Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A hybrid model using data mining and multi-criteria decision-making methods for landslide risk mapping at Golestan Province, Iran

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accurate modeling of landslide risk is essential pre-requisite for the development of reliable landslide control and mitigation strategies. However, landslide risk depends on the poorly known environmental and socio-economic factors for regional patterns of landslide occurrence probability and vulnerability, which constitute still a matter of research. Here, a hybrid model is described that couples data mining and multi-criteria decision-making methods for hazard and vulnerability mapping and presents its application to landslide risk assessment in Golestan Province, Northeastern Iran. To this end, landslide probability is mapped using three state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) algorithms—Maximum Entropy, Support Vector Machine and Genetic Algorithm for Rule Set Production—and combine the results with Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process computations of vulnerability to obtain the landslide risk map. Based on obtained results, a discussion is presented on landslide probability as a function of the main relevant human-environmental conditioning factors in Golestan Province. In particular, from the response curves of the machine learning algorithms, it can be found that the probability p of landslide occurrence decreases nearly exponentially with the distance x to the next road, fault, or river. Specifically, the results indicated that \(p \approx \exp \left( { - \lambda x} \right)\) where the length scale λ is about \(0.0797\) km−1 for road, \(0.108\) km−1 for fault, and \(0.734\) km−1 0.734 km−1 for river. Furthermore, according to the results, p follows, approximately, a lognormal function of elevation, while the equation \(p = p_{0} - K\left( {\theta - \theta_{0} } \right)^{2}\) fits well the dependence of landslide modeling on the slope-angle θ, with \(p_{0} \approx 0.64,\;\theta_{0} \approx 25.6^{ \circ } \;{\text{and}}\;\left| K \right| \approx 6.6 \times 10^{ - 4}\). However, the highest predicted landslide risk levels in Golestan Province are located in the south and southwest areas surrounding Gorgan City, owing to the combined effect of dense local human occupation and strongly landslide-prone environmental conditions. Obtained results provide insights for quantitative modeling of landslide risk, as well as for priority planning in landslide risk management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abay A, Barbieri G, Woldearegay K (2019) GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach: the case of tarmaber district Ethiopia Momona Ethiopian. J Sci 11(1):14–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdulwahid WM, Pradhan B (2017) Landslide vulnerability and risk assessment for multi-hazard scenarios using airborne laser scanning data (LiDAR). Landslides 14(3):1057–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abedini M, Ghasemian B, Shirzadi A (2014) Modeling landslide hazard using statistical model of logistic regression (case study: Kurdistan province, Bijar city). Geography Dev 37:85–102 (In Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Achour Y, Pourghasemi HR (2020) How do machine learning techniques help in increasing accuracy of landslide susceptibility maps? Geoscientif Front 11(3):871–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adineh F, Motamedvaziri B, Ahmadi H, Moeini A (2018) Landslide susceptibility mapping using genetic algorithm for the rule set production (GARP) model. J Mt Sci 15(9):2013–2026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkhasawneh MS, Ngah UK, Tay LT, Isa NAM (2014) Determination of importance for comprehensive topographic factors on landslide hazard mapping using artificial neural network. Environ Earth Sci 72(3):787–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen MB, Ghassemi MR, Shahrabi M, Qorashi M (2003) Accommodation of late Cenozoic oblique shortening in the Alborz range, northern Iran. J Struct Geol 25(5):659–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso JA, Lamata MT (2006) Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach. Internat J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Syst 14(4):445–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Ahmad N (2015) Estimation of rainfall threshold and its use in landslide hazard mapping of Kuala Lumpur metropolitan and surrounding areas. Landslides 12(5):861–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armaş I (2011) An analytic multicriteria hierarchical approach to assess landslide vulnerability. Case study: Cornu village Subcarpathian Prahova Valley/Romania. Zeitschrift Für Geomorphol 55(2):209–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashournejad Q, Hosseini A, Pradhan B, Hosseini SJ (2019) Hazard zoning for spatial planning using GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment: a new hybrid integrated data-driven and knowledge-based model. Arab J Geosci 12(4):126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axen GJ, Lam PS, Grove M, Stockli DF, Hassanzadeh J (2001) Exhumation of the west-central Alborz Mountains, Iran, Caspian subsidence, and collision-related tectonics. Geology 29(6):559–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azareh A, Rahmati O, Rafiei-Sardooi E, Sankey JB, Lee S, Shahabi H, Ahmad BB (2019) Modelling gully-erosion susceptibility in a semi-arid region, Iran: Investigation of applicability of certainty factor and maximum entropy models. Sci Total Environ 655:684–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballabio C, Sterlacchini S (2012) Support vector machines for landslide susceptibility mapping: the Staffora River Basin case study Italy. Math Geosci 44(1):47–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beakawi Al-Hashemi HM, Baghabra Al-Amoudi O (2018) A review on the angle of repose of granular materials. Powder Technol 330:397–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan N, Rai K (2007) Strategic decision making: applying the analytic hierarchy process. Springer Science Business Media, pp 1–171

