Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating the parametric effects and analysis of stir cast aluminium matrix composite by Wirecut-EDM using Topsis method

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this present era, Aluminium Matrix Composites are the most hopeful alternatives to many industrial and structural applications because of their good parental and inbuilt mechanical properties. This work deals with the machining of stir castAl6061 matrix reinforced with 6 wt% zinc oxide particle sample by Wire cut Electro Discharge Machining and investigate the effects of input factors such as pulse on time, wire feed rate and voltage over the responses metal removal rate (MRR) and surface roughness. Wire EDM machining is carried out with a varying pulse on time (4–6 µs), Voltage (50–80 V) and wire feed rate (2–6 m/min). By using TOPSIS approach, the optimal machining parameters are recommended. The optimized results suggest that higher MRR and lower surface roughness were accomplished with the combination of pulse on time, voltage and wire feed rate at 6 µs, 50 V and 4 m/min respectively. The machined surfaces are analyzed by an optical microscope. The significant factors and the effect of factors over responses are determined and analyzed by using ANOVA approach. The results attained are useful for the manufacturers to obtain the better WEDM machining of Al6061 reinforced with ZnO particles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

t on :

Pulse on time

V :

Voltage

WFR :

Wire feed rate

MRR:

Metal removal rate

Ra:

Surface Roughness

g:

gram

cm:

centimeter

mm:

millimeter

Pa:

pascal

ml:

milliliter

HNO3 :

Nitric acid

HCl:

Hydrochloric acid

HF:

Hydrofluoric acid

Al6061:

Aluminium

MMC:

Metal matrix composites

AMC:

Aluminium matrix composites

WEDM:

Wirecut electro discharge machining

TOPSIS:

Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution

Anova:

Analysis of variance

BHN:

Brinell hardness number

EDS:

Energy dispersive spectroscopy

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

References

  1. Taha M A 2001 Practicalization of cast metal matrix composites (MMCs). Mater. Des. 22: 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3069(00)00077-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosso M 2006 Ceramic and metal matrix composites routes and properties. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 175: 364–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaczmar J W, Pietrzak K and Wlosinski W 2000 The production and application of metal matrix composite materials. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 106: 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00639-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miracle D B 2005 Metal matrix composites from science to technological significance. Compos. Sci. Technol. 65: 2526–2540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dey A, Reddy Bandi V R and Pandey K M 2015 Wire electrical discharge machining characteristics of AA6061/cenospherealuminium matrix composites using RSM. Mater. Today Proc. 5: 1278–1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Surappa M K 2003 Aluminium matrix composites: challenges and opportunities. Sadhana 28: 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02717141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yan B H and Wang C C 1993 Machinability of SiC particle reinforced aluminum alloy composite material. J. Jpn. Inst. Light Met. 43: 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02717141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang Y C and Chan S L 2004 Tensile properties of nanometric Al2O3 particulate reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Mater. Chem. Phys. 85: 438–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gopalakrishnan S and Murugan N 2012 Production and wear characterization of AA 6061 matrix titanium diboride particulate reinforced composite by enhanced stir casting method. Compos. Part B Eng. 43: 302–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sajjadi S A, Ezatpour H R and Torabi Parizi M 2012 Comparison of microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 aluminum alloy/Al2O3 composites fabricated by stir and compo-casting processes. Mater. Des. 34: 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aydin H, Bayram A, Uguz A and Akay K S 2009 Tensile properties of friction stir welded joints of 2024 aluminum alloy in different heat treated state. Mater. Des. 30: 2211–2221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.08.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ibrahim I A, Mohamed F A and Lavernia E J 1991 Particulate reinforced metal matrix composites. J. Mater. Sci. 26: 1137–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00544448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramnath B V, Elanchezhian C, Annamalai R M and Aravind S 2014 Aluminium metal matrix composites—a review. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 38: 55–60. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.4.13020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sato A and Mehrabian R 1976 Aluminum matrix composites: fabrication and properties. Metall. Trans. B 7: 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. SakthiSadhasivam R M and Ramanathan K 2018 Dry sliding wear behavior of SiC and ZnO reinforced aluminium 6061 matrix composite using robust design. J. Manuf. Eng. 13: 95–100

    Google Scholar 

  16. SakthiSadhasivam R M, Ramanathan K, Bhuvaneshwari B V and Raja R 2021 A study on tribological behaviour and analysis of ZnO reinforced AA6061 matrix composites fabricated by stir casting route. Ind. Lubr. Tribol. 73: 642–651. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILT-11-2020-0392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Muller F and Monahan J 2000 Nonconventional machining of particle reinforced metal matrix composite. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 40: 1351–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00121-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Satishkumar D, Kanthababu M, Vajjiravelu V, Anburaj R, Sundarrajan N T and Arul H 2011 Investigation of wire electrical discharge machining characteristics of Al6063/SiCp composites. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 56: 975–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3242-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kalyon A 2020 Optimization of machining parameters in sinking electrical discharge machine of caldie plastic mold tool steel. Sadhana 45: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-1305-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shah A, Mufti N A, Rakwal D and Bamberg E 2001 Material removal rate, kerf, and surface roughness of tungsten carbide machined with wire electrical discharge machining. Int. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 20: 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-010-9644-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahaputra S S and Patnaik Amar 2007 Optimization of wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) process parameters using Taguchi method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 34: 911–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0672-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mohanty C P, Satpathy M P, Mahapatra S S and Singh M R 2018 Optimization of cryo-treated EDM variables using TOPSIS-based TLBO algorithm. Sadhana 43: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0829-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuvraj N and Pradeep Kumar M 2015 Multiresponse optimization of abrasive water jet cutting process parameters using TOPSIS approach. Mater. Manuf. Process. 30: 882–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2014.994763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rao S R and Badmanabhan G 2014 Optimization of multiple-machining criteria in electrochemical machining of aluminium composites using design of experiments. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 73: 251–257

    Google Scholar 

  25. Patil N G and Brahmankar P K 2010 Some studies into wire electro-discharge machining of alumina particulate reinforced aluminium matrix composites. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 48: 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2291-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sakthi Sadhasivam R M, Ramanathan K, Ravichandran M and Jayaseelan C 2021 Experimental investigations on microstructure, properties and workability behavior of zinc oxide reinforced Al–Si–Mg matrix composites. Silicon (1–13). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01012-8

  27. Saravanan S, Senthilkumar P, Ravichandran M and Shivasankaran N 2018 Wire electrical discharge machining of AA6063-TiC particle reinforced metal matrix composites using Taguchi method. Material Res. Exp.. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aadab7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shelvaraj S G and Naveen Sait A 2018 Optimization of EDM parameters for Al–TiC composites prepared through powder metallurgy route. Mechanika 24: 135–142. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.mech.24.1.18951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Magesh M, Jothiraj K and Janarthanan G 2017 Optimization of wire-EDM parameters to calculate MRR and measure surface finish on SS410. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol. 2: 20–45. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36343.68003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pazhouhanfar P and Eghbali B 2018 Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of TiB2 reinforced Al6061 matrix composites produced using stir casting process. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 710: 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.10.087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Om P S, Rajneesh K and Meghanshu V 2014 Effect of electro discharge machining process parameters on material removal rate. J. Basic Appl. Eng. Res. 1: 17–20

  32. Arikatla S P, Mannan T and Krishnaiah A 2016 Influence of wire feed rate and wire tension in wire electrical discharge machining of titanium alloy. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 5: 274–281. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRSET.2015.0501034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bisaria H and Shandilya P 2015 Machining of metal matrix composites by EdmAndits variants: a review. DAAAM International Scientific Book. Ch. 23: 267–282

  34. Lauwers B, Kruth JP, Liu W, Eeraerts W, Schacht B and Bleys P 2004 Investigation of material removal mechanisms in EDM of composite ceramic materials. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 149: 347–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.02.013

  35. Ramalinga Reddy M, Ravi Kumar P and Ajay D 2016 Effect of process parameters on surface roughness in EDM process. Int. J. Mod. Eng. Res. 1: 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPTECH.2011.038110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sharma A, Garg M P and Goyal K K 2014 Prediction of optimal conditions for WEDM of Al 6063/ ZrSiO4(p) MMC. Procedia Mater. Sci. 6: 1024–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.173

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere thanks to the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Alagappa Chettiar Government College of Engineering & Technology, Karaikudi for providing the facilities to carry out the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to RM Sakthi Sadhasivam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadhasivam, R.S., Ramanathan, K. Investigating the parametric effects and analysis of stir cast aluminium matrix composite by Wirecut-EDM using Topsis method. Sādhanā 46, 143 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01674-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01674-5

Keywords

Navigation