Skip to main content
Log in

Species mixing effect on Norway spruce response to elevated CO2 and climatic variables: root and radial growth response

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 7-year study was conducted to examine the growth (diameter and root) response of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings to elevated CO2 (CO2ELV, 770 μmol (CO2) mol−1) in different mixture types (monospecific (M): a Norway spruce seedling surrounded by six spruce seedlings, group-admixture (G): a spruce seedling surrounded by three spruce and three European beech seedlings, single-admixture (S): a spruce seedling surrounded by six beech seedlings). After seven years of treatments, no significant effect from elevated CO2 was found on the root dry mass (p = 0.90) and radial growth (p = 0.98) of Norway spruce. Neither did we find a significant interaction between [CO2] × mixing treatments (p = 0.56), i.e. there was not a significant effect of CO2 concentrations [CO2] in all the admixture types. On the contrary, spruce responses to admixture treatments were significant under CO2AMB (p = 0.05), which demonstrated that spruce mainly increased its growth (diameter and root) in M and neighbouring with beech was not favourable for spruce seedlings. In particular, spruce growth diminished when growing beside high proportions/numbers of European beech (S). Here, we also evaluated the association between tree-ring formation and climatic variables (precipitation and air temperature) in different admixture types under elevated and ambient CO2 (CO2AMB, 385 μmol (CO2) mol−1). Overall, our result suggests that spruce responses to climate factors can be affected by tree species mixing and CO2 concentrations, i.e. the interaction between climatic variables × admixture types × [CO2] could alter the response of spruce to climatic variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig.3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acock B (1980) Analysing and predicting the response of the glasshouse crop to environmental manipulation. In Opportunities for increasing Crop Yields. ed. R. G. Hurd. P. V . Biscoe, and C. Dennis. pp. 1 3 1–48. London:Pitman

  • Acock B, Allen LH (1985) Crop responses to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. In: Strain BR, Cure JD (eds) Direct effects of increasing carbon dioxide on vegetation. US Dep Energy, Washington, pp 53–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2005) What have we learned from 15 years of free air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? a meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol 165:351–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atwell BJ, Henery ML, Whitehead D (2003) Sapwood development in Pinus radiate trees grown for three years at ambient and elevated carbon dioxide partial pressures. Tree Physiol 23:13–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Badraghi A, Marek VM (2020) Interactive effects of elevated CO2 and neighbourhood competition on the radial growth of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings. Eur J for Res 139:49–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-020-01264-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7

  • Bazzaz AF (1990) The response of natural ecosystems to the rising global CO2 levels. Annu Rev Eml Syst 21:167–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz AF, Williams EW (1991) Atmospheric CO2 concentrations within a mixed forest: implications for seedling growth. Ecology 72(1):12–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benito PR, Aparicio LG, Paquette A, Messier A, Kattge J, Zavala MA (2014) Diversity increases carbon storage and tree productivity in Spanish forests. Global Ecol Biogeogr 23:311–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijak S (2009) Climate-growth relationships of Norway spruce in north-eastern Poland. – Levanic T, Gricar J, Hafner P, Krajnc R, Jagodic S, Gärtner H, Heinrich I, Helle G (eds.). Trace – Tree Rings in Archaeology, Climatology and Ecology, Vol. 8. Proceedings of the Dendrosymposium 2009, April 16th–19th 2009, Otočec, Slovenia. GFZ Potsdam, Scientific Technical Report STR 10/05, Potsdam, 98–103.

  • Bolte A, Kampf F, Hilbrig L (2013) Space sequestration below ground in old-growth spruce-beech forests—signs for facilitation? Front Plant Sci 4:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley C, Rundquist-John A, Harrington JR (2000) The effects of climatic factors on vegetation dynamics of tallgrass and shortgrass cover. Geocarto Int 15(3):33–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106040008542161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown K, Higginbotham KO (1986) Effects of carbon dioxide enrichment and nitrogen supply on growth of boreal tree seedlings. Tree Physiol 2:223–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coomes DA, Flores O, Holdaway R, Jucker T, Lines ER, Vanderwel MC (2014) Wood production response to climate change will depend critically on forest composition and structure. Glob Chang Biol 20:3632–3645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies GM, Gray A (2015) Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring. Ecol Evol 5(22):5295–5304

