that there are infinitely many integer solutions of those equations, but they also showed that the value of the relevant arithmetic function τ,Ω or ω can be specified. For instance, they proved that there are infinitely many integers n such that ω(n)=ω(n+1)=3.

Arithmetic functions, such as τ, are very sensitive on the exact number of prime factors of their input. In particular, they are highly sensitive on the large prime factors of their input. On the other hand, if we consider functions that are less sensitive to large prime factors, we can say more. Indeed, recently, De Koninck and Luca [6] proved that for any fixed integer k2 we have thatmax{φ(n+1),,φ(n+k)}min{φ(n+1),,φ(n+k)} is arbitrarily close to 1 infinitely often. Here φ stands for the Euler totient function. They also established the same result for the additive functions ω, Ω, the sum of divisors function σ1 and the kernel function γ, which is the multiplicative function defined by the relation γ(pm)=p for any prime power pm.

They had also proved [5, Problem 8.6] that if {i1,,ik} is a permutation of {1,,k}, the inequalitiesφ(n+i1)<<φ(n+ik) hold for an infinite set of natural numbers n.

The purpose of the present paper is to extend these results. We state below our main result and an immediate consequence of it. Both of them are in the same spirit as the work of De Koninck and Luca.

Theorem 1.1

Let k be a positive integer and let f be a positive multiplicative function such that p|f(p)1|= and f(p)1 when p. There exists a positive real number c such that the set of tuples (f(p+1),...,f(p+k)) is dense either in [0,c]k or in [c,+)k.

Corollary 1.2

Let k2 be an integer and let f be a positive multiplicative function such that p|f(p)1|= and f(p)1 when p. If {i1,,ik} is a permutation of {1,,k}, the inequalitiesf(p+i1)<<f(p+ik) hold for infinitely many primes p.

Proof

In Theorem 1.1, we may choose sufficiently small or large (this depends on whether we have density in [0,c]k or [c,+)k) non-negative numbers c1,,ck such that ci1<<cik and f(p+ij)cij for all j{1,,k} on a subsequence of the primes. Then, for ϵ>0 such that ϵ<min{(cij+1cij)/2,j=1,,k1}, we have thatf(p+ij)<cij+ϵ<cij+1ϵ<f(p+ij+1) for infinitely many primes p. 

Remark 1.1

In Theorem 1.1 we assumed that the function f is positive. However, we can have an analogous result for f being zero only on a finite set of primes by replacing the shifts i{1,,k} by the k first multiples of the product of those primes. For example, if f(2)=0, we can modify the proofs below by replacing the shifts i{1,,k} by the even shifts 2i. Doing so implies that there exists a constant c>0 such that the set of tuples (f(p+2),,f(p+2k)) is dense either in [0,c]k or [c,+)k.

Remark 1.2

This theorem extends (1.1), proven by De Koninck and Luca. It is also worth noting that there are additive functions whose values on consecutive integers can be ordered. For example, De Koninck, Friedlander and Luca [4] proved that the inequalitiesω(n+1)<<ω(n+k) hold infinitely often. They also proved that ω can be replaced by Ω in (1.2). Furthermore, minor changes in the solution of Problem 7.26 in [5] can lead to these results with {i1,,ik}={1,,k}.

Theorem 1.1 may be directly deduced from its more technical analogue, which is the following theorem that we prove in Section 2.

Theorem 1.3

Let k2 be an integer and let f be a positive multiplicative function such that f(p)1 as p. Let also K:=k(k+1)((k1)!)2.

(a) Iff(p)>1(f(p)1)=, then the set of tuples (f(p+1),...,f(p+k)) is dense in [f(K),)×[f(1),)××[f(k1),).

(b) Iff(p)<1(1f(p))=, the set of tuples (f(p+1),...,f(p+k)) is dense in [0,f(K)]×[0,f(1)]××[0,f(k1)].

Notation and definitions. If n is a positive integer such that n2, then P+(n) denotes the largest prime factor of n and P(n) denotes the smallest prime factor of n. We also define P+(1)=1 and P(1)=+.

Let y>0 and let n be a natural number. The y-rough part of n is defined to be equal to pan,p>ypa and its y-smooth part is given by pan,pypa.

Section snippets

Auxiliary results and proof of Theorem 1.3

In this section we prove two preparatory lemmas and use them to establish Theorem 1.3. We begin with the first lemma, which will be only needed for the proof of the second one and we then make use of the second lemma to prove Theorem 1.3.

Lemma 2.1

Let {bn}nN be a sequence of non-negative terms with n1bn= and bn0 as n. If β>0, there exists a subsequence {bnk}kN of {bn}nN such that kNbnk=β.

Proof

Since bn0, we may define n1 to be the smallest positive integer such that bn<β for all nn1. Moreover,

Proof of inequality (2.5)

To complete the proof of Theorem 1.3, it remains to prove inequality (2.5). Its proof will be based upon the Fundamental Lemma of Sieve Methods.

Theorem 3.1 The Fundamental Lemma of Sieve Theory

Let A be a finite set of integers and let P be a set of primes. We defineAd:=#{aA:a0(modd)},P(y):=py,pPp,S(A,P,y):=#{aA:(a,P(y))=1}. If there exists a non-negative multiplicative function v, some real number X, remainder terms rd and positive constants κ and C such that v(p)<p for all p|P(y),Ad=Xv(d)d+rdfor alld|P(y)andpP,w1<pw2(1v(p)p)1(log

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank his advisor Dimitris Koukoulopoulos for all the useful discussions on Theorem 1.3 and for suggesting a sieving argument that led to a simplification of Theorem 1.1. He would also like to thank Andrew Granville for sharing his ideas about the necessity of the conditions in the statement of the main theorem. Last, but not least, he thanks the Stavros Niarchos Scholarships Foundation for the generous financial support that provides to him for his doctoral studies.

References (8)

  • P. Erdös et al.

    The distribution of values of the divisor function d(n)

    Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3)

    (1952)
  • D.A. Goldston et al.

    Small gaps between almost primes, the parity problem, and some conjectures of Erdös on consecutive integers

    Int. Math. Res. Not.

    (2011)
  • D.R. Heath-Brown

    The divisor function at consecutive integers

    Mathematika

    (1984)
  • J.M. De Koninck et al.

    On strings of consecutive integers with a distinct number of prime factors

    Proc. Am. Math. Soc.

    (2009)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text