Abstract
We analyze a new type of the plasmon mode in nanosize semiconductor crystals. Rotational dipole plasmon resonance, in which only angular degrees of freedom are excited, prevails in the optical spectra of photodoped nanocrystals. Such a collective mode differs basically from surface plasmon resonances in typical photoabsorption spectra of metallic nanoclusters and can be described as an excited state in a finite Fermi system as well as a rotational motion of a quantum liquid. We demonstrate that such dipole oscillations are harmonic, which makes it possible to identify them as a plasmon resonant excitation.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
V. V. Klimov, Nanoplasmonics (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2009; Pan Stanford, Singapore, 2011).
Quantum Plasmonics, Ed. by S. I. Bozhevolniy et al. (Springer Int., Switzeland, 2016).
Plasmonics. From Basics to Advanced Topics, Ed. by S. Enoch and N. Bonod, vol. 167 of Springer Series in Optical Sciences (Springer, Berlin, 2012).
M. S. Tame, K. R. McEnery, S. K. Ozdemir, et al., Nat. Phys. 9, 329 (2013).
J. A. Scholl, A. L. Koh, and J. A. Dionne, Nature (London, U.K.) 483, 421 (212).
M. Brack, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 667 (1993).
M. Harb, F. Rabilloud, D. Simon, et al., J. Chem. Phys. 129, 194108 (2008).
F. Xuan and C. Guet, Phys. Rev. A 94, 043415 (2016).
U. Kreibig and M. Vollmer, Optical Properties of Metallic Clusters, Vol. 65 of Springer Series in Materials Science (Springer, Berlin, 1995).
Clusters of Atoms and Molecules, Ed. by H. Haberland, Vols. 52, 56 of Springer Series in Chemical Physics (Springer, Berlin, 1994), Vols. 1, 2.
W. A. de Heer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 611 (1993).
C. R. C. Wang, S. Pollack, D. Cameron, and M. M. Kappes, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 3787 (1993).
C. Guet and W. R. Johnson, Phys. Rev. B 45, 11283 (1992).
U. Kreibig and P. Zacharias, Z. Phys. 231, 128 (1970).
I. Kriegel, F. Scotognella, and L. Mannaa, Phys. Rep. 674, 1 (2017).
Nanocrystal Quantum Dots, Ed. by V. I. Klimov (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2010).
R. C. Monreal, T. J. Antosiewicz, and S. P. Appel, New J. Phys. 15, 083044 (2013).
B. Palpant, B. Prével, J. Lermé, et al., Phys. Rev. B 57, 1963 (1998).
J. Lermé, B. Palpant, E. Cottancin, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5105 (1998).
F. Scotognella, G. Della Valle, A. R. S. Kandada, et al., Eur. Phys. J. B 86, 154 (2013).
Y. Xie, L. Carbone, C. Nobile, et al., ACS Nano 7, 7352 (2013).
A. L. Routzahn, S. L. White, L.-K. Fong, et al., Israel. J. Chem. 52, 983 (2012).
J. M. Luther, P. K. Jain, T. Ewers, et al., Nat. Mater. 10, 361 (2011).
A. MSchimpf, N. Thakkar, C. E. Gunthardt, et al., ACS Nano 8, 1065 (2014).
H. Zhang, V. Kulkarni, E. Prodan, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 16035 (2014).
E. Townsend and G. W. Bryant, Nano Lett. 12, 429 (2012).
E. Prodan, P. Nordlander, and N. J. Halas, Nano Lett. 3, 1411 (2003).
S. Link and M. A. El-Sayed, J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 4212 (1999).
J. A. Faucheaux, A. L. D. Stanton, and P. K. Jain, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 976 (2014).
S. D. Lounis, E. L. Runnerstrom, A. Bergerud, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 7110 (2014).
M. A. El-Sayed, Acc. Chem. Res. 37, 326 (2004).
S.-W. Hsu, K. On, and A. T. Rao, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 19072 (2011).