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JE, Gallet BA, Hofmockel KS, Bernhardt ES, Billing SA, Jackson RB, Johnsen KS, Lichter J, McCarthy HR, McCormack ML (2011) Increases in the flux of carbon belowground stimulated nitrogen uptake and sustain the long-term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO2. Ecol Lett 14:349–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dulamsuren C, Hauck M, Leuschner HH, Leuschner C (2011) Climate response of tree-ring width in Larix sibirica growing in the drought-stressed forest-steppe ecotone of northern Mongolia. Ann for Sci 68:275–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0043-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egli P, Körner C (1997) Growth responses to elevated CO2 and soil quality in beech-spruce model ecosystems. Acta Oecol 18(13):343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egli P, Maurer S, Guentharot-Goerg MS, Körner C (1998) Effect of elevated CO2 and soil quality on leaf gas exchange and aboveground growth in beech-spruce model. New Phytol 140(2):185–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feliksik A, Wilczynski S (2009) The effect of climate on tree-ring chronologies of native and nonnative tree species growing under homogenous site conditions. Geochronometria 33:49–57. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10003-009-0006-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1950) Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goisser M, Geppert U, Rötzer T, Paya A, Huber A, Kerner R, Bauerle T, Pretzsch H, Pritsch K, Häberle KH, Matyssek R, Grams TEE (2016) Does belowground interaction with Fagus sylvatica increase drought susceptibility of photosynthesis and stem growth in Picea abies? Forest Ecol Manag 375:268–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handa IT, Hagedorn F, Hattenschwiler S (2008) No stimulation in root production in response to 4 years of in situ CO2 enrichment at the Swiss treeline. Funct Ecol 22:348–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01372.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison XA, Donaldson L, Correa-Cano ME, Evans J, Fisher DN, Goodwin CED, Robinson BS, Hodgson DJ, Inger R (2018) A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology. PeerJ 6:e4794. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4794

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hättenschwiler S, Schweingruber FH, Körner C (1996) Tree ring responses to elevated CO2 and increased N deposition in Picea abies. Plant Cell Environ 19:1369–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hättenschwiler S, Körner C (1998) Biomass allocation and canopy development in spruce model ecosystems under elevated CO2 and increased N deposition tree ring responses to elevated CO2 and increased N deposition. Oecologia 113:104–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helama S, Läänelaid A, Bijak S, Jaagus J (2016) Contrasting tree-ring growth response of Picea abies to climate variability in western and eastern Estonia. Geogr Ann A 98(2):155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilmers T, Avdagić A, Bartkowicz L, Bielak K, Binder F, Bončina A et al (2019) The productivity of mixed mountain forests comprised of Fagus sylvatica, Picea abies, and Abies alba across Europe. Forestry 00:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpz035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houpert L, Rohner B, Forrester DI, Mina M, Huber MO (2018) Mixing effects in Norway spruce—European beech stands are modulated by site quality stand age and moisture availability. Forests. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9020083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idso SB, Kimball BA (1989) Growth responses of carrot and radish to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Environ Exper Bot 29:135–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idso SB, Kimball BA, Mauney JR (1987) Atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment effect on cotton midday foliage temperature: implications for plant water use and crop yield. Agron J 79:667–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen CM, Joanne L, Norby RJ (2008) CO2 enrichment increases carbon and nitrogen input from fine roots in a deciduous forest. New Phytol 179:837–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02516.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2013) Summary for Policymakers. Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds.). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Jach ME, Ceulemans R (1998) Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on phenology, growth and crown structure of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings after two years of exposure in the field. Tree Physiol 19:289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob M, Leuschner C, Thomas FM (2010) Productivity of temperate broad-leaved forest stands differing in tree species diversity. Ann for Sci 67(5):503. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger BC, Edwards LJ, Das K, Sen PK (2016) An R2 squared statistic for fixed effects in the generalized linear mixed model. J Appl Stat 44(6):1086–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis PG (1998) European forests and global change. Cambridge University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallarackal J, Roby TJ (2012) Responses of trees to elevated carbon dioxide and climate change. Biodivers Conserv 21:1327–1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0254-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpeläinen A, Peltola H, Ryyppoe A, Kellomäki S (2005) Scots pine responses to elevated temperature and carbon dioxide concentration: growth and wood properties. Tree Physiol 5:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein T, Bader MKF, Leuzinger S, Mildner M, Schleppi P, Siegwolf RTW, Körner C (2016) Growth and carbon relations of mature Picea abies trees under five years of free air CO2 enrichment. J Ecol 104(6):1720–1733. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klimo E, Kulhavý J (2006) Norway spruce monocultures and their transformation to close-to-nature forests from the point of view of soil changes in the Czech Republic. Ekológia (Bratislava) 25(1):27–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke T, Ammer C, Stimm B, Mosandl R (2007) Admixing broadleaved to coniferous tree species: a review on yield, ecological stability and economics. Eur J for Res 127:89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-007-0186-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Körner Ch (2006) Plant CO2 responses: an issue of definition, time and resource supply. New Phytol 172(3):393–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Körner Ch (1995) Towards a better experimental basis for upscaling plant responses to elevated CO2 and climate warming. Plant Cell Environ 18:1101–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostiainen K, Kaakinen S, Saranpaa P, Sigurdsson AD, Linder S, Vapaavuori E (2004) Effect of elevated [CO2] on stem wood properties of mature Norway spruce grown at different soil nutrient availability. Glob Chang Biol 10:1526–1538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozovits AR, Matyssek R, Winkler JB, Göttlein A, Blaschke H, Grams TE (2005) Above-ground space sequestration determines competitive success in juvenile beech and spruce trees. New Phytol 167(1):181–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaMarche VC, Graybill DA, Fritts HC, Rose MR (1984) Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: tree ring evidence for growth enhancement in natural vegetation. Science 225: 1019–1021