  • Boeckmann M, Joyner TA (2014) Old health risks in new places? An ecological niche model for I. ricinus tick distribution in Europe under a changing climate. Health Place 30:70–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabb EE (1985) Innovative approaches to landslide hazard and risk mapping. Internat Landslide Symp Proc Toronto Canada 1:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenning A, Schwinn M, Ruiz-Páez AP, Muenchow J (2015) Landslide susceptibility near highways is increased by 1 order of magnitude in the Andes of southern Ecuador Loja Province. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15:45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Tsangaratos P, Nguyen VT, Van Liem N, Trinh PT (2020) Comparing the prediction performance of a Deep Learning Neural Network model with conventional machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment. CATENA 188:104426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver SJ (1991) Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. Internat J Geographical Inform Syst 5(3):321–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Catani F, Lagomarsino D, Segoni S, Tofani V (2013) Landslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: sensitivity and scaling issues. Nat Hazard 13:2815–2831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chacon J, Irigaray C, Fernandez TEl, Hamdouni R (2006) Engineering geology maps: landslides and geographical information systems. Bull Eng Geol Environ 65:341–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Li W, Chai H, Hou E, Li X, Ding X (2016) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and certainty factor (CF) models for the Baozhong region of Baoji City. China Environ Earth Sci 75(1):63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Kornejady A, Zhang N (2017a) Landslide spatial modeling: introducing new ensembles of ANN, MaxEnt, and SVM machine learning techniques. Geoderma 305:314–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Panahi M, Kornejady A, Wang J, Xie X, Cao S (2017b) Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system combined with frequency ratio, generalized additive model, and support vector machine techniques. Geomorphology 297:69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convertino M, Troccoli A, Catani F (2013) Detecting fingerprints of landslide drivers: a MaxEnt model. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 118(3):1367–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corominas J, van Westen C, Frattini P, Cascini L, Malet JP, Fotopoulou S, Catani F, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Mavrouli O, Agliardi F, Pitilakis K, Winter MG, Pastor M, Ferlisi S, Tofani V, Hervás J, Smith JT (2014) Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Env 73:209–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF (2002) Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island Hong Kong. Geomorphology 42(3–4):213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Li JXZW, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island Hong Kong. Environ Geol 40(3):381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng Geol 64(1):65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darabi H, Choubin B, Rahmati O, Haghighi AT, Pradhan B, Kløve B (2019) Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and QUEST models: a comparative study of machine learning techniques. J Hydrol 569:142–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Blasio FV (2011) Introduction to the physics of landslides: lecture notes on the dynamics of mass wasting. Springer, p 408

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Souza Muñoz ME, De Giovanni R, de Siqueira MF, Sutton T, Brewer P, Pereira RS, Canhos VP (2011) openModeller: a generic approach to species’ potential distribution modelling. GeoInformatica 15(1):111–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir G, Aytekin M, Akgün A, Ikizler SB, Tatar O (2013) A comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping of the eastern part of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and analytic hierarchy process methods. Nat Hazards 65(3):1481–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewan A (2013) Floods in a megacity: geospatial techniques in assessing hazards, risk and vulnerability. Springer, pp 119–156

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dhurmea KR, Boojhawon R, Rughooputh SDDV (2009). Geostatistical approaches for estimating rainfall over Mauritius. 3rd Research Week 2010.

