Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:53:56.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Implicated Neoliberal Subject in Thomas Pynchon's Bleeding Edge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2021

IVAN STACY
Affiliation:
School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Beijing Normal University. Email: ivanstacy@bnu.edu.cn.
ARIN KEEBLE
Affiliation:
School of Arts and Creative Industries, Edinburgh Napier University. Email: A.Keeble@napier.ac.uk.

Abstract

This article argues that in Bleeding Edge, Pynchon moves from an oppositional schema in which the world is divided into “elect” and “preterite” populations towards one that is concerned with implication and complicity. The article uses Michael Rothberg's The Implicated Subject (2019) as the basis for analysis, and notably his argument that to be implicated in wrongdoing often involves a kind of structural blindness towards suffering elsewhere. In the case of Bleeding Edge, the protagonist, Maxine Tarnow, is implicated in the violence committed in order to secure the hegemony of neoliberalism. The article describes Maxine's gradual recognition of her own blindness, and hence of her implication in the harms perpetrated in the name of neoliberalism. It begins by noting that her experience of neoliberalism is one of process and of immaterial exchange. The second part of the article argues that the introduction of Nicholas Windust shows how neoliberalism may be an experience of rupture or trauma for those outside the developed world. Finally, with the 9/11 attacks on New York, the same violence rebounds against its source; the attacks therefore act as the final stage in Maxine's increasing awareness of her own implication.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the British Association for American Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to thank Professor Stephen Shapiro for his feedback on an early version of this essay, and the editors at JAS and anonymous readers for their detailed feedback and encouragement.

References

1 Pynchon, Thomas, Bleeding Edge (London: Vintage, 2014)Google Scholar. Page references are given parenthetically in the text.

2 Wilson, Rob, “On the Pacific Edge of Catastrophe; or, Redemption: California Dreaming in Thomas Pynchon's Inherent Vice,” Boundary 2, 37, 2 (2010), 217–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Hume, Kathryn, “Mason & Dixon,” in Dalsgaard, Inger H., Herman, Luc and McHale, Brian, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Pynchon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 59–70, 64Google Scholar; see also Hanjo Berressem, “Coda: How to Read Pynchon,” in ibid., 168–88; and Amy Elias, “Paranoia,” in ibid., 121–35, 134: “History for Pynchon is a plot orchestrated by power. But this history is in dialectical relation with a ‘history from below,’ the unrecorded, accumulated force of preterite, everyday life.”

4 McHale, Brian, Constructing Postmodernism (London and New York: Routledge, 1992), 88, 112Google Scholar.

5 Chetwynd, Ali, “More Metaphysician than Politician: Pynchon, TINA, and the Rhetorical Economy of ‘The World (This One)’,” Textual Practice, 33, 3 (Feb. 2019), 451–71, 456–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Pynchon, Thomas, Inherent Vice (London: Vintage, 2010)Google Scholar.

7 For example, Lee Konstantinou suggests that Pynchon has “slightly mellowed,” while Hanjo Berressem argues that Bleeding Edge is “mostly dark, angry, and almost allegorical”; Kostas Kaltsas detects a new concern with family and community; while Chetwynd focusses on the way that “paranoia has become less a matter of conscious investigation than of passive reception.” Konstantinou, Lee, “The One Incorruptible Still Point: A Review of Thomas Pynchon's Bleeding Edge,” Iowa Review, 43, 3 (2013–14), 170–74, 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Berressem, Hanjo, “Economies of Greed in ‘Late Pynchon’: America and the Logic of Capital,” Textual Practice, 33, 3 (Feb. 2019), 433–49, 434CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kaltsas, Kostas, “Of ‘Maidens’ and Towers: Oedipa Maas, Maxine Tarnow, and the Possibility of Resistance,” in Chetwynd, Ali, Freer, Joanna and Maragos, Georgios, eds., Thomas Pynchon, Sex, and Gender (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2018), 36–51, 44Google Scholar; Chetwynd, Ali, “Pynchon after Paranoia,” in Freer, Joanna, ed., The New Pynchon Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019), 33–52, 37Google Scholar.