  • In Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling, I. Olkin et al. eds., Stanford University Press, 278–292

  • Li L, Manning W, Wang X (2019) Elevated CO2 increases root mass and leaf nitrogen resorption in red maple (Acer Rubrum L.). Forests 10:420. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10050420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linares JC, Camarero JJ, Carreira JA (2010) Competition modulates the adaptation capacity of forests to climatic stress: insights from recent growth decline and death in relict stands of the Mediterranean fir Abies pinsapo. J Ecol 98:592–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01645.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhu M, Hatfeld JL (2013) Dynamics of Plant Root Growth Under Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 1352. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/1352

  • Marek MV, Šprtová M, Špunda V, Kalina J (1999) Response of sun versus shade foliage photosynthesis to radiation in Norway spruce. Phyton 39:131–138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mekontchou CG, Houle D, Bergeron Y, Drobyshev I (2020) Contrasting root system structure and belowground interactions between black spruce (Picea mariana Mill. B.S.P) and trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx) in boreal mixedwoods of Eastern Canada. Forests 11:127. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11020127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morison JIL, Lawlor DW (2002) Interactions between increasing CO2 concentration and temperature on plant growth. Plant Cell Environ 22:659–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norby RJ, Warren JM, Iversen CM, Medlyn BE, McMurtrie RE (2010) CO2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(45):19368–19373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller KE, LeCain DR, McCormack LM, Pendall E, Carlson M, Blumenthal DM (2018) Root responses to elevated CO2, warming and irrigation in a semi-arid grassland: Integrating biomass, length and life span in a 5-year field experiment. J Ecol 106(6):2176–2189. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novak J, Dusek D, Slodicak M, Kacalek D (2017) Importance of the first thinning in young mixed Norway spruce and European beech stands. J for Sci 63(6):254–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overdieck D, Ziche D, Jungclaus KB (2007) Temperature responses of growth and wood anatomy in European beech saplings grown in different carbon dioxide concentrations. Tree Physiol 27:261–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson R, McDonald AJS, Stadenberg I (1993) response of small birch plants (Betula pendula Roth.) to elevated CO2 and nitrogen supply. Plant Cell Environ 16:1115–1121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piñeiro J, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Dobrick S, Reich PB, Pendall E, Power SA (2017) Effects of elevated CO2 on fine root biomass are reduced by aridity but enhanced by soil nitrogen: a global assessment. Sci Rep 7:15355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15728-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pretzsch H, Schütze G (2009) Transgressive overyielding in mixed compared with pure stands of Norway spruce and European beech in Central Europe: evidence on stand level and explanation on individual tree level. Eur J for Res 128:183–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretzsch H, Block J, Dieler J, Dong PH, Kohnle U, Nagel J, Spellmann H, Zingg A (2010) Comparison between the productivity of pure and mixed stands of Norway spruce and European beech along an ecological gradient. Ann for Sci 67(712):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretzsch H, Dieler J, Seifert T, Rötzer T (2012) Climate effects on productivity and resource-use efficiency of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) in stands with different spatial mixing patterns. Trees-Struct Funct 26:1343–1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-012-0710-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretzsch H, Schütze G, Uhl E (2013) Resistance of European tree species to drought stress in mixed versus pure forests: Evidence of stress release by inter-specific facilitation. Plant Biol 15:483–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00670.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pretzsch H (2014) Canopy space filling and tree crown morphology in mixedspecies stands compared with monocultures. For Ecol Manage 327:251–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretzsch H, Dieler J (2011) The dependency of the size-growth relationship of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) in forest stands on long-term site conditions, drought events, and ozone stress. Trees 25:355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-010-0510-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primicia I, Camarero JJ, Janda P, Čada V, Morrissey RC, Trotsiuk V, Bače R, Teodosiu M, Svoboda M (2015) Age, competition, disturbance and elevation effects on tree and stand growth response of primary Picea abies forest to climate. For Ecol Manage 354:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puhe J (2003) Growth and development of the root systern of Norway spruce (Picea abies) in forest stands-a review. For Ecol Manage 175:253–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online at https://www.R-project.org/.