  • Duman TY, Can T, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu HA, Sonmez H (2006) Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul Turkey. Environ Geol 51(2):241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dymond JR, Ausseil AG, Shepherd JD, Buettner L (2006) Validation of a region-wide model of landslide susceptibility in the Manawatu-Wanganui region of New Zealand. Geomorphology 74(1–4):70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Bcharia F, Theilen-Willigeb B, Malek HA (2019). Landslide hazard zonation assessment using GIS analysis at the coastal area of Safi (Morocco). In Proceedings of the ICA (Vol. 2).

  • Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distrib 17(1):43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2002) Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach. Environ Geol 41(6):720–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2004) Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey). Eng Geol 75(3–4):229–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erener A, Düzgün HSB (2012) Landslide susceptibility assessment: what are the effects of mapping unit and mapping method? Environ Earth Sci 66(3):859–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T, Nazmfar H, Rezaei Moghaddam MH (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping for the Urmia Lake basin, Iran: a multi-criteria evaluation approach using GIS. Internat J Environ Res 7(2):319–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Jankowski P, Blaschke T (2014) A GIS based spatially-explicit sensitivity and uncertainty analysis approach for multi-criteria decision analysis. Comput Geosci 64:81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felicísimo ÁM, Cuartero A, Remondo J, Quirós E (2013) Mapping landslide susceptibility with logistic regression, multiple adaptive regression splines, classification and regression trees, and maximum entropy methods: a comparative study. Landslides 10(2):175–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning. Eng Geol 102(3–4):99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24(1):38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frigerio I, De Amicis M (2016) Mapping social vulnerability to natural hazards in Italy: a suitable tool for risk mitigation strategies. Environ Sci Policy 63:187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galli M, Guzzetti F (2007) Landslide vulnerability criteria: a case study from Umbria, central Italy. Environ Manage 40:649–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbanzadeh O, Blaschke T, Gholamnia K, Meena SR, Tiede D, Aryal J (2019) Evaluation of different machine learning methods and deep-learning convolutional neural networks for landslide detection. Remote Sens 11(2):196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glade T, Crozier MJ (2005a) The nature of landslide hazard impact. In: Glade T, Anderson MG, Crozier MJ (eds) Landslide risk assessment. John Wiley, pp 43–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Glade T, Crozier MJ (2005b) A review of scale dependency in landslide hazard and risk analysis. In: Glade T, Anderson MG, Crozier MJ (eds) landslide hazard and risk. John Wiley, pp 75–138

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Glade T, Anderson MG, Crozier MJ (2005) Landslide risk assessment. John Wiley, p 832

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz JN, Brenning A, Petschko H, Leopold P (2015) Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling. Comput Geosci 81:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsevski PV, Jankowski P (2010) An optimized solution of multi-criteria evaluation analysis of landslide susceptibility using fuzzy sets and Kalman filter. Comput Geosci 36(8):1005–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsevski PV, Gessler PE, Boll J, Elliot WJ, Foltz RB (2006) Spatially and temporally distributed modeling of landslide susceptibility. Geomorphology 80(3–4):178–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillard-Gonçalves C, Zêzere J (2018) Combining social vulnerability and physical vulnerability to analyse landslide risk at the municipal scale. Geosciences 8(8):294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F (2005) Landslide hazard and risk assessment. Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Univestitat Bonn, p 373

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Mondini AC, Cardinali M, Fiorucci F, Santangelo M, Chang KT (2012) Landslide inventory maps: new tools for an old problem. Earth-Sci Rev 112:42–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2017) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer, p 745

