Abstract
Rationale
The use of methcathinone (MCAT), a psychostimulant drug that can lead to long-term health risks and executive dysfunction, increased to an alarming rate in recent years. Impairments in low-level executive function have been reported in substance use disorder. However, little empirical evidence is available regarding high-level executive function (e.g., problem solving), which may act as a risk factor for relapse.
Objectives
The present study aimed to investigate whether the problem-solving ability was altered in abstinent individuals with methcathinone use disorder (MCUD). Here, we tested fifty male MCUD individuals (short-term MCUD group: twenty-nine patients with MCAT use less than 3 years, long-term MCUD group: twenty-one patients with MCAT use longer than 3 years, which were split by medium years of drug use) and twenty-four well-matched healthy controls (HC) in the Tower of Hanoi task (TOH) to assess the impact of task difficulty on drug-related changes in problem-solving performance. We used several measures to characterize problem-solving performance: the number of mistakes made, the completion time of the task, and the thinking time before the first move.
Results
In the low task difficulty condition, the MCUD group and HC group showed similar levels of mistakes and completion time, while in the high task difficulty condition, the MCUD group reported more mistakes (the mean number of mistakes in each trial: 1.41 ± 1.15 vs 0.79 ± 0.76, P = 0.019, Cohen’s d = 0.635) and longer completion time in the task (the mean completion time in each trial: 45.83 ± 20.51 s vs 33.40 ± 15.10 s, P = 0.010, Cohen’s d = 0.690) than the HC group. The thinking time before the first move did not differ significantly between groups (P = 0.257). We further found that the long-term (more than 3 years) MCUD group made more mistakes than the short-term MCUD group and HC group, mainly in the highly difficult subtasks. The longer time than HCs was reported in the long-term MCUD group among high task difficulty of subtasks. In addition, there was a positive correlation between years of MCAT use and the number of mistakes made in high task difficulty TOH task (r = 0.326, P = 0.021).
Conclusions
Chronic methcathinone use was associated with deficits in problem-solving performance, which depended on the degree of task difficulty. The impairment was more evident in the long-term (> 3 years) MCAT group.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The original data is available from corresponding authors upon request.
References
Altmann EM, Trafton JG (2002) Memory for goals: An activation‐based model. Cogn Sci 26:39–83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2601_2
Anderson JR, Albert MV, Fincham JM (2005) Tracing problem solving in real time: fMRI analysis of the subject-paced Tower of Hanoi. J Cogn Neurosci 17:1261–1274. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929055002427
Angoa-Pérez M, Anneken JH, Kuhn DM (2017) Neurotoxicology of synthetic cathinone analogs. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 32:209–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2016_21
Arnett PA, Rao SM, Grafman J, Bernardin L, Luchetta T, Binder JR, Lobeck L (1997) Executive functions in multiple sclerosis: an analysis of temporal ordering, semantic encoding, and planning abilities. Neuropsychology 11:535–544. https://doi.org/10.1037//0894-4105.11.4.535
Asser A et al (2020) Subacute administration of both methcathinone and manganese causes basal ganglia damage in mice resembling that in methcathinone abusers. J Neural Transm (vienna) 127:707–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-019-02110-z
Asser A et al (2016) Increased striatal VMAT2 binding in mice after chronic administration of methcathinone and manganese. Brain Res 1652:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2016.09.034
Baumann MH, Solis E Jr, Watterson LR, Marusich JA, Fantegrossi WE, Wiley JL (2014) Baths salts, spice, and related designer drugs: the science behind the headlines. J Neurosci 34:15150–15158. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3223-14.2014
Block RI, Erwin WJ, Ghoneim MM (2002) Chronic drug use and cognitive impairments. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 73:491–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00816-x
China Food and Drug Administration (2016) Report on drug abuse in China. Retrieved from http://www.nncc626.com/2018-06/04/c_129886311_2.htm. Accessed 26 April 2021
Chong TT, Bonnelle V, Veromann KR, Juurmaa J, Taba P, Plant O, Husain M (2018) Dissociation of reward and effort sensitivity in methcathinone-induced Parkinsonism. J Neuropsychol 12:291–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12122
Colzato LS, Ruiz MJ, van den Wildenberg WP, Hommel B (2011) Khat use is associated with impaired working memory and cognitive flexibility. PLoS ONE 6:e20602. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020602
Coppola M, Mondola R (2012) Synthetic cathinones: chemistry, pharmacology and toxicology of a new class of designer drugs of abuse marketed as “bath salts” or “plant food.” Toxicol Lett 211:144–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.009
Dahlin E, Neely AS, Larsson A, Bäckman L, Nyberg L (2008) Transfer of learning after updating training mediated by the striatum. Sci 320:1510–1512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155466
Dalley JW, Cardinal RN, Robbins TW (2004) Prefrontal executive and cognitive functions in rodents: neural and neurochemical substrates. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 28:771–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.09.006