  • Remeš J, Pulkrab K, Bílek L, Podrázský V (2020) Economic and PRODUCTION effect of tree species change as a result of adaptation to climate change. Forests 11:431. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers HH, Runion GB, Prior SA, Torbert HA (1999) Response of plants to elevated CO2: root growth, mineral nutrition and soil carbon. In: Luo Y, Mooney HA (eds) Carbon dioxide and environment stress. Academic Press, NY, pp 215–244

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rohner B, Weber P, Thürig E (2016) Bridging tree rings and forest inventories: how climate effects on spruce and beech growth aggregate over time. For Ecol Manage 360:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Peinado R, Bravo-Oviedo A, López-Senespleda E (2017) Forest management and carbon sequestration in the Mediterranean region: a review. Off Syst 26:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Salem MZM, Zeidler A, Beohm M, Srba J (2013) Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) as a bioresource evaluation of solid wood, particleboard, and MDF technological properties and formaldehyde emission. BioResources 8(1):1199–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saulniera M, Schurman J, Vostarek O, Rydval M, Pettit J, Trotsiuka V, Janda P, Bače R, Björklund J, Svoboda M (2020) Climatic drivers of Picea growth differ during recruitment and interact with disturbance severity to influence rates of canopy replacement. Agr Forest Meteorol 287:107981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid I (2002) The influence of soil type and interspecific competition on the fine root system of Norway spruce and European beech. Basic Appl Ecol 3:339–346. https://doi.org/10.1078/1439-1791-00116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzer SA, Klironomos JN, HilleRisLambers J, Kinkel LL, Reich PB, Xiao K, Rillig MC, Sikes BA, Callaway RM, Mangan SA (2011) Soil microbes drive the classic plant diversity–productivity pattern. Ecology 92:296–303. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0773.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer C, Grams TEE, Rötzer T, Al F, Pretzsch H (2017) Drought stress reaction of growth and Δ13C in tree rings of European beech and Norway spruce in monospecific versus mixed stands along a precipitation gradient. Forests 8(177):2–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer C, Rötzer T, Thurm EA, Biber P, Kallenbach C, Pretzsch H (2019) Growth and tree water deficit of mixed Norway spruce and European beech at different heights in a tree and under heavy drought. Forests 10:577. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10070577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selås V, Piovesan G, Adams JM, Bernabei M (2002) Climatic factors controlling reproduction and growth of Norway spruce in southern Norway. Can J for Res 32:217–225. https://doi.org/10.1139/x01-192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) Analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika 52:591–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidor CG, Popa I, Vlad R, Cherubini P (2015) Different tree-ring responses of Norway spruce to air temperature across an altitudinal gradient in the Eastern Carpathians (Romania). Trees 29:985–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1178-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigurdsson BD, Medhurst JL, Wallin G, Eggertsson O, Linder S (2013) Growth of mature boreal Norway spruce was not affected by elevated [CO2] and/or air temperature unless nutrient availability was improved. Tree Physiol 33(11):1192–1205. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpt043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AR, Lukace M, Bambrick M, Miglietta F, Godbold DL (2013) Tree species diversity interacts with elevated CO2 to induce a greater root system response. Global Change Biol 19:217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinnler D, Egli P, Körner C (2002) Four-year growth dynamics of beech–spruce model ecosystems under CO2 enrichment on two different forest soils. Trees 16:423–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo M, Poorter L, Peña-Claros M, Alarcón A, Balcázar J, Leaño C, Licona JC, Llanque O, Vroomans V, Zuidema P, Bongers F (2010) Climate is a stronger driver of tree and forest growth rates than soil and disturbance. J Ecol 99(1):254–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01741.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood CA (2007) Century-scale trends in climatic variability for the Pacific Northwest from Western Juniper (Juniperus occidentalis Hook. ssp. occidentalis) tree-ring data. MSc Thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 211 pp.