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervas J, Bobrowsky P (2009) Mapping: inventories, susceptibility, hazard and risk: in book on landslides - disaster risk reduction. Springer-Verlag (ISBN: 978-3-540-69966-8)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann T, Schölkopf B, Smola AJ (2008) Kernel methods in machine learning. The Annals of Statistics, pp 1171–1220

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong Y, Adler R, Huffman G (2006) Evaluation of the potential of NASA multi‐satellite precipitation analysis in global landslide hazard assessment. Geophys Res Lett 33(22).

  • Hong H, Naghibi SA, Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B (2016) GIS-based landslide spatial modeling in Ganzhou City. China Arab J Geosci 9(2):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantar B, Pradhan B, Naghibi SA, Motevalli A, Mansor S (2018) Assessment of the effects of training data selection on the landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Geomat Nat Haz Risk 9(1):49–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karsli F, Atasoy M, Yalcin A, Reis S, Demir O, Gokceoglu C (2009) Effects of land-use changes on landslides in a landslide-prone area (Ardesen, Rize, NE Turkey). Environ Monit Assess 156:241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawagoe S, Kazama S, Sarukkalige PR (2010) Probabilistic modelling of rainfall induced landslide hazard assessment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14(6):1047–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kecman V (2005) Support vector machines–an introduction. Support vector machines: theory and applications. Springer, pp 1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjekstad O, Highland L (2009) Economic and social impacts of landslides. Landslides–disaster risk reduction. Springer, pp 573–587

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kornejady A, Ownegh M, Bahremand A (2017) Landslide susceptibility assessment using maximum entropy model with two different data sampling methods. CATENA 152:144–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Anbalagan R (2015) Landslide susceptibility zonation in part of Tehri reservoir region using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and GIS. J Earth Syst Sci 124(2):431–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Stohlgren TJ (2009) Maxent modeling for predicting suitable habitat for threatened and endangered tree Canacomyrica monticola in New Caledonia. J Ecol Nat Environ 1(4):094–098

    Google Scholar 

  • Lato MJ, Anderson S, Porter MJ (2019) Reducing landslide risk using airborne lidar scanning data. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 145(9):06019004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2007) Application and verification of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ Geol 52(4):615–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Hong SM, Jung HS (2017) A support vector machine for landslide susceptibility mapping in Gangwon Province Korea. Sustainability 9(1):48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepore C, Kamal SA, Shanahan P, Bras RL (2012) Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility zonation of Puerto Rico. Environ Earth Sci 66(6):1667–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung LC, Cao D (2000) On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 124(1):102–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal AR, Kotze GP (2008) Landslide susceptibility and hazard mapping in Australia for land-use planning—with reference to challenges in metropolitan suburbia. Eng Geol 102(3–4):238–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley and Sons, pp 1–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjanović M, Kovačević M, Bajat B, Voženílek V (2011) Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm. Eng Geol 123(3):225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrnews (2020). https://www.mehrnews.com/news/4917132

  • Michael EA, Samanta S (2016) Landslide vulnerability mapping (LVM) using weighted linear combination (WLC) model through remote sensing and GIS techniques. Model Earth Syst Environ 2(2):88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei G, Soltani A, Soltani M, Darabi M (2018) An integrated data-mining and multi-criteria decision-making approach for hazard-based object ranking with a focus on landslides and floods. Environ Earth Sci 77(16):581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammady M, Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster-Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models. J Asian Earth Sci 61:221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan A, Singh AK, Kumar B, Dwivedi R (2020) Review on remote sensing methods for landslide detection using machine and deep learning. Trans Emerg Telecomm Technol 23:e3998