8 Berressem, “Economies of Greed,” 437.

9 Chetwynd, “Pynchon after Paranoia,” 41.

10 These three categories gained currency as a result of their use in Raul Hilberg's seminal discussion of the Holocaust and are a useful starting point, as is Primo Levi's elaboration of the “gray zone” in Auschwitz, but until recently there was little in the way of discussion of intermediate states between perpetration and victimhood. Recent useful interventions include Bruce Robbins's The Beneficiary, and an emerging body of work that addresses complicity, for example, Chiara Lepora and Robert E. Goodin's On Complicity and Compromise, and two recent collections of essays. Hilberg, Raul, Perpetrators, Victims, Bystanders: The Jewish Catastrophe 1933–1945 (New York: Harper Collins, 1993)Google Scholar; Levi, Primo, The Drowned and the Saved, trans. Rosenthal, Raymond (London: Abacus, 2013)Google Scholar; Robbins, Bruce, The Beneficiary (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017)Google Scholar; Lepora, Chiara and Goodin, Robert E., On Complicity and Compromise (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Afxentiou, Afxentis, Dunford, Robin and Neu, Michael, eds., Exploring Complicity: Concept, Cases and Critique (London: Rowman and Littlefield, 2016)Google Scholar; Wächter, Cornelia and Wirth, Robert, eds., Complicity and the Politics of Representation (London: Rowman and Littlefield, 2019)Google Scholar.

11 Rothberg, Michael, The Implicated Subject: Beyond Victims and Perpetrators (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2019), 1Google Scholar.

12 Ibid., 12.

13 Ibid., 200.

14 Rothberg, Michael, Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar.

15 Mirowski, Philip, Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown (London: Verso, 2014), 92Google Scholar.

16 Käkelä, Tiina, “‘This Land Is My Land, This Land Also Is My Land’: Real Estate Narratives in Pynchon's Fiction,” Textual Practice, 33, 3 (Feb. 2019), 383–98, 393CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Siegel, Jason, “Meatspace Is Cyberspace: The Pynchonian Posthuman in Bleeding Edge,” Orbit: A Journal of American Literature, 4, 2 (June 2016), 1–27, 3Google Scholar.

18 Ibid., 7.

19 McHale, Constructing Postmodernism, 113.

20 Ibid., 113.

21 McCann, Sean, Gumshoe America: Hard Boiled Crime Fiction and the Rise and Fall of New Deal Liberalism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000), 6Google Scholar.

22 Ibid., 16.

23 Ibid., 18.

24 Merivale, Patricia, “Postmodern and Metaphysical Detection,” in Rzepka, Charles and Horsley, Lee, eds., A Companion to Crime Fiction (Chichester: Wiley, 2010), 308–20, 311Google Scholar.

25 Rothberg, The Implicated Subject, 12.

26 McCann, 6.

27 Ibid., 6.

28 Interestingly, one of the leading advocates of neoliberalism anticipated what we might expect to be a critique of it: as Quinn Slodobian notes, “Hayek began to realize in the 1930s that the dispersal of knowledge throughout an entire market economy was so complete that no individual could ever gain a functional overview of it. The shock of the 1930s brought with it the realization that the world economy was basically unknowable.” Slobodian, Quinn, Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018), 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Kaltsas, “Of ‘Maidens’ and Towers,” 40, emphasis in original.

30 Jennifer Backman, “From Hard Boiled to Over Easy: Reimagining the Noir Detective in Inherent Vice and Bleeding Edge,” in Chetwynd, Freer and Maragos, Thomas Pynchon, Sex and Gender, 19–35, 31

31 Pynchon, Thomas, The Crying of Lot 49 (New York: Harper Perennial, 1999)Google Scholar.

32 Melamed, Jodi, Represent and Destroy: Rationalizing Violence in the New Racial Capitalism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011), 138CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Rothberg, The Implicated Subject, 1.

