Kaya Deuser
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
The article proposes a trimodal logical system that can express the strategic ability of coalitions to learn from their experience. The main technical result is the completeness of the proposed system.
- Thomas Ågotnes and Natasha Alechina. 2012. Epistemic coalition logic: Completeness and complexity. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 2 (AAMAS’12). 1099–1106. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Thomas Ågotnes and Natasha Alechina. 2015. Embedding coalition logic in the minimal normal multimodal logic with intersection. In Modality, Semantics and Interpretations. Springer, 1–22.Google Scholar
- Thomas Ågotnes and Natasha Alechina. 2019. Coalition logic with individual, distributed and common knowledge. J. Logic Comput. 29, 7 (No. 2019), 1041–1069. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exv085Google ScholarCross Ref
- Natasha Alechina, Brian Logan, Hoang Nga Nguyen, and Abdur Rakib. 2011. Logic for coalitions with bounded resources. J. Logic Comput. 21, 6 (Dec. 2011), 907–937. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rajeev Alur, Thomas A. Henzinger, and Orna Kupferman. 2002. Alternating-time temporal logic. J. ACM 49, 5 (2002), 672–713. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/585265.585270 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benjamin Aminof, Bastien Maubert, Aniello Murano, Marta Kwiatkowska, and Sasha Rubin. 2019. Probabilistic strategy logic. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benjamin Aminof, Aniello Murano, Sasha Rubin, and Florian Zuleger. 2016. Prompt alternating-time epistemic logics. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. 258–267. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Francesco Belardinelli. 2014. Reasoning about knowledge and strategies: Epistemic strategy logic. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Strategic Reasoning (SR’14), Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 146. 27–33.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Francesco Belardinelli, Catalin Dima, and Aniello Murano. 2018. Bisimulations for logics of strategies: A study in expressiveness and verification. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. 425–434.Google Scholar
- Francesco Belardinelli, Wojciech Jamroga, Damian Kurpiewski, Vadim Malvone, and Aniello Murano. 2019. Strategy logic with simple goals: Tractable reasoning about strategies. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nuel Belnap and Michael Perloff. 1990. Seeing to it that: A canonical form for agentives. In Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning. Springer, 167–190.Google Scholar
- Raphaël Berthon, Bastien Maubert, and Aniello Murano. 2017. Decidability results for ATL* with imperfect information and perfect recall. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 1250–1258. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raphael Berthon, Bastien Maubert, Aniello Murano, Sasha Rubin, and Moshe Y Vardi. 2017. Strategy logic with imperfect information. In Proceedings of the 2017 32nd Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS’17). IEEE, 1–12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jan Broersen, Andreas Herzig, and Nicolas Troquard. 2007. A normal simulation of coalition logic and an epistemic extension. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge. ACM, 92–101. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alice Calaprice. 2011. The Ultimate Quotable Einstein. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Petr Čermák, Alessio Lomuscio, and Aniello Murano. 2015. Verifying and synthesising multi-agent systems against one-goal strategy logic specifications. In Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krishnendu Chatterjee, Thomas A. Henzinger, and Nir Piterman. 2010. Strategy logic. Inf. Comput. 208, 6 (2010), 677–693. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giuseppe De Giacomo and Maurizio Lenzerini. 1994. Boosting the correspondence between description logics and propositional dynamic logics. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’94), Vol. 94. 205–212. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ronald Fagin, Joseph Y. Halpern, Yoram Moses, and Moshe Y. Vardi. 1995. Reasoning about Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raul Fervari, Andreas Herzig, Yanjun Li, and Yanjing Wang. 2017. Strategically knowing how. In Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’17). 1031–1038. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rustam Galimullin and Natasha Alechina. 2017. Coalition and group announcement logic. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK’17). 207–220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Valentin Goranko and Sebastian Enqvist. 2018. Socially friendly and group protecting coalition logics. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 372–380. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Valentin Goranko and Govert van Drimmelen. 2006. Complete axiomatization and decidability of Alternating-time temporal logic. Theor. Comput. Sci. 353, 1 (2006), 93–117. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2005.07.043 Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Harel, Jerzy Tiuryn, and Dexter Kozen. 2000. Dynamic Logic. MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C.A.R. Hoare. 1969. An axiomatic basis for computer programming. Commun. ACM 12 (1969), 576–580. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Horty and Eric Pacuit. 2017. Action types in STIT semantics. Rev. Symbol. Logic 10, 4 (2017), 1–21.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John F. Horty. 2001. Agency and Deontic Logic. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- John F. Horty and Nuel Belnap. 1995. The deliberative STIT: A study of action, omission, ability, and obligation. J. Philos. Logic 24, 6 (1995), 583–644.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fabio Mogavero, Aniello Murano, Giuseppe Perelli, and Moshe Y. Vardi. 2012. What makes ATL* decidable? a decidable fragment of strategy logic. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Concurrency Theory. Springer, 193–208. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fabio Mogavero, Aniello Murano, Giuseppe Perelli, and Moshe Y. Vardi. 2014. Reasoning about strategies: On the model-checking problem. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic 15, 4 (2014), 34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pavel Naumov and Jia Tao. 2017. Coalition power in epistemic transition systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS’17). 723–731. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pavel Naumov and Jia Tao. 2018. Strategic coalitions with perfect recall. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
- Pavel Naumov and Jia Tao. 2018. Together we know how to achieve: An epistemic logic of know-how. Artif. Intell. 262 (2018), 279–300. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.06.007Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grigory K. Olkhovikov and Heinrich Wansing. 2018. Inference as doxastic agency. Part I: The basics of justification STIT logic. Stud. Logic. 107 (2019), 167--194. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rohit Parikh. 1978. The completeness of propositional dynamic logic. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science. Springer, 403–415.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marc Pauly. 2002. A modal logic for coalitional power in games. J. Logic Comput. 12, 1 (2002), 149–166. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/12.1.149Google Scholar
- Vaughan R. Pratt. 1976. Semantical consideration on Floyd-Hoare logic. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE, 109–121. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wiebe van der Hoek and Michael Wooldridge. 2003. Cooperation, knowledge, and time: Alternating-time temporal epistemic logic and its applications. Stud. Logic. 75, 1 (2003), 125–157. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026171312755Google ScholarCross Ref
- Moshe Y. Vardi, Giuseppe Perelli, Aniello Murano, and Fabio Mogavero. 2017. Reasoning about strategies: On the satisfiability problem. Logic. Methods Comput. Sci. 13 (2017).Google Scholar
- Dirk Walther, Wiebe van der Hoek, and Michael Wooldridge. 2007. Alternating-time temporal logic with explicit strategies. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge. ACM, 269–278. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yanjing Wang. 2018. A logic of goal-directed knowing how. Synthese 195, 10 (2018), 4419–4439.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ming Xu. 1995. On the basic logic of STIT with a single agent. J. Symbol. Logic 60, 2 (1995), 459–483. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Strategic Knowledge Acquisition
Recommendations
Constructive and Mechanised Meta-Theory of Intuitionistic Epistemic Logic
Logical Foundations of Computer ScienceAbstractArtemov and Protopopescu proposed intuitionistic epistemic logic (IEL) to capture an intuitionistic conception of knowledge. By establishing completeness, they provided the base for a meta-theoretic investigation of IEL, which was continued by ...
A complete proof system for propositional projection temporal logic
The paper presents a proof system for Propositional Projection Temporal Logic (PPTL) with projection-plus. The syntax, semantics, and logical laws of PPTL are introduced together with an axiom system consisting of axioms and inference rules. To ...
First-Order Linear-time Epistemic Logic with Group Knowledge: An Axiomatisation of the Monodic Fragment
Logic, Language, Information and ComputationWe investigate quantified interpreted systems, a computationally grounded semantics for a first-order temporal epistemic logic on linear time. We report a completeness result for the monodic fragment of a language that includes LTL modalities as well as ...
Comments