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtari M, Abedian S (2019) Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility in Taleghan basin Iran. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 33(7):1297–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtari M, Hoseinzade Z, Shirani K (2020) A comparison study on landslide prediction through FAHP and Dempster-Shafer methods and their evaluation by P-A plots. Environ Earth Sci 79(3):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosavi A, Sajedi-Hosseini F, Choubin B, Taromideh F, Rahi G, Dineva AA (2020) Susceptibility mapping of soil water erosion using machine learning models. Water 12(7):1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murillo-García F, Rossi M, Fiorucci F, Alcántara-Ayala I (2015) Population landslide vulnerability evaluation: the case of the indigenous population of pahuatlán-puebla, Mexico. Eng Geol Soc Territory Springer Cham 2:793–1797

    Google Scholar 

  • Murillo-García FG, Rossi M, Ardizzone F, Fiorucci F, Alcántara-Ayala I (2017) Hazard and population vulnerability analysis: a step towards landslide risk assessment. J Mt Sci 14(7):1241–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhäuser B, Terhorst B (2007) Landslide susceptibility assessment using “weights-of-evidence” applied to a study area at the Jurassic escarpment (SW-Germany). Geomorphology 86(1–2):12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo PTT, Panahi M, Khosravi K, Ghorbanzadeh O, Kariminejad N, Cerda A, Lee S (2021) Evaluation of deep learning algorithms for national scale landslide susceptibility mapping of Iran. Geosci Front 12(2):505–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlmacher GC (2000) The relationship between geology and landslide hazards of Atchison Kansas and vicinity. Midcont Geosci 22:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta K, Kobashi G, Takano S, Kagaya S, Yamada H, Minakami H, Yamamura E (2007) Analysis of the geographical accessibility of neurosurgical emergency hospitals in Sapporo city using GIS and AHP. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 21(6):687–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri AK, Gupta PV, Chander R (1998) Landslide zoning in a part of the Garhwal Himalayas. Environ Geol 36(3–4):325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey VK, Pourghasemi HR, Sharma MC (2020) Landslide susceptibility mapping using maximum entropy and support vector machine models along the Highway Corridor Garhwal Himalaya. Geocarto Internat 35(2):168–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park NW (2015) Using maximum entropy modeling for landslide susceptibility mapping with multiple geoenvironmental data sets. Environ Earth Sci 73(3):937–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parteli EJR, Schmidt J, Blümel C, Wirth K-E, Peukert W, Pöschel T (2014) Attractive particle interaction forces and packing density of fine glass powders. Sci Rep 4(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce J, Ferrier S (2000) Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol Model 133:225–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng L, Niu R, Huang B, Wu X, Zhao Y, Ye R (2014) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on rough set theory and support vector machines: a case of the Three Gorges area, China. Geomorphology 204:287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT, Ball LG, Cohoon KP (2002) Predicting distributions of Mexican birds using ecological niche modelling methods. Ibis 144(1):27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham BT, Bui DT, Prakash I (2018) Bagging based support vector machines for spatial prediction of landslides. Environ Earth Sci 77(4):146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Dudık M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Schapire RE (2004) A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. In Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning (p. 83). ACM.

