Skip to main content
Log in

An Alternative Simplified Evaporation Method for Measuring the Hydraulic Conductivity Function of the Unsaturated Soils

  • PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The simplified evaporation method (SEM) is frequently used for the determination of the hydraulic conductivity function (HCF) of the unsaturated soil. Usually, the mass of soil samples during evaporation is often monitored to calculate the flux. However, the balance is sensitive to the external conditions, such as the tensiometers connected by the cables to transmit data, and the cable will have a disturbing effect on the balance. In this study, a series of laboratory tests were conducted to obtain the hydraulic conductivity function of six kinds of soils, which texture ranged from sand to silty clay by using the alternative simplified evaporation method (ASEM) that reduces the sensitivity of the external environment brought by the balance. The volumetric water content near the centre depth was monitored by the soil moisture sensor, and the change of flux during evaporation was calculated by the volumetric water content. At the same time, for comparison, the mass was monitored during the evaporation process, and the mass of evaporated water was used to calculate the flux (SEM). The HCF obtained by the ASEM was consistent with that obtained by the SEM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. S. Assouline, K. Narkis, R. Gherabli, P. Lefort, and M. Prat, “Analysis of the impact of surface layer properties on evaporation from porous systems using column experiments and modified definition of characteristic length,” Water Resour. Res. 50 (5), 3933–3955 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. R. Bezerracoelho, L. Zhuang, M. C. Barbosa, M. A. A. Soto, and M. T. van Genuchten, “Further tests of the HYPROP evaporation method for estimating the unsaturated soil hydraulic properties,” J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 66 (2), 161–169 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2017-0046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Chueasamat, T. Hori, H. Saito, T. Sato, and Y. Kohgo, “Experimental tests of slope failure due to rainfalls using 1g physical slope models,” Soils Found. 58 (2), 290–305 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Dane and A. Klute, “Salt effects on the hydraulic properties of a swelling soil,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41 (6), 1043–1049 (1977). https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100060005x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Ediz, İ. Bentli, and İ. Tatar, “Improvement in filtration characteristics of diatomite by calcination,” Int. J. Miner. Process. 94 (3–4), 129–134 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2010.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Fujimaki and A. Yanagawa, “Application of evaporation method using two tensiometers for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity beyond tensiometric range,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 52, 405–413 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319040069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. T. V. Genuchten, “A closed-form equation for pre- dicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44 (5), 892–898 (1980). https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Q. Liu, N. Yasufuku, and K. Omine, “Self-watering system for arid area: a method to combat desertification,” Soils Found. 58 (4), 838–852 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P. A. Londra, “Simultaneous determination of water retention curve and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of substrates using a steady-state laboratory method,” HortScience 45 (7), 1106–1112 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502013000400024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. McNeill, L. Lilburne, S. Carrick, T. Webb, and T. Cuthill, “Pedotransfer functions for the soil water characteristics of New Zealand soils using S-map information,” Geoderma 326, 96–110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Mualem, “A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media,” Water Resour. Res. 12 (3), 513–522 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Q. Niu, D. Fratta, and Y. H. Wang, “The use of electrical conductivity measurements in the prediction of hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils,” J. Hydrol. 522, 475–487 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Peters and W. Durner, “Simplified evaporation method for determining soil hydraulic properties,” J. Hydrol. 356 (1–2), 147–162 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.04.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Rahimi, H. Rahardjo, and E. C. Leong, “Effect of range of soil–water characteristic curve measurements on estimation of permeability function,” Eng. Geol. 185, 96–104 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.11.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Rahmati and M. R. Neyshaboury, “Soil air permeability modeling and its use for predicting unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 80 (6), 1507–1513 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015.12.0430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Satyanaga, H. Rahardjo, Z. H. Koh, and H. Mohamed, “Measurement of a soil-water characteristic curve and unsaturated permeability using the evaporation method and the chilled-mirror method,” J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. 20 (5), 368–374 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1800593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. U. Schindler, “Ein Schnellverfahren zur Messung der Wasserleitfähigkeit im teilgesättigten Boden an Stechzylinderproben,” Arch. Acker- Pflanzenbau Bodenkd. 24, 1–7 (1980).

  18. U. Schindler and L. Müller, “Simplifying the evaporation method for quantifying soil hydraulic properties,” J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 169 (5), 623–629 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200521895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Stanić, N. Jaćimović, A. Ranđelović, and J. Despotović, “Laboratory investigation of hydraulic characteristics of fly ash as a fill material from the aspects of pollutant transport,” Water Sci. Technol. 76 (4), 976–982 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. L. Weeks and S. Richards, “Soil-water properties computed from transient flow data,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 31 (6), 721–725 (1967). https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1967.03615995003100060008x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. W. Su, Y.-J. Cui, P.-J. Qin, F. Zhang, W.-M. Ye, and N. Conil, “Application of instantaneous profile method to determine the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated natural stiff clay,” Eng. Geol. 243, 111–117 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Wind, “Capillary conductivity data estimated by a simple method,” in Proceedings of UNESCO/IASH Symposium “Water in the Unsaturated Zone” (Wageningen, 1966), pp. 181–191.

Download references

Funding

This research was supported in part by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2017QD017), and the Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program (J17KA195).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiali Miao.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiang Liu, Xi, P., Miao, J. et al. An Alternative Simplified Evaporation Method for Measuring the Hydraulic Conductivity Function of the Unsaturated Soils. Eurasian Soil Sc. 54, 1359–1366 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229321090052

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229321090052

Keywords:

Navigation