  • Urban O, Janouš D, Pokorný R, Marková I, Pavelka M, Fojtík Z, Šprtová M, Kalina J, Marek MV (2001) Glass domes with adjustable windows: a novel technique for exposing juvenile forest stands to elevated CO2 concentration. Photosyntetica 39:395–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannoppen A, Kint V, Ponette Q, Verheyen K, Muys B (2019) Tree species diversity impacts average radial growth of beech and oak trees in Belgium, not their long-term growth trend. For Ecosyst 6(10):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Versace S, Gianelle D, Frizzera L, Tognetti R, Vittorio G, Dalponte M (2019) Prediction of Competition Indices in a Norway Spruce and Silver Fir-Dominated Forest Using Lidar Data. Remote Sens 11:2734. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11232734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Taub DR (2010) Interactive effects of elevated carbon dioxide and environmental stresses on root mass fraction in plants: a meta-analytical synthesis using pairwise techniques. Oecologia 163(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1572-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RJ, Hopfmueller M (2001) Dendrochronological investigations of Norway spruce along an elevational transect in the Bavarian Forest. Dendrochronologia 19(1):67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer R, Grabner M (1997) Effects of climate on vertical resin duct density and radial growth of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Trees 11:271–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter B (2013) Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. . http://arxiv.org/pdf/1308.5499.pdf

  • Wolff E, Fung I, Hoskins B, Mitchell J, Palmer T, Santer B, Shepherd J, Shine K, Solomon S, Trenberth K, Walsh J, Wuebbles D (2014) Climate Change: Evidence & Causes. An overview from the Royal Society and the US National Academy of Sciences. 36 pp.

  • Yazaki K, Maruyama Y, Mori M, Koike T, Funada R (2005) Effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentration on wood structure and formation in trees. In: Omasa K, Nouchi I, De Kok LJ (eds) Plant responses to air pollution and global change. Springer, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeste A, Blanco JA, Imbert JB, Zozaya-Vela H, Elizalde-Arbilla M (2021) Pinus sylvestris L and Fagus sylvatica L effects on soil and root properties and their interactions in a mixed forest on the Southwestern Pyrenees. Forest Ecol Manag 481:118726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Dang QL (2007) Interactive effects of soil temperature and CO2 on morphological and biomass traits in seedlings of four boreal tree species. For Sci 53:453–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Chen HYH, Reich PB (2012) Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta-analysis. J Ecol 100:742–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01944.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zubizarreta-Gerendiain A, Gort-Oromi J, Mehtätalo L, Peltola H, Venäläinen A, Pulkkinen P (2012) Effects of cambial age, clone and climatic factors on ring width and ring density in Norway spruce (Picea abies) in southeastern Finland. Forest Ecol Manag 263:9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication is an output of the CzechGlobe Centre that is being developed within the OP RDI and co-financed from EU funds and the State Budget of the Czech Republic (Project: CzechGlobe, Reg. No. CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0073). The authors are grateful for the financial support also by a grant under COST EumixFor no. COST CZ LD 14063” Effect of the mixture on stand tree species composition, structure, and biomass“.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AB data collection, analyses and developed the concept of the manuscript, revised and wrote the manuscript; MMV designed and performed the experimental work, data collection, and revised manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aysan Badraghi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Miren del Rio.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (JPG 61 kb)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 11 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Badraghi, A., Marek, M.V. Species mixing effect on Norway spruce response to elevated CO2 and climatic variables: root and radial growth response. Eur J Forest Res 140, 1363–1376 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-021-01405-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-021-01405-9

Keywords

Navigation