Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Plant Biostimulants in Sustainable Potato Production: an Overview

  • Published:
Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In modern agriculture, the reduction of environmental impact, ensuring both high and stable yield and high quality, is a primary goal. To avoid an excessive use of external inputs, without compromising crop performance, the increase of soil nutrient availability and nutrient use efficiency is fundamental in a sustainable potato production. In this framework, the use of plant biostimulants, such as humic substances, seaweed and microalgal extracts, hydrolysed proteins and amino acids and microorganisms, could give a great help to farmers. Due to the agronomic importance and the keen interest in these substances, the aim of this review was to survey and summarise the outputs derived from scientific published studies on the combination of potato and plant biostimulants. In the literature, several in vitro, growth chamber, glasshouse and field experiments were reported. Field experiments were conducted in different environmental conditions, using different genotypes, and all the applied plant biostimulants showed beneficial effects on both productive and qualitative potato parameters. Seaweed extract and humic substances could also reduce the normal dose of fertiliser without reducing yield. Among quality features, tuber size, contents of protein, vitamin C, starch and phenols are the principal parameters influenced by plant biostimulants. Weaknesses related to the use of plant biostimulants were shown and were related to different effectiveness of products due to their origin, production process and microbial species. In addition, product/strain-genotype interactions have been shown. Environmental factor, agricultural practice and timing of treatment can influence the effectiveness of both microbial and non-microbial plant biostimulants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Zinada IA, Sekh-Eleid KS (2015) Humic acid to decrease fertilization rate on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). AJAF 3(5):234–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akinremi OO, Janzen RL, Lemke RL, Larney FJ (2000) Response of canola, wheat and green beans to leonardite additions. Can J Soil Sci 80:437–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alenazi M, Wahb-Allah MA, Abdel-Razzak HS, Ibrahim AA, Alsadon A (2016) Water regimes and humic acid application influences potato growth, yield, tuber quality and water use efficiency. Am J Potato Res 93:463–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baradar A, Saberi-Riseh R, Sedaghati E, Akhgar A (2015) Effect of some bacteria and iron chelators on potato colonization by Arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi inoculated by Rhizoctonia. Indian J Sci Technol 8(19). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i19/76216

  • Battacharyya D, Babgohari MZ, Rathor P, Prithiviraj B (2015) Seaweed extracts as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hortic 30(196):39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berbara RLL, García AC (2014) Humic substances and plant defense metabolism. In: Ahmad P, Wani MR (eds) Physiological mechanisms and adaptation strategies in plants under changing environment: volume 1. Springer Science+Business Media, New York, pp 297–319

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj DP, Lundquist PO, Alstrom S (2008) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spore-associated bacteria affect mycorrhizal colonization, plant growth and potato pathogens. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2494–2501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bulgari R, Cocetta G, Trivellini A, Vernieri P, Ferrante A (2015) Biostimulants and crop responses: a review. Biol Agric Hortic 31:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2014.964649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW (2014) Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil 383:3–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canellas LP, Olivares FL, Aguiar NO, Jones DL, Nebbioso A, Mazzei P, Piccolo A (2015) Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hortic 30(196):15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caradonia F, Battaglia V, Righi L, Pascali G, La Torre A (2018) Plant biostimulant regulatory framework: prospects in Europe and current situation at international level. J Plant Growth Regul 38:448–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-018-9853-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caradonia F, Francia E, Morcia C, Ghizzoni R, Moulin L, Terzi V, Ronga D (2019) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria avoid processing tomato leaf damage during chilling stress. Agronomy 9:299. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9060299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caradonia F, Ronga D, Flore A, Barbieri R, Moulin L, Terzi V, Francia E (2020) Biostimulants and cherry rootstock increased tomato fruit yield and quality in sustainable farming systems. Ital J Agron 15(2):121–131. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2020.1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cicco A, Jeanty JC (2019) The EU potato sector-statistics on production, prices and trade. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/pdfscache/49931.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2020.

  • Dwelle RB, Hurley PJ (1984) The effects of foliar application of cytokinins on potato yields in south eastern Idaho. Ida Agric Exp Stn USA 64:293–299

  • El-Zohiri SSM, Asfour YM (2009) Effect of some organic compounds on growth and productivity of some potato cultivars. Ann Agric Sci, Moshtohor 47(3):403–415

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2020) www.fao.org/faostat/en/. Accessed 2 July 2020

  • García AC, Berbara RLL, Farías LP, Izquierdo FG, Hernández OL, Campos RH, Castro RN (2012) Humic acids of vermicompost as an ecological pathway to increase resistance of rice seedlings to water stress. Afr J Biotechnol 11:3125–3134