34 This seemingly irrational attraction carries echoes of the relationship between Frenesi Gates and Brock Vond in Pynchon's Vineland (1990). Frenesi, an independent filmmaker linked to late 1960s radicalism, is powerlessly attracted to the Nixonian/Reaganite agent Vond, whose “erect penis had become the joystick with which, hurtling into the future, she would keep trying to steer among the hazards and obstacles.” Thomas Pynchon, Vineland (London: Vintage, 2000), 293.

35 Klein, Naomi, The Shock Doctrine (London: Penguin, 2007)Google Scholar.

36 Ibid., 21.

37 Notably, Anna Hartnell argues that Klein's emphasis “neglects the role of consent” and “fails to track the progression of neoliberal policies as forms of ‘slow violence’.” However, in Bleeding Edge, the effects of neoliberal policies on the developing world are not so much represented in terms of slow violence as much as they are in terms of outright brutality. Hartnell, Anna, After Katrina: Race, Neoliberalism, and the End of the American Century (New York: State University of New York Press, 2017), 132Google Scholar.

38 Huehls, Mitchum and Greenwald-Smith, Rachel, eds., Neoliberalism and Contemporary Literary Cultures (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017), 8Google Scholar.

39 Alternative narratives are offered, for example, in Deckard, Sharae and Shapiro, Stephen, World Literature, Neoliberalism and the Culture of Discontent (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shapiro, Stephen and Kennedy, Liam, eds., Neoliberalism and Contemporary American Literature (Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College Press, 2019)Google Scholar and Slobodian, Globalists.

40 This allusion to the “other 9/11” – the events of which are powerfully portrayed in Ken Loach's contribution to 11′09″01 (2002), a collection of short films produced by Alain Brigand – is also part of the novel's project of de-exceptionalizing 9/11, or as Joseph Darlington has noted, challenging paradigmatic narratives where 9/11 is “severed ideologically from both its causes and its effects.” Darlington, Joseph, “Capitalist Mysticism and the Historicizing of 9/11 in Thomas Pynchon's Bleeding Edge,” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 57, 3 (May 2016), 242–53, 242Google Scholar.

41 Slobodian, 2.

42 Greene, Graham, The Quiet American (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1967; first published 1955), 15Google Scholar.

43 Ibid., 28.

44 Ibid., 36.

45 Deckard and Shapiro, 27.

46 Pynchon, The Crying of Lot 49, 85. Pynchon's questioning of causality can be regarded as a career-long interest, evident for example in Gravity's Rainbow when Leni Pökler raises the notion that relationships may be “parallel, not series.” Pynchon, Thomas, Gravity's Rainbow (New York: Viking Press, 1973), 159Google Scholar.

47 Palmeri, Frank, “Neither Literally nor as Metaphor: Pynchon's The Crying of Lot 49 and the Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” ELH, 54, 4 (Winter 1987), 979–99, 981–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Rothberg, Multidirectional Memory, 3.

49 Ibid., 35.

50 Ibid., 70, 81–82.

51 Ibid., 81.

52 In fact, as Greg Grandin notes, the rupture of 9/11 was actually exploited by the Bush administration, which harnessed “the force of American revanchism” to further deregulation in the US and abroad, in the aftermath of the attacks. Grandin, Greg, Empire's Workshop: Latin America, the United States, and the Rise of the New Imperialism (New York: Owl Books, 2007), 197Google Scholar.

53 Siegel, “Meatspace Is Cyberspace,” 13.

54 Ibid., 25.

55 See Jeffrey Severs, “‘Homer Is My Role Model’: Father-Schlemiels, Sentimental Families, and Pynchon's Affinities with the Simpsons,” in Chetwynd, Freer and Maragos, Thomas Pynchon, Sex and Gender, 194–208.