X. Liu and M. T. Swihart, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 3908 (2014).
G. Garcia, R. Buonsanti, E. L. Runnerstrom, et al., Nano Lett. 11, 4415 (2011).
M. Kanehara, H. Koike, T. Yoshinaga, and T. Teranishi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 17736 (2009).
D. J. Rowe, J. S. Jeong, K. A. Mkhoyan, and U. R. Kortshage, Nano Lett. 13, 1317 (2013).
Zh. Sun and B. Zhao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 221106 (2007).
G. Mie, Ann. Phys. 25, 377 (1908).
H. Liu, C. K. Brozek, S. Sun, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 26066 (2017).
A. M. Schimpf, C. E. Gunthardt, J. DRinehart, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 16569 (2013).
W. Ekardt, Phys. Rev. B 31, 6360 (1985).
D. E. Beck, Phys. Rev. B 35, 7325 (1987).
L. G. Gerchikov, C. Guet, and A. N. Ipatov, Phys. Rev. A 66, 053202 (2002).
A. N. Ipatov, L. G. Gerchikov, and C. Guet, J. Comput. Mater. Sci. 35, 347 (2006).
U. Banin, Y. Cao, D. Katz, and O. Millo, Nature (London, U.K.) 400, 542 (1999).
L. P. Kouwenhoven, D. G. Austing, and S. Tarucha, Rep. Prog. Phys. 64, 701 (2001).
A. N. Ipatov, L. G. Gerchikov, and C. Guet, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 13, 297 (2018).
K. Yabana and G. F. Bertsch, Phys. Scr. 48, 633 (1993).
N. Ju, A. Bulgac, and J. W. Keller, Phys. Rev. B 48, 9071 (1993).
P. Östling, P. Apell, and A. Rosen, Europhys. Lett. 21, 539 (1993).
M. Madjet, G. Guet, and W. R. Johnson, Phys. Rev. A 51, 1327 (1995).
Applied Many-Body Methods in Spectroscopy and Electronic Structure, Ed. by D. Mikharjee (Springer Science, New York, 1992).
H. E. Wilhelm, Phys. Rev. D 1, 2278 (1970).
G. Guiliani and G. Vignale, Quantum Theory of Electron Liquid (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2005).
T. Ihn, Semiconductor Nanostructures: Quantum States and Electronic Transport (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2010).
F. Rossi, Theory of Semiconductor Quantum Devices: Microscopic Modeling and Simulation Strategies (Springer Science, New York, 2011).
H. Morko and Ü. Özgür, in Zinc Oxide (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2009).
Ll. Serra, F. Garcias, J. Navarro, et al., Phys. Rev. B 46, 9369 (1992).
D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moscalev, and V. K. Khersonskii, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988).
R. Dreizler and E. Gross, Density Functional Theory (Plenum, New York, 1995).
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 3: Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory (Nauka, Moscow, 1989; Pergamon, New York, 1977,).
L. D. Landau, Sov. Phys. JETP 3, 920 (1957).
D. P. Grimmer, Phys. B+C (Amsterdam, Neth.) 106, 9 (1981).
J. Feldman, H. Knörrer, and E. Trubowitz, Commun. Math. Phys. 247, 1 (2004).
B. Fröhlich, M. Feld, E. Vogt, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 130403 (2012).
C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1983).
F. Alpeggiani, S. D’Agostino, and L. C. Andreani, Phys. Rev. B 86, 035421 (2012).
Quantum Confinement Effects, Observations and Insights, Ed. by R. Parker (Nova Science, New York, 2017).
B. Zorman, M. V. Ramakrishna, and R. A. Freisner, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 7649 (1995).
S. Neeleshwar, C. L. Chen, C. B. Tsai, et al., Phys. Rev. B 71, 201307 (2005).
A. Dalgarno and G. A. Victor, Proc. R. Soc. A 291, 291 (1966).
D. J. Rowe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 40, 153 (1968).
G. F. Bertsch and R. A. Brorlia, Oscillations in Finite Quantum Systems (Cambridge Univ. Press, UK, 1994).
M. Ya. Amusia and L. V. Chernysheva, Computation of Atomic Processes (IOP, Bristol, 1997).
C. de Boor, A Practical Guide to Splines (Springer, New York, 1978).
J. Sapirstein and W. R. Johnson, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 29, 5213 (1996).
W. E. Ormand, J. M. Pacheco, S. Sanguinetti, et al., Z. Phys. D 24, 401 (1992).
G. F. Bertsch and D. Tomanek, Phys. Rev. B 40, 2749 (1989).
J. M. Pacheco and R. A. Broglia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 400 (1989).
J. M. Pacheco and W. D. Schöne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4986 (1997).
F. Della Salla, R. Rousseau, A. Görling, and D. Marx, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 183401 (2004).
C. Yannouleas and R. A. Broglia, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 217, 105 (1991).
B. Tanatar and D. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. B 39, 5005 (1989).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Prof. Claude Guet from the Nanyang Technological University for fruitful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Translated by N. Wadhwa
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
The collective excited state |Φν〉 in the RPAX (29) is characterized by certain values of total angular momentum L and its projection M. This is ensured by the dependence of amplitudes X and Y on the angular momentum projections in terms of the Clebsch–Gordan coefficient
In the case of dipole excitations considered here, L = |lp – lh| = 1, and the dependence of the reduced parts of amplitudes \({{X}_{{{{n}_{p}}{{l}_{p}},{{n}_{h}}{{l}_{h}}}}}\) and \({{Y}_{{{{n}_{p}}{{l}_{p}},{{n}_{h}}{{l}_{h}}}}}\) on radial quantum numbers np,h and orbital angular momenta lp,h of single-particle states is determined from the numerical solution of matrix equation (30).
In the two-level 2 × 2 RPAX model, in superposition (29), we take into account only one HOMO–LUMO transition, for which
Consequently, only one pair of reduced amplitudes X and Y satisfying Eqs. (35) is left, and their values are written in explicit form as relation (37). Coulomb matrix element V in Eqs. (35), (36) can be written in form
where the result of summation over spin indices has already been included in the form of factor 2. Single-particle wavefunctions are defined as product (7), and we disregard the dependence of their radial components on the angular momentum
Operator \({v}\)(r, r') of the Coulomb interaction between particles is represented as the sum of “direct” and exchange components (19), which makes it possible to calculate the corresponding terms separately, V = Vd + Vx.
The “direct” part of operator V(r, r') is determined from the multipole expansion in spherical harmonics (2). After integration with respect to angular variables [59],
and subsequent summation over mp, h, we obtain
The corresponding contribution 2ΔVd/\({{\hbar }^{2}}\) to Ω2 on the right-hand side of Eq. (36) with account for relations (14), (25), (22), and (20) exactly coincides with term KC/M in formula (24) for \(\omega _{p}^{2}\) in the hydrodynamic model.
Analogously, the exchange part of the matrix element can be written in form
where factor 2 appears again as a result of summation over the spin indices. The sum of the product of two spherical harmonics in \(\psi _{{{{l}_{h}}{{m}_{h}}}}^{*}\)(r)\({{\psi }_{{{{l}_{p}}{{m}_{p}}}}}\)(r) and the Clebsch–Gordan coefficient can be transformed to [59]
After the calculation of the angular part, expression (50) becomes
Therefore, with account for relations (14), (25), (22), and (20), exchange contribution 2ΔVx/\({{\hbar }^{2}}\) to Ω2 exactly coincides with exchange term Kx/M in relation (24).
Expressions (45) for RPAX amplitudes were also used in the calculation of transition density \(\rho _{{{\text{tr}}}}^{{(\nu )}}\)(r) = 〈Φν|δρ(r)|Φ0〉. After the summation over spin indices, formula (41) is transformed to
The summation over mp and mh is performed using expression (51) and leads to final result
which with account for relation (48), gives exactly expressions (42) and (43).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerchikov, L.G., Ipatov, A.N. Rotational Dipole Plasmon Mode in Semiconductor Nanoparticles. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 132, 922–940 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776121050022
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776121050022