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghobadi M, Dehnavi MM, Yadavi AR, Parvizi K, Zafari D (2020) Reduced P fertilization improves Fe and Zn uptake in potato when inoculated with AMF in P, Fe and Zn deficient soil. Rhizosphere 15:100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghyselinck J, Velivelli SLS, Heylen K, O’Herlihy E, Franco J, Rojas M, De Vos P, Prestwich BD (2013) Bioprospecting in potato fields in the Central Andean Highlands: screening of rhizobacteria for plant growth-promoting properties. Syst Appl Microbiol 36:116–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gugała M, Zarzecka K, Dołęga H, Niewęgłowski M, Sikorska A (2016) The effect of biostimulants and herbicides on glycoalkaloid accumulation in potato. Plant Soil Environ 62:256–260. https://doi.org/10.17221/187/2016-PSE

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gururani MA, Upadhyaya CP, Baskar V, Venkatesh J, Nookaraju A, Park SW (2013) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance abiotic stress tolerance in Solanum tuberosum through inducing changes in the expression of ROS-scavenging enzymes and improved photosynthetic performance. J Plant Growth Regul 32:245–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haider MW, Ayyub CM, Pervez MA, Asad HU, Manan A, Raza SA, Ashraf I (2012) Impact of foliar application of seaweed extract on growth, yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Soil Environ 31:157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • du Jardin P (2015) Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci Hortic 196:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kargapolova KY, Burygin JL, Tkachenko OV, Evseeva NV, Pukhalskiy YV, Belimov AA (2020) Effectiveness of inoculation of in vitro-grown potato microplants with rhizosphere bacteria of the genus Azospirillum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-020-01791-9

  • Khosravifar S, Farahvash F, Aliasgharzad N, Yarnia M, Khoei FR (2020) Effects of different irrigation regimes and two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on some physiological characteristics and yield of potato under field conditions. J Plant Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1758133

  • Koch M, Naumann M, Pawelzik E, Gransee A, Thiel H (2019) The importance of nutrient management for potato production part I: plant nutrition and yield. Potato Res 63:97–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski B, Jäger AK, Van Staden J (1999) The effect of a seaweed concentrate on the in vitro growth and acclimatization of potato plantlets. Potato Res 42:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Singh SP, Raha P (2018) Organic sources use of amino acids based biostimulants and irrigation schedule on yield: water use efficiency relationship on potato tuber. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 7(1):1255–1259

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin RP (2008) Relative effects of biological amendments and crop rotations on soil microbial communities and soilborne diseases of potato. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1341–1351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lola-Luz T, Hennequart F, Gaffney M (2014) Effect on health promoting phytochemicals following seaweed application, in potato and onion crops grown under a low input agricultural system. Sci Hortic 170:224–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo S, Pandino G, Mauromicale G (2020) Optimizing nitrogen fertilization to improve qualitative performances and physiological and yield responses of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Agronomy 10:352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malboobi MA, Behbahani M, Madani H, Owlia P, Deljou A, Yakhchali B, Moradi M, Hassanabadi H (2009) Performance evaluation of potent phosphate solubilizing bacteria in potato rhizosphere. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:1479–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani F, Bettaieb T, Doudech N, Hannachi C (2013) Effect of hydrogen peroxide and thiourea on dormancy breaking of microtubers and field-grown tubers of potato. Afr Crop Sci J 21(3):221–234

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur DAJ, Knowles NR (1992) Resistance responses of potato to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under varying abiotic phosphorus levels. Plant Physiol 100:341–351 0032-0889/92/100/0341/11/$01.00/0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murashev SV, Kiru SD, Verzhuk VG, Pavlov AV (2020) Potato plant growth acceleration and yield increase after treatment with an amino acid growth stimulant. Agron Res 18. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.20.036