  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190(3–4):231–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Dudık M, Elith J, Graham CH, Lehmann A, Leathwick J, Ferrier S (2009) Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol Appl 19:181–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontius RG Jr, Schneider LC (2001) Land-cover change model validation by a ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agr Ecosyst Environ 85(1–3):239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Kerle N (2016) Random forests and evidential belief function-based landslide susceptibility assessment in Western Mazandaran Province. Iran Environ Earth Sci 75(3):185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2012) Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed. Iran Nat Hazards 63(2):965–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Jirandeh AG, Pradhan B, Xu C, Gokceogluet C (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS at the Golestan Province Iran. J Earth Syst Sci 122:349–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Kariminejad N, Amiri M, Edalat M, Zarafshar M, Blaschke T, Cerda A (2020) Assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique. Sci Rep 10:3203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Sezer EA, Gokceoglu C, Buchroithner MF (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide-prone area (Cameron Highlands, Malaysia). IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48(12):4164–4177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radbruch-Hall DH, Varnes DJ (1976) Landslides—cause and effect. Bull Internat Assoc Eng Geology-Bull De L’assoc Internat De Géol De L’ingénieur 13(1):205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmati O, Golkarian A, Biggs T, Keesstra S, Mohammadi F, Daliakopoulos IN (2019) Land subsidence hazard modeling: machine learning to identify predictors and the role of human activities. J Environ Manage 236:466–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach P, Mondini A, Rossi M (2014) The influence of land use change on landslide susceptibility zonation: the Briga catchment test site (Messina, Italy). Environ Manage 54(6):1372–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remondo J, Bonachea J, Cendrero A (2008) Quantitative landslide risk assessment and mapping on the basis of recent occurrences. Geomorphology 94(3–4):496–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodposhti MS, Rahimi S, Beglou MJ (2014) PROMETHEE II and fuzzy AHP: an enhanced GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Nat Hazards 73(1):77–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy J, Saha S (2019) Landslide susceptibility mapping using knowledge driven statistical models in Darjeeling District, West Bengal India. Geoenviron Disasters 6(1):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15(3):234–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salarian T, Zare M, Jouri MH, Miarrostami S, Mahmoudi M (2014) Evaluation of shallow landslides hazard using artificial neural network of multi-layer perceptron method in subalpine grassland (Case study: Glandrood watershed-Mazandaran). Internat J Agric Crop Sci 7(11):795

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Flores E (2007) GARP modeling of natural and human factors affecting the potential distribution of the invasives Schismus arabicus and Brassica tournefortii in ‘El Pinacate y Gran Desierto de Altar’Biosphere Reserve. Ecol Model 204(3–4):457–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt J, Parteli EJR, Uhlmann N, Wörlein N, Wirth K-E, Pöschel T, Peukert W (2020) Packings of micron-sized spherical particles - insights from bulk density determination, X-ray microtomography and discrete element simulations. Adv Powder Technol 31:2293–2304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderbauer S, Ehrlich D (2004) Risk, hazard and people’s vulnerability to natural hazards. A review of definitions, concepts and data. European Commission Joint Research Centre. EUR 21410:40.

  • Sevgen E, Kocaman S, Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C (2019) A novel performance assessment approach using photogrammetric techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping with logistic regression. ANN Random Forest Sens 19(18):3940

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanmugam G, Wang Y (2015) The landslide problem. J Palaeogeogr 4(2):109–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma LP, Patel N, Ghose MK, Debnath P (2013) Synergistic application of fuzzy logic and geo-informatics for landslide vulnerability zonation—a case study in Sikkim Himalayas India. Appl Geomat 5(4):271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidle R, Ochiai H (2006) Processes, prediction, and land use. Water resources monograph. American Geophysical Union, pp 1–307

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stockman AK, Beamer DA, Bond JE (2006) An evaluation of a GARP model as an approach to predicting the spatial distribution of non-vagile invertebrate species. Divers Distrib 12(1):81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell D (1999) The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 13(2):143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell DR, Noble IR (1992) Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: a robust and informative method of data analysis. Math Comput Simul 33(5–6):385–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2004a) A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environ Geol 45:665–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2004b) Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment, Turkey. Eng Geol 71:303–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taxonomy S (2003) Soil survey staff. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. USDA, Ninth Edition, 332p.

  • Tazik E, Jahantab Z, Bakhtiari M, Rezaei A, Alavipanah SK (2014) Landslide susceptibility mapping by combining the three methods fuzzy logic, frequency ratio and analytical hierarchy process in Dozain basin. Internat Arch Photogram Remote Sens Spatial Inform Sci 40(2):267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin GA, Montz BE (1997) Natural hazards: explanation and integration. The Guilford Press, p 388p

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourani M, Caglayan A, Saber R, Isik V (2021) Determination of land subsidence in gorgan plain with insar method (Golestan, NE Iran). In book: geoscience for society, education and environment. Chapter: 3.11. Publisher: Romanian Society of Applied Geophysics (SGAR).

  • Townsend Peterson A, Papeş M, Eaton M (2007) Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent. Ecography 30(4):550–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzielli M, Nadim F, Lacasse S, Kaynia AM (2008) A conceptual framework for quantitative estimation of physical vulnerability to landslides. Eng Geol 102(3–4):251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahidnia MH, Alesheikh AA, Alimohammadi A, Hosseinali F (2010) A GIS-based neuro-fuzzy procedure for integrating knowledge and data in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci 36(9):1101–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vakhshoori V, Pourghasemi HR, Zare M, Blaschke T (2019) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-Based Data mining algorithms. Water 11(11):2292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Eeckhaut M, Hervás J, Jaedicke C, Malet JP, Montanarella L, Nadim F (2012) Statistical modelling of Europe-wide landslide susceptibility using limited landslide inventory data. Landslides 9(3):357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Westen CJ, Van Asch TWJ, Soeters R (2005) Landslide hazard and risk zonation; why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Env 65(2):167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik VN (1999) The nature of statistical learning theory, 2nd edn. Springer Verlag, p 314p

    Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. The UNESCO Press, pp 3–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Xie B, Wan F, Xiao Q (2007) Application of ROC curve analysis in evaluating the performance of alien species’ potential distribution models. Biodiv Sci 15(4):365–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XY, Huang XL, Jiang LY, Qiao GX (2010) Predicting potential distribution of chestnut phylloxerid (Hemiptera: Phylloxeridae) based on GARP and Maxent ecological niche models. J Appl Entomol 134(1):45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Xu Q, Luo B (2017) Vulnerability analysis and susceptibility evaluation of landslides based on fractal theory in Nanjiang County. Hydrogeol Eng Geol 44(3):119–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Zhang J, Lin H (2019) Satellite-based analysis of landfill landslide: the case of the 2015 Shenzhen landslide. Internat J Geotech Eng 5:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao L, Zhang Y, Peng G (2018) Landslide susceptibility assessment using integrated deep learning algorithm along the China-Nepal highway. Sensors 18(12):4436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. CATENA 72(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao X, Tham LG, Dai FC (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: a case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong China. Geomorphology 101(4):572–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yesilnacar EK (2005) The application of computational intelligence to landslide susceptibility mapping in Turkey. University of Melbourne Department, p 200

    Google Scholar 

  • Yesilnacar E, Topal T (2005) Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol 79(3–4):251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef AM, Pourghasemi HR, Pourtaghi ZS, Al-Katheeri MM (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest, boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and general linear models and comparison of their performance at Wadi Tayyah Basin, Asir Region Saudi Arabia. Landslides 13(5):839–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zêzere JL, Garcia RAC, Oliveira SC, Reis E (2008) Probabilistic landslide risk analysis considering direct costs in the area north of Lisbon (Portugal). Geomorphology 94(3–4):467–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao T, Dai F, Xu NW (2017) Coupled DEM-CFD investigation on the formation of landslide dams in narrow rivers. Landslides 14(1):189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L, Sun OJ, Sang W, Li Z, Ma K (2007) Predicting the spatial distribution of an invasive plant species (Eupatorium adenophorum) in China. Landscape Ecol 22(8):1143–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang J, Cui P, Hu K, Chen X, Yonggang GE (2010) Characteristics of earthquake-triggered landslides and post-earthquake debris flows in Beichuan County. J Mt Sci 7:246–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Geological Survey and Mineral Explorations of Iran (GSI) for preparing maps, data, and reports. EJRP thanks the German Research Foundation for funding through the Heisenberg Programme (project number 434377576).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Elham Rafiei Sardooi or Ali Azareh.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rafiei Sardooi, E., Azareh, A., Mesbahzadeh, T. et al. A hybrid model using data mining and multi-criteria decision-making methods for landslide risk mapping at Golestan Province, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 80, 487 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09788-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09788-z

Keywords

Navigation