Demirbas H, Ilhan IO, Dogan YB (2012) Ways of problem solving as predictors of relapse in alcohol dependent male inpatients. Addict Behav 37:131–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.08.007
Djamshidian A et al (2013) Increased reflection impulsivity in patients with ephedrone-induced Parkinsonism. Addiction 108:771–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12080
Du L et al (2016) Changes in problem-solving capacity and association with spontaneous brain activity after a single electroconvulsive treatment in major depressive disorder. J Ect 32:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/yct.0000000000000269
EMCDDA (2010) Annual report 2010: the state of the drugs problem in Europe. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union
Ersche KD, Clark L, London M, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ (2006) Profile of executive and memory function associated with amphetamine and opiate dependence. Neuropsychopharmacol 31:1036–1047. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300889
Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (2005) Neural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: from actions to habits to compulsion. Nat Neurosci 8:1481–1489. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1579
Fasano A (2014) Methcathinone-induced parkinsonism results from permanent brain damage: a message for the masses. Eur J Neurol 21:181–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12229
Gilbert SJ, Burgess PW (2008) Executive function. Curr Biol 18:R110–R114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.12.014
Goel V, Grafman J (1995) Are the frontal lobes implicated in “planning” functions? Interpreting data from the Tower of Hanoi. Neuropsychologia 33:623–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(95)90866-p
Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND (2011) Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nat Rev Neurosci 12:652–669. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3119
Gygi MP, Fleckenstein AE, Gibb JW, Hanson GR (1997) Role of endogenous dopamine in the neurochemical deficits induced by methcathinone. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 283:1350–1355
Hansen AL, Dahl L, Olson G, Thornton D, Grung B, Thayer JF (2015) A long-term fatty fish intervention improved executive function in inpatients with antisocial traits and a history of alcohol and drug abuse. Scand J Psychol 56:467–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12229
Heppner PP, Petersen CH (1982) The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. J Couns Psychol 29:66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.29.1.66
Hoffman R, Al’Absi M (2010) Khat use and neurobehavioral functions: suggestions for future studies. J Ethnopharmacol 132:554–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.05.033
Hutten N, Steenbergen L, Colzato LS, Hommel B, Theunissen EL, Ramaekers JG, Kuypers KPC (2019) Cocaine enhances figural, but impairs verbal ‘flexible’ divergent thinking. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 29:813–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.06.003
Inozemtseva O, Pérez-Solís L, Matute E, Juárez J (2016) Differential improvement of executive functions during abstinence in cocaine-dependent patients: a longitudinal study. Subst Use Misuse 51:1428–1440. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2016.1178293
Juurmaa J et al (2016) Grey matter abnormalities in methcathinone abusers with a Parkinsonian syndrome. Brain Behav 6:e00539. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.539
Kanato M, Leyatikul P, Choomwattana C et al (2017) ASEAN drug monitoring report 2016. ASEAN Narcotics Cooperation Center, Bangkok. Retrieved from: https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Doc6-ADM-Report-2016-as-of-15-November-2017-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 26 April 2021
Katz DP, Bhattacharya D, Bhattacharya S, Deruiter J, Clark CR, Suppiramaniam V, Dhanasekaran M (2014) Synthetic cathinones: “a khat and mouse game.” Toxicol Lett 229:349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.06.020
Leyrer-Jackson JM, Nagy EK, Olive MF (2019) Cognitive deficits and neurotoxicity induced by synthetic cathinones: is there a role for neuroinflammation? Psychopharmacol 236:1079–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-018-5067-5
López-Arnau R, Martínez-Clemente J, Pubill D, Escubedo E, Camarasa J (2014) Serotonergic impairment and memory deficits in adolescent rats after binge exposure of methylone. J Psychopharmacol 28:1053–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881114548439
Lopez-Rodriguez AB, Viveros MP (2019) Bath salts and polyconsumption: in search of drug-drug interactions. Psychopharmacol 236:1001–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-05213-3
McCann UD, Wong DF, Yokoi F, Villemagne V, Dannals RF, Ricaurte GA (1998) Reduced striatal dopamine transporter density in abstinent methamphetamine and methcathinone users: evidence from positron emission tomography studies with [11C]WIN-35,428. J Neurosci 18:8417–8422. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-20-08417.1998
Miotto K, Striebel J, Cho AK, Wang C (2013) Clinical and pharmacological aspects of bath salt use: a review of the literature and case reports. Drug Alcohol Depend 132:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.06.016
Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol 41:49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
Numminen H, Lehto JE, Ruoppila I (2001) Tower of Hanoi and working memory in adult persons with intellectual disability. Res Dev Disabil 22:373–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0891-4222(01)00078-6
Ornstein TJ, Iddon JL, Baldacchino AM, Sahakian BJ, London M, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (2000) Profiles of cognitive dysfunction in chronic amphetamine and heroin abusers. Neuropsychopharmacology 23:113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0893-133x(00)00097-x
Palamar JJ (2018) “Bath salt” use and beliefs about use among electronic dance music attendees. J Psychoactive Drugs 50:437–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2018.1517229
Patel NB (2015) “Natural Amphetamine” Khat: a cultural tradition or a drug of abuse? Int Rev Neurobiol 120:235–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2015.02.006
Rogers RD et al (1999) Dissociable deficits in the decision-making cognition of chronic amphetamine abusers, opiate abusers, patients with focal damage to prefrontal cortex, and tryptophan-depleted normal volunteers: evidence for monoaminergic mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacol 20:322–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0893-133x(98)00091-8
Riley AL et al (2020) Abuse potential and toxicity of the synthetic cathinones (i.e., “Bath salts”). Neurosci Biobehav Rev 110:150–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.07.015
Ross EA, Reisfield GM, Watson MC, Chronister CW, Goldberger BA (2012) Psychoactive “bath salts” intoxication with methylenedioxypyrovalerone. Am J Med 125:854–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.02.019
Sikk K, Taba P (2015) Methcathinone “Kitchen Chemistry” and permanent neurological damage. Int Rev Neurobiol 120:257–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2015.02.002
Stepens A et al (2014) The outcome of the movement disorder in methcathinone abusers: clinical, MRI and manganesemia changes, and neuropathology. Eur J Neurol 21:199–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12185
Stepens A et al (2008) A Parkinsonian syndrome in methcathinone users and the role of manganese. N Engl J Med 358:1009–1017. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa072488
Stepens A, Stagg CJ, Platkajis A, Boudrias MH, Johansen-Berg H, Donaghy M (2010) White matter abnormalities in methcathinone abusers with an extrapyramidal syndrome. Brain 133:3676–3684. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq281
Sullivan JR, Riccio CA, Castillo CL (2009) Concurrent validity of the tower tasks as measures of executive function in adults: a meta-analysis. Appl Neuropsychol 16:62–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084280802644243
Tapert SF, Brown SA, Myers MG, Granholm E (1999) The role of neurocognitive abilities in coping with adolescent relapse to alcohol and drug use. J Stud Alcohol 60:500–508. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.1999.60.500
Valente MJ, Guedes de Pinho P, de Lourdes BM, Carvalho F, Carvalho M (2014) Khat and synthetic cathinones: a review. Arch Toxicol 88:15–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-013-1163-9
Welsh MC, Huizinga M (2005) Tower of Hanoi disk-transfer task: influences of strategy knowledge and learning on performance. Learn Individ Differ 15:283–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.05.002
Winstock AR, Mitcheson L (2012) New recreational drugs and the primary care approach to patients who use them. BMJ 344:e288. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e288
Zaami S, Giorgetti R, Pichini S, Pantano F, Marinelli E, Busardò FP (2018) Synthetic cathinones related fatalities: an update. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 22:268–274. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201801_14129
Zhao M (2020) New psychoactive substances and law enforcement responses in a local context in China—a case study of methcathinone. Asian Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-020-09315-2
Acknowledgements
We thank the lab members for their help during data collection and management.
Funding
The study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China grants (81822017, 31771215), Medicine and Engineering Interdisciplinary Research Fund of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (ZH2018ZDA30), Guangdong grant ‘Key technologies for treatment of brain disorders’ (No.2018B030331001), Shanghai Municipal Education Commission—Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support (20181715), Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science - Shenzhen Fundamental Research Institutions (NYKFKT20190020) and Hundred-talent Fund from Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health (2018BR21) to TFY, and by National Natural Science Foundation of China grants (31900765) and Shanghai Sailing Program from The Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (19YF1441900) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M640405) to DZ. The study is also supported by grants from the Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BY and TFY designed the study; HBZ, LXW, and YPL performed the study; HBZ, YPL, DZ, BY, and TFY analyzed the results and wrote the paper together; all authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Role of funder
The funders have no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, and writing of the manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Hang-Bin Zhang, Di Zhao, and Yu-Ping Liu contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding authors Bo Yang and Ti-Fei Yuan contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, HB., Zhao, D., Liu, YP. et al. Problem-solving deficits in methcathinone use disorder. Psychopharmacology 238, 2515–2524 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05874-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05874-z