  • Naqqash T, Hameed S, Imran A, Hanif MK, Majeed A, van Elsas JD (2016) Differential response of potato toward inoculation with taxonomically diverse plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Front Plant Sci 7:144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naumann M, Koch M, Thiel H, Gransee A, Pawelzik E (2020) The importance of nutrient management for potato production part II: plant nutrition and tuber quality. Potato Res 63:121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-019-09430-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prajapati A, Patel C, Singh N, Jain S, Chongtham S, Maheshwari M, Patel C, Patel R (2016) Evaluation of seaweed extract on growth and yield of potato. Environ Ecol 34(2):605–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Pramanick B, Brahmachari K, Mahapatra BS, Ghosh A, Ghosh D, Kar S (2017) Growth, yield and quality improvement of potato tubers through the application of seaweed sap derived from the marine alga Kappaphycus alvarezii. J Appl Phycol 29:3253–3260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Röder C, Mógor AF, Szilagyi-Zecchin VJ, Gemin LG, Mógor G (2018) Potato yield and metabolic changes by use of biofertilizer containing L-glutamic acid. Com Sci 9:211–218. https://doi.org/10.14295/CS.v9i2.2564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronga D, Biazzi E, Parati K, Carminati D, Carminati E, Tava A (2019a) Microalgal biostimulants and biofertilisers in crop productions. Agronomy 9:192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ronga D, Caradonia F, Francia E, Morcia C, Rizza F, Badeck FW, Ghizzoni R, Terzi V (2019b) Interaction of tomato genotypes and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under reduced irrigation. Horticulturae 5:79. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5040079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanli A, Karadogan T, Tonguc M (2013) Effect of leonardite applications on yield and some quality parameters of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Turk J Field Crops 18(1):20–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarhan TZE (2011) Effect of humic acid and seaweed extracts on growth and yield of potato plant (Solanum tuberosum L.) Desiree cv. Mesop J Agric 39:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretaria LB, Molejon MLA, Bayogan ERV, Lacap AT, Ekman JH (2018) Evaluation of various methods to break dormancy of potato (Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Granola’) minitubers. Acta Hortic 1205:401–410. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1205.47

  • Selim EM, Shaymaa IS, Asaad FF, El-Neklawy AS (2012) Interactive effects of humic acid and water stress on chlorophyll and mineral nutrient contents of potato plants. J Appl Sci Res 8:531–537

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Selladurai R, Purakayastha TJ (2016) Effect of humic acid multinutrient fertilizers on yield and nutrient use efficiency of potato. J Plant Nutr 39:949–956

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seyedbagheri M (2010) Influence of humic products on soil health and potato production. Potato Res 53:341–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stark JC, Love SL, Knowles NR (2020) Tuber quality. In: Stark J, Thornton M, Nolte P (eds) Potato production systems. Springer, Cham, pp 479–498

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Struik PC, Wiersema SG (1999) Seed potato technology. Wageningen Academic Pub, Wageningen

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suh HY, Yoo KS, Suh SG (2014) Tuber growth and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) as affected by foliar or soil application of fulvic and humic acids. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 55:183–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tkachenko OV, Evseeva NV, Terentyeva EV, Burygin GL, Shirokov AA, Burov AM, Matora LY, Shchyogole SY (2020) Improved production of high-quality potato seeds in aeroponics with plant-growth-promoting Rhizobacteria. Potato Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-020-09464-y

  • Verlinden G, Pycke J, Mertens J, Debersaques F, Verheyen K, Baert G, Bries J, Haesaert G (2009) Application of humic substances results in consistent increase in crop yield and nutrient uptake. J Plant Nutr 32:1407–1426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Volpato S, Masoero G, Giovannetti G, Nuti M (2020) Arbuscular mycorrhizal biofertilizers sources in the potato (Solanum tuberosum) plant show interactions with cultivars on yield and litter-bags Spectral Features. J Agron Res 2(4):9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadas W, Dziugieł T (2020) Changes in assimilation area and chlorophyll content of very early potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars as influenced by biostimulants. Agronomy 10:387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yao MK, Tweddell RJ, Desilets H (2002) Effect of two vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth of micropropagated potato plantlets and on the extent of disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Mycorrhiza 12:235–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Technical support during greenhouse experiment from Elisa Biazzi, Agata Ursino and Barbara Pintus of CREA-ZA Lodi, is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Dr. Pilar Morera-Margarit for her comments on the manuscript.

Funding

PSR 2014-2020 “Strutturazione e Valorizzazione della Filiera della Patata di Montagna” - domanda di sostegno n. 5114607 funded by Emilia Romagna Region, Italy; Grant No. 2015/1411 “Il Polo delle Microalghe. Le Microalghe per il trattamento e la valorizzazione di rifiuti e sottoprodotti agro-zootecnici e caseari” (MiReAZoC) funded by Fondazione Cariplo, Milano, Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola n. 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy

    Federica Caradonia & Enrico Francia

  2. CREA Research Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture, viale Piacenza n. 29, 26900, Lodi, Italy

    Domenico Ronga & Aldo Tava

  3. Pharmacy Department, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II n. 132, 84084, Fisciano, SA, Italy

    Domenico Ronga

Authors
  1. Federica Caradonia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Domenico Ronga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aldo Tava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Enrico Francia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federica Caradonia.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caradonia, F., Ronga, D., Tava, A. et al. Plant Biostimulants in Sustainable Potato Production: an Overview. Potato Res. 65, 83–104 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-021-09510-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-021-09510-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation