FormalPara Key Summary Points

Why carry out this study?

Identification of pharmacologic treatments that cause viral clearance of SARS-CoV-2 is important for addressing the global COVID-19 pandemic.

Ribavirin is an inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase inhibitor with activity against coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2.

It was not known if ribavirin aerosol would be effective in treating hospitalized adults who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and were experiencing respiratory distress.

An open-label, compassionate use study was initiated using an experimental dosing regimen of aerosolized ribavirin to deliver medication in a shorter treatment period.

This is the first report of efficacy and safety outcomes in patients treated with ribavirin aerosol for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

What was learned from the study?

This case series of five hospitalized patients with COVID-19 illustrates the potential benefit of administration of ribavirin aerosol in SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance; further research is ongoing.

Introduction

The virus responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2, is a betacoronavirus similar to SARS-CoV and the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) [1]. SARS-CoV-2 is known, in some instances, to induce an excessive pro-inflammatory host response, including aberrant induction of inflammatory cytokines, which is associated with severe lung pathology and can result in patient mortality [2, 3]. As in patients with SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV, some patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection develop acute respiratory distress syndrome, and pulmonary ground glass opacities are commonly observed on imaging [2, 4]. A 2020 report illustrated similarities between the pathological features observed in a patient with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 and those typically seen in SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV infections [5].

Ribavirin is an inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, a key enzyme in the de novo synthesis of guanine nucleotides, and has demonstrated in vitro activity against a number of emerging viruses [6, 7]. Ribavirin inhibits RNA synthesis by disrupting the activity of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRp), crucial enzymes in the life cycle of coronaviruses, and also inhibits mRNA capping [6,7,8]. Ribavirin has been used against RdRp of the hepatitis C virus [8], and orally administered ribavirin (in combination with other medications) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection [9, 10].

Ribavirin for inhalation solution (ribavirin aerosol) is approved by the FDA and Health Canada for the treatment of infants and young children with severe lower respiratory tract infections due to respiratory syncytial virus [11, 12] and has been made available in Italy for patients with COVID-19 as part of a compassionate use program. Aerosol administration of ribavirin has been shown to be effective against multiple variants of influenza [13,14,15]. In order to evaluate the activity of ribavirin and other anti-polymerase drugs against SARS-CoV-2, a 2020 study used homology modeling to build the Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 RdRp and then assessed the binding properties of different antiviral compounds using molecular docking [8]. Authors concluded that ribavirin demonstrated tight binding to the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp and could potentially interfere with protein synthesis, leading to viral eradication [8]. Currently, many countries are using newly developed vaccines to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or decrease the severity of the disease. At the same time, public health authorities are facing important challenges with the current and emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2 that could lead to limited efficacy of the available vaccines. For this reason, additional antiviral therapies are needed for patients who will develop more severe infection with SARS-CoV-2.

An open-label, compassionate use study was initiated to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ribavirin aerosol (10 mL of 100 mg/mL in nebulizer reservoir administered for 30 min twice daily [bid] for at most 6 days) in the treatment of hospitalized adults who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and were experiencing respiratory distress. Here, data are presented for the first five patients treated for SARS-CoV-2 infection in this compassionate use study.

Case Presentations

Ethics committee approval of the compassionate use program (IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, Rome, Italy; and San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy) was obtained before treatment was initiated. The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments. All patients provided written informed consent for participation in the compassionate use program and for their information and images to be included in this article.

Patients were managed according to international and Italian treatment guidelines for COVID-19. In addition, ribavirin was administered using the PARI BOY® SX inhalation system (PARI GmbH, Starnberg, Germany); the nebulizer was driven by wall air at a standard flow rate. Ribavirin was provided in 6-g vials that were diluted with 60 mL of distilled water. For each ribavirin treatment, 10 mL of solution was placed in the nebulizer reservoir. Nebulized ribavirin (100 mg/mL for 30 min bid) was administered for 6 days (i.e., 12 doses total). Healthcare providers remained outside the patient room during ribavirin aerosol administration. Patients were remotely monitored through a window during drug administration, and vital signs were remotely measured every 10 min.

Four men and one woman were treated, with an age range of 29 to 72 years (Table 1). Prior to patient enrollment in the compassionate use program, the diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed by positive tests for SARS-CoV-2 (Table 2) and laboratory testing ruled out other bacterial, viral, and fungal etiologies including Legionella, pneumococcus, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, tuberculosis, cytomegalovirus, human immunodeficiency virus, and aspergillosis.

Table 1 Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and test results at the start of ribavirin aerosol therapy
Table 2 Diagnostic testing and treatments

Patient 1

The patient was admitted to the hospital on July 8, 2020 (Table 2). Analysis of bronchial washing fluids confirmed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 (Table 2), and a chest computed tomography (CT) scan without contrast showed pseudonodular areas of parenchymal thickening in the right upper lobe with associated ground glass areas (involving 15–20% of the lung parenchyma) and some reactive mediastinal lymph nodes (Fig. 1). The patient was enrolled in the compassionate use study and treated with nebulized ribavirin from July 13 through July 19. On the third day of ribavirin therapy, a repeat nasopharyngeal swab, a conjunctival sample, and a SARS-CoV-2 antibody test were performed, all of which were negative.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Chest computed tomography scans without contrast for patient 1 at pretreatment, showing pseudonodular areas of parenchymal thickening in the upper right lobe with associated ground glass areas and some reactive mediastinal lymph nodes, and posttreatment after 6 days of therapy with ribavirin solution for inhalation, showing resolution of the pseudonodular areas and minimal residual subpleural areas

One day after completion of the ribavirin aerosol treatment regimen, a chest CT scan showed resolution of pseudonodular areas previously described, with only minimal residual subpleural areas of parenchymal thickening (less than 5% of the lung parenchyma; Fig. 1). On the same day, a nasopharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. The patient was discharged on July 22 (approximately 3 days after completing ribavirin treatment) and returned to quarantine. At the end of quarantine, two sequential nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 yielded negative results.

Patient 2

A chest CT scan without contrast showed multiple areas of parenchymal consolidation affecting the lower lobes of both lungs with associated ground glass areas, involving 20–25% of the lung parenchyma (Fig. 2). The patient was admitted to the hospital on July 30, 2020 (Table 2). Serologic testing for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies performed on July 31 was negative. The patient was enrolled in the compassionate use program and treated with nebulized ribavirin from July 31 through August 6. On the third day of ribavirin aerosol therapy, a repeat nasopharyngeal swab tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, while a conjunctival sample was negative.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Chest computed tomography scans without contrast for patient 2 at pretreatment, showing multiple areas of parenchymal consolidation affecting the lower lobes of both lungs with associated ground glass areas, and posttreatment after 6 days of therapy with ribavirin solution for inhalation, showing almost complete resolution of the parenchymal consolidation and ground glass areas

A chest CT scan performed on the last day of ribavirin aerosol treatment showed almost complete resolution of the previously described parenchymal consolidation and ground glass areas (parenchymal involvement of less than 5%; Fig. 2). On the same day, a nasopharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Serologic testing performed at the end of ribavirin aerosol therapy was positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The patient was discharged from the hospital on August 7 and returned to quarantine. At the end of quarantine, two sequential nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 yielded negative results.

Patient 3

The patient was admitted to the hospital on October 13, 2020 (Table 2). A chest CT scan without contrast was performed on October 15 and showed bilateral parenchymal thickening and multiple associated ground glass areas with crazy paving (involving approximately 25% of the lung parenchyma) and some reactive mediastinal lymph nodes (Fig. 3). The patient was enrolled in the compassionate use study and treated with nebulized ribavirin from October 16 through October 22. After the first 2 days of ribavirin therapy, the fever resolved and the cough subsided. At the end of ribavirin therapy, a nasopharyngeal swab test for SARS-CoV-2 was negative.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Chest computed tomography scans without contrast for patient 3 at pretreatment, showing bilateral parenchymal thickening and multiple associated ground glass areas with crazy paving and some reactive mediastinal lymph nodes, and posttreatment after 6 days of therapy with ribavirin solution for inhalation, showing moderate clearing of the bilateral parenchymal thickening and stable small mediastinal lymph nodes

On October 22 (the day of completion of ribavirin aerosol treatment regimen), a chest CT scan showed moderate clearing of the bilateral parenchymal thickening previously described (with parenchymal involvement of approximately 10%), some bands of atelectasis, and stable small mediastinal lymph nodes (Fig. 3). The patient was discharged from the hospital later that day. At the end of quarantine, two sequential nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 yielded negative results.

Patient 4

A chest CT scan without contrast that was performed on the day of hospital admission (October 29, 2020) showed parenchymal thickening and multiple associated ground glass areas with crazy paving aspects, predominantly at the basal pyramid of both lower lobes (involving approximately 10% of the lung parenchyma) and small mediastinal lymph nodes (Fig. 4; Table 2). The patient was enrolled in the compassionate use study and treated with nebulized ribavirin from October 30 through November 3. The patient requested hospital discharge on November 3 for family reasons and, therefore, received 10 of the planned 12 doses. The patient was apyretic after the first 2 days of ribavirin therapy, and the cough subsided.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Chest computed tomography scans without contrast for patient 4 at pretreatment, showing parenchymal thickening and multiple associated ground glass areas with crazy paving aspects, predominantly at the basal pyramid of both lower lobes, and posttreatment after 5 days of therapy with ribavirin solution for inhalation, showing a stationary pulmonary picture

A chest CT scan performed on the fifth day of ribavirin aerosol therapy (November 3) showed a stationary pulmonary picture with parenchymal involvement of less than 10% (Fig. 4). The patient was discharged from the hospital on November 3; at discharge, a nasopharyngeal swab tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. A follow-up nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 that was performed on November 17 (end of quarantine) yielded negative results.

Patient 5

The patient was admitted to the hospital on December 26, 2020. Empiric treatment with antibiotics (Table 2) provided limited improvement. On January 21, a nasopharyngeal swab tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, and a chest CT scan without contrast showed focal ground glass areas, mainly located in the upper lobes bilaterally, with the largest in the medial area of the middle lobe (Fig. 5). There were no signs of interstitial thickening and no evidence of lymphadenomegaly in the mediastinal area. These findings were considered consistent with COVID-19 interstitial pneumonia and grossly affected 5–10% of the lung parenchyma. A serology test for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was positive. The patient was enrolled in the compassionate use study and treated with nebulized ribavirin from January 21 through January 27. On day 3 of ribavirin aerosol therapy, a nasopharyngeal swab again tested positive for SARS-CoV-2.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Chest computed tomography scans without contrast for patient 5 at pretreatment, showing focal ground glass areas, mainly located in the upper lobes bilaterally, with the largest in the medial area of the middle lobe, and posttreatment, showing almost complete resolution of the ground glass thickening in the parenchymal area, with only a few areoles persistently and slightly thickened

A CT scan performed on February 1 showed complete resolution of the ground glass thickening in the parenchymal area, with only a few areoles persistently and slightly thickened (Fig. 5). On February 3 (1 week after the last dose of ribavirin aerosol), viral clearance was verified with a negative nasopharyngeal swab. The patient was discharged from the hospital on February 4 in good clinical condition. At the end of quarantine, two sequential nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 yielded negative results.

Safety and Tolerability

In all cases, treatment with ribavirin aerosol was well tolerated, and no adverse effects on the skin or eyes were observed. No bronchospasm was reported during treatment, and no changes in heart rhythm were recorded. All patients received low-molecular-weight heparin throughout hospitalization except patient 5, who received prophylaxis with enoxaparin and an antiplatelet agent to reduce thromboembolic risk.

Discussion

Identification of pharmacologic treatments that induce viral containment and clearance of SARS-CoV-2 is important for addressing the global COVID-19 pandemic [6]. The details reported here illustrate the potential benefit of administration of ribavirin aerosol in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Three of these five patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were initially treated empirically with antibiotics; one of them (patient 2) also received corticosteroids and other antiviral medications. Two patients received no antiviral or immunomodulating treatments other than ribavirin. Ribavirin aerosol treatments (12 doses administered over 6 days) were provided as part of a compassionate use program. Rapid improvement in respiratory symptoms was observed after initiation of ribavirin aerosol therapy and was followed by effective viral clearance. Pretreatment CT scans showed pseudonodular areas of parenchymal thickening in the upper right lobe with associated ground glass opacities (patient 1), multiple areas of parenchymal consolidation in both lower lobes with associated ground glass opacities (patient 2), bilateral parenchymal thickening and multiple associated ground glass areas (patient 3), and focal ground glass areas in the upper lobes bilaterally (patient 5), which were almost completely resolved (patients 1, 2, and 5) or moderately cleared (patient 3) on post-treatment imaging. For patient 4, CT scans showed a stable pulmonary picture. All patients recovered fully, and nasopharyngeal swabs obtained after hospital discharge were negative for SARS-CoV-2.

An experimental dosing regimen of aerosolized ribavirin was developed for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection in order to deliver medication in a shorter treatment period. The FDA-recommended dosing for patients with respiratory syncytial virus is a solution of 20 mg/mL with continuous aerosol administration for 12–18 h per day for 3–7 days [11]. Research using animal models demonstrated that the use of a higher concentration ribavirin solution (60 mg/mL) could significantly reduce treatment time [16, 17]. Ribavirin 100 mg/mL administered using a more efficient nebulizer was effective in reducing mortality in a lethal influenza A virus mouse model [18]. Administration of ribavirin aerosol 100 mg/mL for 30 min is estimated to deliver 1760 μg/mL to the alveolar lining fluid, which is approximately 64 times the half maximal response (EC50) of 26.7 μg/mL observed against a clinical isolate of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro (data on file). Administration of ribavirin aerosol as recommended in the treatment of respiratory syncytial virus (20 mg/mL over 12 h) [11] results in an estimated dose of 10.9 mg/kg, whereas administration in the compassionate use study (ribavirin aerosol 100 mg/mL for 30 min) results in an estimated dose of 5.1 mg/kg, which represents approximately half the systemic exposure (data on file).

In vitro and clinical data suggest that ribavirin may be an effective therapeutic in the medical management strategy of patients with COVID-19. In vitro research has demonstrated antiviral efficacy for lopinavir and ribavirin against SARS-associated coronavirus, and a clinical study showed that patients with probable SARS-CoV treated with a combination of lopinavir/ritonavir, ribavirin (oral or intravenous), and corticosteroids (n = 41) had a significantly lower rate of adverse clinical outcomes (i.e., acute respiratory distress syndrome or patient mortality) than a historical control group treated with ribavirin and corticosteroids (n = 111; P < 0.001) [19]. Other in vitro studies have shown that MERS-CoV is sensitive to a combination of ribavirin and interferon-α2b [20]. A publication regarding a 38-year-old man diagnosed with COVID-19 reported the successful use of intravenously administered ribavirin as one component of medical therapy that also included antibiotics, antitussives, bronchodilators, and interferon-α1b [21]. A 2020 open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 evaluated 14-day combination therapy (n = 86) with orally administered lopinavir/ritonavir, orally administered ribavirin, and subcutaneously administered interferon-β1b (in the subset of 52 patients admitted less than 7 days from symptom onset) compared with a control group that received only orally administered lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 41) [22]. That study found that the combination treatment was significantly better for alleviating symptoms, reducing viral load, and shortening the duration of hospitalization.

Although the mechanisms of action have not been fully elucidated, ribavirin has broad antiviral effects that appear to target both viral and host responses [23]. Proposed mechanisms for the antiviral efficacy of ribavirin, which may be concentration dependent, include the inhibition of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase leading to changes in the balance of intracellular nucleotide concentrations, inhibition of mRNA capping, alterations in host cell gene expression, inhibition of viral RdRp, and enhancement of viral mutagenesis [23]. In the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection, ribavirin could reduce lung involvement indirectly through reduction of viral replication and local shedding. This could reduce viral exposure to alveolar dendritic cells and T lymphocytes, thereby limiting the inflammatory cascade mediated by cytokines and chemokines, which is the main mechanism of alveolar damage and alteration in respiratory exchange.

None of the five patients included in this case series required admission to an intensive care unit, and the effectiveness of ribavirin aerosol for severe presentations of COVID-19 is unclear. However, the results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study support the feasibility and efficacy of using ribavirin aerosol treatment in infants requiring mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure caused by respiratory syncytial virus infection [24].

Potential advantages with ribavirin aerosol treatment for patients with COVID-19 versus oral or intravenous formulations include direct targeting of medication to the site of infection and a lower risk for adverse events that are associated with systemic administration. However, there are concerns about using an aerosol treatment in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 because of increased risk of healthcare providers being exposed to the virus. It is known that the drug can disperse into the bedside area during treatment with ribavirin aerosol [11], and the extent to which treatment may also impact virus dispersal is unclear. In addition to the standard precautions taken when treating patients with COVID-19, it is recommended that healthcare providers wear a facemask (as well as eye protection, gloves, and a gown), close the door to the patient room, and remain at a safe distance (possibly outside the door) during nebulizer treatments [25]. In the current report, healthcare providers wore FFP3 masks and remained outside the patient room during ribavirin aerosol treatment. The short duration of therapy (30 min bid) means that this restriction in patient contact would not be expected to compromise patient care.

Conclusion

Ribavirin is an inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase inhibitor with demonstrated activity against coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2, in preclinical research. The positive preliminary findings obtained and reported here, both in terms of efficacy and safety, support continuation of the compassionate use study and execution of further clinical studies (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT04356677 and NCT04551768) to evaluate whether ribavirin for inhalation (ribavirin aerosol) may be a useful option in the treatment of patients with COVID-19.